Where Dinosaurs Roamed
Footprints at one of the nation's oldest—and most fought over—fossil beds offer new clues to how the behemoths lived
- By Genevieve Rajewski
- Smithsonian magazine, May 2008, Subscribe
Othniel Charles Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope were the two most prominent dinosaur specialists of the 1800s—and bitter enemies. They burned through money, funding expeditions to Western badlands, hiring bone collectors away from each other and bidding against one another for fossils in a battle of one-upmanship. They spied on each other's digs, had their minions smash fossils so the other couldn't collect them, and attacked each other in academic journals and across the pages of the New York Herald—making accusations of theft and plagiarism that tarnished them both. Yet between them they named more than 1,500 new species of fossil animals. They made Brontosaurus, Stegosaurus and Triceratops household names and sparked a dinomania that thrives today.
One of Marsh and Cope's skirmishes involved fossil beds in Morrison, Colorado, discovered in 1877 by Arthur Lakes, a teacher and geologist-for-hire. Lakes wrote in his journal that he had discovered bones "so monstrous...so utterly beyond anything I had ever read or conceived possible." He wrote to Marsh, at Yale, to offer his finds and services, but his letters met with vague replies and then silence. Lakes then sent some sample bones to Cope, the editor of American Naturalist. When Marsh got word that his rival was interested, he promptly hired Lakes. Under Marsh's control, the Morrison quarries yielded the world's first fossils of Stegosaurus and Apatosaurus, the long-necked plant eater more popularly known as Brontosaurus.
Lakes spent four field seasons chiseling the most easily reached bones out of the fossil beds. Before he left the area, he allegedly blew up one of the most productive sites—"Quarry 10"—to prevent Cope from digging there.
For 123 years, the site was lost, but in 2002 researchers from the Morrison Natural History Museum used Lakes' field notes, paintings and sketches to find the quarry, expose its original floor and support beams and begin digging once more. "The first things that we found were charcoal fragments: we were digging right below the campfire that Arthur Lakes had built," says Matthew Mossbrucker, director of the museum.
They quickly discovered that at least one misdeed attributed to the feud between Marsh and Cope was probably exaggerated. "It looks like [Lakes] just shoveled some dirt in there," says Mossbrucker. "I think he told people that he had dynamited it closed because he didn't want the competition up at the quarry—playing mind games with Cope's gang."
The reopened quarry is awash in overlooked fossils as well as relics that earlier paleontologists failed to recognize: dinosaur footprints that provide startling new clues about how the creatures lived.
The dig site is perched halfway up the west side of a narrow ridge called the Dakota hogback. The only way up is to walk—over loose rock, past prickly brush and rattlesnakes—with frequent pauses to catch one's breath. On this July morning, Mossbrucker leads six volunteers as they open the quarry for its fourth full modern-day field season. The crew erects a canopy over the pit before forming a bucket brigade to remove backfill that has washed into the hole since last season.
Down in a test pit, the crew digs into the side of the ridge, carefully undercutting the layer of cracked sandstone that served as the original quarry's ceiling. The ledge collapsed several times in the 1870s. More than 100 tons of rock crashed into the pit one night, and had the crew been working instead of sleeping nearby, Lakes wrote, the "entire party would have been crushed to atoms and buried beneath tons of rocks which afterwards took us over a week to remove by blasting and sledge hammers."
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Dinosaurs Fossils Jurassic Period 19th Century Colorado
Additional Sources
"The Sauropod Chronicles," by Richard A. Kissel, Natural History, April 2007
Historic Dinosaur Quarries of the Dinosaur Ridge Area by Adrian Hunt et al., Friends of Dinosaur Ridge and the University of Colorado at Denver, 2002









Comments (7)
we had found some unexplained bones on our property and can not identify them can you please help?
Posted by Sabrina DeClue on March 26,2012 | 04:29 PM
Hi, my name is amber i am 13 years old and i have a therory for this type of stuff, archaeology is something more than just digging up fossils and finding bones it gives us an idea about how wedo stuff to save the planet or find out how others lived there lives. you compare and contrast, there are so many things you can figure out. I know that ur thinking that this is wrong accepting this from a young girl but its the truth. I have learned alot. sincerly, amber mock
Posted by amber mock on March 19,2009 | 11:49 AM
William Buckland, an English geologist, coined the term "coprolite" in the early 1800s. It is derived from the greek words kopros, meaning "dung", and lithos, meaning "stone".
Posted by Sarah on May 16,2008 | 04:19 PM
You left out the "insult" that Marsh saddled his rival Cope with for all time. I was told that after finding fossilized poop, Marsh, in honor of his rival named it coprolite, so that Cope would be associated in perputuity.
Posted by Christian Edwards on May 13,2008 | 10:53 AM
In response to Tracy Ford: The article is correct. I'm pretty sure that the tracks you are referring to are from the Middle Jurassic, far too old to be from Apatosaurus proper. Regardless, these footprints are from a site were Apatosaurus was found. I have seen these tiny sauropod tracks at the Morrison Museum, and they show distinct claw impressions that link them to Apatosaurus. The article references not just bipedal tracks but “functionally running” tracks. This too would distinguish these footprints from the Mexican tracks. I hope this adds clarity. Great article.
Posted by Tim Mulvey on May 2,2008 | 06:27 PM
This is wrong, this isn't the 'first' time 'Apatosaurus' i.e. sauropod junile tracks were found of them walking bipedally. In fact the first one that I know of was in 1996. Ferrusquia-Villafranca, I., Jimenez-Hiadalgo, E., and Bravo-Cuvas, V. M., 1996, Footprints of Small Sauropods from the Middle Jurassic of Oaxaca, Southeastern Mexico: In: The Continental Jurassic, edited by Morales, M., 1996, Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, n. 60, p. 119-126. I even did a drawing of an Apatosaurus (adult) walking bipedally through a termite mound 'field in 2000. Tracy
Posted by Tracy Ford on April 30,2008 | 01:45 AM
The Morrison quarries are known as Dinosaur Ridge. The Friends of Dinosaur Ridge (http://www.dinoridge.org/) offer tours, and paleontologists at the Morrison Natural History Museum (http://www.mnhm.org/) dig there.
Posted by Sarah on April 30,2008 | 11:55 AM
Where are the Morrison Quarries? My Microsoft Streets & Trips does not yield the site the article discusses. Is it in or near Dinosaur National Monument?
Posted by Philip Neal on April 26,2008 | 10:01 PM
I thought "Where Dinosaurs Roamed" from your May 2008 issue was a great article by Ms. Rajewski; a fascinating read about "battling" paleontologists. It's amazing how uncivilized acedemics can be to each other. I thought this was a well-researched piece that didn't get lost in facts: the writer wove a lively narrative that made the most of the limited word count. I enjoy reading Smithsonian whenever I pick it up, but felt compelled to offer kudos for this story because it left me wanting to learn more. I am curious to know, however, why the writer was given such limited space for such a compelling story? (Is she working on a book on this topic? If so, I will keep a look out for it.) Perhaps I am a "dinomaniac," like the writer, but I thoroughly enjoyed this story and look forward to reading more of Ms. Rajewski's fine journalism. Well done. Smithsonian.
Posted by George Corsiglia on April 25,2008 | 09:40 PM