Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us
One hundred years after the ocean liner struck an iceberg and sank, the tragedy still looms large in the popular psyche
- By Andrew Wilson
- Illustration by Robert G. Lloyd
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2012, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 7)
Edith, a fashion buyer, journalist and stylist, had contacted producer Charles Brackett when she had first learned that the Barbara Stanwyck film was going to be made, outlining her experiences and offering her services. The letter elicited no response, as Brackett had decided not to speak to any individual survivors. The filmmakers were more interested in constructing their own story, one that would meet all the criteria of melodrama without getting bogged down by the real-life experiences of people like Edith.
The production team did, however, invite her—and a number of other survivors—to a preview of Titanic in New York in April 1953. It was an emotional experience for many of them, not least third-class passengers Leah Aks, who had been 18 at the time of the disaster, and her son, Philip, who had been only 10 months old. Edith recalled how, in the panic, the baby Philip had been torn out of his mother’s arms and thrown into her lifeboat. Leah tried to push her way into this vessel, but was directed into the next lifeboat to leave the ship. Edith had done her best to comfort the baby during that long, cold night in the middle of the Atlantic—repeatedly playing the tune of “La Maxixe” by twisting the tail of her toy pig—before they were rescued.
The reunion brought all these memories back. “The baby, amongst other babies, for whom I played my little pig music box to the tune of ‘Maxixe’ was there,” said Edith of the screening. “He [Philip] is forty-one years old, is a rich steel magnate from Norfolk, Virginia.”
Edith enjoyed the event, she said, and had the opportunity of showing off the little musical pig, together with the dress she had worn on the night of the disaster. Edith congratulated Brackett on the film, yet, as a survivor, she said she had noticed some obvious errors. “There was a rather glaring inadequacy letting people take seats in the lifeboat as most of them had to get up on the rail and jump into the boat which swung clear of the side of the boat,” she said. “The boat also went down with the most awful rapidity. It fairly shot into the water whereas yours gracefully slid into the water.” Despite these points, she thought the film was “splendid”—she conceded he had done a “good job”—and, above all, it brought the night alive once more. “It gave me a heartache and I could still see the sailors changing the watches, crunching over the ice and going down to stoke those engines from where they never returned,” she said.
After the melodrama of the Titanic film—the movie won an Academy Award in 1953 for its screenplay—the public wanted to know more about the doomed liner. The demand was satisfied by Walter Lord, a bespectacled advertising copywriter who worked for J. Walter Thompson in New York. As a boy, Lord, the son of a Baltimore lawyer, had sailed on the Titanic’s sister ship, the Olympic. With an almost military precision—Lord had worked as both a code clerk in Washington and as an intelligence analyst in London during World War II—he amassed a mountain of material about the ship, and, most important, managed to locate, and interview, more than 60 survivors. The resulting book, A Night to Remember, is a masterpiece of restraint and concision, a work of narrative nonfiction that captures the full drama of the sinking. On its publication in the winter of 1955, the book was an immediate success—entering the New York Times best-seller list at Number 12 in the week of December 11—and since then has never been out of print. “In the creation of the Titanic myth there were two defining moments,” wrote one commentator, “1912, of course, and 1955.”
The publication of A Night to Remember—together with its serialization in the magazine Ladies’ Home Journal in November 1955—had an immediate effect on the remaining survivors, almost as if the Titanic had been raised from the murky depths of their collective consciousness.
Madeleine Mellenger wrote to Lord himself, telling him of her emotions when the Carpathia pulled into New York. “The noise, commotion and searchlights terrified me,” she said. “I stood on the deck directly under the rigging on which Captain Arthur Rostron climbed to yell orders thru’ a megaphone....I live it all over again and shall walk around in a daze for a few days.” Memories of the experience came back in flashes—the generosity of an American couple, honeymooners on board the Carpathia, who gave her mother, who was shoeless, a pair of beautiful French bedroom slippers, which were knitted and topped with big pink satin bows; and the horror of being forced to spend what seemed like an eternity in a cabin with a woman, Jane Laver Herman, who had lost her husband in the sinking.
Walter Lord became a receptacle into which survivors could spill their memories and fears. He, in turn, collected survivors’ tales, and memorabilia such as buttons, menus, tickets and silver spoons, with a near-obsessive passion, hoarding information about the Titanic’s passengers long after he had sent his book off to the publishers.
There was a rush to transfer Lord’s book to the screen, first in an American TV drama made by Kraft Television Theatre, which had an audience of 28 million when it aired in March 1956, and then in a big-budget British movie, which would be released in 1958. The rights to the book were bought by William MacQuitty, an Irish-born producer who, like Walter Lord, had been fascinated by the Titanic since he was a boy. As a child, growing up in Belfast, he remembered teams of 20 draft horses pulling the liner’s enormous anchors through the cobbled streets of the city, from the foundry to the Harland and Wolff shipyard.
