The Smithsonian's Crystal Skull
How the museum's quartz cranium highlights the epic silliness of the new Indiana Jones movie
- By Owen Edwards
- Smithsonian.com, May 30, 2008, Subscribe
The crystal skull sought by Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones in the latest silver-screen installment of the archaeologist’s over-the-top adventures is, of course, a movie prop—masquerading as an ancient artifact from pre-Columbian Central America
The Smithsonian's Crystal Skull »
James Di Loreto/NMAH/SI
The crystal skull sought by Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones in the latest silver-screen installment of the archaeologist’s over-the-top adventures is, of course, a movie prop—masquerading as an ancient artifact from pre-Columbian Central America. (Disclosure: in my day job, I work for a magazine published by producer George Lucas’ Educational Foundation.) As it happens, the prop bears a strong resemblance to scores of crystal skulls in museum collections around the world. These skulls, carved from large chunks of quartz, may well have been chiseled by descendants of Aztecs and Mayans, but they are decidedly post-Columbian.
Fakes are an all too real part of the museum world. “There are always artists capable of making and selling things that seem old,” says anthropologist Jane MacLaren Walsh of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (NMNH). Walsh has seen her share of fakes. In fact, she has become something of a specialist on the subject. “I didn’t start out as a skeptic,” she says, “but experience has changed my outlook.”
In 1992, according to Walsh, the museum received an unsolicited donation of a larger-than-life, ten-inch-high skull carved from milky-hued quartz. Some time later, Walsh, an expert in Mexican archaeology, was asked to research the skull, one of several known to exist. Until that point, skulls of this kind typically had been attributed to ancient Mesoamerican cultures.
Walsh knew that if the skull proved to be a genuine pre-Columbian relic, it would constitute an important addition to the Smithsonian collection. But she harbored doubts from the start. “After Mexican independence,” she says, “a lot of outsiders started coming into the country and collecting historic pieces for museums.” The collectors, she adds, “created a demand, and local artisans then created a supply. Some of the things sold to these foreigners may not have been made to intentionally deceive, but certain dealers claimed that they were ancient.”
A major player in the skull game, according to Walsh, was Frederick Arthur Mitchell-Hedges, an English stockbroker-turned-adventurer who, in 1943, began displaying a crystal carving that he called “The Skull of Doom” to his dinner-party guests. His daughter, Anna, later claimed that he had found the skull in a ruined temple in Belize during the early 1920s. The family’s stories seemed to generate the “discovery” of more skulls with even wilder tales attached. (They had come from the lost city of Atlantis or been left by extraterrestrials.)
Investigations by the Linnean Society of London, a research institute specializing in taxonomy and natural history, revealed that Mitchell-Hedges actually purchased his skull at auction at Sotheby’s in London in 1943 for around £400, about $18,000 today. How it came to the auction house isn’t known. (Anna Mitchell-Hedges kept it until her death at age 100 last year; the object remains in the family.) Experts now believe that many extant crystal skulls were made in Germany during the late 1800s; Walsh thinks that the Smithsonian skull was carved in Mexico in the 1950s.
By 1996, Walsh had decided to put the skull to the test. She took it to London’s British Museum, whose collections contain two similar skulls. Margaret Sax, a materials expert there, used scanning electron microscopy to study tool marks on the skulls. In each case, she noted that modern tools and abrasives had been employed. Today, the skull that launched Walsh’s sleuthing sits in a locked cabinet in her Washington, D.C. office, faux and forlorn. Walsh, offering an explanation as to why many museums even today exhibit crystal skulls as authentic Mesoamerican antiquities, describes the artifacts as “reliable crowd pleasers.”
A few years ago, another skull was sent to NMNH for testing. Researchers took a sample; what had appeared to be quartz crystal was found to be glass.
“So that [one],” says Walsh, “turned out to be a fake fake.”
Owen Edwards, who lives in San Francisco, is a freelance writer and author of the book Elegant Solutions.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: National Museum of Natural History Crystals Artifacts Museums
Additional Sources
"Legend of the Crystal Skulls: The Truth Behind Indiana Jones's Latest Quest" by Jan MacLaren Walsh, Archaeology, May/June 2008
| Tweet | Digg |
Comments (26)
+ View All Comments
Research conducted at the crystal skulls were resolved this mystery and found that about 200 years old. So no 3 600 years, not 12 000 years, but come the second half of the nineteenth century. Several people were well-earned on them. The first is Mr. Eugene Boban who sold skulls as artifacts or objects of great value. . Another person who has raised capital, was Mrs. Ann Mitchell-Hedges who was on his tour lobanju.Kristalne charged views on the skull are still a good business. Sales are nicely packaged fraud.
