The Strange Lives of Polar Dinosaurs
How did they endure months of perpetual cold and dark?
- By Mitch Leslie
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2007, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
Similarly, Fiorillo and Roland Gangloff, a retired paleontologist from the University of Alaska, have found that the small meat-eater Troodon was much more common on the North Slope of Alaska than farther south. Troodon might have gained an advantage over the other carnivorous dinosaurs in the north because it also had large eyes and a hefty brain, perhaps useful for hunting all winter long.
Other dinosaurs might have migrated south for the winter (or north, if they lived in the Southern Hemisphere). Rich says his dinosaurs would have made unlikely travelers. They were small, and an inland sea would have blocked their path to warmer climes. But Edmontosaurus, from Alaska's North Slope, is a better candidate for seasonal migration. Adults were about the size of elephants, so they would not have been able to crawl under rocks when temperatures fell. Rough calculations suggest that by ambling at about 1 mile per hour—"browsing speed" for animals of that size—herds of Edmontosaurus could have journeyed more than 1,000 miles south in three months, says paleobotanist Bob Spicer of the Open University in Milton Keynes, Britain. Such a migration would have taken them out of the "zone of darkness" and into areas where plants might have still been growing.
For his part, Fiorillo doubts it. He and Gangloff contend that juvenile Edmontosaurus grew too slowly to have tramped long distances. They couldn't have kept up with a herd, so the animals must have stayed put, regardless of temperatures. This kind of back-and-forth might be dizzying, but it's how science moves ahead, especially in paleontology, where researchers have to draw conclusions from small numbers of often-fragmentary fossils.
The dinosaurs had an impressive run. They settled every continent, grew bigger than any other land animals and lasted for more than 150 million years. And then they vanished. Their demise has spawned more than a little speculation about its cause. Scenarios range from disease or competition with mammals to the flyby of an as-yet-undetected companion to the sun, a kind of death star.
Most paleontologists have accepted another extraterrestrial killer, an asteroid more than six miles wide that socked Earth 65 million years ago. It gouged a crater more than 100 miles wide on what is now the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico. According to the leading scenario, the impact threw huge amounts of dust and other debris into the atmosphere, blocking sunlight and sinking the Earth into darkness for weeks or even months. A global disaster certainly struck at the time, according to overwhelming fossil and geological evidence. As Fastovsky and Weishampel write in The Evolution and Extinction of the Dinosaurs, "the world's oceans were virtually 'dead'" as photosynthesis by plankton ceased and marine food webs unraveled. The dinosaurs died, while the ancestors of today's mammals, birds and reptiles hung on.
Paleontologists disagree about what the existence of polar dinosaurs says about the asteroid-winter scenario. Fiorillo says he is skeptical of it because "dinosaurs in Alaska were doing just fine in conditions just like that." He argues that climate changes caused by shifts in circulation of the atmosphere and oceans probably did in the dinosaurs.
But Rich says that the lives of polar dinosaurs can help researchers understand why dinosaurs went extinct after the impact. The catastrophe had to have been long and severe enough to kill off the dark- and cold-adapted animals. "You can't just have it [darkness] for a month and do the job," he says.
But Fastovsky says that polar dinosaurs tell us nothing about the animals' demise because we don't know whether these particular species were even alive at the end of the Cretaceous period. Rich's Australian dinosaurs were long extinct by the time the asteroid hit. Whether the dinosaurs on the North Slope of Alaska were alive is uncertain, he says; researchers have found no fossil layers there from the very end of the Cretaceous period.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
photoagraghy can do crazy things thses days!
Posted by alina on February 20,2009 | 01:33 AM
Get a clue.We all saw the Indian Ocean surge onto coa stal lands after that deep water earthquake several years ago.Even though the surges only advanced half a mile inland,the loss of life and property was indeed immense.Try to envision a catastrophy hundreds of times greater than that quake,something so very pow- erful as to make the entire planet tremble.Something that could effectively knock the earth off of it's fragile slanted axis,causing all major bodies of water worldwide to vio- lently lurch and course across land surface areas,de- stroying everything in their paths.The human death toll would be in the billions,as well as the oxygen producing forests so seriously damaged that the lack of air along with rotting corpses causing disease would kill off most of the pockets of survivors This is not science fiction,but a very serious and troubling reality,as certain comets,meteorites and as- terroids streak closer and closer to our dear planet.Be- ware of the evil that is called Hermes,labeled an aster- oid which it is really not.An entity that defies our law of science,it has two cores(heads)that are busy orbiting one another as it hurtles through our part of the Milky Way.It is something evil,and I believe it to be a tool of the devil.May God help us.
