Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us
One hundred years after the ocean liner struck an iceberg and sank, the tragedy still looms large in the popular psyche
- By Andrew Wilson
- Illustration by Robert G. Lloyd
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2012, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 7)
When the film was released, on May 16, 1912, just a month after the sinking, it was celebrated for its technical realism and emotional power. “The startling story of the world’s greatest sea disaster is the sensation of the country,” stated the Moving Picture News. “Miss Dorothy Gibson, a heroine of the shipwreck and one of the most talked-of survivors, tells in this motion picture masterpiece of the enthralling tragedy among the icebergs.” (The actual film no longer survives.)
“The nation and the world had been profoundly grieved by the sinking of the Titanic,” she said, “and I had the opportunity to pay tribute to those who gave their lives on that awful night. That is all I tried to do.” In truth, the experience had left her feeling hollow, disassociated from her reality. Soon after the release of Saved from the Titanic, Dorothy walked out of her dressing room at the Fort Lee studios and turned her back on the movie business. She was, she stated, “dissatisfied.”
At some point during the summer or autumn of 1912—just as Brulatour was forming, with Carl Laemmle, the Universal Film Manufacturing Company, later to become Universal Pictures—Brulatour’s wife, Clara, finally decided to bring the farce that was her marriage to an end. After scandalous and protracted divorce proceedings, Gibson married Brulatour on July 6, 1917, in New York. It soon became obvious that whatever spark they had between them had been kept alive by the illicit nature of the relationship. The couple divorced in 1923.
Dorothy fled to Europe, where her mother had already settled. Ensconced in Paris, she had enough money from her alimony for everyday luxuries such as cocktails and champagne and entertained a wide range of bohemian friends including the writers Colette, H.G. Wells and James Joyce. “Oh my, what a time I am having!” she told a journalist in 1934. “I never cared much for motion pictures, you see, and I am too glad to be free of that work. I tell you it was an immense burden. I have had my share of troubles, as you know, but since coming to France, I have recovered from that and feel happy at last. Who could not be deliriously happy in this country? I have such fun. But I fear it cannot go on like this always. I have had my dream life, and am sure that someday a dark cloud will come and wash it all away!”
The shadow she feared would destroy her dream life was World War II. In May 1940, Dorothy was in Florence to collect her mother and bring her back to France when Germany invaded Holland and Belgium. It would still have been possible for the two women to return to America. The reason they didn’t? Certainly their experience on the Titanic was a factor. “I must say I never wanted to make the Ocean trip to America at this time,” said Dorothy later in an affidavit, “as my mother and I were most timid on the ocean—we had been in a shipwreck—but I also never wanted to stay in Italy, but we just waited in Italy always hoping things would be better to travel.”
Trying to make sense of Dorothy’s life from this point onward is a difficult task. In the spring of 1944, while still in Florence with her mother, she was informed by the questura, the Italian police, that she would be taken to the German-controlled Fossoli internment center. She tried to escape, but on April 16 was arrested and taken to a Nazi concentration camp. After being moved around various camps, she was imprisoned at San Vittore, which she described as a “living death.” It’s most likely that Gibson would have died in this camp had it not been for the machinations of a double agent, Ugo Luca Osteria, known as Dr. Ugo, who wanted to infiltrate Allied intelligence in Switzerland (something he subsequently failed to do). Gibson was smuggled out of the camp under the pretense that she was a Nazi sympathizer and spy. Although the plan worked—she did escape and crossed into Switzerland—the experience left her understandably drained. After interrogation in Zurich, where she gave an affidavit to James G. Bell, vice consul of the American consulate general, she was judged too stupid to have been a genuine spy. In Bell’s words, Dorothy “hardly seems bright enough to be useful in such capacity.”
Dorothy tried to resume a normal life after this episode, but the trauma of her survival—first the Titanic, then a concentration camp—took its toll. After the war ended in 1945, she returned to Paris and enjoyed a few months at the Ritz, where, on February 17, 1946, she died in her suite, probably from a heart attack, at age 56.
The sinking of the world’s most famous ship generated three waves of Titanic mania. The first, as we have seen, hit popular consciousness immediately after the disaster, resulting in Brulatour’s newsreel, Dorothy Gibson’s film Saved from the Titanic, a clutch of books written by survivors, poems like Edwin Drew’s “The Chief Incidents of the Titanic Wreck” (published in May 1912) and Thomas Hardy’s “The Convergence of the Twain” (June 1912), and a flurry of songs (112 different pieces of music inspired by the loss of the Titanic were copyrighted in America in 1912 alone).
