Marie Antoinette
The teenage queen, now the subject of a new movie, was embraced by France in 1770. Twenty-three years later, she lost her head to the guillotine. (But she never said, "Let them eat cake")
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
Around five o'clock on the morning of the sixth, rebels surged toward the queen's bedroom, killing two guards. A terrified Marie Antoinette leapt out of bed and raced to the king's apartments. Louis, meanwhile, had dashed to her bedroom to rescue her, but finding her gone, doubled back with their son to join her and their daughter in the dining hall of his quarters. By this time, the Marquis de Lafayette, commander of the National Guard, had arrived with Guard troops and temporarily restored order.
But the throng, swollen to some 10,000 people, began clamoring to take Louis to Paris. When someone cried out for the queen to show herself on the balcony, she stepped forward, curtsying with such aplomb that the mob grew silent, then burst into cries of "Long live the queen!" But Marie Antoinette sensed that the reprieve would be short-lived. Retreating inside, she broke down. "They are going to force us to go to Paris, the King and me, preceded by the heads of our bodyguards on pikes," she said. Her words proved prophetic. Within hours, the triumphant procession—indeed with the guards' heads on pikes—was escorting the captive royal family to the old Tuileries palace in the capital.
Although the king and queen were not locked in, and in theory could have left the palace had they chosen to do so, they withdrew into self-imposed seclusion. The king seemed unable to act. "Taking the place of her husband (whom everyone thrust contemptuously aside as an incurable weakling)," writes Zweig, Marie Antoinette "held council with the ministers and ambassadors, watching over their undertakings and revising their dispatches."
"She was decisive where he was indecisive," biographer Antonia Fraser says in a new PBS documentary Marie Antoinette. "She was courageous when he was vacillating." She dashed off letters in cipher and invisible ink to other European sovereigns, pleading with them to invade France and shore up the king's crumbling authority, but to no avail. Meeting secretly with Mirabeau in July 1790, she won the influential legislator over to the cause of preserving the monarchy. By December, however, she was devising a contingency plan to flee Paris for Montmédy, near the Austrian-controlled Netherlands. There the royal couple planned to mount a counterrevolution with troops under the command of Royalist general Francois-Claude Bouillé. When Mirabeau died in April 1791 without securing the Assembly's promise to retain Louis as king in a constitutional monarchy, Louis and Marie Antoinette put their plan into action. But instead of following Bouillé's advice to make the trip in two light carriages, the queen insisted on keeping the family together in a lumbering coach called a berlin, encumbered with a silver dinner service, a clothes-press, and a small wine chest. (Fersen had made the arrangements, even mortgaging his estate to pay for the carriage.) Late in the evening of June 20, 1791, the royal family, disguised as servants, slipped out of the capital. Fersen accompanied them as far as Bondy, 16 miles east of the Tuileries. While the horses were being changed, he pleaded with Louis to let him continue with the family rather than reuniting at Montmédy two days later as planned. Louis refused, perhaps, suggests biographer Evelyne Lever, because he thought it humiliating to be under the protection of his wife's lover. Also, Fraser says in the PBS film, Louis didn't want people to think a foreigner had helped them get away.
In Varennes, 130 miles east of Paris, a band of armed villagers accosted the king, who had been recognized inside the conspicuous berlin, and forced the royal entourage into a municipal official's house. When a small contingent of Royalist troops arrived to free them, Louis vacillated, then, fearing a confrontation with the steadily growing mob brandishing arms outside the house, declined the troops' help, choosing instead to wait for Bouillé. Had Fersen, a trained officer, been allowed to stay with the group, he might well have taken more decisive action and helped lead the family to safety. Instead, emissaries dispatched by the Assembly arrived with orders to return the family to Paris. Crowds of angry Parisians lined the streets as the king and queen were taken back to the Tuileries palace, where they were held captive by National Guardsmen. Louis was caricatured as a castrated pig, while the queen was portrayed as a wanton traitor.
