Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us
One hundred years after the ocean liner struck an iceberg and sank, the tragedy still looms large in the popular psyche
- By Andrew Wilson
- Illustration by Robert G. Lloyd
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2012, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 7)
At around 6 o’clock the lifeboat carrying Dorothy Gibson drew up alongside the Carpathia. A few moments later, after she had climbed the rope ladder that had been lowered down from above, she found herself on deck. Still wearing her damp, wind-swept evening gown, Dorothy was approached by Carpathia passengers James Russell Lowell and his wife, and asked whether she would like to share their cabin. After eating breakfast, she retired to their quarters, where she slept for the next 26 hours.
Jules Brulatour had always intended to send a film crew to the pier to record Dorothy’s arrival in New York; he was one of the first to realize that the newsreel could be used as a powerful publicity tool and that the star’s return to America on board the world’s most famous rescue ship would help boost box-office numbers. But suddenly he found himself with an extraordinary story on his hands. Information about the loss of the Titanic was in short supply—initially some newspapers had claimed that all its passengers had survived. Capt. Arthur Rostron of the Carpathia had placed a blanket ban on information from the vessel being leaked to the news media—the wireless service could be used, he said, only for communication with the authorities and for relay of messages between survivors and their families, as well as the task of providing a list of which of the Titanic’s passengers had perished.
As the Carpathia sailed into New York—on the stormy night of Thursday, April 18—it was surrounded by a mass of tiny vessels, all chartered by news corporations desperate to break what would be one of the biggest stories of modern times. From their tugs, reporters shouted through megaphones offering terrific sums of money for information and exclusives, but Captain Rostron said he would shoot any pressmen who dared venture aboard his ship.
However, one of his original passengers, Carlos F. Hurd, was a veteran journalist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and over the course of the past four days he had spoken to many survivors, amassing enough information for a 5,000-word story. Hurd’s only problem was how to get the report off the ship. He managed to send a wireless message to a friend at the New York Evening World, which, in turn, chartered a tug to sail to the Carpathia. Out of sight of the captain, Hurd stuffed his manuscript into an oilskin bag, which he then threw down to the waiting boat. The final edition of the New York Evening World, published on April 18, carried a digest of Hurd’s report, which was published in full the next morning. The story—“Titanic Boilers Blew up, Breaking Her in Two After Striking Berg”—began: “Fifteen hundred lives—the figures will hardly vary in either direction by more than a few dozen—were lost in the sinking of the Titanic, which struck an iceberg at 11:45 p.m., Sunday, and was at the ocean’s bottom two hours and thirty-five minutes after.”
As Dorothy Gibson stood on the deck of the Carpathia, the night was so black that she could hardly make out the skyline of New York. Unknown to her, thousands of people had come out that rainy night to witness the arrival of the Carpathia. Dorothy “ran crying down the ramp” into the arms of her stepfather, soon followed by her mother. Leonard Gibson ushered his stepdaughter and wife through the crowd and into a taxi and whisked them off to a New York restaurant. But there was only one thing on Dorothy’s mind—her lover, Brulatour. She realized that it would have been inappropriate for him to meet her at the pier—this would have given rise to scandal—but she desperately needed to see him. After a couple of hours, she drove to the hotel where she had arranged to meet him.
That night Brulatour presented her with an engagement ring—a cluster of diamonds worth $1,000—and a plan: to make a dramatic one-reel film of her survival. Soon, he said, she would not only be his wife, but she would be more famous than ever before. The loss of the Titanic would make both things possible.
The public’s appetite for information and details—accounts of suffering, bravery, self-sacrifice and selfishness—seemed insatiable, and Brulatour at first took advantage of it by employing the relatively new medium of newsreel. His footage of the docking of the Carpathia—which was spliced together with scenes of Capt. Edward J. Smith, who had been lost in the disaster, walking on the bridge of the Titanic’s sister ship, the Olympic, and shots of icebergs from the area where the liner sank, together with images of the launching of the liner—premiered in East Coast theaters on April 22. Not only was Brulatour’s Animated Weekly newsreel “the first on the scene with specially chartered tugboats and an extra relay of cameramen,” according to Billboard magazine, but it also showed that “the motion picture may fairly equal the press in bringing out a timely subject and one of startling interest to the public at large.”
Brulatour hyped the newsreel as “the most famous film in the whole world,” and so it proved, packing theaters across America over the following weeks. The pioneering movie mogul organized a private screening for Guglielmo Marconi—the inventor of the wireless technology that had played a central part in the Titanic story—and gave a copy of the film to President William Howard Taft, whose close friend Maj. Archie Butt had died in the sinking. Spurred on by the success of his Animated Weekly feature, Brulatour decided to go ahead with a silent film based on the disaster, starring his lover, authentic Titanic survivor Dorothy Gibson.
Within a few days of her arrival in New York, Dorothy had sketched out a rough outline for a story. She would play Miss Dorothy, a young woman traveling in Europe who is due to return to America on the Titanic to marry her sweetheart, Ensign Jack, in service with the U.S. Navy.
Shooting began almost immediately at the Fort Lee studio and on location on board a derelict freighter that lay in New York Harbor. She was clad in the same outfit she had worn the night she had escaped the sinking ship—a white silk evening dress, a sweater, an overcoat and black pumps.The verisimilitude of the experience was overwhelming. This wasn’t so much acting, in its conventional form at least, as replaying. Dorothy drew on her memory and shaped it into a reconstruction.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (36)
+ View All Comments
The title was "Why the Titanic Still Fascinates Us". It should have been "The Titanic Still Fascinates Us." Never seemed to get around to "why?"
