Marie Antoinette
The teenage queen, now the subject of a new movie, was embraced by France in 1770. Twenty-three years later, she lost her head to the guillotine. (But she never said, "Let them eat cake")
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 5)
In one salon is the exquisite harp Marie Antoinette played well enough to accompany Antonio Salieri, the Hapsburg court composer and Mozart rival she invited to visit. In an adjoining room, Baulez shows me the infamous pale blue boudoir with mirrored interior shutters that the queen could raise and lower at will. "People imagined mirrors surrounding a bed for secret trysts," he says, "but she was just trying to keep curious passersby from peering inside." Whatever trysts there were did not include Louis, who spent not a single night at the Petit Trianon, although he did occasionally pop by to read to himself in a little rowboat.
Fersen was the more frequent guest. The queen went so far as to furnish an apartment above hers for him. By October 1787, they were exchanging clandestine letters about such prosaic domestic details as where to put a stove. Unraveling the details of their relationship has kept biographers guessing for more than 200 years, largely because Fersen destroyed substantial portions of his journal and a great-nephew to whom his letters were entrusted censored some and suppressed others. "I can tell you that I love you," Marie Antoinette declared in one letter back to him.
They had met at a Paris opera ball in January 1774, when Fersen, the 18-year-old son of a wealthy Swedish nobleman, was making the grand tour. The young queen invited him to several balls at Versailles, but not long after, he left for England. Four years later he returned to the French court as a young military officer and, according to Comte Francois Emmanuel de Saint-Priest—Louis' future minister of the interior—"captured the queen's heart." In early 1779, Fersen signed on to fight on behalf of France in the American Revolution, in part perhaps to escape the queen's growing infatuation. When he returned to Versailles four years later, in June 1783, he wrote to his sister, swearing off marriage because: "I cannot belong to the only person to whom I want to belong, the one who really loves me, and so I do not want to belong to anyone." That summer, he visited Marie Antoinette nearly every day.
By now the 27-year-old queen—mother of a 4 1/2-year-old daughter, Marie Thérèse Charlotte,and a son, the Dauphin Louis Joseph Xavier, nearly 2—had blossomed into a full-figured beauty, with luminous eyes and a demeanor some saw as dignified, others as haughty. As a young princess, she had burst into tears when Mercy had pressured her to get involved in politics; now she scolded the French foreign minister for excluding Joseph II from the peace process with England, though to little effect.
Some two years later, around the time her second son, Louis Charles, was born, Marie Antoinette became the victim of one of the most byzantine swindles in history. A fortune hunter named Jeanne de Lamotte Valois persuaded the gullible Cardinal de Rohan that she was a close friend of the queen's—though Marie Antoinette had never heard of her. Lamotte's lover, Rétaux de Villette, forged letters purportedly from the queen imploring the cardinal to buy a necklace of 647 diamonds costing 1.5 million francs ($4.7 million today). Writing as the queen, de Villette said "she" was too embarrassed to ask Louis for so expensive a present and was relying on the gallant cardinal to obtain it for her. The queen would, of course, repay him.
After a clandestine meeting in the palace gardens with a woman hired by Lamotte to impersonate the queen, Rohan was hooked. When jewelers delivered the necklace to the cardinal, he gave it to Rétaux, disguised as the queen's footman. Lamotte's husband then smuggled it to London to be sold off in pieces. When the jewelers demanded payment in August 1785, Marie Antoinette was livid with rage and Louis ordered Rohan arrested.
The subsequent trial caused a sensation. The Paris Parliament defied the king's command to convict the duped cardinal and acquitted him. Lamotte was flogged, branded on her breast with a V for voleuse (thief) and tossed into prison. And though Marie Antoinette was not on trial, she might as well have been. "The queen was innocent," Napoleon observed years later, "and, to make sure that her innocence should be publicly recognized, she chose the Parliament of Paris for her judge. The upshot was that she was universally regarded as guilty."
The affair of the necklace provided further fodder for scandal-mongering pamphleteers and journalists already intent on portraying the queen as greedy and corrupt. From then on, she could do no right. Her embarrassment made Louis more vulnerable than ever. Beset by severe food shortages, weighed down by taxes, resentful of royal absolutism and inspired by the egalitarian example of an independent United States, French citizens were growing increasingly vocal in their demands for self-government. In May 1789, to avert the nation's impending bankruptcy (a series of wars, years of corruption and Louis' support of the American Revolution as a means of weakening England had depleted the French treasury), the king convened the Estates-General, an assembly of representatives of the clergy, nobility and commoners that had not met since 1614. As Marie Antoinette's carriage wound from the palace through the streets of Versailles to welcome the gathering, crowds along the way stood in sullen silence. In a sermon at the town's Church of Saint Louis, the Bishop of Nancy railed against the queen's profligate spending. (Dubbed Madame Deficit, the queen was increasingly blamed for the country's desperate financial situation, although she had in fact already cut back on personal expenses.) At the time of the Bishop's sermon, however, the 33-year-old mother was consumed with anxiety over her older son, the gravely ill Dauphin. Within a month, the 7-year-old prince would be dead of tuberculosis of the spine.
