The Dying Tecumseh
A sculpture depicting the death of the legendary Shawnee warrior reveals much about how the Indians of the West were viewed in the early ages of the United States
- By Bil Gilbert
- Smithsonian magazine, July 1995, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
Frederick Pettrich began work on The Dying Tecumseh in 1837, doubtless much influenced by these political happenings. This was certainly the case with John Dorival, who in 1833 painted the immensely popular Battle of the Thames. In the foreground of an extremely busy battle scene, Johnson and Tecumseh are engaged in hand-to-hand combat. The former brandishes a pistol, sports a dragoon's tall stovepipe hat adorned with an ostrich plume and sits astride a splendid white charger. Tecumseh, on foot, appears to be about seven feet tall, overtopping Johnson's rearing horse. He wears a flowing headdress fabricated from the plumage of at least four or five eagles. Lithographic prints of Dorival's work were purchased and widely distributed by managers of Johnson's Vice Presidential campaign. Other paintings of this battle, quite similar in heroic detail and inaccuracy, came to decorate many a 19th-century barbershop and barroom.
For reasons of obvious self-interest the conquerors of Tecumseh eulogized him first as a "red Hannibal-Napoleon" and then as a man of preternatural sagacity, courage and honor. Typically, the Indiana Centinel, published in Vincennes, editorialized: "Every schoolboy in the Union now knows that Tecumseh was a great man. His greatness was his own, unassisted by science or education. As a statesman, warrior and patriot, we shall not look on his like again.
"A decade or so after his death Tecumseh had become The Noble — in fact the noblest — Savage. Towns, businesses and children — William Tecumseh Sherman, for one — were named for him. In my own youth, growing up in southern Michigan 30 miles to the west of the village of Tecumseh, it was still widely believed that his was the face that appeared on the "Indian Head" penny. I later learned that the model for this coin was the daughter of a U.S. Mint engraver, but legend generally overrides fact. In addition to sculptures, paintings, woodcuts and other pictographic works, hundreds and probably thousands of articles and books, occasional epic poems and dramas about Tecumseh have appeared since his death. And they continue. Tecumseh literature is now more voluminous than that devoted to William Henry Harrison or Richard Johnson, and nearly all of it is laudatory. Except for Robert E. Lee, sans peur et sans reproche, no other declared enemy of the United States has been so well regarded for so long as has Tecumseh.
Praise for noble enemies — once they are safely out of the way — is part of a long heroic tradition. But with the passage of time the enduring interest in and admiration for Tecumseh has raised a question that has become more troublesome for many Americans. It is: "If Tecumseh and his cause were so noble, why was he killed and mutilated?"
With this in mind it has occurred to me that the sculpture in the National Museum of American Art, the most massive of the many memorials to the man, could be retitled Tecumseh's Revenge.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (4)
This fantastic article may well finally answer the question, "Why was this enemy of the United States used when the US Naval Academy was designed?" The central focus of the time honored Bancroft Hall is named Tecumseh Court and has a bust statue of this famous Indian Warrior in full battle dress. Hard to understand without the statement "Tecumseh was a warrior at 15; later he became a renowned field commander and a charismatic orator" provided above. Thank you Steve Frasher USNA Class of 1970
Posted by Steve Frasher on July 13,2012 | 03:44 PM
Well, the indigenous native Indian population had no business being on "our" property to begin with. What were they doing here? It is unfortunate that America's political history is predicated on the confiscation of the previous inhabitant's property through forced military means and the government-organized and sanctioned eradication of that population. In a moral gesture, European emigres and those that have followed, essentially have cordoned off these remaining indigenous inhabitants from the main population on "camps" or reservations far away from European settlements. The parallels to the behavior of the German Nazis from the Krystallnacht to the subsequent behavior of the Nazis are extraordinary. There are similar historical parallels in Australia, South Africa and Latin America as well, which when full explored, should shed considerable light on the nature of the human animal. The distillation of actual human behavior and the rationalizations given for the justification of those behaviors can hopefully explain the root essence of animal behavior and motivation with a more enlightened perspective.
Posted by Steven P. Mitchell on June 24,2012 | 01:50 AM
Being a longtime newspaperman in Tennessee, I have multiple "Native American" friends here who refuse to use or deal with $20 bills with Andrew Jackson's likeness printed on them...due to the infamous Trail of Tears migration forced on them by President Jackson. Theirs is another viewpoint of U.S. history, valid in their eyes and hearts...
Posted by Dan Whittle on June 3,2012 | 05:15 PM
I read that for Tecumseh's face Pettrich used the cast taken after the warrior's death. Is that correct?
Posted by Fedora Giordano on July 10,2010 | 03:37 PM