The Mystery of Bosnia's Ancient Pyramids
An amateur archaeologist says he's discovered the world's oldest pyramids in the Balkans. But many experts remain dubious
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2009, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 5)
Critics also cite the potential damage to Bosnia's archae- ological heritage. "In Bosnia, you can't dig in your back garden without finding artifacts," says Adnan Kaljanac, a graduate student of ancient history at the University of Sarajevo. Although Osmanagich's excavation has kept its distance from the medieval ruins on Visocica Hill, Kaljanac worries that the project may destroy undocumented Neolithic, Roman or medieval sites in the valley. Similarly, in a 2006 letter to Science magazine, Schoch said the hills in Visoko "could well yield scientifically valuable terrestrial vertebrate specimens. Presently, the fossils are being ignored and destroyed during the ‘excavations,' as crews work to shape the natural hills into crude semblances of the Mayan-style step pyramids with which Osmanagich is so enamored."
That same year, the Commission to Preserve National Monuments, an independent body created in 1995 by the Dayton peace treaty to safeguard historical artifacts from nationalist infighting, asked to inspect artifacts reportedly found at Osmanagich's site. According to commission head Lovrenovic, commission members were refused access. The commission then expanded the protected zone around Visoki, effectively pushing Osmanagich off the mountain. Bosnia's president, ministers and parliament currently have no authority to override the commission's decisions.
But if Osmanagich has begun to encounter obstacles in his homeland, he's had continuing success abroad. This past June, he was made a foreign member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, one of whose academicians served as "scientific chairman" of the First International Scientific Conference of the Valley of the Pyramids, which Osmanagich convened in Sarajevo in August 2008. Conference organizers included the Russian Academy of Technical Sciences, Ain Shams University in Cairo and the Archaeological Society of Alexandria. This past July, officials in the village of Boljevac, Serbia, claimed that a team sent by Osmanagich had confirmed a pyramid under Rtanj, a local mountain. Osmanagich e-mailed me he had not visited Rtanj himself nor had he initiated any research at the site. However, he told the Serbian newspaper Danas that he endorsed future study. "This is not the only location in Serbia, nor the region, where there is a possibility of pyramidal structures," he was quoted as saying.
For now Osmanagich has gone underground, literally, to excavate a series of what he says are ancient tunnels in Visoko—which he believes are part of a network that connects the three pyramids. He leads me through one of them, a cramped, three-foot-high passage through disconcertedly unconsolidated sand and pebbles he says he is widening into a seven-foot-tall thoroughfare—the tunnel's original height, he maintains—for tourists. (The tunnel was partially filled, he says, when sea levels rose by 1,500 feet at the end of the ice age.) He points out various boulders he says were transported to the site 15,000 years ago, some of which bear carvings he says date back to that time. In an interview with the Bosnian weekly magazine BH Dani, Nadija Nukic, a geologist whom Osmanagich once employed, claimed there was no writing on the boulders when she first saw them. Later, she saw what appeared to her as freshly cut marks. She added that one of the foundation's workers told her he had carved the first letters of his and his children's names. (After the interview was published, Osmanagich posted a denial from the worker on his Web site. Efforts to reach Nukic have been unavailing.)
Some 200 yards in, we reach the end of the excavated portion of the tunnel. Ahead lies a tenuous-looking crawl space through the gravelly, unconsolidated earth. Osmanagich says he plans to dig all the way to Visocica Hill, 1.4 miles away, adding that, with additional donations, he could reach it in as few as three years. "Ten years from now nobody will remember my critics," he says as we start back toward the light, "and a million people will come to see what we have."
Colin Woodard is a freelance writer living in Maine. His most recent book is The Republic of Pirates (Harcourt, 2007).
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Archaeology Mesolithic Bosnia and Herzegovina Historic and Cultural Monuments
Additional Sources
"Mad About Pyramids," Science, by John Bohannon, September 22, 2006.
"Some See a 'Pyramid' to Hone Bosnia's Image. Others See a Big Hill," by Craig S. Smith, New York Times, May 15, 2006.









Comments (54)
+ View All Comments
Intresting comment on the Egytian pyrimids being cast from a sandstone mixture. Ive read about this before and it seems this guy noticed street vendors selling Spynx sp. replicas and other souveniers that look real so he asked a vendor about it and was told they mix up this stuff out of pulverized sandstone and cement type and cast it like any mold and out comes the sandstone looking ptoduct. So he starts thinking and goes out to the great pyrimid and gets some chunks od debris and breakes it up and behold..Contamination with camel hair etc. Or so the story goes.. Supposedly the Egyptian Government doesnt want this to get around as it makes the construction of the pyramids very much more easily doable. Ancient American magazine has a story on the Bosnian pyramid and someone states a carbon dating from wood in alleged tunnel at 30,000 years old.
Posted by Dale on February 4,2013 | 03:45 PM
Whack-a-doodle is not a valid scientific methodology. Nice looking hills though.
Posted by Northland on February 2,2013 | 11:25 AM
It's a natural form. Bosnian Pyramid is fake.
