The Unmaking of the President
Lyndon Johnson believed that his withdrawal from the 1968 presidential campaign would free him to solidify his legacy
- By Clay Risen
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2008, Subscribe
At the beginning of 1968, no one could have predicted the reception that would greet President Lyndon Baines Johnson as he entered St. Patrick's Cathedral in Manhattan on the afternoon of Thursday, April 4. Here was a man so dogged by protesters that he had been limiting his public appearances to military bases and American Legion halls. Here was an activist president—his legislative achievements were exceeded only by those of his idol, Franklin D. Roosevelt—who had become so divisive that he had abandoned his re-election campaign just four days before. And yet, as he began walking down the aisle with his daughter Luci, the 5,000 people who had gathered for the installation of Terence Cooke as archbishop of New York rose and began to applaud. As the president and his daughter sat silently through Cooke's inaugural sermon, the archbishop addressed him directly: "Mr. President, our hearts, our hopes, our continued prayers go with you."
The greeting in New York City was just the latest manifestation of a dramatic turn in Johnson's popularity. Hundreds had lined the streets to see his motorcade as it entered the city. Another crowd had cheered him during a visit to Chicago three days earlier. Newspaper editorials had heaped praise on Johnson for his decision not to seek re-election. It was as if someone had flipped a switch in the national psyche: in a Harris Poll taken after his withdrawal announcement the previous Sunday night, the public went from 57 percent against to 57 percent in favor of the job he was doing as president.
After dropping his campaign, Johnson was by all accounts a man renewed. An increasingly hostile Congress, constant public criticism, the recent Tet Offensive by Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces, and the prospects of a grueling re-election battle had ground him to a nub; now, freed from political pressures and embraced by the media and public, he plotted an agenda for his remaining months. Along with peace in Vietnam, he had a long list of domestic programs he felt he now had the political capital to get passed. As he wrote in his memoirs about his New York visit, "The world that day seemed to me a pretty good place."
But then, just hours after Johnson entered St. Patrick's, James Earl Ray poked his Remington Gamemaster out the bathroom window of a Memphis flophouse and fired at the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who was standing outside his room at the Lorraine Motel, 80 yards away. King was rushed to a nearby hospital, where he died at 7:05 p.m.
An aide relayed the news of the shooting to Johnson as he sat meeting with Robert Woodruff, head of Coca-Cola, and former Georgia governor Carl Sanders in the West Wing of the White House; word of King's death came within an hour. The president finished his business quickly, then huddled with his inner circle of aides to work on a statement he would read on television. Before the night was out, looting and burning erupted in Washington, just blocks from the White House; over the next several days, riots would break out in as many as 125 cities. When it was over, 39 people were dead, more than 2,600 injured and 21,000 arrested; the damages were estimated at $65 million—the equivalent of about $385 million today—though the destruction was so widespread that a full accounting remains impossible.
Back in the White House, even as the riots were beginning, Johnson knew his hopes for a legislative victory lap were finished. Just hours after King's death, he told his domestic policy adviser, Joseph A. Califano Jr.: "Everything we've gained in the last few days we're going to lose tonight."
Johnson had weathered riots before—the first of the "long, hot summers" was in 1964, only months into his presidency. But by 1968 he knew that another spasm of urban disorder would ruin his standing with the public. Far more than Vietnam, a combination of civil rights activism and racial riots had eroded LBJ's support among white, middle-class Americans. "The level of vitriol in the mail and the calls over all the race issues dwarfed anything we had on Vietnam," Califano told me recently in the Manhattan office where he chairs the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. "He was very conscious that he'd become an incredibly divisive figure because of his strong stand on the race issue."
Nevertheless, Johnson began 1968 hoping he could push through his ambitious domestic agenda while running for re-election: among other items, a 10 percent income tax surcharge, a ban on housing discrimination and more money for the Head Start school-readiness program, housing and jobs. "In January he was still willing to spend whatever capital he had left—and it was dwindling fast—to get his work done without waiting for the war to be over," Califano wrote in his memoirs. "Often we put so many complex proposals out in a day that reporters were unable to write clearly about them." But the disastrous Tet Offensive in January and February and antiwar Senator Eugene McCarthy's striking second-place finish in the New Hampshire primary in March convinced Johnson that he had to do something drastic. "Abdication," historian Doris Kearns Goodwin wrote in her biography of Johnson, "was thus the last remaining way to restore control, to turn rout into dignity, collapse into order."