Posted by Mars Masters on January 9,2009 | 06:10 AM
The dinos where found on top of an Antarctica mountain? Hmmm... trying to escape what? Vegetation would be better found at ground level - right? Could it be that water levels were rising exponentially eventually drowning them? Dated 230 million years ago? Now how's that possible when dating methods are not accurate after about 50KY? I think some paleo- people need to "throw the baby out with the bath water"! LOL
Posted by SpookySr on December 22,2008 | 06:16 PM
I love these comments. LOL, almost as funny as the article. The mesozoic period was hot. There were no icy polar caps. CO2 was the highest that it ever has been by the end of the Cretaceous and as a GHG helped to keep the planet warm with abundant foilage. Antarctica and Australia were not polar, did not have 6 months of night albeit the nights were longer than today and it was not very cold in winter. The same goes for the Arctic. I suggest a visit to Palaeos.com for a look at continental positions, climate and other pertinent information on what the world was like at that time.
Posted by Quietman on December 17,2008 | 02:03 PM
Hers my take on it. The earth was about 1/4 the size it is today in the beginning. It was all continent the whole thing the water covered about 1/2 the continent leaving room for dinosaurs. It was humid and warm the dinosaurs needed only skin, the gravity was alot less so they grew to be very large and were perfectly suited for their environment they could run and play as we do their bones are the same density as ours. As the earth grew and spread the one continent apart at the rifts in the oceans today the fresh water that was above the continent flowed into the oceans taking the minerals with it making salt water seas. As the earth gains mass from the bombardment of the atoms that come from the sun it grows as does every planet and even the universe grows. Continual Creation. The dinosaurs died out slowly as the earth grew and changed it got colder and gravity increased. They laid eggs which were easy pray for rodents.
Posted by Jim on November 22,2008 | 11:34 AM
Hello , Smithsonian I have a question for ya ?? . I have had this thought for many years and i hope you can answer it for me. Thinking Biblical times . When the earth was covered in water . During Noah`s time .I was thinking what happened to the fish in the sea and whales ect. they didn`t die dd they during the once covered by water . That wipped out all living things that are not of the sea. Except all those on the arch .Why couldn`t the bones found ?? now called Dinosaurs be bones of whales ect , serpents ect ??. What happens to a fish when the water drys up and the land becomes dry ??.that fish would die right ??. Well why couldn`t the Dinosaurs be fish bones ?? and not Dinosaurs ??.If the land was covered in water with no land in site for yrs as in Noahs day and the ark. When the water dried up and land was visable and the land became more and more as the water dried up. Whales and creatures of the sea was like fish outta water concept ? they died because the water dried up .((yes the bible talks about serpents )) of the sea !!!. ?? . the wanderer .
Posted by Fire Of God on September 23,2008 | 01:08 PM
the moon can also be dated at around 6000 years by its dust production. 3 to 5 inches of moon dust.
Posted by Dr.Q on September 14,2008 | 09:57 PM
I saw a similar discovery shown on a dvd seminar (Dinosaurs and the Bible: by, Kent Hovind). Some dead dinosaurs and other giant creatures were discovered in antartica buried under half a mile of ice. The exlpanation was that the Biblical flood buried all the dinosaurs all over the world 4,400 years ago. After doing my own amatuer research for the past 7 years studying evolution and creation, and the fallicies of radio metric dating, I don't believe that the world is more than 6,000 years anymore. Although it would be ok if it was.
Posted by James on July 24,2008 | 05:21 PM
How long does it take for bone to turn to stone? And what if you find something that is not suppost to be in your area due to the geological age of the place it is found?
Posted by gardenfind on July 8,2008 | 07:27 PM
you guys are all fools not every thing the scientists say is true
Posted by tim on June 19,2008 | 11:50 AM
Sorry to be picky but stories about dinosaurs should be in a paleontology section...not Archaeology.
Posted by Liz on May 28,2008 | 11:18 PM
OR...the pachycephalosaurus WAS just the agent to unleash the THING from captivity in the ice WITH its ice-breaker helm and inquisitive nature the POOR beast was the first of the last as the THING ate of the dinosaur but could not stomach the fur of the TINY mammals of the time...WHO wants furry food when you can have slick and juicy?!?
Posted by Paul on May 27,2008 | 02:10 AM
But now that we know the snark is warm-blooded, you shouldn't take such offense, G. It seems that a combination of rapid environmental change AND the rise of a furry competitor might have given the meek the advantage here. Hey, the harder they fall. But maybe those arctic dinos hung on longer than the rest. Now that would be the find: some arctic dino bones in the belly of a proto-polar bear, just above the iridium line. (Charles, iridium isn't a country, dear. Snark, snark. :)
Posted by Paul on May 27,2008 | 02:05 AM
where were the plesiosaurs fossils found?
Posted by eric on April 15,2008 | 03:56 PM