Posted by David Shows on April 10,2013 | 11:03 PM
i love the titanic but did you know there were watertight doors.
Posted by dylan on April 5,2013 | 09:43 PM
Great pictures. One problem. In one of the pictures, the author of this article referred to Titanic as a cruise liner. For your information, Titanic was NOT a cruise liner. There is a difference between a cruise ship and an ocean liner.
Posted by Mike on August 29,2012 | 12:36 PM
Super interesting and real the Titanic*s story!!!
Posted by Maria Torres on July 26,2012 | 03:12 AM
Several years ago, a Canadian newspaper columnist noted another strange twist associated with the disaster: the sudden popularity of a Halifax grave bearing the name Jack Dawes, which coincides with that of the Cameron movie's hero. Apparently, he worked in the engine room and had nothing but his name in common with Leonardo di Caprio's rakish swain, but this did not stop processions of teenage girls dropping flowers, emotional notes and yes, lingerie beside the grave. It makes you wonder how much else in what we call history is really just some of us clinging to our myths. Regardless, thank you for a fine article.
Posted by R. Pritchard on April 29,2012 | 10:40 AM
I am a scriber until 2017. The above article I truly enjoyed. Printed this out for my pastor to read. If there is a charge for this you have my address. Thank you so much for your magazine, I learn so much from them. I am 81 years old and don't travel much anymore. The e-mail is my office address - I work at my church part-time. Thank you again. Patricia
Posted by Patricia Niedentohl on April 11,2012 | 08:53 AM
This was a very well written, interesting article, but I'm not sure it was titled appropriately. It never answers the question about WHY the Titanic fascinates us. It should have been titled The Titanic Still Fascinates Us.
Posted by Rhona on April 10,2012 | 05:58 PM
Passenger manifest records for 479 survivors of the Titanic disaster who arrived in the Port of New York via the Carpathia are in the Ellis Island database (e.g., Madeline Astor) – includes passenger names, place of residents, age and images of the original manifests. http://bit.ly/HlYySg
Posted by Suzanne Mannion on April 10,2012 | 01:37 PM
Wikipedia lists twenty-six ships sunk between 1943-45 which each had a death toll exceeding that of the "Titanic." This includes the MV Wilhelm Gustlof and MV Goya, with deaths tolls of 9,000 and 6,000 respectively. Yet I would bet you that not one person in a thousand who can identify the Titanic has ever heard of either the Gustlof or the Goya, or any of the other dozens of ships from this period with such terrible loss of life. So it cannot be the scale of the Titanic disaster alone which keeps it alive in memory. Loss of life in the Lusitania sinking rivals that of the Titanic, but how many books and movies have been made about the Lusitania? I suspect the relative anonymity of these other disastrous sinkings compared to the Titanic is largely due to the fact that the people who died aboard the Titanic died accidentally while those in all the other sinkings were deliberately killed in acts of war. Moreover, most of the dead were citizens of countries waging ruthless war against Britain and the United States. To consider all these other terrible deaths mean thinking about people dying not from a collision with an iceberg but from naval submarines deliberately firing torpedos at them.
Posted by Jack Olson on April 10,2012 | 09:22 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amounts of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
My great Aunt Mahala Douglas, my grandfathers brother Walter D. Douglas and maid Berthe were first class passengers on Titanic. Ever since I was a little girl I have been reserching all the info about them, and finally got to the archives of Cedar Rapids, Iowa where they were originally from, to read Aunt Mahalas interviews first hand when she returned from the tradgedy. It is so interesting to read what was really said and how she really dealt with the whole tragedy. I would also like to comment on the fact that it is never brought up that the disaster devastated the towns in England where families husbands were the only ones bringing in the money and all of those men that died in the bowels of the ship put a tremendous amount of families in poverty.
Posted by Frances Martin on March 21,2012 | 09:44 AM
A UFA (Nazi) production called "Titanic," directed by Herbert Selpin, predates the melodramas which Andrew Wilson cites. It is available through Kino video. The original was briefly released in April 1943 but then banned by censors because the scenes of panic were too real for a civilian population subjected to Allied "Strategic" bombing. Apparently scenes were lifted by A Night To Remember. While its propaganda nature is blatant, it is the only film which has scenes of the commission's hearings on the disaster.
Posted by Jordan Auslander on March 19,2012 | 06:25 PM
Andrew Wilson's article is a fascinating addition to the lore of the Titanic. But the introductory caption is appalling. What is it about the deaths of 1500 people that you find "glorious"?
Posted by Mary Noll Nagase on March 15,2012 | 12:33 AM
The Titanic tragedy is only one more example of Man vs. Nature with the former often losing out. Hemingway's "Old Man & the Sea" underscored this. And so it was with the Tsunami in December 2004 while hundreds of thousands enjoyed coastal areas, the Fukushima reactors built near an unfortunate unstable vault line with totally inadequate wave breakers. Too many people around the globe are living dangerously too close to their coasts that are often subjected to Nature's wrath.
Mankind's messing with Nature often results with allegedly "unintended consequences" - just as New Orleans' defense measures were considered inadequate for decades by those living there and observing near total neglect to anticipate the hurricane that was sure to hit as it did in 1927.
As Prof. Pangloss in Voltaire's "Candide" consoled us with the idea that whatever happens is for the best and we should simply grow our own gardens. "Panglossian philosophy" is immortalized in both Webster and Oxford dictionaries.
Posted by Peter M. Lutterbeck, M.D. on March 12,2012 | 07:01 AM
+ View All Comments