Marie Antoinette
The teenage queen, now the subject of a new movie, was embraced by France in 1770. Twenty-three years later, she lost her head to the guillotine. (But she never said, "Let them eat cake")
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 5)
Six months later, on August 2, the Widow Capet, as Marie Antoinette was now known, was transferred to the Conciergerie, a dank prison dubbed "death's antechamber." Louis' sister, Elisabeth, Marie Thérèse and Louis Charles remained in the Temple tower. Later that month, the queen recognized among her visitors a former officer, the Chevalier Alexandre de Rougeville, who dropped at her feet one or two carnations (accounts differ) containing a note that said he would try to rescue her. A guard spotted the note, and when public prosecutor Antoine Fouquier-Tinville learned that Royalists were scheming to free the former queen (the plan became known as the Carnation Plot), he moved to put her immediately on trial.
Emaciated and pale, Marie Antoinette maintained her composure at the trial, a grueling 32-hour ordeal carried out over two days. She responded with eloquence to the prosecutor's litany of accusations—she was guilty, he said, of making secret agreements with Austria and Prussia (which had joined with Austria in the war against France), of shipping money abroad to Louis' two younger brothers in exile and of conspiring with these enemies against France. Accused of manipulating the king's foreign policy, she coolly replied: "To advise a course of action and to have it carried out are very different things."
On the first day of the trial, the prosecution delivered a bombshell, presenting testimony by young Louis that he had sex with his mother and his aunt. (Caught masturbating by his jailer, the boy had invented the story to shift blame onto the two women.) The former queen summoned up a stirring denunciation. "Nature refuses to answer such a charge brought against a mother," she replied. "I appeal in this matter to all the mothers present in court." The prosecutor's ploy backfired as the audience reacted with abashed silence. But the trial's conclusion was foregone. With civil war threatening to destroy the new Republic, "Marie Antoinette was deliberately targeted," says Fraser in the PBS production, "in order to bind the French together in a kind of blood bond." Found guilty of treason, the former queen was sentenced to die.
On the eve of her execution, Marie Antoinette wrote a last letter, to her sister-in-law, entreating Elisabeth to forgive young Louis for his accusations and to persuade him not to try to avenge his parents' deaths. "I am calm," she reflected, "as people are whose conscience is clear." Before the former queen left prison the next morning, October 16, 1793, the executioner cut off her hair and bound her hands behind her. A priest counseled courage. "Courage?" Marie Antoinette shot back. "The moment when my ills are going to end is not the moment when courage is going to fail me."
As an open tumbrel cart carrying the condemned woman rolled through the streets to what is now the Place de la Concorde, Marie Antoinette, two weeks shy of her 38th birthday, but appearing far older, maintained a stoic pose, captured in Jacques-Louis David's harsh sketch (below) from the rue Sainte-Honoré. When the guillotine sliced off her head at 12:15 p.m., thousands of spectators erupted in cheers. Her body was placed in a coffin and tossed into a common grave in a cemetery behind the Church of the Madeleine.
Still imprisoned in the Temple tower, Louis Charles remained isolated from his sister and his aunt, who was also executed, in May 1794, as an enemy of the people. In June 1795, the 10-year-old boy, a king—Louis XVII to Royalists—without a country, died in the Temple tower, most likely of the same tuberculosis that had felled his elder brother. Six months later, his 17-year-old sister was returned to Austria in a prisoner exchange. She ultimately married her first cousin, the Duke d'Angoulême, and died childless at age 72 in 1851 outside Vienna.
Fersen became a trusted adviser to the Swedish king. But he never forgave himself for not saving the woman he loved on the flight to Varennes. "Why, ah why did I not die for her on the 20th of June?" he wrote in his journal. Nineteen years later, on June 20, 1810, a Stockholm mob, wrongly believing that he had poisoned the heir to the Swedish throne, beat him to death with sticks and stones. He was 54.
In April 1814, following Napoleon's exile to Elba, Louis' brother the Comte de Provence, then 58, returned from his own exile in England to assume the French throne as Louis XVIII. The following January, he had the bodies of his older brother and the queen disinterred and reburied in the Saint-Denis Cathedral near Paris, where idealized stone statues of the royal couple now kneel in prayer above the underground vault.