Posted by Ratko Krsmanovic on February 19,2011 | 10:28 PM
i got a quick question for my reasearch paper, have any of the real skulls been uncoverd yet; or have they all been fakes?
if you got an answer e-mail me @ brendenpatriots@yahoo.com
thank you
Posted by brenden johnson on November 12,2009 | 02:06 PM
Uncle found a skull face carved on brownish rock, hand size, and the back of the rock is smooth. The skeleton face is very detailed; teeth, eyes, nose, and was found in known mound areas in a deep water hole near the Illinois river. Any knowledge or thoughts?
Posted by CAROLYN HALL on September 8,2009 | 03:22 PM
I understand that people would be skeptical of such a brilliant piece of art. What do you think about the phenomenom of some crystal skulls changing in weight and color? Is this just an outright lie?
Posted by todd A. on January 20,2009 | 09:49 PM
ive long to here about unusuall artifacts but the key i belive to be light or maybe a low denity light source it is possible that they may find something just a thought try it who knows it is hypothsis it may infact show somrthing just think projection
Posted by jeremy crossno on January 8,2009 | 01:03 AM
I loved it. I saw Indiana Jones & the kngdome of the chrystal skull last night so it made me look it up online to see if it was true!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Kylie Richards on November 8,2008 | 10:39 AM
This is what I believe, that no one will ever know the true power of any of the skulls until they are brought together. Until then they are just items collecting dust in a museum. If they do hold some kind of supernatural power not know to earth, then maybe its been hidden for a reason , or maybe its complete "b.s." Does anyone even know where the skulls came from?
Posted by willie on October 26,2008 | 04:34 PM
Its my belief that its the design and shape of the skull that is the center of its function. It seems to me that it is a instrument of sort that works off sounds or frequencys.Notice that the human skull itself, contains sight, hearing, and speech. Experiment how light, vibration, and magnets refract against it.
Posted by david cisneros on October 2,2008 | 02:48 AM
i love what skeptics buy into. i also love what gullible people need proof of. more power to asking questions i guess. long live the search for knowledge.
Posted by gerald delaney on September 22,2008 | 05:18 PM
I have no doubt that the crystal skulls lurking in various museums are of relatively recent origin, but I'd like to know more about a much smaller skull set in the base of a Mexican reliquary which is believed to be from 17th century. This object was part of the "Mexico -- Splendors of Thirty Centuries" exhibit which toured the U.S. in the 80's and a picture of it appeared in the exhibit book.
Posted by Jojo Jones on July 10,2008 | 10:15 AM
Very cool! I really enjoyed this article!
Posted by Chris Broersma on June 19,2008 | 12:17 AM
A real skull Has been found and shown on ng tv with marking on it of a map in south america to Africa and then to south Africa.. She then said it will go to a collector. I later found the skull in a rock shop being told that it was a geode. I still have the item today and it looks real to me, A little to real.
Posted by Michael Cline on June 17,2008 | 08:01 PM
Apparently, two key pieces of information regarding the Mitchell-Hedges Skull are missing from the Owen Edwards story. First, the surprising high-tech results from the Hewlett-Packard laboratory investigation. Second,the belief by some that M-H left the skull in London with someone who had loaned him money for an expedition, only to find on his return the latter had arranged to sell (or re-sell) it through Sothbey's, which forced an angry M-H to purchase (or re-purchase) it for £400 in 1943. Perhaps joint investigation by the Linnaeus Society and Sothebey's is needed to clarify the core issue, namely, the highly advanced technology evidenced in the M-H Skull, leaving aside all Atlantis, 2012, UFO and pre-colombian attachments?
Posted by Stan Hall on June 16,2008 | 05:23 AM
It's a shame that cultural promoters use Hollywood's movies like "Indiana Jones" to attract the masses to museums, art galleries, and other cultural activities, but what the heck! some how is necessary to achieve the impacts of art in society and its surroundings.
Posted by Jordi Prat on June 12,2008 | 12:09 AM
+ View All Comments