Marie Antoinette
The teenage queen, now the subject of a new movie, was embraced by France in 1770. Twenty-three years later, she lost her head to the guillotine. (But she never said, "Let them eat cake")
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 5)
In one salon is the exquisite harp Marie Antoinette played well enough to accompany Antonio Salieri, the Hapsburg court composer and Mozart rival she invited to visit. In an adjoining room, Baulez shows me the infamous pale blue boudoir with mirrored interior shutters that the queen could raise and lower at will. "People imagined mirrors surrounding a bed for secret trysts," he says, "but she was just trying to keep curious passersby from peering inside." Whatever trysts there were did not include Louis, who spent not a single night at the Petit Trianon, although he did occasionally pop by to read to himself in a little rowboat.
Fersen was the more frequent guest. The queen went so far as to furnish an apartment above hers for him. By October 1787, they were exchanging clandestine letters about such prosaic domestic details as where to put a stove. Unraveling the details of their relationship has kept biographers guessing for more than 200 years, largely because Fersen destroyed substantial portions of his journal and a great-nephew to whom his letters were entrusted censored some and suppressed others. "I can tell you that I love you," Marie Antoinette declared in one letter back to him.
They had met at a Paris opera ball in January 1774, when Fersen, the 18-year-old son of a wealthy Swedish nobleman, was making the grand tour. The young queen invited him to several balls at Versailles, but not long after, he left for England. Four years later he returned to the French court as a young military officer and, according to Comte Francois Emmanuel de Saint-Priest—Louis' future minister of the interior—"captured the queen's heart." In early 1779, Fersen signed on to fight on behalf of France in the American Revolution, in part perhaps to escape the queen's growing infatuation. When he returned to Versailles four years later, in June 1783, he wrote to his sister, swearing off marriage because: "I cannot belong to the only person to whom I want to belong, the one who really loves me, and so I do not want to belong to anyone." That summer, he visited Marie Antoinette nearly every day.
By now the 27-year-old queen—mother of a 4 1/2-year-old daughter, Marie Thérèse Charlotte,and a son, the Dauphin Louis Joseph Xavier, nearly 2—had blossomed into a full-figured beauty, with luminous eyes and a demeanor some saw as dignified, others as haughty. As a young princess, she had burst into tears when Mercy had pressured her to get involved in politics; now she scolded the French foreign minister for excluding Joseph II from the peace process with England, though to little effect.
Some two years later, around the time her second son, Louis Charles, was born, Marie Antoinette became the victim of one of the most byzantine swindles in history. A fortune hunter named Jeanne de Lamotte Valois persuaded the gullible Cardinal de Rohan that she was a close friend of the queen's—though Marie Antoinette had never heard of her. Lamotte's lover, Rétaux de Villette, forged letters purportedly from the queen imploring the cardinal to buy a necklace of 647 diamonds costing 1.5 million francs ($4.7 million today). Writing as the queen, de Villette said "she" was too embarrassed to ask Louis for so expensive a present and was relying on the gallant cardinal to obtain it for her. The queen would, of course, repay him.
After a clandestine meeting in the palace gardens with a woman hired by Lamotte to impersonate the queen, Rohan was hooked. When jewelers delivered the necklace to the cardinal, he gave it to Rétaux, disguised as the queen's footman. Lamotte's husband then smuggled it to London to be sold off in pieces. When the jewelers demanded payment in August 1785, Marie Antoinette was livid with rage and Louis ordered Rohan arrested.
The subsequent trial caused a sensation. The Paris Parliament defied the king's command to convict the duped cardinal and acquitted him. Lamotte was flogged, branded on her breast with a V for voleuse (thief) and tossed into prison. And though Marie Antoinette was not on trial, she might as well have been. "The queen was innocent," Napoleon observed years later, "and, to make sure that her innocence should be publicly recognized, she chose the Parliament of Paris for her judge. The upshot was that she was universally regarded as guilty."