Marie Antoinette would likely have been perfectly happy to have played only a ceremonial part as queen. But Louis' weakness forced her to take a more dominant role—for which the French people could not forgive her. Cartoons depicted her as a harpy trampling the constitution. She was blamed for bankrupting the country, when others in the high-spending, lavish court bore equal responsibility. Ultimately, she was condemned simply for being Louis' wife and a symbol of tyranny. Thomas Jefferson, minister to France under Louis XVI, famously asserted that if Marie Antoinette had been cloistered in a convent, the French Revolution would never have taken place. Perhaps Jefferson goes too far. Certainly she became a scapegoat for nearly everything that was wrong with France's absolutist, dynastic system. But it's also clear that in their refusal to compromise, Louis and Marie Antoinette lost everything.
Based in France, Richard Covington writes on culture, history, science and the arts from his home near Versailles.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (38)
+ View All Comments
@Debrah: That is why we need a constitutional monarchy.
Posted by TheMonarchist on January 13,2013 | 08:20 PM
What a sad story... I like to read history and I find it awkward but logical how when reading about the death of a million people, it feels like just another statistic, but when reading a biography, it just feels so saddening
Posted by hasan on December 26,2012 | 02:41 PM
This was always the danger of an absolute monarchy. An accident of birth is not a reason to place someone on the throne, especially someone as young as Louis XVI was when he became Dauphin. He was obviously not suited to rule, nor was he suited to be husband to anyone, especially not Marie Antoinette. Revolutions are always inevitable when rulers make life difficult for their citizens. Another danger is a monarch's ability to snuff out a person's life, simply because they've fallen out of favor. Henry VIII had a wandering eye, choosing a prospective new bride solely on appearance without knowing their character. He had two of his wives beheaded. The French Revolution beheaded their monarchs,Louis and Marie. The Russian Revolution brought about the murders of Czar Nicholas, his entire family and servants who happened to be incarcerated with them. I am happy not to live in those times when people felt vindicated upon the death of former rulers.
Posted by Debrah on December 4,2012 | 12:26 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
Truly a good read condensing such a long history into into a quick understandable summary. I'm going to bookmark this site for my history cravings. Thanks!
Posted by linda pagan on November 25,2012 | 02:56 PM
I'm gonna be Marie Antoinette for Halloween
Posted by on October 9,2012 | 04:40 PM
Interesting to find out a bit more about MA. She had such a lovely name. I suspect that she had no way of knowing how to be a queen and did what she wanted like a spoilt child. I think she would have given more to her people if she had of seen the states fo their environments etc. Thank you for more insight as I just watched the movie and wanted to know more.
Posted by Tania on June 8,2012 | 12:26 AM
LOUIS XVI WAS NOT A GOOD LEADER COZ HE WAS SAYING THAT PEASENTS TO DO ALL THE WORK AND TO PAY MORE TAXES
Posted by DINEO on May 7,2012 | 10:36 AM
I personaly, was so profoundly touched by the sureality and confoundedness of the plyte thrusted upon the heads of two children so young,and without a clue as to what was about to be asked of them as children makeing grownup decisions,in what had to seem to them to be all a make belive world.Only to discover in inocients the power that they pocessed over an entire country with only a childs imgination to rule it.This artical was so perfectly and informatively written,and gave such insight to the true facts,that it did away with fictitious asuptions that I may have had. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PS I don't belive the Louise accussed his mother and aunt.
Posted by Robert L Welch Jr on January 18,2012 | 04:30 PM
@Christy....to view the sketch hit 'more photos'next to the painting of Marie Antoinette. This was a very informative, interesting and well written article. Thank you.
Posted by eva on June 22,2011 | 02:18 AM
It is worth correcting that her son was manipulated into making up the sexual abuse charge,not because he got caught masturbating,I believe he was 8 maybe 10 oldest at this time,it is Louis XVII we are talking about,he was turned over to Simone an illiterate man working under Jacques Hebert a journalist/revolutionary of the time,who manipulated little Louis into hating his parents and,Marie Antoniette wrote to her sister in law Princess Elisabeth when she was about to be executed to apologize on Louis XVII's behalf,for the horrible accusations made by him,but again manipulated into doing so.the idea that he was caught masturbating is utterly false and must be removed from this otherwise fine article.
Posted by Juan on June 21,2011 | 12:33 AM
What I never realised is that Napolean and Marie Antoinette were in such a close timeframe.
This is an extremely well written story, which offers more facts than I've been able to find anywhere else.
Keep up the good work.
Posted by Margo Somboon on June 18,2011 | 10:50 AM
I JUST SAW THE MOVIE ON CABLE, THANK'S FOR THIS ARTICLE IT GAVE ME MORE INSITE ON WHAT ELSE HAPPENED.
Posted by Belinda Gamble on March 13,2011 | 08:46 PM
+ View All Comments