The Waldseemüller Map: Charting the New World
Two obscure 16th-century German scholars named the American continent and changed the way people thought about the world
- By Toby Lester
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2009, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 5)
This was an astonishing statement. Histories of New World discovery have long told us that it was only in 1513—after Vasco Núñez de Balboa had first caught sight of the Pacific by looking west from a mountain peak in Panama—that Europeans began to conceive of the New World as something other than a part of Asia. And it was only after 1520, once Magellan had rounded the tip of South America and sailed into the Pacific, that Europeans were thought to have confirmed the continental nature of the New World. And yet here, in a book published in 1507, were references to a large world map that showed a new, fourth part of the world and called it America.
The references were tantalizing, but for those studying the Introduction to Cosmography in the 19th century, there was an obvious problem. The book contained no such map.
Scholars and collectors alike began to search for it, and by the 1890s, as the 400th anniversary of Columbus' first voyage approached, the search had become a quest for the cartographical Holy Grail. "No lost maps have ever been sought for so diligently as these," Britain's Geographical Journal declared at the turn of the century, referring both to the large map and the globe. But nothing turned up. In 1896, the historian of discovery John Boyd Thacher simply threw up his hands. "The mystery of the map," he wrote, "is a mystery still."
On March 4, 1493, seeking refuge from heavy seas, a storm-battered caravel flying the Spanish flag limped into Portugal's Tagus River estuary. In command was one Christoforo Colombo, a Genoese sailor destined to become better known by his Latinized name, Christopher Columbus. After finding a suitable anchorage site, Columbus dispatched a letter to his sponsors, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain, reporting in exultation that after a 33-day crossing he had reached the Indies, a vast archipelago on the eastern outskirts of Asia.
The Spanish sovereigns greeted the news with excitement and pride, though neither they nor anybody else initially assumed that Columbus had done anything revolutionary. European sailors had been discovering new islands in the Atlantic for more than a century—the Canaries, the Madeiras, the Azores, the Cape Verde islands. People had good reason, based on the dazzling variety of islands that dotted the oceans of medieval maps, to assume that many more remained to be found.
Some people assumed that Columbus had found nothing more than a few new Canary Islands. Even if Columbus had reached the Indies, that didn't mean he had expanded Europe's geographical horizons. By sailing west to what appeared to be the Indies (but in actuality were the islands of the Caribbean), he had confirmed an ancient theory that nothing but a small ocean separated Europe from Asia. Columbus had closed a geographical circle, it seemed—making the world smaller, not larger.
But the world began to expand again in the early 1500s. The news first reached most Europeans in letters by Amerigo Vespucci, a Florentine merchant who had taken part in at least two voyages across the Atlantic, one sponsored by Spain, the other by Portugal, and had sailed along a giant continental landmass that appeared on no maps of the time. What was sensational, even mind-blowing, about this newly discovered land was that it stretched thousands of miles beyond the Equator to the south. Printers in Florence jumped at the chance to publicize the news, and in late 1502 or early 1503 they printed a doctored version of one of Vespucci's letters, under the title Mundus Novus, or New World, in which he appeared to say that he'd discovered a new continent. The work quickly became a best seller.
"In the past," it began, "I have written to you in rather ample detail about my return from those new regions...and which can be called a new world, since our ancestors had no knowledge of them, and they are entirely new matter to those who hear about them. Indeed, it surpasses the opinion of our ancient authorities, since most of them assert that there is no continent south of the equator....[But] I have discovered a continent in those southern regions that is inhabited by more numerous peoples and animals than in our Europe, or Asia or Africa."
This passage has been described as a watershed moment in European geographical thought—the moment at which a European first became aware that the New World was distinct from Asia. But "new world" didn't necessarily mean then what it means today. Europeans used it regularly to describe any part of the known world that they had not previously visited or seen described. In fact, in another letter, unambiguously attributed to Vespucci, he made clear where he thought he had been on his voyages. "We concluded," he wrote, "that this was continental land—which I esteem to be bounded by the eastern part of Asia."
In 1504 or so, a copy of the New World letter fell into the hands of an Alsatian scholar and poet named Matthias Ringmann. Then in his early 20s, Ringmann taught school and worked as a proofreader at a small printing press in Strasbourg, but he had a side interest in classical geography—specifically, the work of Ptolemy. In a work known as the Geography, Ptolemy had explained how to map the world in degrees of latitude and longitude, a system he had used to stitch together a comprehensive picture of the world as it was known in antiquity. His maps depicted most of Europe, the northern half of Africa and the western half of Asia, but they didn't, of course, include all the parts of Asia visited by Marco Polo in the 13th century, or the parts of southern Africa discovered by the Portuguese in the latter half of the 15th century.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Explorers Geography Age of Discovery Americas
Additional Sources
"Renaissance German Cosmographers and the Naming of America," Christine R. Johnson, Past & Present, Number 191, May 2006









Comments (20)
+ View All Comments
Yes, great map and story.
I, too, am wondering if copies are available.