The Assembly allowed Louis to remain as a figurehead on the throne to legitimize a proposed new constitution, but he had little actual political power. Meanwhile, at the same time Marie Antoinette was secretly lobbying moderate republicans in the Assembly for a constitutional monarchy, she was also writing to European rulers that the "monstreuse" constitution was "a tissue of unworkable absurdities" and the Assembly "a heap of blackguards, madmen and beasts." Although Louis privately detested the constitution, on September 14, 1791, he took an oath to uphold it, agreeing to share power with the elected Legislative Assembly.
In Stockholm, Fersen had persuaded the Swedish king to back a new escape attempt. In February 1792, the daring count—by now branded an outlaw for his role in the flight to Varennes—snuck into the heavily guarded palace and spent some 30 hours with the queen. Toward the end of his visit, Louis showed up and rejected Fersen's scheme for escape through Normandy. Around midnight of Fersen's second day, Marie Antoinette bade him farewell—for the last time.
In April, under pressure from the Assembly, Louis declared war on Austria, which was preparing to invade France to restore Alsace (occupied by the French) and obtain full liberty for the royal family. Rightly suspecting that the king and queen were plotting with the enemy, an armed mob stormed the Tuileries on August 10, killing more than a thousand guards and noblemen. Louis and his family fled on foot through a courtyard to the nearby Assembly building, where they begged the representatives for protection.
The Assembly, however, voted to have the king, queen, their son and daughter, and the king's sister Elisabeth locked up in the Temple tower, a forbidding medieval fortress in the center of Paris. On September 20, the new revolutionary National Convention, the successor to the Assembly, met for the first time. The following day they abolished the 1,000-year-old monarchy and established the Republic.
For the former royal family, now prisoners in the Temple tower, the next two months passed improbably in something like domestic tranquility. While the king schooled his 7-year-old son, Louis Charles, in the dramas of Corneille and Racine, the queen gave Marie Thérèse, 13, history lessons, played chess with her husband, did needlework and even sang at the harpsichord. Then, on November 20, Louis' letters to foreign powers plotting counterrevolution were discovered in a strongbox hidden in the Tuileries. Louis was taken from his family, locked up on the floor below them and, on December 26, put on trial. Maximilien Robespierre, a chief architect of the Revolution, and the fiery journalist Jean-Paul Marat were among the many radical leaders who testified against him during a three-week trial. "It is with regret that I pronounce the fatal truth," proclaimed Robespierre, "Louis must die, so that the country may live." After a unanimous vote by members of the Convention (with a few abstentions) that Louis had conspired against the state, members of the more moderate revolutionary faction argued that the former king should be confined until the end of the war with Austria, then sent into exile. Even English philosopher Thomas Paine, elected to the Convention as a hero of the American Revolution, pleaded for the royal family to be banished to America. But it was not to be. Louis, 38, was condemned to death on January 16, 1793. He was allowed to spend a few hours with his wife, son, daughter and sister before being led to the guillotine on January 21 and executed before a crowd estimated at 20,000.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (39)
+ View All Comments
Regarding the numerous history sites, books, and other media about what Truly happened during Louie and Marie Antoinette's reign, I could never find a website that truly concurred with another expedition of that part of French History. The fact is that, no one truly knew what happened because its possible that what the "boucher's a la rein" notations of that time in the monarchy were most likely destroyed, in the storming of the Palace of Versailles. Personally, I don't really know what to believe. Marie Antoinette I do believe had a very mother-like disposition, including the peasant boy that she took in, which made her, in my eyes a very tender-heated person. However, still nothing is said about the conflicting history of whether Gabrielle De Polingac was there in Versailles to begin with or, in the Movie "Les Adeaux a la Rein", where they depicted Marie Antoinette to have created the Duke and Duchess of Polingac, with the royal fortune, because she desired Gabrielle in a more intimate way. And this time in french history is appealing to me, because it is one of the biggest controversies in Human History. I do believe that Louie Catorze and Marie Antoinette had some to do with the deficit, but the rest were the Wars, the Revolutions, and the rest of the Royalties expenses a Versailles at the time. (And the rest of the residents of Versailles weren't exactly cheap to maintain. Most of them fled when it happened.) All of these things conflict with each other. Its a sad story, that M&L bore the brunt of the hatred that in my opinion was less than 10-15% their fault. They both cut their expenses to ease the rest of the french people's pain. Id like to go there one day and form my own opinion about it though. Though i do commend and give kudos to this websites view on M&L, it had a lot of things that were never mentioned about it.