The First World War, and then the Second quieted the Titanic storm; the loss of hundreds of thousands of men on the battlefields of Europe, the whole-scale destruction of cities and communities around the world, and Hitler’s single-minded plan to wipe out an entire race of people, together with other “undesirables,” placed the sinking of the ship, with its death toll of 1,500, toward the bottom end of the league of global tragedies.
The mid-1950s is generally considered to represent the second wave of Titanic fever. In the midst of the cold war—when there was a perceived threat that, at any moment, the world could end in nuclear Armageddon—the Titanic represented a containable, understandable tragedy. A mist of nostalgia hung over the disaster—nostalgia for a society that maintained fixed roles, in which each man and woman knew his or her place; for a certain gentility, or at least an imagined gentility, by which people behaved according to a strict set of rules; for a tragedy that gave its participants time to consider their fates.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (34)
Great pictures. One problem. In one of the pictures, the author of this article referred to Titanic as a cruise liner. For your information, Titanic was NOT a cruise liner. There is a difference between a cruise ship and an ocean liner.
Posted by Mike on August 29,2012 | 12:36 PM
Super interesting and real the Titanic*s story!!!
Posted by Maria Torres on July 26,2012 | 03:12 AM
Several years ago, a Canadian newspaper columnist noted another strange twist associated with the disaster: the sudden popularity of a Halifax grave bearing the name Jack Dawes, which coincides with that of the Cameron movie's hero. Apparently, he worked in the engine room and had nothing but his name in common with Leonardo di Caprio's rakish swain, but this did not stop processions of teenage girls dropping flowers, emotional notes and yes, lingerie beside the grave. It makes you wonder how much else in what we call history is really just some of us clinging to our myths. Regardless, thank you for a fine article.
Posted by R. Pritchard on April 29,2012 | 10:40 AM
I am a scriber until 2017. The above article I truly enjoyed. Printed this out for my pastor to read. If there is a charge for this you have my address. Thank you so much for your magazine, I learn so much from them. I am 81 years old and don't travel much anymore. The e-mail is my office address - I work at my church part-time. Thank you again. Patricia
Posted by Patricia Niedentohl on April 11,2012 | 08:53 AM
This was a very well written, interesting article, but I'm not sure it was titled appropriately. It never answers the question about WHY the Titanic fascinates us. It should have been titled The Titanic Still Fascinates Us.
Posted by Rhona on April 10,2012 | 05:58 PM
Passenger manifest records for 479 survivors of the Titanic disaster who arrived in the Port of New York via the Carpathia are in the Ellis Island database (e.g., Madeline Astor) – includes passenger names, place of residents, age and images of the original manifests. http://bit.ly/HlYySg
Posted by Suzanne Mannion on April 10,2012 | 01:37 PM
Wikipedia lists twenty-six ships sunk between 1943-45 which each had a death toll exceeding that of the "Titanic." This includes the MV Wilhelm Gustlof and MV Goya, with deaths tolls of 9,000 and 6,000 respectively. Yet I would bet you that not one person in a thousand who can identify the Titanic has ever heard of either the Gustlof or the Goya, or any of the other dozens of ships from this period with such terrible loss of life. So it cannot be the scale of the Titanic disaster alone which keeps it alive in memory. Loss of life in the Lusitania sinking rivals that of the Titanic, but how many books and movies have been made about the Lusitania? I suspect the relative anonymity of these other disastrous sinkings compared to the Titanic is largely due to the fact that the people who died aboard the Titanic died accidentally while those in all the other sinkings were deliberately killed in acts of war. Moreover, most of the dead were citizens of countries waging ruthless war against Britain and the United States. To consider all these other terrible deaths mean thinking about people dying not from a collision with an iceberg but from naval submarines deliberately firing torpedos at them.
Posted by Jack Olson on April 10,2012 | 09:22 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amounts of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amount of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
A UFA (Nazi) production called "Titanic," directed by Herbert Selpin, predates the melodramas which Andrew Wilson cites. It is available through Kino video. The original was briefly released in April 1943 but then banned by censors because the scenes of panic were too real for a civilian population subjected to Allied "Strategic" bombing. Apparently scenes were lifted by A Night To Remember. While its propaganda nature is blatant, it is the only film which has scenes of the commission's hearings on the disaster.
