Catching Up With "Old Slow Trot"
Stubborn and deliberate, General George Henry Thomas was one of the Union's most brilliant strategists. So why was he cheated by history?
- By Ernest B. Furgurson
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2007, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 7)
By late 1883, U.S. Colored Troops were filling some of the gaps opened in Federal forces by battle and disease. Although Sherman had resisted using black soldiers, Thomas gladly accepted them. In the drastic move from serfdom to freedom, he wrote, it was probably better for ex-slaves to be soldiers, and thus gradually learn to support themselves, than "to be thrown upon the cold charities of the world without sympathy or assistance."
As the Federals gathered strength to thrust into Georgia, this was not the only disagreement between the tightly strung Ohioan and the calm Virginian. In early March, Lincoln called Grant east to become general in chief of all Northern armies. No one was surprised that Grant's friend Sherman, rather than Thomas, replaced him as commander in the West, even though as a major general Thomas was senior to Sherman. Ex-colonel Donn Piatt, a 19th-century booster and biographer of Thomas, called it "the nakedest favoritism that ever disgraced a service."
At the start of his 1864 drive toward Atlanta, Sherman rejected Thomas' plan to take his command through Snake Creek Gap to cut off and smash Joseph Johnston's Confederate army. More than a month into Georgia, an impatient Sherman complained to Grant that Thomas' Army of the Cumberland was slowing his advance—"a fresh furrow in a plowed field will stop the whole column." He was still in this mood a few days later when he ignored Thomas' advice against attacking the strongly entrenched Rebels head-on at Kennesaw Mountain. The Federals lost more than 2,000 troops in trying to take what Thomas had warned was an impregnable position.
Thomas commanded about two-thirds of Sherman's infantry; his army was the center force, the sledgehammer in the four-month campaign, and led the way into Atlanta. But neither Sherman, Grant, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton nor Lincoln cited Thomas in their congratulations. As in the 1864 Virginia campaign, where all the official praise and headlines went to Grant, in Georgia it was all Sherman. In his special order announcing the victory, Sherman credited Maj. Gen. Henry W. Slocum's corps with entering the city first—although Slocum was under Thomas' command and had headed the corps for only six days.
When Atlanta's mayor protested Sherman's harsh military rule, the general replied, "War is cruelty and you cannot refine it...those who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out....You might as well appeal against the thunderstorm." Then he set out on his storied march to infamy and greatness, pillaging the countryside as he cut a great swath through the Confederacy.
Thomas took a different view. Stern though he was in combat, he posted a guard at the house of a citizen suspected of disloyalty because, he said, "We must remember that this is a civil war, fought to preserve the Union that is based on brotherly love and patriotic belief in the one nation....The thing becomes horribly grotesque...when we visit on helpless old men, women, and children the horrors of a barbarous war. We must be as considerate and kind as possible, or we will find that in destroying the rebels we have destroyed the Union."
Opposite in personality, tactics and philosophy, Thomas and Sherman were thereafter gratefully separated in geography as well. While Grant grappled with Lee in Virginia and Sherman gutted the eastern Confederacy, Thomas was sent back to Tennessee to reorganize the stripped-down Army of the Cumberland and deal with Hood. The Confederate general had got away from Atlanta with some 40,000 troops and evaded Sherman's effort to catch him. Now he was marching north through Tennessee. Thomas' Federals under John Schofield slowed and badly damaged the Rebels in the fierce battle of Franklin, but by December Hood was dug in on the high ground facing Nashville. Thomas fortified the city while he gathered strength for a decisive blow, but to carry it out he needed more men, horses and supplies.
Grant, 500 miles away, grew impatient. He sent telegrams urging Thomas to move, then ordered him to "attack at once." Thomas said after the war that he was tempted—"grossly improper as it would have been"—to ask why Grant himself, who was entrenched around Petersburg, was not fighting. Defeat at Nashville "would have been a greater calamity than any which had befallen the Federal forces," he said. "It would have cleared the way for the triumphant march of Hood's army through Kentucky, and a successful invasion of Indiana and Illinois, in which there were no Federal troops. It was therefore of the last importance that the battle upon which so much depended should not be fought until I was ready for it." Thomas continued planning, training, stocking—equipping his horsemen with the new breech-loading Spencer carbines.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (15)
There are several good biographies of Thomas. The best is likely Francis McKinney's "Education in Violence" (http://www.amazon.com/Education-Violence-George-History-Cumberland/dp/0962529052). It really gives a positive, but fair view of GHT. Christopher Einholt's "George Thomas: Virginian for the Union (http://www.amazon.com/George-Thomas-Virginian-Campaigns-Commanders/dp/0806141212/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1332444400&sr=1-1) is also very good. Brian Steel Wills (who wrote perhaps the definitive biography of Nathan Bedford Forrest) has a new one out as well, which is likely very good. Thomas' gravesite in Troy is simple and very moving.
