Boar War
A marauding hog bites the dust in a border dispute between the United States and Britain that fails to turn ugly
- By Deborah Franklin
- Smithsonian magazine, June 2005, Subscribe
In a classroom on San Juan Island, Washington, across the HaroStrait from Victoria, Canada, a man in uniform was showing 26 fifth graders how to load a rifle. “It looks old, but it’s a weapon of modern warfare, mass-produced in a factory in Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in the mid-19th century,” said Michael Vouri, a National Park Service ranger at San Juan Island National Historical Park. “It fires .58-caliber bullets—huge lead balls—and was designed specifically to hurt and kill people. It can hit a man from five football fields away, and when it strikes bone, the bone splinters in every direction.” Silent and saucereyed, the kids craned for a better look.
Vouri lowered the rifle and held it out for closer inspection. “This is the sort of gun that almost started a war, right here on this island, between the United States and England, in 1859,” he said.
So began another of Vouri’s retellings of the boundary dispute between the United States and Britain that threatened to pitch the two nations into their third bloody conflict in less than 100 years. Few people outside of San JuanIsland have ever heard of the Pig War—whose peaceful outcome makes it an all-too-rare example of nonviolent conflict resolution—though in 1966 the U.S. government created the San Juan Island National Historical Park to commemorate it. Vouri, a Vietnam veteran who wrote a book about the standoff, believes it holds lessons for today.
By 1859, forty-five years after the inconclusive settlement of the War of 1812, the United States and Great Britain had developed an uneasy entente. The “Anglo-American Convention” of 1818 had solidified England’s control over the eastern half of what we know today as Canada, and citizens from each nation were moving ever west across the North American continent. The convention also established the border between the United States and Britain along the 49th parallel from the Lake of the Woods, bordering what is now Minnesota, west to the Rocky Mountains. Under its terms, the two countries would jointly administer the so-called Oregon Country northwest of the Rockies for ten years. In theory, unless either nation could decisively show that it had settled the region, the treaty would be renewed.
But renewal always seemed unlikely. To the thousands of Yankee settlers and fortune seekers who poured into the Oregon Territory during the mid-19th century, this half-million-square-mile swath of land—comprising today’s Oregon, Washington, Idaho and parts of Montana, Wyoming and British Columbia—represented a promised land. The same was true for English merchants, who craved the region’s deep ports and navigable rivers as lucrative highways for trade.
For decades, the Hudson’s Bay Company, a private furtrading corporation that functioned as England’s surrogate government in the territory, had lobbied for a border that would keep the Columbia River—a crucial pipeline for pelts—in English hands. But by the 1840s, British trappers found themselves vastly outnumbered. The U.S. population had swollen from more than 5 million in 1800 to 23 million by mid-century, and a heady sense of Manifest Destiny continued to drive farmers west. “In 1840 there were 150 Americans in all of Oregon Country,” says University of Washington historian John Findlay. “By 1845 that number had jumped to 5,000, and Americans were feeling their oats.”
Tensions had peaked in 1844 when under the slogan “Fifty-four forty or fight,” Democratic presidential candidate James Polk promised to push the U.S. border almost 1,000 miles north to 40 minutes above the 54th parallel, all the way to Russia’s territory of Alaska.
But Polk, who went on to beat Kentucky Whig Henry Clay for the presidency, sent the U.S. military not north but south in 1846, into a two-year war with Mexico. That conflict ultimately expanded the United States’ southern border to include Texas, California and most of New Mexico, and it stretched the frontier army almost to the breaking point. Another war on another front hardly seemed possible. “Polk wasn’t stupid,” says Scott Kaufman, author of The Pig War: The United States, Britain, and the Balance of Power in the Pacific Northwest, 1846-72. “He wanted territory—no question. But he wasn’t prepared to go to war with Britain about it.”
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (13)
well my comment is/it is is like a question that what was the problem with a british troops for burning the boar farm and even in their camp they are not feeding the boar women and choildren and what was thier consquen that the international law given to the british?
Posted by koang peter on August 6,2011 | 12:14 PM
I am wondering what the war was about. Was it all about slave labour and segregation? cheers.
Posted by Jimmy on May 31,2011 | 05:27 PM
i want to know if the was any mgedvule soko who was a traditiona healer durin the boar english war?
Posted by nokwanda on March 8,2010 | 04:34 AM
Re Harold Percy Bennett born 20 july 1881 in Mylor ,cornwall england.Elizabeth Tess He was my great uncle.He served and was a survivor HMS Amphion which inflicted the first german ship loss and was herself the first casualty of the british fleet in ww1.She struck a mine and sank 32hrs after war was declared with germany.
There is a three page report and pictures on the internet.
I was pleased to find your information on here.Uhru for now.Thanks Tess for the australian bit and here was me thinking I was the first bennett to migrate here...bummer!
Posted by cyril alexander bennett on May 26,2009 | 11:34 PM
The pig belonged to the Hudson's Bay Company, according to Charles Griffin's journal (entry dated June 15) and depositions taken in Whatcom County Superior Court (September 1859).
Posted by Mike Vouri on May 15,2009 | 06:36 PM
Elizabeth, I found Harold percy bennett in the national Archives of Australia. I knew one of them went there. he also had a son there as well. he joined the Australian Imperial Force September 29th 1915. I am sure there are still relatives alive there. Tess Cawley tesscawley@telkomsa.net
Posted by tess cawley on February 12,2009 | 04:00 PM
Re Harold Percy Bennett, born 20.7.1881, siblings were Cyril Victor b 1887, Arthur Sydney b 1878, Helen Benedicta 1873 - 1960, Ernest Peace b 1870, Reace b 1868, Walter W b 1866, Alonso A b 1864, Alfred b 1863, Alphonso b 1862. Parents Alice Julia (nee Jennings) and John Bennett b 1813. I was adopted into the above family. If this is the right "Harold Percy Bennett" I think this is the right family, as some of what you say rings a bell from my childhood. I am in Cape Town and maybe I can help. tesscawley@telkomsa.net
Posted by Tess Cawley on February 12,2009 | 03:16 PM
I am researching my Grandfather, Harold Percy Bennett, born 20.7.1881. He was a chief Petty Officer in the Royal Navy but obviously might have had promotion later in his career. He was in the Boar War and I would like to know which ship he wasw on/or names of the ships involved. I know H,M,S,Venables did go to S.Africa but how can I find the ship my grandfather was on please. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks.
Posted by elizabeth Lean on October 21,2008 | 06:13 PM
My grand father was said to have spent the Boar War distiling water with the ships boiler of the coast of Afeica. He was an engineer James Cook 1870-1937 Any information please?
Posted by B COOK on October 21,2008 | 05:35 AM
I have a pipe from the boar war, it is a Sherlock Holmes style and has a small coin attached at the front.It is made of wood and bears the inscription From G B to J B 1900-1901. Could you give me any information on this as I am unable to find any references to this particular pipe. Thanks.
Posted by Audrey on October 4,2008 | 12:30 PM
This conflict is known locally as "The Pig War," not "The Boar War." While Vouri's book and some other versions report that the pig belonged to Cutlar, other sources (including a soldier's journal, which I have read), say that the pig was owned by a man named Sawyer, who left the island, and that, as Sawyer had disappeared, Cutlar was convinced to claim the pig was his in a later, official complaint.
Posted by Heidi on August 15,2008 | 06:23 AM
What was the date the Boar war started and when did it finish ?
Posted by Paul on August 7,2008 | 06:54 PM
I am trying to find out the name of the hat British Soldiers wore as part of their uniform during the Boar War
Posted by elisabeth gardner on June 21,2008 | 09:39 PM