The affair of the necklace provided further fodder for scandal-mongering pamphleteers and journalists already intent on portraying the queen as greedy and corrupt. From then on, she could do no right. Her embarrassment made Louis more vulnerable than ever. Beset by severe food shortages, weighed down by taxes, resentful of royal absolutism and inspired by the egalitarian example of an independent United States, French citizens were growing increasingly vocal in their demands for self-government. In May 1789, to avert the nation's impending bankruptcy (a series of wars, years of corruption and Louis' support of the American Revolution as a means of weakening England had depleted the French treasury), the king convened the Estates-General, an assembly of representatives of the clergy, nobility and commoners that had not met since 1614. As Marie Antoinette's carriage wound from the palace through the streets of Versailles to welcome the gathering, crowds along the way stood in sullen silence. In a sermon at the town's Church of Saint Louis, the Bishop of Nancy railed against the queen's profligate spending. (Dubbed Madame Deficit, the queen was increasingly blamed for the country's desperate financial situation, although she had in fact already cut back on personal expenses.) At the time of the Bishop's sermon, however, the 33-year-old mother was consumed with anxiety over her older son, the gravely ill Dauphin. Within a month, the 7-year-old prince would be dead of tuberculosis of the spine.
Historians trace the French Revolution to that summer of 1789. On July 14, some 900 Parisian workers, shopkeepers and peasants—fearing that the king, who at the queen's urging had moved a large number of troops to Versailles and Paris, would dissolve the representative National Assembly—stormed the Bastille prison to seize arms and ammunition. Marie Antoinette tried to convince her husband to put down the insurrection, but not wanting to provoke an all-out conflict, he refused, effectively ceding Paris to the revolutionaries. Comte Honoré de Mirabeau, leader of the increasingly anti-monarchist National Assembly, observed that the queen had become "the only man at court." In the weeks that followed, the Assembly did away with age-old privileges for the aristocracy and clergy, declared a free press, got rid of serfdom and proclaimed the Rights of Man.
A little before noon on October 5, a mob of several thousand market women, armed with pikes and sickles, set out from Paris' Hôtel de Ville (City Hall) on a 12-mile trek to Versailles to protest a lack of jobs and the high cost of bread. By evening, thousands more, some carrying guns, had joined them in front of the palace. After dithering over what to do, Louis finally decided to seek refuge in the distant Rambouillet château. But when his coachmen rolled out the royal carriages, the crowd cut the horses' harnesses, stranding him and his family.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (38)
@Debrah: That is why we need a constitutional monarchy.
Posted by TheMonarchist on January 13,2013 | 08:20 PM
What a sad story... I like to read history and I find it awkward but logical how when reading about the death of a million people, it feels like just another statistic, but when reading a biography, it just feels so saddening
Posted by hasan on December 26,2012 | 02:41 PM
This was always the danger of an absolute monarchy. An accident of birth is not a reason to place someone on the throne, especially someone as young as Louis XVI was when he became Dauphin. He was obviously not suited to rule, nor was he suited to be husband to anyone, especially not Marie Antoinette. Revolutions are always inevitable when rulers make life difficult for their citizens. Another danger is a monarch's ability to snuff out a person's life, simply because they've fallen out of favor. Henry VIII had a wandering eye, choosing a prospective new bride solely on appearance without knowing their character. He had two of his wives beheaded. The French Revolution beheaded their monarchs,Louis and Marie. The Russian Revolution brought about the murders of Czar Nicholas, his entire family and servants who happened to be incarcerated with them. I am happy not to live in those times when people felt vindicated upon the death of former rulers.
Posted by Debrah on December 4,2012 | 12:26 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
this is an awesome site to look up information for marie antoinette and I love this site to look up information on her.
Posted by sabrina62798 on December 3,2012 | 09:13 AM
Truly a good read condensing such a long history into into a quick understandable summary. I'm going to bookmark this site for my history cravings. Thanks!
Posted by linda pagan on November 25,2012 | 02:56 PM
I'm gonna be Marie Antoinette for Halloween
Posted by on October 9,2012 | 04:40 PM
Interesting to find out a bit more about MA. She had such a lovely name. I suspect that she had no way of knowing how to be a queen and did what she wanted like a spoilt child. I think she would have given more to her people if she had of seen the states fo their environments etc. Thank you for more insight as I just watched the movie and wanted to know more.