Posted by Jordan Auslander on March 19,2012 | 06:25 PM
Andrew Wilson's article is a fascinating addition to the lore of the Titanic. But the introductory caption is appalling. What is it about the deaths of 1500 people that you find "glorious"?
Posted by Mary Noll Nagase on March 15,2012 | 12:33 AM
The Titanic tragedy is only one more example of Man vs. Nature with the former often losing out. Hemingway's "Old Man & the Sea" underscored this. And so it was with the Tsunami in December 2004 while hundreds of thousands enjoyed coastal areas, the Fukushima reactors built near an unfortunate unstable vault line with totally inadequate wave breakers. Too many people around the globe are living dangerously too close to their coasts that are often subjected to Nature's wrath.
Mankind's messing with Nature often results with allegedly "unintended consequences" - just as New Orleans' defense measures were considered inadequate for decades by those living there and observing near total neglect to anticipate the hurricane that was sure to hit as it did in 1927.
As Prof. Pangloss in Voltaire's "Candide" consoled us with the idea that whatever happens is for the best and we should simply grow our own gardens. "Panglossian philosophy" is immortalized in both Webster and Oxford dictionaries.
Posted by Peter M. Lutterbeck, M.D. on March 12,2012 | 07:01 AM
While this article focused on the survivors of the Titanic sinking, the story of the people who did not survive and of the compassionate people of Halifax, Nova Scotia, captures my attention when I think of the disaster. Halifax had to deal with the aftermath of the disaster, retrieving the bodies, trying to identify them, and shipping the remains home. From the rows of tombstones for the unnamed in Halifax cemeteries, to the Maritime Museum's exhibits, I found this story far more poignant and interesting than that of the survivors.
Posted by Karen Morley on March 9,2012 | 09:31 AM
This was an interesting article, but I'm surprised that when mentioning the movies made about the tragedy there was no mention of the most famous survivor of them all - the Unsinkable Molly Brown! She was not a fictional character. She was very real, and the musical made of her story was very popular, both on Broadway and in movie form. I saw the movie with Debbie Reynolds when I was a young girl and it ignited a life long faccination with the story of the Titanic.
Posted by Joanne Babic on March 9,2012 | 05:35 AM
As a retired meteorologist, the Titanic fascinates me because it illustrates a new theory of climate change. It was going nearly full speed into a dense field of icebergs, near the end of a very cold decade; Niagara Falls froze over in 1911, and there are numerous pictures of people walking across on the ice. 1911 was the coldest year of the 20th Century. Why was the decade so cold? It was a period of minimum solar activity, manifested in a weak magnetic field. This allows high energy cosmic rays to enter our atmosphere, producing more cloud condensation nuclei, more clouds, and less heat from the sun. The connection is illustrated in a weblog by Mr. Nigel Calder at http://calderup.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/cosmic-rays-sank-the-titanic/ Recent experiments, both at CERN and in Denmark, confirm the cloud causation effect of cosmic rays. The current solar cycle is quite weak, and the next is forecast (by NASA) to be even weaker. We may be entering a cool phase of climate.
Posted by Richard C Savage on March 8,2012 | 05:38 PM
I had a friend who was on the Titanic. Her name was Eleanor Johnson-Shuman and she was two 1/2 years-old at the time. She was traveling with with her Mother, nanny (18 year-old Elin Braf) and her brother Fred (who was four year-old). She told me that her brother was dropped into "Collapsible D" by Elin from the deck of the ship just a few minutes before it went under (noting here that page 35 of the magazine shows Collapsible D but the story indicates that it's Lifeboat #7) making Fred the last person to board a lifeboat from the Titanic (see also PBS TV program www.DeathInAmerica.com). Eleanor was a great lady and I have fond memories of her making us chocolate chip cookies during a set up in her home for an interview on a Canadian TV show. Unfortunately her brother Fred didn't fare so well and had difficulties dealing with the trauma of the event for the rest of his life. Just before the premiere of the Titanic movie in Chicago, we introduced Eleanor to James Cameron who told us that although he'd visited the ship several times, she was the first actual survivor he'd ever met! She remembered being held by her mother in the boat (that's allgedly Eleanor's Mom with her back to the camera in Collapsible D) and it being cold but had to go from her mother's description for details of the event. Fred refused to publicly discuss it - ever.
