Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us
One hundred years after the ocean liner struck an iceberg and sank, the tragedy still looms large in the popular psyche
- By Andrew Wilson
- Illustration by Robert G. Lloyd
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2012, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 7)
When the film was released, on May 16, 1912, just a month after the sinking, it was celebrated for its technical realism and emotional power. “The startling story of the world’s greatest sea disaster is the sensation of the country,” stated the Moving Picture News. “Miss Dorothy Gibson, a heroine of the shipwreck and one of the most talked-of survivors, tells in this motion picture masterpiece of the enthralling tragedy among the icebergs.” (The actual film no longer survives.)
“The nation and the world had been profoundly grieved by the sinking of the Titanic,” she said, “and I had the opportunity to pay tribute to those who gave their lives on that awful night. That is all I tried to do.” In truth, the experience had left her feeling hollow, disassociated from her reality. Soon after the release of Saved from the Titanic, Dorothy walked out of her dressing room at the Fort Lee studios and turned her back on the movie business. She was, she stated, “dissatisfied.”
At some point during the summer or autumn of 1912—just as Brulatour was forming, with Carl Laemmle, the Universal Film Manufacturing Company, later to become Universal Pictures—Brulatour’s wife, Clara, finally decided to bring the farce that was her marriage to an end. After scandalous and protracted divorce proceedings, Gibson married Brulatour on July 6, 1917, in New York. It soon became obvious that whatever spark they had between them had been kept alive by the illicit nature of the relationship. The couple divorced in 1923.
Dorothy fled to Europe, where her mother had already settled. Ensconced in Paris, she had enough money from her alimony for everyday luxuries such as cocktails and champagne and entertained a wide range of bohemian friends including the writers Colette, H.G. Wells and James Joyce. “Oh my, what a time I am having!” she told a journalist in 1934. “I never cared much for motion pictures, you see, and I am too glad to be free of that work. I tell you it was an immense burden. I have had my share of troubles, as you know, but since coming to France, I have recovered from that and feel happy at last. Who could not be deliriously happy in this country? I have such fun. But I fear it cannot go on like this always. I have had my dream life, and am sure that someday a dark cloud will come and wash it all away!”
The shadow she feared would destroy her dream life was World War II. In May 1940, Dorothy was in Florence to collect her mother and bring her back to France when Germany invaded Holland and Belgium. It would still have been possible for the two women to return to America. The reason they didn’t? Certainly their experience on the Titanic was a factor. “I must say I never wanted to make the Ocean trip to America at this time,” said Dorothy later in an affidavit, “as my mother and I were most timid on the ocean—we had been in a shipwreck—but I also never wanted to stay in Italy, but we just waited in Italy always hoping things would be better to travel.”
Trying to make sense of Dorothy’s life from this point onward is a difficult task. In the spring of 1944, while still in Florence with her mother, she was informed by the questura, the Italian police, that she would be taken to the German-controlled Fossoli internment center. She tried to escape, but on April 16 was arrested and taken to a Nazi concentration camp. After being moved around various camps, she was imprisoned at San Vittore, which she described as a “living death.” It’s most likely that Gibson would have died in this camp had it not been for the machinations of a double agent, Ugo Luca Osteria, known as Dr. Ugo, who wanted to infiltrate Allied intelligence in Switzerland (something he subsequently failed to do). Gibson was smuggled out of the camp under the pretense that she was a Nazi sympathizer and spy. Although the plan worked—she did escape and crossed into Switzerland—the experience left her understandably drained. After interrogation in Zurich, where she gave an affidavit to James G. Bell, vice consul of the American consulate general, she was judged too stupid to have been a genuine spy. In Bell’s words, Dorothy “hardly seems bright enough to be useful in such capacity.”
Dorothy tried to resume a normal life after this episode, but the trauma of her survival—first the Titanic, then a concentration camp—took its toll. After the war ended in 1945, she returned to Paris and enjoyed a few months at the Ritz, where, on February 17, 1946, she died in her suite, probably from a heart attack, at age 56.
The sinking of the world’s most famous ship generated three waves of Titanic mania. The first, as we have seen, hit popular consciousness immediately after the disaster, resulting in Brulatour’s newsreel, Dorothy Gibson’s film Saved from the Titanic, a clutch of books written by survivors, poems like Edwin Drew’s “The Chief Incidents of the Titanic Wreck” (published in May 1912) and Thomas Hardy’s “The Convergence of the Twain” (June 1912), and a flurry of songs (112 different pieces of music inspired by the loss of the Titanic were copyrighted in America in 1912 alone).
The First World War, and then the Second quieted the Titanic storm; the loss of hundreds of thousands of men on the battlefields of Europe, the whole-scale destruction of cities and communities around the world, and Hitler’s single-minded plan to wipe out an entire race of people, together with other “undesirables,” placed the sinking of the ship, with its death toll of 1,500, toward the bottom end of the league of global tragedies.
