The Strange Lives of Polar Dinosaurs
How did they endure months of perpetual cold and dark?
- By Mitch Leslie
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2007, Subscribe
On a balmy Sunday morning in early March, I'm on a beach in southern Australia looking for ice—or at least traces of it. It's summer in the Southern Hemisphere, and most of the beachgoers sloshing through the rising tide or walking their dogs are wearing T-shirts and shorts. Tom Rich, a paleontologist at Museum Victoria in Melbourne, leads the way along the low, tawny cliffs that crowd the shoreline. Rich is 66, with a stubbly silver beard, sparse gray hair and slanting eyebrows that give his face a sad, world-weary look. He was raised in Southern California and Texas but has spent his professional life in Australia. During more than three decades down under, he's picked up Aussie citizenship and plenty of the country's colorful lingo, but his accent remains stubbornly American. "I sound like I just got off the plane," he says.
This part of the coast, known as Flat Rocks, is near the resort town of Inverloch, about a two-hour drive southeast of Melbourne through farms and woodland parched by more than a decade of drought. Rich stops next to a pile of rubble at the base of a cliff. "That's it," he says. Partly buried by flakes of battleship-gray rock is a telling geological formation. Tongues of dark tan sediment droop into the lighter-colored layer below. The formation is called a "cryoturbation" and was caused when once-frozen clay sank into an underlying layer of sand during a thaw long ago.
Snow and ice are rare in this part of Australia today. But evidence from Flat Rocks and other nearby sites confirms that a little over 100 million years ago, "it was bloody cold around here," as Rich puts it. Though about a third of Australia now lies within the tropics, back then the continent sat about 2,000 miles south of its current position, snuggled against Antarctica. Southeastern Australia probably had a climate similar to that of Chicago, if not Fairbanks.
All the more surprising, then, that dinosaurs thrived here at that time. Think "dinosaurs" and you probably conjure up behemoths trudging through sweltering swamps or torrid tropical forests. But Rich and other scientists working in Australia, Alaska and even atop a mountain in Antarctica have unearthed remains of dinosaurs that prospered in environments that were cold for at least part of the year. Polar dinosaurs, as they are known, also had to endure prolonged darkness—up to six months each winter. "The moon would be out more than the sun, and it would be tough making a living," says paleontologist David Weishampel of Johns Hopkins University.
The evidence that dinosaurs braved the cold—and maybe scrunched through snow and slid on ice—challenges what scientists know about how the animals survived. Although Rich wasn't the first to unearth polar dinosaurs, he and a few other paleontologists are filling in the picture of how these animals lived and what their environments were like. Recent research might also shed light on two of the most disputed questions in paleontology: Were dinosaurs warmblooded? And what killed them off?
Every year from late January to early March, Dinosaur Dreaming—the polar dinosaur project led by Rich—descends on the shore near Inverloch. The sound you hear as you walk up the beach toward the dig is the clinking of hammers on chisels. Kneeling around flat-topped beach boulders that serve as improvised workbenches, a dozen or so volunteers pound on lumps of gray rock. Several wear this year's fashion statement, a T-shirt that reads "Mammalia: Popcorn of the Cretaceous" and shows a bipedal dinosaur clutching two ratlike mammals in one paw and tossing another toward its gaping, toothy mouth.
Down in the "hole," a knee-deep gash near the waterline marked off by a circle of fluorescent pink construction netting, another group is using a rock saw and chisels to dislodge blocks the size of loaves of bread. These chunks will also go under the hammer.
At a folding table in the lee of the cliffs, Lesley Kool is triaging the finds brought in by the rock-breakers. Kool started out as a volunteer on Rich's first dino excavation in 1984. She knew little about dinosaurs, but she trained herself to be an expert preparator—the person who winkles fossils out of the rock without smashing them to dust—and developed a knack for identifying fossils. Now she runs the dig. She can tell you that the brownish chunk you hoped was the dinosaur find of the century is really a commonplace bit of fossilized turtle shell.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
photoagraghy can do crazy things thses days!
Posted by alina on February 20,2009 | 01:33 AM
Get a clue.We all saw the Indian Ocean surge onto coa stal lands after that deep water earthquake several years ago.Even though the surges only advanced half a mile inland,the loss of life and property was indeed immense.Try to envision a catastrophy hundreds of times greater than that quake,something so very pow- erful as to make the entire planet tremble.Something that could effectively knock the earth off of it's fragile slanted axis,causing all major bodies of water worldwide to vio- lently lurch and course across land surface areas,de- stroying everything in their paths.The human death toll would be in the billions,as well as the oxygen producing forests so seriously damaged that the lack of air along with rotting corpses causing disease would kill off most of the pockets of survivors This is not science fiction,but a very serious and troubling reality,as certain comets,meteorites and as- terroids streak closer and closer to our dear planet.Be- ware of the evil that is called Hermes,labeled an aster- oid which it is really not.An entity that defies our law of science,it has two cores(heads)that are busy orbiting one another as it hurtles through our part of the Milky Way.It is something evil,and I believe it to be a tool of the devil.May God help us.