Posted by J.R. Olivero on March 8,2012 | 02:45 PM
Nicely done, Mr. Wilson. Looking forward to your book. I've been fascinated by this tragedy since in grade school (late 1960s) when my brother borrowed Walter Lord's "A Night to Remember" from our library. The book jacket referenced the book, "Futility, or Wreck of the Titan" -- which, to some, accurately predicts the sinking. I've been captivated ever since.
Posted by Joe Michaels on March 7,2012 | 11:19 PM
I wonder why, after 100 years, Titanic still holds so much interest for us. There have been other shipwrecks that resulted in greater loss of life. The Sultana blew up after the American civil war killing about 1800. Perhaps because the media of the time claimed Titanic was "un-sinkable" (a claim the White Star line, Harland and Wollfe, and Mr. Andrews never made). It could be because of the class distinctions and the disproportionate number of survivors versus victims by class. Dr. Ballard was once quoted that he wished he had never revealed the location of Titanic. He saw it as grave site and didn't want it violated. A cable caught by one of his camera sleds By the way, his discovery of the wreck was an aside to his real mission of mapping the wreck of the submarines Thresher and Scorpion. Plus, it was his chance to test his theories of deep sea research without sending humans to dangerous depths.
Posted by Mark Mueller on March 7,2012 | 07:05 PM
This is a wonderful article. However, there is an error in the illustrations as anyone who is a devoted titanic follower knows the 4th stack was a dummy stack. I saw the Titanic exhibit in Saint Louis, MO when it was here (several times actually), and the exhibit was just fascinating. I really hope it makes it way here again soon.
Posted by Dave W. on March 7,2012 | 03:39 PM
Another thing the writer failed to note is that Ballard became interested in locating the wreck of the Titanic after Clive Cussler wrote the fantastic novel "Raise the Titanic." Cussler's character in the novel (Dirk Pitt) raises the ship using balloon-like ballast and explosives strategically placed around the ship--an idea so plausible that Ballard set out to find her and see if it could be done. Alas, he found the ship in two pieces, confirming what only some of the passengers claimed—that Titanic broke in half before sinking.
I too have been fascinated by the story. My sister and I scoured out anything we could find about the ship in the 1970s, not in either wave of Titanic mania.
Posted by Lulu on March 3,2012 | 09:57 PM
i love the titanic!
Posted by Amaryllis on March 2,2012 | 08:26 PM
For those who are interested, there is a "replica" of the forward half of the ship that you can visit in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee. It contains numerous artifacts from the ship.
Posted by Cleve Gray on March 2,2012 | 07:08 PM
Yes, this is a good article. Just 2 very minor comments:
1. The fresh paint is mentioned by Third Class passenger Elin Hakkarainen in her account (1996): 'Being on the Titanic was a new adventure. Everything was shiny and new and you could still smell the fresh paint'.
2. The foundry where the anchors were cast was not in Belfast, but at Netherton, near Dudley in the West Midlands, England.
Elin's story is one of 12 featured in my Titanic book, due to be published in March:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Titanic-Last-Night-Small-Town/dp/0199595577
It was historian Walter Lord in A Night to Remember (1955) who described the sinking of the Titanic as 'the last night of a small town'. My book Titanic: The Last Night of a Small Town (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012), both builds upon and challenges Lord's famous account. First, it re-balances the narrative, covering First, Second, and Third Class; women as well as men; children as well as adults; crew members as well as passengers; and people from countries other than Britain and America. Second, the book offers not just a minute-by-minute depiction of events, but explores themes - the ship's construction, social class, migration, radio - thereby employing and extending the metaphor of a small town.
The book features the stories of both crew and passengers. The featured crew includes the Second Officer; a Stewardess; the young Assistant Wireless Operator; and the Captain of the Carpathia rescue ship. There are eight featured passengers in all - an amateur military historian and governess in First Class; a teacher in Second; a domestic servant and mother in Third; and three children. On the centenary of the sinking, it is the individual histories of twelve of the inhabitants of the small town that this book reconstructs. The book employs the rigorous, sceptical approach of the social historian, while at the same time retaining the vividness of the eye-witness account.
