The Strange Lives of Polar Dinosaurs
How did they endure months of perpetual cold and dark?
- By Mitch Leslie
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2007, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 5)
The crew she supervises includes a smattering of students, a retired literature professor from Tucson, a vacationing manager from an auto parts maker and the owner of an environmental cleanup service who can't stop bursting into song. Most of them come back year after year. They say they return for the camaraderie—and the chance of making a discovery. "It's an addiction for which there is no cure," says Nicole Evered, 68, who has worked on the Flat Rocks dig since it started.
Here the stereotypical image of the fossil hunter sprawled in the dust, unearthing a gigantic dinosaur bone with only a whisk broom and dental picks, doesn't apply. The fossils are too small, too fragmentary and too scattered. In more than 20 years of digging at various places in southern Australia, Rich and his crew have discovered only three articulated specimens, with bones connected as they were in life.
Most of the dinosaur bones they find at Flat Rocks, Kool explains, come from "hypsis" (pronounced HIP-sees), short for hypsilophodonts. These small, darting plant-eaters typically stood about as tall as turkeys. Their distinctive thighbones, which sport a downward-pointing spur, are easy to recognize. But this year's dig has also turned up some rarer finds, such as a thumbnail-size tooth from an as yet unnamed meat-eating dinosaur. One rock yielded a long, black fang that looks like an obsidian toothpick and may have come from a pterosaur, a type of flying reptile. And just two months ago, Rich's colleague Anthony Martin of Emory University in Atlanta announced that patterns in a 115-million-year-old layer of mud at Flat Rocks are dinosaur tracks. The 14-inch-long, three-toed footprints came from a type of meat-eating dinosaur called a theropod. Judging from the size and spacing of the prints, it must have stood about 12 feet high, making it the largest carnivorous dinosaur known to have lived there.
Promising fossils get wrapped in toilet tissue and newspaper for protection. Back at the museum, preparators will remove the encasing rock with tools that range from tungsten carbide needles to miniature, hand-held jackhammers powered by compressed air. Even unpromising chunks of rock will be pounded down to nuggets the size of sugar cubes; the team will check the bits for mammal jaws that are so small they could fit on a postage stamp.
It was the prospect of finding ancient mammal bones—not dinosaurs—that drew Rich to Australia. He was never a dinomaniac, not even as a child. What hooked his imagination, though, were the early mammals that scurried around at the same time as the dinosaurs. One illustration in a book he read as a boy portrayed the animals as snacking triumphantly on dinosaur eggs. Rich went with the evolutionary winners and studied fossil hedgehogs for his doctorate at Columbia University.
He landed in Australia in the early 1970s with no job and no intention of looking for one. His wife, Patricia Vickers-Rich, also a paleontologist, was in the country to follow up on her PhD research on fossil birds. But while thumbing through a newspaper "to get an idea what this country was about" he saw a help wanted ad for a curator at the local museum. He got the job and works there to this day. Rich and his wife—now a professor at Monash University in Melbourne and chief collaborator on the dinosaur research—stayed here because, he says, "the country was wide open" for studying the early evolution of mammals and birds.
In 1982, Rich met some museum volunteers eager to get their hands dirty at a dinosaur dig, but he initially resisted their pleas. He knew of a site 180 miles west of Flat Rocks that he had dubbed Dinosaur Cove after finding a few unidentifiable bone fragments there years earlier. Excavating there would require tunneling into cliffs—a dangerous proposition—with no guarantee of finding anything. But in 1984 he finally gave in, and within weeks the team found several dinosaur bones and a tooth.
For ten years Rich and a mostly amateur crew blasted, bored, picked and chiseled into the steep hillside. They dug two tunnels, each more than 60 feet long, and moved more than 600 tons of rock, much of it by hand. Rich says that "you wouldn't have to work that hard in Montana," which is famous for its dinosaur deposits and where the tectonic movements that hoisted the Rockies exposed bone-harboring rock strata. In contrast, Rich calls Australia, where dinosaur sediments are mostly buried deep, a "crappy country for dinosaur fossils."
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
photoagraghy can do crazy things thses days!
Posted by alina on February 20,2009 | 01:33 AM
Get a clue.We all saw the Indian Ocean surge onto coa stal lands after that deep water earthquake several years ago.Even though the surges only advanced half a mile inland,the loss of life and property was indeed immense.Try to envision a catastrophy hundreds of times greater than that quake,something so very pow- erful as to make the entire planet tremble.Something that could effectively knock the earth off of it's fragile slanted axis,causing all major bodies of water worldwide to vio- lently lurch and course across land surface areas,de- stroying everything in their paths.The human death toll would be in the billions,as well as the oxygen producing forests so seriously damaged that the lack of air along with rotting corpses causing disease would kill off most of the pockets of survivors This is not science fiction,but a very serious and troubling reality,as certain comets,meteorites and as- terroids streak closer and closer to our dear planet.Be- ware of the evil that is called Hermes,labeled an aster- oid which it is really not.An entity that defies our law of science,it has two cores(heads)that are busy orbiting one another as it hurtles through our part of the Milky Way.It is something evil,and I believe it to be a tool of the devil.May God help us.
