The Unmaking of the President
Lyndon Johnson believed that his withdrawal from the 1968 presidential campaign would free him to solidify his legacy
- By Clay Risen
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2008, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 6)
That can't be allowed to happen, he continued. That's why he had called the meeting. Resoundingly, his guests told him that words weren't enough; with King gone, black citizens needed to see action in order to believe that there was still hope for progress. Otherwise, the country could experience untold violence in the coming days.
Johnson promised immediate, concrete action. Then, accompanied by the leaders, he went by 12-car motorcade to a memorial service at Washington National Cathedral, where King had addressed an overflow crowd just five days before. "Forgive us for our individual and our corporate sins that have led us inevitably to this tragedy," intoned King's Washington representative, the Rev. Walter Fauntroy. "Forgive us, forgive us. God, please forgive us."
Upon returning to the White House, Johnson read another statement on television promising to address Congress that Monday with a list of new social spending plans. "We must move with urgency, with resolve, and with new energy in the Congress, in the courts, in the White House, the statehouses and the city halls of the nation, wherever there is leadership—political leadership, leadership in the churches, in the homes, in the schools, in the institutions of higher learning—until we do overcome," he said.
Afterward, Johnson sat down to lunch with Luci, Busby, McPherson, Califano and Supreme Court Justice (and longtime adviser) Abe Fortas. Before they began eating, Johnson bowed his head and said, "Help us, Lord, to know what to do now." Looking up, he added, "I thought I'd better get specific about it, fellas." Halfway through the meal, one of the men got up and went to the window overlooking Pennsylvania Avenue. "Gentlemen, I think you'd better see this," he said. Through the budding trees they spied a flood of cars and people, all pushing their way westward out of the city.
Johnson and others moved from the dining room to the sitting room. The president looked down the long hall of the White House toward the east and pointed silently. Out the window, past the Treasury Building, a column of smoke was rising from downtown Washington.
By 1968, the White House was well-versed in crisis management. As reports of rioting across the city began streaming in, Johnson called in Cyrus Vance, the former deputy secretary of defense who had overseen federal efforts during the 1967 riots in Detroit, from his law office in New York to help coordinate the Washington response. D.C. Mayor Walter Washington set a curfew of 5:30 p.m. Califano established a White House command center in his office, while the city government set one up at the mayor's office. At one point, Califano handed the president a report saying that militant African-American leader Stokely Carmichael was planning a march on Georgetown, home to many of the media elite LBJ so disdained. "Goddamn!" the president caustically joked. "I've waited thirty-five years for this day."
By 5 p.m. federal troops occupied the Capitol, surrounded the White House and had begun patrolling with sheathed bayonets; ultimately, some 12,500 soldiers and National Guardsmen would be sent to Washington. Tanks crunched broken glass beneath their treads. And Washington wasn't the only city to be occupied. "At about five o'clock in the afternoon, Johnson got a call from Mayor [Richard J.] Daley, who started telling him Chicago was getting out of control," McPherson told me. Federal troops soon arrived in Chicago. They marched into Baltimore on Sunday.
Scores of cities across the nation registered some level of civil disturbance. Pittsburgh and, later, Kansas City, Missouri, teetered on the edge of uncontrollable violence. In Nashville, rioters torched an ROTC building. National Guard troops were deployed in Raleigh and Greensboro, North Carolina. Even small, previously peaceful cities were hit—in Joliet, outside Chicago, rioters burned down a warehouse not far from a key Army munitions factory.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
Read the book "LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK's Assassination" to get an accurate vision of who this man really was. One must go beyond the good sentiments toward this man that are based solely on the fact he managed to become president.
Posted by Alexandre Boucher on December 31,2010 | 03:06 PM
Sounds a lot like an apologist of LBJ writing the whole story. Personally, LBJ always struck the middle and lower classes as an arrogant, boisterous thorn in the country's side. If he was not linked to JFK's assassination, it would be surprising to hear those arguments. This man was one who could be vile,vulgar and perhaps evil. Much was evidenced by transcripts and audiotapings of his dialogue. All power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely; LBJ loved power, and hence was a principality in this country who many think did more harm than good. I knew several middle class guys who died in Nam thanks to his wish to be idolized just as FDR was, but look at what they have done to our war on poverty and tax structures. It is over for them. . . let us find new ways to correct our wonderful country.
Posted by L.Mark on May 19,2008 | 09:10 AM
My largest negative regarding LBJ, that I hold in mind, is that LBJ campaigned for election on peace platform, although he never, seemingly, had intended to deliver peace and withdrawal of our troops in Vietnam, but had intentions to escalate the war in Vietnam, later calling it a peace offensive. LBJ, for all intents and purposes, was determined to not be the president who lost a war. Present day, we currently have two democratic candidates that are promising the same sort of thing, essentially, in relation, to Iraq. The dems are promising to draw down the troops and bring our troops home. To myself, I just totally make those issues a null void box in my mind because I know in history we have had candidates/presidents who promised peace, and who promised we would not get involved in foreign wars (FDR), but who never delivered on these things. Inspiring words, campaign promises, moving speeches and rhetoric are not actions. Even Woodrow Wilson was considered a oratorical phenom.
Posted by Mercey on April 20,2008 | 12:09 AM
History will look back at LBJ's incredible courage in civil rights, and read such speeches as he gave to a joint session of Congress after the horrors in Selma, invoking Dr. King's words, "And We Shall Overcome", reportedly bringing Dr. King to tears as he watched Johnson on national TV. Johnson will be remembered as a great President for what he achieved, and what he tried to achieve, in his civil rights and his entire domestic agenda.
Posted by David E. Whitten on April 19,2008 | 12:10 AM
I found this article extremely interesting. I had forgotten many of the details of what happened at the time, and was glad to be reminded, and to hear information about the inside workings of the Johnson administration that I hadn't heard about before. My only criticism would be that the author jumps about in time, so that the sequence of events is muddled and hard to get straight in one's mind.
Posted by Ms Troy Parker Farr on April 12,2008 | 02:15 PM
I sat in that meeeting at the whiite House on April 5, 1968 with President Johnson. To this day,I wonder why Floyd McKissick of CORE, who was in the building, was not permitted to join us in the Conference Room. Paranoia was running rampant in the White House that day.
Posted by IRichard Gordon Hatcher on April 8,2008 | 12:05 AM
What better testimony to Johnson's magnificent civil rights accomplishments then, 40 years later, we have an African-American candidate who may well become president. While obsession with race and injustice because of it is the sorriest part of the American story, it has also brought forth moments of great courage, from people of all colors.
Posted by Fred Ripley on April 8,2008 | 09:09 AM
Except for Abraham Lincoln, has any President held office in more turbulent times in America than LBJ? He took over for a President that after his death all of a sudden became the greatest President we ever had in many peoples minds. He had to deal with racial tension, Vietnam and the assasinations for MLK and RFK. LBJ was a big man with big faults, but I would like to see history treat him more kindly than it has to this point.
Posted by Pete Iseppi on April 3,2008 | 08:13 AM
We need that kind of unifying spirit from our current leaders. Too many of the same attitudes of 40 years ago still persist.
Posted by jim jordan on April 1,2008 | 05:18 PM
A very good article. Useful to remind people president Johnson was a sincere new dealer.
Posted by Claude Julien on March 28,2008 | 06:10 AM