Posted by Tania on June 8,2012 | 12:26 AM
LOUIS XVI WAS NOT A GOOD LEADER COZ HE WAS SAYING THAT PEASENTS TO DO ALL THE WORK AND TO PAY MORE TAXES
Posted by DINEO on May 7,2012 | 10:36 AM
I personaly, was so profoundly touched by the sureality and confoundedness of the plyte thrusted upon the heads of two children so young,and without a clue as to what was about to be asked of them as children makeing grownup decisions,in what had to seem to them to be all a make belive world.Only to discover in inocients the power that they pocessed over an entire country with only a childs imgination to rule it.This artical was so perfectly and informatively written,and gave such insight to the true facts,that it did away with fictitious asuptions that I may have had. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PS I don't belive the Louise accussed his mother and aunt.
Posted by Robert L Welch Jr on January 18,2012 | 04:30 PM
@Christy....to view the sketch hit 'more photos'next to the painting of Marie Antoinette. This was a very informative, interesting and well written article. Thank you.
Posted by eva on June 22,2011 | 02:18 AM
It is worth correcting that her son was manipulated into making up the sexual abuse charge,not because he got caught masturbating,I believe he was 8 maybe 10 oldest at this time,it is Louis XVII we are talking about,he was turned over to Simone an illiterate man working under Jacques Hebert a journalist/revolutionary of the time,who manipulated little Louis into hating his parents and,Marie Antoniette wrote to her sister in law Princess Elisabeth when she was about to be executed to apologize on Louis XVII's behalf,for the horrible accusations made by him,but again manipulated into doing so.the idea that he was caught masturbating is utterly false and must be removed from this otherwise fine article.
Posted by Juan on June 21,2011 | 12:33 AM
What I never realised is that Napolean and Marie Antoinette were in such a close timeframe.
This is an extremely well written story, which offers more facts than I've been able to find anywhere else.
Keep up the good work.
Posted by Margo Somboon on June 18,2011 | 10:50 AM
I JUST SAW THE MOVIE ON CABLE, THANK'S FOR THIS ARTICLE IT GAVE ME MORE INSITE ON WHAT ELSE HAPPENED.
Posted by Belinda Gamble on March 13,2011 | 08:46 PM
All though thier leadership was not perfect and many mistakes were made by them my heart goes out to the younge couple, could you imagine how thier ages effected thier wrong dicissions wich altimatly led to thier cruel fate.
Posted by Vivienne on October 14,2010 | 01:11 AM
Those poor children. Married at 14 and 15, chosen for a role to lead a country not by their merits, but by their birth. Spoiled, young, clueless kids, with tons of money in their control -- of course the spending got out of hand. Of course they at first were not even aware of the poverty in their country.
This was a great article, though it makes all the more clear that it's good we did away with this horrible, terrible system of leaders by blood.
While I sympathize with Marie and Louis, the revolutionaries did what they had to do to free their people.
Posted by Sammy on September 10,2010 | 02:38 AM
Where's the sketch? In the text, it said the sketch was below, but I never found it. Great article, very informative.
Posted by Kristy on January 22,2010 | 02:40 PM
Good website i like it :) :) :)
Posted by Olivia on December 7,2009 | 04:58 PM
Marie Antoinette's child did NOT make up the story, nor was he caught--well--as you write. The sick jailer made up the whole disgusting story as a plot to destroy MA. Even Robespierre was outraged when he heard the story. He knew well it would disgust the public, and very possibly win them over to MA.
We all reap what we sow and most everyone who had a direct hand in destroying the innocent royal family was dead within a year or so.
Posted by Margo Jurgensen on July 21,2009 | 05:20 PM
I really did enjoy this article I love reading about Marie Antoinette, I admire her greatly im also one of her last surviving relatives my family and I are former memebers of the Austrian Royal Family the Habsburgs until we were dethroned in 1921 and exiled to America. I always remember my Great Grandmother telling me the true story of Marie Antoientte and the events that lead up to the most pointless war in history. she was not a featherbrain, frivolous, cold hearted person she was kind and loving and had a very warm heart, and tried to help the plight of the poor on many occasion's especially in the winter of 1787. We have a painting hanging in our library of Marie Antoinette in her trianon garden painted be Madame Louise-Élisabeth Vigée-Lebrun in 1789 and every time I walk past it I can see her sense of fear and sadness in her eyes.......adeu adeu
Posted by Alexander on May 13,2009 | 06:00 PM
Thank you for the enlightening article! It really helped me get a better grasp on Marie Antoinette for my research paper. The style and format was functional and beautiful. Thank you!