Posted by Mars Masters on January 9,2009 | 06:10 AM
The dinos where found on top of an Antarctica mountain? Hmmm... trying to escape what? Vegetation would be better found at ground level - right? Could it be that water levels were rising exponentially eventually drowning them? Dated 230 million years ago? Now how's that possible when dating methods are not accurate after about 50KY? I think some paleo- people need to "throw the baby out with the bath water"! LOL
Posted by SpookySr on December 22,2008 | 06:16 PM
I love these comments. LOL, almost as funny as the article. The mesozoic period was hot. There were no icy polar caps. CO2 was the highest that it ever has been by the end of the Cretaceous and as a GHG helped to keep the planet warm with abundant foilage. Antarctica and Australia were not polar, did not have 6 months of night albeit the nights were longer than today and it was not very cold in winter. The same goes for the Arctic. I suggest a visit to Palaeos.com for a look at continental positions, climate and other pertinent information on what the world was like at that time.
Posted by Quietman on December 17,2008 | 02:03 PM
Hers my take on it. The earth was about 1/4 the size it is today in the beginning. It was all continent the whole thing the water covered about 1/2 the continent leaving room for dinosaurs. It was humid and warm the dinosaurs needed only skin, the gravity was alot less so they grew to be very large and were perfectly suited for their environment they could run and play as we do their bones are the same density as ours. As the earth grew and spread the one continent apart at the rifts in the oceans today the fresh water that was above the continent flowed into the oceans taking the minerals with it making salt water seas. As the earth gains mass from the bombardment of the atoms that come from the sun it grows as does every planet and even the universe grows. Continual Creation. The dinosaurs died out slowly as the earth grew and changed it got colder and gravity increased. They laid eggs which were easy pray for rodents.
Posted by Jim on November 22,2008 | 11:34 AM
Hello , Smithsonian I have a question for ya ?? . I have had this thought for many years and i hope you can answer it for me. Thinking Biblical times . When the earth was covered in water . During Noah`s time .I was thinking what happened to the fish in the sea and whales ect. they didn`t die dd they during the once covered by water . That wipped out all living things that are not of the sea. Except all those on the arch .Why couldn`t the bones found ?? now called Dinosaurs be bones of whales ect , serpents ect ??. What happens to a fish when the water drys up and the land becomes dry ??.that fish would die right ??. Well why couldn`t the Dinosaurs be fish bones ?? and not Dinosaurs ??.If the land was covered in water with no land in site for yrs as in Noahs day and the ark. When the water dried up and land was visable and the land became more and more as the water dried up. Whales and creatures of the sea was like fish outta water concept ? they died because the water dried up .((yes the bible talks about serpents )) of the sea !!!. ?? . the wanderer .
Posted by Fire Of God on September 23,2008 | 01:08 PM
the moon can also be dated at around 6000 years by its dust production. 3 to 5 inches of moon dust.
Posted by Dr.Q on September 14,2008 | 09:57 PM
I saw a similar discovery shown on a dvd seminar (Dinosaurs and the Bible: by, Kent Hovind). Some dead dinosaurs and other giant creatures were discovered in antartica buried under half a mile of ice. The exlpanation was that the Biblical flood buried all the dinosaurs all over the world 4,400 years ago. After doing my own amatuer research for the past 7 years studying evolution and creation, and the fallicies of radio metric dating, I don't believe that the world is more than 6,000 years anymore. Although it would be ok if it was.
Posted by James on July 24,2008 | 05:21 PM
How long does it take for bone to turn to stone? And what if you find something that is not suppost to be in your area due to the geological age of the place it is found?
Posted by gardenfind on July 8,2008 | 07:27 PM
you guys are all fools not every thing the scientists say is true
Posted by tim on June 19,2008 | 11:50 AM
Sorry to be picky but stories about dinosaurs should be in a paleontology section...not Archaeology.
Posted by Liz on May 28,2008 | 11:18 PM
OR...the pachycephalosaurus WAS just the agent to unleash the THING from captivity in the ice WITH its ice-breaker helm and inquisitive nature the POOR beast was the first of the last as the THING ate of the dinosaur but could not stomach the fur of the TINY mammals of the time...WHO wants furry food when you can have slick and juicy?!?
Posted by Paul on May 27,2008 | 02:10 AM
But now that we know the snark is warm-blooded, you shouldn't take such offense, G. It seems that a combination of rapid environmental change AND the rise of a furry competitor might have given the meek the advantage here. Hey, the harder they fall. But maybe those arctic dinos hung on longer than the rest. Now that would be the find: some arctic dino bones in the belly of a proto-polar bear, just above the iridium line. (Charles, iridium isn't a country, dear. Snark, snark. :)
Posted by Paul on May 27,2008 | 02:05 AM
where were the plesiosaurs fossils found?
Posted by eric on April 15,2008 | 03:56 PM