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
Read the book "LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK's Assassination" to get an accurate vision of who this man really was. One must go beyond the good sentiments toward this man that are based solely on the fact he managed to become president.
Posted by Alexandre Boucher on December 31,2010 | 03:06 PM
Sounds a lot like an apologist of LBJ writing the whole story. Personally, LBJ always struck the middle and lower classes as an arrogant, boisterous thorn in the country's side. If he was not linked to JFK's assassination, it would be surprising to hear those arguments. This man was one who could be vile,vulgar and perhaps evil. Much was evidenced by transcripts and audiotapings of his dialogue. All power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely; LBJ loved power, and hence was a principality in this country who many think did more harm than good. I knew several middle class guys who died in Nam thanks to his wish to be idolized just as FDR was, but look at what they have done to our war on poverty and tax structures. It is over for them. . . let us find new ways to correct our wonderful country.
Posted by L.Mark on May 19,2008 | 09:10 AM
My largest negative regarding LBJ, that I hold in mind, is that LBJ campaigned for election on peace platform, although he never, seemingly, had intended to deliver peace and withdrawal of our troops in Vietnam, but had intentions to escalate the war in Vietnam, later calling it a peace offensive. LBJ, for all intents and purposes, was determined to not be the president who lost a war. Present day, we currently have two democratic candidates that are promising the same sort of thing, essentially, in relation, to Iraq. The dems are promising to draw down the troops and bring our troops home. To myself, I just totally make those issues a null void box in my mind because I know in history we have had candidates/presidents who promised peace, and who promised we would not get involved in foreign wars (FDR), but who never delivered on these things. Inspiring words, campaign promises, moving speeches and rhetoric are not actions. Even Woodrow Wilson was considered a oratorical phenom.
Posted by Mercey on April 20,2008 | 12:09 AM
History will look back at LBJ's incredible courage in civil rights, and read such speeches as he gave to a joint session of Congress after the horrors in Selma, invoking Dr. King's words, "And We Shall Overcome", reportedly bringing Dr. King to tears as he watched Johnson on national TV. Johnson will be remembered as a great President for what he achieved, and what he tried to achieve, in his civil rights and his entire domestic agenda.
Posted by David E. Whitten on April 19,2008 | 12:10 AM
I found this article extremely interesting. I had forgotten many of the details of what happened at the time, and was glad to be reminded, and to hear information about the inside workings of the Johnson administration that I hadn't heard about before. My only criticism would be that the author jumps about in time, so that the sequence of events is muddled and hard to get straight in one's mind.
Posted by Ms Troy Parker Farr on April 12,2008 | 02:15 PM
I sat in that meeeting at the whiite House on April 5, 1968 with President Johnson. To this day,I wonder why Floyd McKissick of CORE, who was in the building, was not permitted to join us in the Conference Room. Paranoia was running rampant in the White House that day.
Posted by IRichard Gordon Hatcher on April 8,2008 | 12:05 AM
What better testimony to Johnson's magnificent civil rights accomplishments then, 40 years later, we have an African-American candidate who may well become president. While obsession with race and injustice because of it is the sorriest part of the American story, it has also brought forth moments of great courage, from people of all colors.
Posted by Fred Ripley on April 8,2008 | 09:09 AM
Except for Abraham Lincoln, has any President held office in more turbulent times in America than LBJ? He took over for a President that after his death all of a sudden became the greatest President we ever had in many peoples minds. He had to deal with racial tension, Vietnam and the assasinations for MLK and RFK. LBJ was a big man with big faults, but I would like to see history treat him more kindly than it has to this point.
Posted by Pete Iseppi on April 3,2008 | 08:13 AM
We need that kind of unifying spirit from our current leaders. Too many of the same attitudes of 40 years ago still persist.
Posted by jim jordan on April 1,2008 | 05:18 PM
A very good article. Useful to remind people president Johnson was a sincere new dealer.
Posted by Claude Julien on March 28,2008 | 06:10 AM