Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us
One hundred years after the ocean liner struck an iceberg and sank, the tragedy still looms large in the popular psyche
- By Andrew Wilson
- Illustration by Robert G. Lloyd
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2012, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 7)
The first full-scale movie representation of the disaster in the ’50s was a melodrama called simply Titanic, starring one of the ruling queens of the “woman’s picture,” Barbara Stanwyck. She plays Julia Sturges, a woman in the midst of an emotional crisis. Trapped in an unhappy marriage to a cold but wealthy husband, Richard (Clifton Webb), she boards the Titanic with the intention of stealing their two children away from him.
The film, directed by Jean Negulesco, was not so much about the loss of the liner as the loss, and subsequent rekindling, of love. If the scenario—a broken marriage, a devious plan to separate children from their father, a revelation surrounding true parenthood—wasn’t melodramatic enough, the charged emotional setting of the Titanic was used to heighten the sentiment.
It would be easy to assume that the plotline of the abducted children in producer and screenwriter Charles Brackett’s Titanic was nothing more than the product of a Hollywood screenwriter’s overheated imagination. Yet the story had its roots in real life. Immediately after the Carpathia docked in New York, it came to light that on board the liner were two young French boys—Lolo (Michel) and Momon (Edmond)—who had been kidnapped by their father (traveling on the Titanic under the assumed name Louis Hoffman). Fellow second-class passenger Madeleine Mellenger, who was 13 at the time, remembered the two dark-haired boys, one aged nearly 4, the other 2. “They sat at our table . . . and we wondered where their mamma was,” she said. “It turned out that he [the father] was taking them away from ‘mamma’ to America.” In an interview later in his life, Michel recalled the majesty of the Titanic. “A magnificent ship!” he said. “I remember looking down the length of the hull—the ship looked splendid. My brother and I played on the forward deck and were thrilled to be there. One morning, my father, my brother, and I were eating eggs in the second-class dining room. The sea was stunning. My feeling was one of total and utter well-being.” On the night of the sinking, he remembered his father entering their cabin and gently awakening the two boys. “He dressed me very warmly and took me in his arms,” he said. “A stranger did the same for my brother. When I think of it now, I am very moved. They knew they were going to die.”
Despite this, the man calling himself Louis Hoffman—real name Michel Navratil—did everything in his power to help fellow passengers safely into the boats. “The last kindness . . . [he] did was to put my new shoes on and tie them for me,” recalled Madeleine. She escaped to safety with her mother in Lifeboat 14, leaving the sinking ship at 1:30 a.m., but Michel Navratil had to wait until 2:05 a.m. to place his sons in Collapsible D, the last boat to be lowered. Witnesses recall seeing the man they knew as Hoffman crouching on his knees, ensuring that each of his boys was wrapped up warmly.
As he handed his elder son over to Second Officer Charles Herbert Lightoller, who was responsible for loading the boat, Michel stepped back, raised his hand in a salute and disappeared into the crowd on the port side of the ship. His son Michel later recalled the feel of the lifeboat hitting the water. “I remember the sound of the splash, and the sensation of shock, as the little boat shivered in its attempt to right itself after its irregular descent,” he said.
After the Carpathia docked in New York, the two boys became instantly famous. Journalists dubbed the boys the “Orphans of the Deep” or the “Waifs of the Titanic” and within days their pictures were featured in every newspaper in America. Back in Nice, Marcelle Navratil, desperate to know about the fate of her children, appealed to the British and French consulates. She showed the envoys a photograph of Michel, and when it was learned that Thomas Cook and Sons in Monte Carlo had sold a second-class ticket to a Louis Hoffman—a name Navratil had borrowed from one of their neighbors in Nice—she began to understand what her estranged husband had done.
The White Star Line promptly offered their mother a complimentary passage to New York on the Oceanic, leaving Cherbourg on May 8. Only a matter of weeks later, Marcelle Navratil arrived in New York. A taxi took her to the Children’s Aid Society, which had been besieged by photographers and reporters. According to a New York Times account, “The windows of the building opposite were lined with interested groups of shopworkers who had got wind of what was happening across the way and who were craning their necks and gesticulating wildly toward a window on the fifth floor where the children were believed to be.” The young mother was allowed to greet her boys alone. She found Michel sitting in a corner of the room, in the window seat, turning the pages of an illustrated alphabet book. Edmond was on the floor, playing with the pieces of a puzzle.
When she entered, the boys looked anxious, but then, as they recognized their mother, a “growing wonder spread over the face of the bigger boy, while the smaller one stared in amazement at the figure in the doorway. He let out one long-drawn and lusty wail and ran blubbering into the outstretched arms of his mother. The mother was trembling with sobs and her eyes were dim with tears as she ran forward and seized both youngsters.”
Although he passed away on January 30, 2001, at the age of 92, the last male survivor of the Titanic disaster, Michel always said, “I died at 4. Since then I have been a fare-dodger of life. A gleaner of time.”
One of the most forthright and determined of the real Titanic voices belonged to Edith Russell, the then 32-year-old first-class passenger who had managed to get aboard one of the lifeboats, still clutching a possession she regarded as her lucky talisman—a toy musical pig that played the pop tune “La Maxixe.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (34)
+ View All Comments
Great pictures. One problem. In one of the pictures, the author of this article referred to Titanic as a cruise liner. For your information, Titanic was NOT a cruise liner. There is a difference between a cruise ship and an ocean liner.