Posted by Eliza on May 3,2009 | 08:02 PM
Thank you very mush sir. My research paper was much easier to do from your beautifully written research paper.
Posted by Mys noseln on April 27,2009 | 05:02 PM
I am currently doing a report on King Louis XVI. This article tries to shift the blame of bankrupting France off of Marie Antoinette. She bought thousands on dresses each year and she gambled and she spent like a couple million on that building for her intimate friends. If you ask me she had just about as much blame as Louis XV and XVI. Sure I think the death penalty was a bit much, but don't try to blame others for her misdeeds. I do however agree that this article will affect my project greatly for I now have a different view point to look at. Thank You.
Posted by Dani Sedina on April 25,2009 | 05:10 PM
I've always thought fondly of Marie Antoinette. Taking on so much responsibility at such a young age would be a burden to almost anyone. Not only that but she was forced to spend her life with someone she never even met until shortly before their wedding. Although her husband was content with her "arrangement" she was criticized for spending time with Fersen and for being in love with him. Blame was also placed on her for the country's economic issues although those started during Louis' grandfather's reign. This is article was very well put together and I really appreciate the fact that the author and the people who helped research this took the time to put this together. You've made a wonderful contribution to this magazine.
Posted by Emma Marie on March 25,2009 | 04:32 PM
I really enjoyed this article. I love reading about Marie Antoinette. I would've loved to have met her. It really bites how France pretty much hated her just because where she came from!!! France was enemies with Austria for centuries, and although her mother tried to end it by setting up her daughter with the then future king of france, they pretty much hated her from the get go, at least that's what i gathered from other things i've read, it just got worse over time, and no matter how hard she tried to please them, the french just hated her. it's sad that such a wonderful young woman had to end her life by the hands of a country who really never wanted her in the first place. I hope her soul is at rest as well as the souls of her family.
Posted by Felicia on January 11,2009 | 04:08 AM
shed alot of light on the subject. Very helpful to fellow essay writers who cant find good resourses. Thanks for writing it.
Posted by Samantha on January 8,2009 | 10:49 PM
Thank you for a great history lesson.
Posted by Petra on December 25,2008 | 04:02 PM
Excellent article. Thank you to writer who made it availabel to us, readers. Great job.
Posted by E Williams on November 2,2008 | 08:58 PM
Poor Marie Antionette and Louis XIV were murdered for the sins of the many who came before them...With your eloquent words she will hopefully be seen and recognized as a most tragic figure of history, and the scapegoat of ignorance...I applaud your wonderfully written article, which shed much needed light, on this remarkable young woman...Well done indeed!
Posted by Kerin Elizabeth Azaria O-Donnell-Michta on October 23,2008 | 07:40 AM
Thank You so much for such a well written and enjoyable article; it is one of the best I have read on this interesting woman. I appreciate all the time and effort and congratulate the author/authors.
Posted by LB on October 11,2008 | 11:05 AM
i have read many articles on her and i have to say i agree with every body
Posted by petra on September 29,2008 | 10:02 PM
Marie Antoinette has long been one of my favorite people to read about from history. Out of all I've ever read about her, I have to say this article by far has been one of the best written I've ever seen. Thank you for this article. I thoroughly enjoyed it!
Posted by SJ on August 17,2008 | 01:07 PM
fantastic good job
Posted by h.f. on July 2,2008 | 02:49 PM
I'm glad the article exists.
Posted by Mary N on June 23,2008 | 09:50 PM
Marie was so young and sheltered as queen having lived a life of luxury and plenty.For the people's discontent,she had to pay with her life .I have discovered some truly interesting facts on the teenage queen.
Posted by Leslie Thio on May 28,2008 | 09:30 AM
she was not mean at at all she was not even arrogoant but simple said and lonley
Posted by Dominque on April 15,2008 | 01:53 PM
This was very well researched and helped me get a better understanding of Marie. Thank you. M.S.
Posted by M.S. on March 27,2008 | 10:45 AM
This is a well researched and well considered look at the life and private world of Marie Antoinette. I really enjoyed it and I offer my thanks to those who must have worked hard to put it together.
Posted by Scott Smith on January 21,2008 | 04:40 PM