The Unmaking of the President
Lyndon Johnson believed that his withdrawal from the 1968 presidential campaign would free him to solidify his legacy
- By Clay Risen
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2008, Subscribe
(Page 6 of 6)
But King's assassination gave the bill new life. The Senate had already passed it; the House followed suit on Wednesday, April 10. Johnson signed the bill the next day, a week after King's death, surrounded by 300 friends, staffers, civil rights leaders and members of Congress. Taking note of the violence of the past few days, he said, "The only real road to progress for a free people is through the process of law." He also pleaded with Congress to pass legislation he had already introduced for social programs totaling $78 billion ($465 billion today). "We have come some of the way, not nearly all of it," he said.
But by then his power was spent. He would get his surtax passed later that year, but only after agreeing to painful spending cuts. Congress would approve a plan for new low-income housing, but it was a GOP-backed plan. Johnson couldn't even claim full credit for passage of the fair-housing bill: Richard Nixon, who was pursuing the Republican nomination for president, telephoned GOP legislators that weekend urging them to support it, the better to remove civil rights from the coming campaign. The bill also included a ban on transporting or teaching the use of firearms and incendiary devices deployed in riots, making it palatable to law-and-order advocates. And in the end, Congress refused to provide money to enforce the ban on discrimination.
Johnson may be remembered as the Vietnam War president, but in his mind his greatest legacy was his efforts to improve the lives of African-Americans. And he had much to show for it: the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, the War on Poverty, Head Start and more. But as the 1960s wore on, he also saw himself in a race—against black militancy, against rising ghetto frustrations, against an increasingly conservative white electorate.
At times, he privately lashed out at black America. "I asked so little in return," he later lamented to Kearns Goodwin. "Just a little thanks. Just a little appreciation. That's all. But look what I got instead....Looting. Burning. Shooting. It ruined everything." And April 1968 was the final blow. In a telling memo from April 10, Califano confronted his boss: "You are publicly on record promising a message. Failure to deliver will be considered a breach of faith by the entire Negro community and a good deal of the influential white community." Johnson scribbled angrily in reply, "I promised nothing. I stated my intentions only. Since changed by riots."
More than wounding his pride, the riots forced Johnson to realize how little his efforts had actually changed the country, at least in the short term. He had naively hoped that a massive assault of federal spending would relieve conditions in the ghetto overnight; when 125 cities erupted over one weekend, he had to confront the fact that nothing he had done seemed to have had an effect. "God knows how little we've really moved on this issue, despite all the fanfare," he later told Kearns Goodwin. "As I see it, I've moved the Negro from D+ to C-. He's still nowhere. He knows it. And that's why he's out in the streets.
"Hell," he added, "I'd be there too."
Clay Risen is the author of A Nation in Flames: America in the Wake of the King Assassination, due out in spring 2009.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
Read the book "LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK's Assassination" to get an accurate vision of who this man really was. One must go beyond the good sentiments toward this man that are based solely on the fact he managed to become president.
Posted by Alexandre Boucher on December 31,2010 | 03:06 PM
Sounds a lot like an apologist of LBJ writing the whole story. Personally, LBJ always struck the middle and lower classes as an arrogant, boisterous thorn in the country's side. If he was not linked to JFK's assassination, it would be surprising to hear those arguments. This man was one who could be vile,vulgar and perhaps evil. Much was evidenced by transcripts and audiotapings of his dialogue. All power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely; LBJ loved power, and hence was a principality in this country who many think did more harm than good. I knew several middle class guys who died in Nam thanks to his wish to be idolized just as FDR was, but look at what they have done to our war on poverty and tax structures. It is over for them. . . let us find new ways to correct our wonderful country.
Posted by L.Mark on May 19,2008 | 09:10 AM
My largest negative regarding LBJ, that I hold in mind, is that LBJ campaigned for election on peace platform, although he never, seemingly, had intended to deliver peace and withdrawal of our troops in Vietnam, but had intentions to escalate the war in Vietnam, later calling it a peace offensive. LBJ, for all intents and purposes, was determined to not be the president who lost a war. Present day, we currently have two democratic candidates that are promising the same sort of thing, essentially, in relation, to Iraq. The dems are promising to draw down the troops and bring our troops home. To myself, I just totally make those issues a null void box in my mind because I know in history we have had candidates/presidents who promised peace, and who promised we would not get involved in foreign wars (FDR), but who never delivered on these things. Inspiring words, campaign promises, moving speeches and rhetoric are not actions. Even Woodrow Wilson was considered a oratorical phenom.
Posted by Mercey on April 20,2008 | 12:09 AM
History will look back at LBJ's incredible courage in civil rights, and read such speeches as he gave to a joint session of Congress after the horrors in Selma, invoking Dr. King's words, "And We Shall Overcome", reportedly bringing Dr. King to tears as he watched Johnson on national TV. Johnson will be remembered as a great President for what he achieved, and what he tried to achieve, in his civil rights and his entire domestic agenda.
Posted by David E. Whitten on April 19,2008 | 12:10 AM
I found this article extremely interesting. I had forgotten many of the details of what happened at the time, and was glad to be reminded, and to hear information about the inside workings of the Johnson administration that I hadn't heard about before. My only criticism would be that the author jumps about in time, so that the sequence of events is muddled and hard to get straight in one's mind.
Posted by Ms Troy Parker Farr on April 12,2008 | 02:15 PM
I sat in that meeeting at the whiite House on April 5, 1968 with President Johnson. To this day,I wonder why Floyd McKissick of CORE, who was in the building, was not permitted to join us in the Conference Room. Paranoia was running rampant in the White House that day.
Posted by IRichard Gordon Hatcher on April 8,2008 | 12:05 AM
What better testimony to Johnson's magnificent civil rights accomplishments then, 40 years later, we have an African-American candidate who may well become president. While obsession with race and injustice because of it is the sorriest part of the American story, it has also brought forth moments of great courage, from people of all colors.
Posted by Fred Ripley on April 8,2008 | 09:09 AM
Except for Abraham Lincoln, has any President held office in more turbulent times in America than LBJ? He took over for a President that after his death all of a sudden became the greatest President we ever had in many peoples minds. He had to deal with racial tension, Vietnam and the assasinations for MLK and RFK. LBJ was a big man with big faults, but I would like to see history treat him more kindly than it has to this point.
Posted by Pete Iseppi on April 3,2008 | 08:13 AM
We need that kind of unifying spirit from our current leaders. Too many of the same attitudes of 40 years ago still persist.
Posted by jim jordan on April 1,2008 | 05:18 PM
A very good article. Useful to remind people president Johnson was a sincere new dealer.
Posted by Claude Julien on March 28,2008 | 06:10 AM