Historians trace the French Revolution to that summer of 1789. On July 14, some 900 Parisian workers, shopkeepers and peasants—fearing that the king, who at the queen's urging had moved a large number of troops to Versailles and Paris, would dissolve the representative National Assembly—stormed the Bastille prison to seize arms and ammunition. Marie Antoinette tried to convince her husband to put down the insurrection, but not wanting to provoke an all-out conflict, he refused, effectively ceding Paris to the revolutionaries. Comte Honoré de Mirabeau, leader of the increasingly anti-monarchist National Assembly, observed that the queen had become "the only man at court." In the weeks that followed, the Assembly did away with age-old privileges for the aristocracy and clergy, declared a free press, got rid of serfdom and proclaimed the Rights of Man.
A little before noon on October 5, a mob of several thousand market women, armed with pikes and sickles, set out from Paris' Hôtel de Ville (City Hall) on a 12-mile trek to Versailles to protest a lack of jobs and the high cost of bread. By evening, thousands more, some carrying guns, had joined them in front of the palace. After dithering over what to do, Louis finally decided to seek refuge in the distant Rambouillet château. But when his coachmen rolled out the royal carriages, the crowd cut the horses' harnesses, stranding him and his family.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (38)
+ View All Comments
@Debrah: That is why we need a constitutional monarchy.
Posted by TheMonarchist on January 13,2013 | 08:20 PM
What a sad story... I like to read history and I find it awkward but logical how when reading about the death of a million people, it feels like just another statistic, but when reading a biography, it just feels so saddening
Posted by hasan on December 26,2012 | 02:41 PM
This was always the danger of an absolute monarchy. An accident of birth is not a reason to place someone on the throne, especially someone as young as Louis XVI was when he became Dauphin. He was obviously not suited to rule, nor was he suited to be husband to anyone, especially not Marie Antoinette. Revolutions are always inevitable when rulers make life difficult for their citizens. Another danger is a monarch's ability to snuff out a person's life, simply because they've fallen out of favor. Henry VIII had a wandering eye, choosing a prospective new bride solely on appearance without knowing their character. He had two of his wives beheaded. The French Revolution beheaded their monarchs,Louis and Marie. The Russian Revolution brought about the murders of Czar Nicholas, his entire family and servants who happened to be incarcerated with them. I am happy not to live in those times when people felt vindicated upon the death of former rulers.
Posted by Debrah on December 4,2012 | 12:26 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
Truly a good read condensing such a long history into into a quick understandable summary. I'm going to bookmark this site for my history cravings. Thanks!
Posted by linda pagan on November 25,2012 | 02:56 PM
I'm gonna be Marie Antoinette for Halloween
Posted by on October 9,2012 | 04:40 PM
Interesting to find out a bit more about MA. She had such a lovely name. I suspect that she had no way of knowing how to be a queen and did what she wanted like a spoilt child. I think she would have given more to her people if she had of seen the states fo their environments etc. Thank you for more insight as I just watched the movie and wanted to know more.
Posted by Tania on June 8,2012 | 12:26 AM
LOUIS XVI WAS NOT A GOOD LEADER COZ HE WAS SAYING THAT PEASENTS TO DO ALL THE WORK AND TO PAY MORE TAXES
Posted by DINEO on May 7,2012 | 10:36 AM
I personaly, was so profoundly touched by the sureality and confoundedness of the plyte thrusted upon the heads of two children so young,and without a clue as to what was about to be asked of them as children makeing grownup decisions,in what had to seem to them to be all a make belive world.Only to discover in inocients the power that they pocessed over an entire country with only a childs imgination to rule it.This artical was so perfectly and informatively written,and gave such insight to the true facts,that it did away with fictitious asuptions that I may have had. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PS I don't belive the Louise accussed his mother and aunt.
Posted by Robert L Welch Jr on January 18,2012 | 04:30 PM
@Christy....to view the sketch hit 'more photos'next to the painting of Marie Antoinette. This was a very informative, interesting and well written article. Thank you.
Posted by eva on June 22,2011 | 02:18 AM
It is worth correcting that her son was manipulated into making up the sexual abuse charge,not because he got caught masturbating,I believe he was 8 maybe 10 oldest at this time,it is Louis XVII we are talking about,he was turned over to Simone an illiterate man working under Jacques Hebert a journalist/revolutionary of the time,who manipulated little Louis into hating his parents and,Marie Antoniette wrote to her sister in law Princess Elisabeth when she was about to be executed to apologize on Louis XVII's behalf,for the horrible accusations made by him,but again manipulated into doing so.the idea that he was caught masturbating is utterly false and must be removed from this otherwise fine article.
Posted by Juan on June 21,2011 | 12:33 AM
What I never realised is that Napolean and Marie Antoinette were in such a close timeframe.
This is an extremely well written story, which offers more facts than I've been able to find anywhere else.
Keep up the good work.
Posted by Margo Somboon on June 18,2011 | 10:50 AM
I JUST SAW THE MOVIE ON CABLE, THANK'S FOR THIS ARTICLE IT GAVE ME MORE INSITE ON WHAT ELSE HAPPENED.
Posted by Belinda Gamble on March 13,2011 | 08:46 PM
+ View All Comments