The Top 10 Political Conventions That Mattered the Most
As the two parties bring together their faithful supporters, we look at those conventions in the past that truly made a difference in the country’s political history
- By Kenneth C. Davis
- Smithsonian.com, August 27, 2012, Subscribe
As the two main party conventions approach—the Republicans kick off today, August 27, in Tampa, Florida, followed by the Democrats in Charlotte, North Carolina, next week—pardon the nation’s collective yawn.
National conventions, once riveting political theater that held America in suspense for days, have been reduced to a made-for-television, political promo for the two parties. Since primary elections now routinely determine the candidates, this quadrennial dog-and-pony show offers a ho-hum pageant, in which windy speeches are delivered, party platforms hammered out and often ignored, and delegates don silly hats and hold up handmade signs extolling the virtues of candidates, causes and home states. Once the scene of bare-knuckle politicking and backroom deals, the modern conventions now provide comforting tableaus –full of sound and fury, but mostly signifying nothing.
That is why the once-trumpeted network “gavel-to-gavel” coverage has gone the way of disco and leisure suits.
The convention had essentially become obsolete by the 1972 Democratic Convention in Miami. Following the party reforms of the early 1970s, state primary elections could provide enough delegates to choose the nominee. Senator George McGovern—who had helped write the Democratic Party’s new nominating rules — garnered a majority of Democratic delegates by the time the convention began. (McGovern was then crushed by Nixon in a landslide.) So we may never again have a repeat of 1924, when the Democrats took 17 days and 103 ballots in the longest convention ever to nominate John W. Davis –who was and remains an obscure congressman from West Virginia.
But once upon a time, conventions mattered. They chose the candidates, often with plenty of intrigue and horse-trading in the notorious “smoke-filled rooms” of yesteryear. And for that reason, some memorable conventions have changed the course of history. Here, in chronological order, are the Ten Most Consequential Conventions, also highlighting a few significant convention “Firsts.”
1. 1831 Anti-Masonic Convention—Why start with one of the most obscure third parties in American history? Because they invented nominating conventions. The Anti-Masons, who feared the growing political and financial power of the secret society of Freemasons, formed in upstate New York; among their members was future president Millard Fillmore.
Before the Anti-Masons met in Baltimore in September 1831, candidates for president were chosen in the Congressional caucuses of two major parties –then the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans (soon to be the Democratic Party). In December 1831, the short-lived National Republican party followed the Anti-Mason lead and met in Baltimore to nominate Henry Clay, the powerful Kentucky congressman. The Democrats followed suit, also in Baltimore, selecting Andrew Jackson, the ultimate victor, in May 1832.
“King Caucus” was dead. The political convention had been born. And the country never looked back.
2. 1856 Republican Convention—The first national convention of the Republican Party marks the beginning of the two-party system as we know it. Meeting in Philadelphia, the new party chose John C. Frémont –the “Pathfinder” who mapped the way West for a generation of pioneers. A popular hero, Frémont also provided the new party with its slogan: “Free Soil, Free Speech, Free men, Frémont.” The slavery issue had become America’s undeniable fault line, even if most Republicans, including Abraham Lincoln, sought only to end the extension of slavery, not abolish it outright..
Frémont also ignited the first “birther” controversy. Opponents claimed he was born in Canada–and worse, back then, he was Catholic! (Former president Fillmore, onetime Anti-Mason, was nominated that year by the Know-Nothings, another odd third party which opposed immigration and foreigners.)
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
thanks
Posted by Ann on September 13,2012 | 05:33 AM
Although a good article: (The Top Ten Political Conventions That Mattered The Most), the article contains a glaring error. In #6 It states: Roosevelt finished second; he and Taft had split the Republican vote, leaving an opening for Democrat Woodrow Wilson to win the presidency. This of course is not true. Wilson received 435 Electoral Votes and Taft received only 8. Roosevelt's 88 Electoral Votes would have made no difference whatsoever. Jeffrey C. Apparius Bremerton, WA
Posted by Jeffrey C. Apparius on September 3,2012 | 09:24 AM
Both comments are correct. The sentence was to have read an "assassin bullet" not an "anarchist's bullet." It has been corrected. I regret the error.
Posted by Kenneth C. Davis on August 31,2012 | 06:36 PM
Giteau, as has been pointed out, was not an anarchist. "I am a Stalwart," he proclaimed, "and Arthur is President now!" '68 should be on the list, but if '68, then the Copperhead convention (also in Chicago) of 1864 should be as well.
Posted by j sharkey on August 30,2012 | 07:26 PM
Dear Mr. Davis, You mentioned the 1924 Democratic convention, but did not include it in your list. Why? The Progressives and the Klan battled each other to a draw in 1924 and set the stage for the Progressives to take over in 1928 (and beyond). It was a turning point for the Democrats. And it was similar to the 1964 Republican convention. Seems to me that the 1924 Democratic convention deserves a better place in history.
Posted by William H. Keyser on August 28,2012 | 06:30 PM
I know this much about history: Garfield was not assassinated by an anarchist. McKinley was. John W. Davis was more than an obscure Congressman from West Virginia. He was prominent in the Wilson Administration as Ambassador to Great Britain and Solicitor General, he was considered by Presidents of both parties for a seat on the Supremen Court, and he was a founder of a major NY law firm that still bears his name. No quarrel with the choice of the Top 10, though restricting it to ten squeezes out the Democrats' conventions of 1844 and 1896 and 1948, and the Republicans' of 1952 and 1964.
Posted by John G. Caulfield on August 28,2012 | 01:42 PM