MacQuitty chose Roy Baker as director, Eric Ambler as scriptwriter and Walter Lord as a consultant on the project. The overall effect MacQuitty wanted to achieve was one of near-documentary realism. Art director Alex Vetchinsky employed his obsessive eye for detail to recreate the Titanic itself. Working from original blueprints of the ship, Vetchinsky built the center third of the liner, including two funnels and four lifeboats, an undertaking that required 4,000 tons of steel. This was constructed above a concrete platform, which had to be strong enough to support the “ship” and the surging mass of hundreds of passengers who were shown clinging to the rails to the very last.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (36)
+ View All Comments
The title was "Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us". It should have been "The Titanic Still Fascinates Us." Never seemed to get around to "why?"
Posted by David Shows on April 10,2013 | 11:03 PM
i love the titanic but did you know there were watertight doors.
Posted by dylan on April 5,2013 | 09:43 PM
Great pictures. One problem. In one of the pictures, the author of this article referred to Titanic as a cruise liner. For your information, Titanic was NOT a cruise liner. There is a difference between a cruise ship and an ocean liner.
Posted by Mike on August 29,2012 | 12:36 PM
Super interesting and real the Titanic*s story!!!
Posted by Maria Torres on July 26,2012 | 03:12 AM
Several years ago, a Canadian newspaper columnist noted another strange twist associated with the disaster: the sudden popularity of a Halifax grave bearing the name Jack Dawes, which coincides with that of the Cameron movie's hero. Apparently, he worked in the engine room and had nothing but his name in common with Leonardo di Caprio's rakish swain, but this did not stop processions of teenage girls dropping flowers, emotional notes and yes, lingerie beside the grave. It makes you wonder how much else in what we call history is really just some of us clinging to our myths. Regardless, thank you for a fine article.
Posted by R. Pritchard on April 29,2012 | 10:40 AM
I am a scriber until 2017. The above article I truly enjoyed. Printed this out for my pastor to read. If there is a charge for this you have my address. Thank you so much for your magazine, I learn so much from them. I am 81 years old and don't travel much anymore. The e-mail is my office address - I work at my church part-time. Thank you again. Patricia
Posted by Patricia Niedentohl on April 11,2012 | 08:53 AM
This was a very well written, interesting article, but I'm not sure it was titled appropriately. It never answers the question about WHY the Titanic fascinates us. It should have been titled The Titanic Still Fascinates Us.
Posted by Rhona on April 10,2012 | 05:58 PM
Passenger manifest records for 479 survivors of the Titanic disaster who arrived in the Port of New York via the Carpathia are in the Ellis Island database (e.g., Madeline Astor) – includes passenger names, place of residents, age and images of the original manifests. http://bit.ly/HlYySg
Posted by Suzanne Mannion on April 10,2012 | 01:37 PM
Wikipedia lists twenty-six ships sunk between 1943-45 which each had a death toll exceeding that of the "Titanic." This includes the MV Wilhelm Gustlof and MV Goya, with deaths tolls of 9,000 and 6,000 respectively. Yet I would bet you that not one person in a thousand who can identify the Titanic has ever heard of either the Gustlof or the Goya, or any of the other dozens of ships from this period with such terrible loss of life. So it cannot be the scale of the Titanic disaster alone which keeps it alive in memory. Loss of life in the Lusitania sinking rivals that of the Titanic, but how many books and movies have been made about the Lusitania? I suspect the relative anonymity of these other disastrous sinkings compared to the Titanic is largely due to the fact that the people who died aboard the Titanic died accidentally while those in all the other sinkings were deliberately killed in acts of war. Moreover, most of the dead were citizens of countries waging ruthless war against Britain and the United States. To consider all these other terrible deaths mean thinking about people dying not from a collision with an iceberg but from naval submarines deliberately firing torpedos at them.
Posted by Jack Olson on April 10,2012 | 09:22 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amounts of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amount of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
A UFA (Nazi) production called "Titanic," directed by Herbert Selpin, predates the melodramas which Andrew Wilson cites. It is available through Kino video. The original was briefly released in April 1943 but then banned by censors because the scenes of panic were too real for a civilian population subjected to Allied "Strategic" bombing. Apparently scenes were lifted by A Night To Remember. While its propaganda nature is blatant, it is the only film which has scenes of the commission's hearings on the disaster.
Posted by Jordan Auslander on March 19,2012 | 06:25 PM
Andrew Wilson's article is a fascinating addition to the lore of the Titanic. But the introductory caption is appalling. What is it about the deaths of 1500 people that you find "glorious"?
Posted by Mary Noll Nagase on March 15,2012 | 12:33 AM
The Titanic tragedy is only one more example of Man vs. Nature with the former often losing out. Hemingway's "Old Man & the Sea" underscored this. And so it was with the Tsunami in December 2004 while hundreds of thousands enjoyed coastal areas, the Fukushima reactors built near an unfortunate unstable vault line with totally inadequate wave breakers. Too many people around the globe are living dangerously too close to their coasts that are often subjected to Nature's wrath.
Mankind's messing with Nature often results with allegedly "unintended consequences" - just as New Orleans' defense measures were considered inadequate for decades by those living there and observing near total neglect to anticipate the hurricane that was sure to hit as it did in 1927.
As Prof. Pangloss in Voltaire's "Candide" consoled us with the idea that whatever happens is for the best and we should simply grow our own gardens. "Panglossian philosophy" is immortalized in both Webster and Oxford dictionaries.
Posted by Peter M. Lutterbeck, M.D. on March 12,2012 | 07:01 AM
+ View All Comments