Posted by Mike on August 29,2012 | 12:36 PM
Super interesting and real the Titanic*s story!!!
Posted by Maria Torres on July 26,2012 | 03:12 AM
Several years ago, a Canadian newspaper columnist noted another strange twist associated with the disaster: the sudden popularity of a Halifax grave bearing the name Jack Dawes, which coincides with that of the Cameron movie's hero. Apparently, he worked in the engine room and had nothing but his name in common with Leonardo di Caprio's rakish swain, but this did not stop processions of teenage girls dropping flowers, emotional notes and yes, lingerie beside the grave. It makes you wonder how much else in what we call history is really just some of us clinging to our myths. Regardless, thank you for a fine article.
Posted by R. Pritchard on April 29,2012 | 10:40 AM
I am a scriber until 2017. The above article I truly enjoyed. Printed this out for my pastor to read. If there is a charge for this you have my address. Thank you so much for your magazine, I learn so much from them. I am 81 years old and don't travel much anymore. The e-mail is my office address - I work at my church part-time. Thank you again. Patricia
Posted by Patricia Niedentohl on April 11,2012 | 08:53 AM
This was a very well written, interesting article, but I'm not sure it was titled appropriately. It never answers the question about WHY the Titanic fascinates us. It should have been titled The Titanic Still Fascinates Us.
Posted by Rhona on April 10,2012 | 05:58 PM
Passenger manifest records for 479 survivors of the Titanic disaster who arrived in the Port of New York via the Carpathia are in the Ellis Island database (e.g., Madeline Astor) – includes passenger names, place of residents, age and images of the original manifests. http://bit.ly/HlYySg
Posted by Suzanne Mannion on April 10,2012 | 01:37 PM
Wikipedia lists twenty-six ships sunk between 1943-45 which each had a death toll exceeding that of the "Titanic." This includes the MV Wilhelm Gustlof and MV Goya, with deaths tolls of 9,000 and 6,000 respectively. Yet I would bet you that not one person in a thousand who can identify the Titanic has ever heard of either the Gustlof or the Goya, or any of the other dozens of ships from this period with such terrible loss of life. So it cannot be the scale of the Titanic disaster alone which keeps it alive in memory. Loss of life in the Lusitania sinking rivals that of the Titanic, but how many books and movies have been made about the Lusitania? I suspect the relative anonymity of these other disastrous sinkings compared to the Titanic is largely due to the fact that the people who died aboard the Titanic died accidentally while those in all the other sinkings were deliberately killed in acts of war. Moreover, most of the dead were citizens of countries waging ruthless war against Britain and the United States. To consider all these other terrible deaths mean thinking about people dying not from a collision with an iceberg but from naval submarines deliberately firing torpedos at them.
Posted by Jack Olson on April 10,2012 | 09:22 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amounts of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amount of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
A UFA (Nazi) production called "Titanic," directed by Herbert Selpin, predates the melodramas which Andrew Wilson cites. It is available through Kino video. The original was briefly released in April 1943 but then banned by censors because the scenes of panic were too real for a civilian population subjected to Allied "Strategic" bombing. Apparently scenes were lifted by A Night To Remember. While its propaganda nature is blatant, it is the only film which has scenes of the commission's hearings on the disaster.
Posted by Jordan Auslander on March 19,2012 | 06:25 PM
Andrew Wilson's article is a fascinating addition to the lore of the Titanic. But the introductory caption is appalling. What is it about the deaths of 1500 people that you find "glorious"?
Posted by Mary Noll Nagase on March 15,2012 | 12:33 AM
The Titanic tragedy is only one more example of Man vs. Nature with the former often losing out. Hemingway's "Old Man & the Sea" underscored this. And so it was with the Tsunami in December 2004 while hundreds of thousands enjoyed coastal areas, the Fukushima reactors built near an unfortunate unstable vault line with totally inadequate wave breakers. Too many people around the globe are living dangerously too close to their coasts that are often subjected to Nature's wrath.
Mankind's messing with Nature often results with allegedly "unintended consequences" - just as New Orleans' defense measures were considered inadequate for decades by those living there and observing near total neglect to anticipate the hurricane that was sure to hit as it did in 1927.
As Prof. Pangloss in Voltaire's "Candide" consoled us with the idea that whatever happens is for the best and we should simply grow our own gardens. "Panglossian philosophy" is immortalized in both Webster and Oxford dictionaries.
Posted by Peter M. Lutterbeck, M.D. on March 12,2012 | 07:01 AM
While this article focused on the survivors of the Titanic sinking, the story of the people who did not survive and of the compassionate people of Halifax, Nova Scotia, captures my attention when I think of the disaster. Halifax had to deal with the aftermath of the disaster, retrieving the bodies, trying to identify them, and shipping the remains home. From the rows of tombstones for the unnamed in Halifax cemeteries, to the Maritime Museum's exhibits, I found this story far more poignant and interesting than that of the survivors.
Posted by Karen Morley on March 9,2012 | 09:31 AM
This was an interesting article, but I'm surprised that when mentioning the movies made about the tragedy there was no mention of the most famous survivor of them all - the Unsinkable Molly Brown! She was not a fictional character. She was very real, and the musical made of her story was very popular, both on Broadway and in movie form. I saw the movie with Debbie Reynolds when I was a young girl and it ignited a life long faccination with the story of the Titanic.
Posted by Joanne Babic on March 9,2012 | 05:35 AM
+ View All Comments