The mid-1950s is generally considered to represent the second wave of Titanic fever. In the midst of the cold war—when there was a perceived threat that, at any moment, the world could end in nuclear Armageddon—the Titanic represented a containable, understandable tragedy. A mist of nostalgia hung over the disaster—nostalgia for a society that maintained fixed roles, in which each man and woman knew his or her place; for a certain gentility, or at least an imagined gentility, by which people behaved according to a strict set of rules; for a tragedy that gave its participants time to consider their fates.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (36)
+ View All Comments
The title was "Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us". It should have been "The Titanic Still Fascinates Us." Never seemed to get around to "why?"
Posted by David Shows on April 10,2013 | 11:03 PM
i love the titanic but did you know there were watertight doors.
Posted by dylan on April 5,2013 | 09:43 PM
Great pictures. One problem. In one of the pictures, the author of this article referred to Titanic as a cruise liner. For your information, Titanic was NOT a cruise liner. There is a difference between a cruise ship and an ocean liner.
Posted by Mike on August 29,2012 | 12:36 PM
Super interesting and real the Titanic*s story!!!
Posted by Maria Torres on July 26,2012 | 03:12 AM
Several years ago, a Canadian newspaper columnist noted another strange twist associated with the disaster: the sudden popularity of a Halifax grave bearing the name Jack Dawes, which coincides with that of the Cameron movie's hero. Apparently, he worked in the engine room and had nothing but his name in common with Leonardo di Caprio's rakish swain, but this did not stop processions of teenage girls dropping flowers, emotional notes and yes, lingerie beside the grave. It makes you wonder how much else in what we call history is really just some of us clinging to our myths. Regardless, thank you for a fine article.
Posted by R. Pritchard on April 29,2012 | 10:40 AM
I am a scriber until 2017. The above article I truly enjoyed. Printed this out for my pastor to read. If there is a charge for this you have my address. Thank you so much for your magazine, I learn so much from them. I am 81 years old and don't travel much anymore. The e-mail is my office address - I work at my church part-time. Thank you again. Patricia
Posted by Patricia Niedentohl on April 11,2012 | 08:53 AM
This was a very well written, interesting article, but I'm not sure it was titled appropriately. It never answers the question about WHY the Titanic fascinates us. It should have been titled The Titanic Still Fascinates Us.
Posted by Rhona on April 10,2012 | 05:58 PM
Passenger manifest records for 479 survivors of the Titanic disaster who arrived in the Port of New York via the Carpathia are in the Ellis Island database (e.g., Madeline Astor) – includes passenger names, place of residents, age and images of the original manifests. http://bit.ly/HlYySg
Posted by Suzanne Mannion on April 10,2012 | 01:37 PM
Wikipedia lists twenty-six ships sunk between 1943-45 which each had a death toll exceeding that of the "Titanic." This includes the MV Wilhelm Gustlof and MV Goya, with deaths tolls of 9,000 and 6,000 respectively. Yet I would bet you that not one person in a thousand who can identify the Titanic has ever heard of either the Gustlof or the Goya, or any of the other dozens of ships from this period with such terrible loss of life. So it cannot be the scale of the Titanic disaster alone which keeps it alive in memory. Loss of life in the Lusitania sinking rivals that of the Titanic, but how many books and movies have been made about the Lusitania? I suspect the relative anonymity of these other disastrous sinkings compared to the Titanic is largely due to the fact that the people who died aboard the Titanic died accidentally while those in all the other sinkings were deliberately killed in acts of war. Moreover, most of the dead were citizens of countries waging ruthless war against Britain and the United States. To consider all these other terrible deaths mean thinking about people dying not from a collision with an iceberg but from naval submarines deliberately firing torpedos at them.
Posted by Jack Olson on April 10,2012 | 09:22 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amounts of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amount of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
A UFA (Nazi) production called "Titanic," directed by Herbert Selpin, predates the melodramas which Andrew Wilson cites. It is available through Kino video. The original was briefly released in April 1943 but then banned by censors because the scenes of panic were too real for a civilian population subjected to Allied "Strategic" bombing. Apparently scenes were lifted by A Night To Remember. While its propaganda nature is blatant, it is the only film which has scenes of the commission's hearings on the disaster.
Posted by Jordan Auslander on March 19,2012 | 06:25 PM
Andrew Wilson's article is a fascinating addition to the lore of the Titanic. But the introductory caption is appalling. What is it about the deaths of 1500 people that you find "glorious"?
Posted by Mary Noll Nagase on March 15,2012 | 12:33 AM
The Titanic tragedy is only one more example of Man vs. Nature with the former often losing out. Hemingway's "Old Man & the Sea" underscored this. And so it was with the Tsunami in December 2004 while hundreds of thousands enjoyed coastal areas, the Fukushima reactors built near an unfortunate unstable vault line with totally inadequate wave breakers. Too many people around the globe are living dangerously too close to their coasts that are often subjected to Nature's wrath.
Mankind's messing with Nature often results with allegedly "unintended consequences" - just as New Orleans' defense measures were considered inadequate for decades by those living there and observing near total neglect to anticipate the hurricane that was sure to hit as it did in 1927.
As Prof. Pangloss in Voltaire's "Candide" consoled us with the idea that whatever happens is for the best and we should simply grow our own gardens. "Panglossian philosophy" is immortalized in both Webster and Oxford dictionaries.
Posted by Peter M. Lutterbeck, M.D. on March 12,2012 | 07:01 AM
+ View All Comments