Posted by Wayne Zaccgnini on June 7,2013 | 02:12 PM
@Debrah: That is why we need a constitutional monarchy.
Posted by TheMonarchist on January 13,2013 | 08:20 PM
What a sad story... I like to read history and I find it awkward but logical how when reading about the death of a million people, it feels like just another statistic, but when reading a biography, it just feels so saddening
Posted by hasan on December 26,2012 | 02:41 PM
This was always the danger of an absolute monarchy. An accident of birth is not a reason to place someone on the throne, especially someone as young as Louis XVI was when he became Dauphin. He was obviously not suited to rule, nor was he suited to be husband to anyone, especially not Marie Antoinette. Revolutions are always inevitable when rulers make life difficult for their citizens. Another danger is a monarch's ability to snuff out a person's life, simply because they've fallen out of favor. Henry VIII had a wandering eye, choosing a prospective new bride solely on appearance without knowing their character. He had two of his wives beheaded. The French Revolution beheaded their monarchs,Louis and Marie. The Russian Revolution brought about the murders of Czar Nicholas, his entire family and servants who happened to be incarcerated with them. I am happy not to live in those times when people felt vindicated upon the death of former rulers.
Posted by Debrah on December 4,2012 | 12:26 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
Truly a good read condensing such a long history into into a quick understandable summary. I'm going to bookmark this site for my history cravings. Thanks!
Posted by linda pagan on November 25,2012 | 02:56 PM
I'm gonna be Marie Antoinette for Halloween
Posted by on October 9,2012 | 04:40 PM
Interesting to find out a bit more about MA. She had such a lovely name. I suspect that she had no way of knowing how to be a queen and did what she wanted like a spoilt child. I think she would have given more to her people if she had of seen the states fo their environments etc. Thank you for more insight as I just watched the movie and wanted to know more.
Posted by Tania on June 8,2012 | 12:26 AM
LOUIS XVI WAS NOT A GOOD LEADER COZ HE WAS SAYING THAT PEASENTS TO DO ALL THE WORK AND TO PAY MORE TAXES
Posted by DINEO on May 7,2012 | 10:36 AM
I personaly, was so profoundly touched by the sureality and confoundedness of the plyte thrusted upon the heads of two children so young,and without a clue as to what was about to be asked of them as children makeing grownup decisions,in what had to seem to them to be all a make belive world.Only to discover in inocients the power that they pocessed over an entire country with only a childs imgination to rule it.This artical was so perfectly and informatively written,and gave such insight to the true facts,that it did away with fictitious asuptions that I may have had. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PS I don't belive the Louise accussed his mother and aunt.
Posted by Robert L Welch Jr on January 18,2012 | 04:30 PM
@Christy....to view the sketch hit 'more photos'next to the painting of Marie Antoinette. This was a very informative, interesting and well written article. Thank you.
Posted by eva on June 22,2011 | 02:18 AM
It is worth correcting that her son was manipulated into making up the sexual abuse charge,not because he got caught masturbating,I believe he was 8 maybe 10 oldest at this time,it is Louis XVII we are talking about,he was turned over to Simone an illiterate man working under Jacques Hebert a journalist/revolutionary of the time,who manipulated little Louis into hating his parents and,Marie Antoniette wrote to her sister in law Princess Elisabeth when she was about to be executed to apologize on Louis XVII's behalf,for the horrible accusations made by him,but again manipulated into doing so.the idea that he was caught masturbating is utterly false and must be removed from this otherwise fine article.
Posted by Juan on June 21,2011 | 12:33 AM
What I never realised is that Napolean and Marie Antoinette were in such a close timeframe.
This is an extremely well written story, which offers more facts than I've been able to find anywhere else.
Keep up the good work.
Posted by Margo Somboon on June 18,2011 | 10:50 AM
+ View All Comments