Posted by Glenn Raucher on March 22,2012 | 03:28 PM
I would agree whole-heartedly with the description of Thomas as "guileless". At Nashville somebody kept sending telegrams to Washington informing Stanton and Halleck that Thomas was incompetent, lacking confidence of his officers, etc. When John Schofield was caught red-handed by one of Thomas's staff sending a telegram to D.C., Thomas's response was "Why would he want to do that?" The officer had to explain that Schofield wanted Thomas's job. Thomas was stunned that a fellow officer would put politics above the national interest. When passing Thomas Circle on a bus in the fall of 2009, the driver and passengers all wondered who the statue was for, and I happily explained that it was to honor the one general who never lost a battle in the Civil War. They thought that was pretty neat. So did I.
Posted by John Hartman on January 19,2012 | 12:14 AM
A sidebar on George H Thomas' statue in Washington DC. The statue was paid for by contributions from his soldiers of the Army of the Cumberland. No tax payers funds were used. The ironical part and so appropiate is that the statue is made of bronze. The bronze source was captured Confederate cannon surrendered and melted down.
Posted by Dan Hughes on November 22,2011 | 04:07 PM
Thank you soooo much for this story. It was such a great help for my report on Thomas. The only thing I question is
"By late 1883, U.S. Colored Troops were filling some of the gaps opened in Federal forces by battle and disease."
-is 1883 supposed to be 1863?
It seems crazy that he was such a great hero but no one really even knows about him...
Posted by Breanna Naylor on October 30,2011 | 09:36 PM
incredible story, that if allowing assess what identifies us as a nation today, history is not forgotten and we should occasionally look in those who once gave everything for consseguir which millions enjoy today, freedom. excellent article.
Posted by Seguros online on October 24,2011 | 04:45 AM
"By late 1883, U.S. Colored Troops were filling some of the gaps opened in Federal forces by battle and disease."
Apparently the Civil War went on a lot longer than I thought it did.
Posted by William Stephens on February 4,2011 | 06:11 PM
That was a very enjoyable story, Thank-you! It's to bad his brother couldn't find him a Virgina bride.He certinly deserved it. Respectfully, John
Posted by John Bridges on February 4,2011 | 10:58 AM
I really learned a lot from this article. I was a Civil War buff in school and don't remember anything about Thomas.
PS- fix the picture caption.
Posted by CD Willliams on January 8,2011 | 06:13 PM
this is a good ariticle but yea as posted bii micheal i would like to know were is thomas burried
Posted by sylvia on December 9,2010 | 03:50 PM
this still dont answer mii question why was he created by history
Posted by sylvia on December 9,2010 | 03:24 PM
Thank You for the excellent article!
I just read Benson Bobrick's book, and then your article, immensely enjoying both. What is the best biography of Thomas, in your estimation? Also,has anyone done a systematic review of Grant and Sherman's alleged reconstruction of the war? Sounds like it started from the beginning, within days after Nashville.
-Bill Strubbe
Posted by William Strubbe on August 15,2010 | 09:53 PM
Thomas is buried in Troy, NY. A picture is on my website "Army of the Cumberland and George H. Thomas Source" (www.aotc.net). Click on Photos. See also my essay "Bring Thomas Home" (click on Archive).
Posted by Bob Redman on November 28,2009 | 03:54 PM
1. i would like to know where gen thomas burried and if possible a picture of the grave site. 2.who is the army of the cumberland? is it an ongong group of people?--who gave money for the 1879 equsterian statue. 3. an info fact sheet would povide essential fact on all washington dc statues and their locations by the smithsonian institution.
Posted by michael consiglio on September 7,2009 | 09:54 PM
The irony of Grant and Sherman's continued jealous belittlement of Thomas is that without Thomas's calculated as well as impromptu victorious deeds in the West (and I count Chattanooga as calculated rather than miraculous), the names of Sherman and Grant might today be remembered in an altogether different light; in fact, the outcome of the war itself may have changed. Great article.
Posted by Todd Norris on June 24,2009 | 05:21 PM