Posted by Ron Munson on April 11,2010 | 06:56 PM
This anomalously accurate map, like the Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings (Hapgood), was drawn from ancient source maps drawn by the mapping method described in article #2 at http://IceAgeCivilizations.com.
Posted by James I. Nienhuis on February 6,2010 | 08:14 AM
There is a very good DVD called THE MAP MAKERS - ep. 1 is about this map, and some other early maps.(was a 3 TV episode series by "Wild Dream Films" in association with "The History Channel" - so possibly gets repeated on cable.
Ep 2: is on Mercator Atlas.
Oddly - Ep 3 jumps to 400 years later - but it is very interesting, being about the elaborate mapping for the D-Day invasion of France in 1944.
But what happened to all the cartographic explorers in between - e.g. Captain Cook, Matthew Flinders - AND the other map makers in the rest of the world (Arabs, Turks, Chinese)? Maybe the Producers ran out of money? Pity.
Even just these 3 eps. are really worth seeing.
Posted by Dr Antony Howe on January 11,2010 | 02:37 AM
Not to be too pedantic, but St-Die was not in France in 1507. Lorraine was still part of the Holy Roman Empire, and would remain so for another 200 years. By law that is--but de facto, it was a separate state, with its own ruling family, and its own important patronage of artists and scholars, like Walseemuller.
Posted by Jonathan Spangler on January 11,2010 | 08:46 AM
An excellent article both fascinating and informative in an area that does not receive enough press. I shall buy the book so as to read the remainder of what space could not allow. Thank you. T.N. Craig
Posted by Terry N. Craig on December 26,2009 | 07:14 PM
A great story.
In answer to why they assumed there was a great sea beyond the Americas could be:
1. They, like the Portugese estimated the circumference of the earth, pretty closely. 2.From Marco Polo's report, they knew there was a great sea to the east of China. 3. Therefore,thatsea must cover the distance from China/Japan to the Americas or there might be two or more seas in between with other lands deviding them. So they showed the west coast of the Americas bounding this sea as undefined . For all they knew it might extend most of the way to China. Again,a great story, right to the end.
Posted by LA Bob on December 15,2009 | 05:06 PM
I thought it to be fascinating and insightful that the words, "those southern regions that is inhabited by more numerous peoples and animals than in our Europe, or Asia or Africa", begins to give us the initial sightings and revelations of people and animals outside of the then known continents. Such profundity in the simple written word!!
Posted by Deborah Dolsey on December 12,2009 | 11:27 AM
I have just finished reading the Smithsonian Magazine and the article by Toby Lester. Mr. Lester writes in a style that reminds me of a New York Times Best Seller. I thoroughly enjoyed the piece and could not put it down until I finished it. Thanks Mr. Lester. Let's have more!
Posted by Jim Palmer on December 12,2009 | 09:21 AM
Completely facinating, Although,even though Waldseemüller drew the map, judging from the text I think we should call it the Ringmann map.
Posted by Sean on December 10,2009 | 10:34 PM
The Waldseemuller Map looks very much like the one drawn by Piri Reis (Known as the Piri Reis Map) in 1513. His shows Antarctica's landmass free of ice. He explained that he composed his map from some 20 different maps, some of which dated back to Alexander the Great (died 323 AD) and even earlier.
Subsequent analysis of the Piri Reis Map showed it to be extremely accurate and according to some people could have only been done by viewing the earth from space.
In 1513, supposedly,North and South America as well as Antarctica had not been discovered. So how could these continents be depicted on any maps drawn up by Waldseemuller or Piri Reis.
It leads us to believe that a very intelligent race of people must have existed in our ancient and distant past.
Posted by Cecil Miller on December 9,2009 | 01:01 AM
Cristovão Colombo a portuguese natural of Cuba(in Alentejo-Portugal) discovered America at the service of the King of Spain, and he wrote the first map of the area.
I do believe that the Portuguese National Library (Torre do Tombo ) has a copy of this book, but on the area of reserves and it is not yet available as an internet copy and as with all the 15/16 th century books they do not allow us "the not illuminaty" to touch or even see it. But they are doing a fantastic job copying these kind of books so we will be able to see it soon.
I am not an expert on maps I am doing PHD on the Portuguese Caravel construction but I can try to answer any question because my latim and portuguese are much better than my english. We do have 7 years of latin and only 3 of english at school.
Merry Xmas
Francisco
Posted by Francisco A. Fontes on December 9,2009 | 02:24 PM
To John Burkhart, who asked for the title of the book--it's The Fourth Part of the World: The Race to the Ends of hte Earth and the Epic Story of the Map that Gave America Its Name, by Toby Lester
Posted by T.A. Frail on December 9,2009 | 01:23 PM
Thanks for an amazing article in another amazing issue of Smithsonian.
Posted by Calogero on December 9,2009 | 12:20 PM
On pg 79 part of the sub-title says "A new book tells how___" etc. What is the title of this book and who is the author?? I would like to read it.
thanx
Posted by John Burkhart on December 4,2009 | 11:37 PM
+ View All Comments