Posted by Jess on January 24,2013 | 05:21 PM
I have not seen the others, but from basic photos one can tell that Visocica Hill looks closer to a pyramid than to a regular 'hill'. Anybody that refutes this is in a constant state of denial.
Posted by jef on January 8,2013 | 01:36 PM
if this is a real pyramid why not clear the foliage off the very top to uncover the top and that would soon prove this to be genuine pyramid or geological????
Posted by alex on December 23,2012 | 03:34 PM
Quite fascinating, his economics degree did him well. #YOLO
Posted by Semeni Somnus on November 27,2012 | 08:18 AM
Well, is certainly strange that this shape should be so naturally pyramidic. I thought that when no entrance could be found that they must be some form of natural. But you do have to take the water site into consideration. As in Ireland. It remains to be determined what conditions existed on Earth when these massive forms were solidified. I am thinking magnetism? What if the water was levitated? In a 10 Tesla that happens, and the effort to draw down this sky river would require? This theory fits with the Maori myth of eels from the sky. For all our science discoveries we are focused on astronomical occurrences when the history of E has yet to be defined.
Posted by katesisco on November 24,2012 | 07:47 PM
There are Pyramids in Bosnia, in spite of the fact, that according to mainstream science, they should not be there. There are lots of excavations sites, any of them is showing lined up megalithic structures. Any megalith is 3D-rectangular. Lets say, lets presume they are natural. If that is the truth, then Empire State Building is also natural, not man made. Why? If you check the soil, it is made of the same material (iron, conglomerate). There are lots of other, similar objects that go high in the sky, made of the same material, in the near-by. I could even find some geologist (not real professionals, of course) that could confirm that. It's easy to play games of science, but it is hard to catch a deep breath and look into the hard evidence, and to be frank with oneself. In defiance to all side counter-theories, Bosnian Pyramids are there, for anyone that is really interested into the truth to go there and to look for himself, and to form his own independent opinion. I am convinced, because I was there, looked at the evidence, touched the megaliths, and saw how jackhammer broke down trying to drill into one of them. Concrete in megaliths is harder then any known natural rock, or man made concrete, so, it must be something done with basic materials, like with concrete material of Empire State Building, yet, the method is unknown to modern science, as in other cases of ancient structures. Mainstream science started to be dogmatic, as church was in middle ages. The which-hunt in media is like which-hunts in those times. It is said, said moment for the world today, that one of the biggest archeological discoveries was being so maliciously scrutinized.
Posted by Nick on October 21,2012 | 09:16 PM
I looked at the pictures and saw no real evidence of a pyramid there. Since when are tunnels (even if they were man made) a solid indication of the existence of a pyramid. Carbon dating, please, what did they carbon dated? the soil or what? Shouldn't we expect the soil of a mountain to be as old as the mountain? Who discovered this pyramids? someone with a degree in international economics and politics and a doctorate in the sociology of history who made a lot of trips to other pyramid sites before he "found" this "pyramids". How many years since the discovery? Can anyone provide me with a link to any undeniable evidence? He and the Bosnian government are really smart. He gains fame and gets paid very well and the government gets tourism. Isn't a book about Hitler and some others going to Antarctica his story to make money and not the history of the world? Were is the evidence in any of this?
Posted by livinginstone on October 19,2012 | 02:34 AM
I am sedimentologist in Comenius University, Bratislava. What I have seen on videos, there are not human made pavement or terraces, but natural beds of sandstones and conglomerates. Individual beds were deposited on sea bottom between marl beds. Sandstone beds were naturally breaked up to regular or irregular blocks. It si common in nature. Very peculiar is shape of the hill. If it is ancient pyramid, it was carved from natural hill but not built.
Posted by Daniel on October 18,2012 | 05:13 AM
i cant halp but enjoy you quack smarmy historians who deny the validation of this pyramid to keep your pathetic tenure. LMFAO! time to rewrite history you paid off shills. your not worth the paper your printed on. what a waste of time and money you were. I guess the smithsonain cant dump THESE artifacts at sea. on behalf of humanity, thanks for nothing.
Posted by jaydi on September 22,2012 | 11:07 AM
I have said it before and I'll say it again. If you are an armchair critic, degreed or not, and have not done research your self on a project, then your comments are hollow.
Posted by Arthur Faram on August 6,2012 | 01:48 PM
pyramid?where is it?inside the mountain,inside the soil.how did it get in there?where are the perfectly cut stones?where are the lovely rooms?where are the lovely steps?where are the corridors?where are the wall drawings and paintings?they either lie for easy money or they work for cia or mossad or
Posted by anticapitalist on July 6,2012 | 12:21 PM
Are we sure we are reading a scientific article on the pyramids in the Smithsonian Magazine? The magazine article reads like a state department rebuttal bringing up the recent Bosnian war. It reads like a white-wash. Sorry Smithsonian, but I have read enough articles in the Smithsonian to realize that this is very un-Smithsonian like article. The article sounds defensive and that I want to ask, is there something that the US government writers are trying to hide, and using the Smithsonian Magazine to get that information out couched in a slanted article.
Posted by Carol on May 23,2012 | 11:46 PM
+ View All Comments