John Welshman
Posted by John Welshman on March 1,2012 | 05:40 AM
Two illustrations of Titanic are used in the article, and both show smoke coming from the aft (4th) stack. The 4th stack was a dummy, and anyone who has read Walter Lord's A Night to Remember, is well aware of that. The copy was great.
Posted by W. Wander on February 29,2012 | 07:54 PM
The Titanic story was something that never held any great interest to me until my son was doing a school project on the subject in 2011, since that time i read any articles i find on the subject,one of the best i have read is a book titled "and the band played on" by Christopher Ward and published by Hodder and Stoughton which covers the disaster and the legacy in relation to the authors family in the years after.
Posted by Gavin Morrison on February 29,2012 | 05:41 PM
@Ben Pittam, I'm not trying to be a jerk, but the writer was intentionally quoting the movie with the fresh paint smell line...the entire paragraph is devoted to it...
Posted by Pamela Webb on February 28,2012 | 11:51 PM
Good grief. 2 people claimed that the article states Millvina Dean said "It’s been 84 years and I can still smell the fresh paint,” she says. “The china had never been used, the sheets had never been slept in. Titanic was called the ship of dreams and it was, it really was.” Read carefully, people. The paragraph clearly indicates the fictional character of Rose from the film "Titanic" said it.
I know, it's stupid and nitpicky to correct people like this, but as someone who writes technical documentation which on occasion some people don't follow properly and then blame me for because they skipped a crucial qualifier, I take offense at poor reading comprehension. ;-)
Posted by Mike Reilly on February 28,2012 | 03:42 PM
I've always been fascinated with the Titanic too, since childhood. About 20 years ago, I discovered the story of Milka Saric (Desic), one of the young ladies traveling in 3rd class and on her way to meet her new husband, in Duluth, MI I think.... Somehow she was never listed among the missing passengers, but her daughters (now gone too) and the entire church community vouched for the authenticity of her claim. She never relished the spotlight, not did her family,but they always valued a little homemade cloth purse Milka had with her that terrible night.
About 15-20 years ago, I tried to tell the authors of some of the books about Milka, but its as if they didn't want to know there were any more survivors. "There are so many false claims," they tried to explain.
Milka's story: "A Walk in Faith: Milka Desich" was written in the March/April 1987 issue of Serb World, USA magazine. It said how she finally made her way to the Iron Range to meet her husband and the town folks waiting her arrival.
Posted by Milana Bizic on February 28,2012 | 03:12 PM
The part of the article that talks about smelling fresh paint was not a memory from the woman who was only 3 months old at the time of the sinking. It is a line that "Rose" from the Titanic movie says as she remembers her voyage on the ship.
This article was great! I am looking forward to the opening of the ehibit at The Henry Ford Museum in March.
Posted by B.G. on February 27,2012 | 09:43 PM
In 1997 there was Titanic exhibit in Memphis, Tennessee, part of WONDERS: The Memphis International Cultural Series. Major sponsors were Coca-Cola, Federal Express Corporation, ICI Acrylics, Inc., International Paper and The Kroger Company. I was awed by this excellent exhibit, as were thousands of other Memphians and visitors.
Posted by Jo Ann Hall on February 27,2012 | 03:50 PM
This was an interesting article with a major omission. Robert Ballard who found the Titanic wreckage began to be fascinated with the idea of doing so after Clive Cussler wrote Raise the Titanic, a fictional account of an attempt to raise the ship from the ocean floor using massive flotation balloons. The book was made into a movie in the mid-70s. It would be difficult then to argue that the discovery of the actual wreckage in 1985 began a second phase of interest in the Titanic as the author purports. Let's give at least a nod to the marine archaeological fascination held by Cussler and whatever influence he may have had over the reading public through his novels.
Posted by Kerry Ketcham on February 26,2012 | 11:14 PM
The 3 month old girl at the end of the article talks about how she remembered the smell of the fresh paint on the Titanic.Come on.Who remembers anything at age 3 months!!!
Posted by ben pittam on February 26,2012 | 02:07 PM
This is a wonderful article. I've been researching Titanic for some time now and I appreciate the broader perspective of this article.
Posted by Paula Moldenhauer on February 24,2012 | 03:47 PM