Posted by Mars Masters on January 9,2009 | 06:10 AM
The dinos where found on top of an Antarctica mountain? Hmmm... trying to escape what? Vegetation would be better found at ground level - right? Could it be that water levels were rising exponentially eventually drowning them? Dated 230 million years ago? Now how's that possible when dating methods are not accurate after about 50KY? I think some paleo- people need to "throw the baby out with the bath water"! LOL
Posted by SpookySr on December 22,2008 | 06:16 PM
I love these comments. LOL, almost as funny as the article. The mesozoic period was hot. There were no icy polar caps. CO2 was the highest that it ever has been by the end of the Cretaceous and as a GHG helped to keep the planet warm with abundant foilage. Antarctica and Australia were not polar, did not have 6 months of night albeit the nights were longer than today and it was not very cold in winter. The same goes for the Arctic. I suggest a visit to Palaeos.com for a look at continental positions, climate and other pertinent information on what the world was like at that time.
Posted by Quietman on December 17,2008 | 02:03 PM
Hers my take on it. The earth was about 1/4 the size it is today in the beginning. It was all continent the whole thing the water covered about 1/2 the continent leaving room for dinosaurs. It was humid and warm the dinosaurs needed only skin, the gravity was alot less so they grew to be very large and were perfectly suited for their environment they could run and play as we do their bones are the same density as ours. As the earth grew and spread the one continent apart at the rifts in the oceans today the fresh water that was above the continent flowed into the oceans taking the minerals with it making salt water seas. As the earth gains mass from the bombardment of the atoms that come from the sun it grows as does every planet and even the universe grows. Continual Creation. The dinosaurs died out slowly as the earth grew and changed it got colder and gravity increased. They laid eggs which were easy pray for rodents.
Posted by Jim on November 22,2008 | 11:34 AM
Hello , Smithsonian I have a question for ya ?? . I have had this thought for many years and i hope you can answer it for me. Thinking Biblical times . When the earth was covered in water . During Noah`s time .I was thinking what happened to the fish in the sea and whales ect. they didn`t die dd they during the once covered by water . That wipped out all living things that are not of the sea. Except all those on the arch .Why couldn`t the bones found ?? now called Dinosaurs be bones of whales ect , serpents ect ??. What happens to a fish when the water drys up and the land becomes dry ??.that fish would die right ??. Well why couldn`t the Dinosaurs be fish bones ?? and not Dinosaurs ??.If the land was covered in water with no land in site for yrs as in Noahs day and the ark. When the water dried up and land was visable and the land became more and more as the water dried up. Whales and creatures of the sea was like fish outta water concept ? they died because the water dried up .((yes the bible talks about serpents )) of the sea !!!. ?? . the wanderer .
Posted by Fire Of God on September 23,2008 | 01:08 PM
the moon can also be dated at around 6000 years by its dust production. 3 to 5 inches of moon dust.
Posted by Dr.Q on September 14,2008 | 09:57 PM
I saw a similar discovery shown on a dvd seminar (Dinosaurs and the Bible: by, Kent Hovind). Some dead dinosaurs and other giant creatures were discovered in antartica buried under half a mile of ice. The exlpanation was that the Biblical flood buried all the dinosaurs all over the world 4,400 years ago. After doing my own amatuer research for the past 7 years studying evolution and creation, and the fallicies of radio metric dating, I don't believe that the world is more than 6,000 years anymore. Although it would be ok if it was.
Posted by James on July 24,2008 | 05:21 PM
How long does it take for bone to turn to stone? And what if you find something that is not suppost to be in your area due to the geological age of the place it is found?
Posted by gardenfind on July 8,2008 | 07:27 PM
you guys are all fools not every thing the scientists say is true
Posted by tim on June 19,2008 | 11:50 AM
Sorry to be picky but stories about dinosaurs should be in a paleontology section...not Archaeology.
Posted by Liz on May 28,2008 | 11:18 PM
OR...the pachycephalosaurus WAS just the agent to unleash the THING from captivity in the ice WITH its ice-breaker helm and inquisitive nature the POOR beast was the first of the last as the THING ate of the dinosaur but could not stomach the fur of the TINY mammals of the time...WHO wants furry food when you can have slick and juicy?!?
Posted by Paul on May 27,2008 | 02:10 AM
But now that we know the snark is warm-blooded, you shouldn't take such offense, G. It seems that a combination of rapid environmental change AND the rise of a furry competitor might have given the meek the advantage here. Hey, the harder they fall. But maybe those arctic dinos hung on longer than the rest. Now that would be the find: some arctic dino bones in the belly of a proto-polar bear, just above the iridium line. (Charles, iridium isn't a country, dear. Snark, snark. :)
Posted by Paul on May 27,2008 | 02:05 AM
where were the plesiosaurs fossils found?
Posted by eric on April 15,2008 | 03:56 PM