The Mystery of Bosnia's Ancient Pyramids
An amateur archaeologist says he's discovered the world's oldest pyramids in the Balkans. But many experts remain dubious
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2009, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
Archaeological claims have long been used to serve political purposes. In 1912, British archaeologists combined a modern skull with an orangutan jaw to fabricate a "missing link" in support of the claim that human beings arose in Britain, not Africa. (The paleontologist Richard Leakey later noted that English elites took so much pride in "being the first, that they swallowed [the hoax] hook, line and sinker." )
More recently, in 2000, Shinichi Fujimura—a prominent archaeologist whose finds suggested that Japanese civilization was 700,000 years old—was revealed to have buried the forged artifacts he had supposedly discovered. "Fujimura's straightforward con was undoubtedly accepted by the establishment, as well as the popular press, because it gave them evidence of what they already wanted to believe—the great antiquity of the Japanese people," Michele Miller wrote in the archaeological journal Athena Review.
Some Bosnian scholars have publicly opposed Osmanagich's project. In April 2006, twenty-one historians, geologists and archaeologists signed a letter published in several Bosnian newspapers describing the excavations as amateurish and lacking proper scientific supervision. Some went on local television to debate Osmanagich. Bosniak nationalists retaliated, denouncing pyramid opponents as "corrupt" and harassing them with e-mails. Zilka Kujundzic-Vejzagic of the National Museum, one of the Balkans' pre-eminent archaeologists, says she received threatening phone calls. "One time I was getting onto the tram and a man pushed me off and said, ‘You're an enemy of Bosnia, you don't ride on this tram,'" she recalls. "I felt a bit endangered."
"I have colleagues who have gone into silence because the attacks are constant and very terrible," says University of Sarajevo historian Salmedin Mesihovic. "Every day you feel the pressure."
"Anyone who puts their head above the parapet suffers the same fate," says Anthony Harding, a pyramid skeptic who was, until recently, president of the European Association of Archaeologists. Sitting in his office at the University of Exeter in England, he reads from a thick folder of letters denouncing him as a fool and a friend of the Serbs. He labeled the file "Bosnia—Abuse."
In June 2006, Sulejman Tihic, then chairman of Bosnia's three-member presidency, endorsed the foundation's work. "One does not need to be a big expert to see that those are the remains of three pyramids," he told journalists at a summit of Balkan presidents. Tihic invited Koichiro Matsuura, then director-general of Unesco, to send experts to determine if the pyramids qualified as a World Heritage site. Foreign scholars, including Harding, rallied to block the move: 25 of them, representing six countries, signed an open letter to Matsuura warning that "Osmanagich is conducting a pseudo-archaeological project that, disgracefully, threatens to destroy parts of Bosnia's real heritage."
But the Pyramid Foundation's political clout appears considerable. When the minister of culture of the Bosniak-Croat Federation, Gavrilo Grahovac, blocked the renewal of foundation permits in 2007—on the grounds that the credibility of those working on the project was "unreliable"—the action was overruled by Nedzad Brankovic, then the federation prime minister. "Why should we disown something that the entire world is interested in?" Brankovic told reporters at a press conference following a visit to the site. "The government will not act negatively toward this project." Haris Silajdzic, another member of the national presidency, has also expressed support for Osmanagich's project, on grounds that it helps the economy.
Critics contend that the project not only sullies Bosnian science but also soaks up scarce resources. Osmanagich says his foundation has received over $1 million, including $220,000 from Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan; $240,000 from the town of Visoko; $40,000 from the federal government; and $350,000 out of Osmanagich's pocket. Meanwhile, the National Museum in Sarajevo has struggled to find sufficient funds to repair wartime damage and safeguard its collection, which includes more than two million archaeological artifacts and hundreds of thousands of books.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Archaeology Mesolithic Bosnia and Herzegovina Historic and Cultural Monuments
Additional Sources
"Mad About Pyramids," Science, by John Bohannon, September 22, 2006.
"Some See a 'Pyramid' to Hone Bosnia's Image. Others See a Big Hill," by Craig S. Smith, New York Times, May 15, 2006.









Comments (54)
+ View All Comments
Intresting comment on the Egytian pyrimids being cast from a sandstone mixture. Ive read about this before and it seems this guy noticed street vendors selling Spynx sp. replicas and other souveniers that look real so he asked a vendor about it and was told they mix up this stuff out of pulverized sandstone and cement type and cast it like any mold and out comes the sandstone looking ptoduct. So he starts thinking and goes out to the great pyrimid and gets some chunks od debris and breakes it up and behold..Contamination with camel hair etc. Or so the story goes.. Supposedly the Egyptian Government doesnt want this to get around as it makes the construction of the pyramids very much more easily doable. Ancient American magazine has a story on the Bosnian pyramid and someone states a carbon dating from wood in alleged tunnel at 30,000 years old.
Posted by Dale on February 4,2013 | 03:45 PM
Whack-a-doodle is not a valid scientific methodology. Nice looking hills though.
Posted by Northland on February 2,2013 | 11:25 AM
It's a natural form. Bosnian Pyramid is fake.
Posted by Jess on January 24,2013 | 05:21 PM
I have not seen the others, but from basic photos one can tell that Visocica Hill looks closer to a pyramid than to a regular 'hill'. Anybody that refutes this is in a constant state of denial.
Posted by jef on January 8,2013 | 01:36 PM
if this is a real pyramid why not clear the foliage off the very top to uncover the top and that would soon prove this to be genuine pyramid or geological????
Posted by alex on December 23,2012 | 03:34 PM
Quite fascinating, his economics degree did him well. #YOLO
Posted by Semeni Somnus on November 27,2012 | 08:18 AM
Well, is certainly strange that this shape should be so naturally pyramidic. I thought that when no entrance could be found that they must be some form of natural. But you do have to take the water site into consideration. As in Ireland. It remains to be determined what conditions existed on Earth when these massive forms were solidified. I am thinking magnetism? What if the water was levitated? In a 10 Tesla that happens, and the effort to draw down this sky river would require? This theory fits with the Maori myth of eels from the sky. For all our science discoveries we are focused on astronomical occurrences when the history of E has yet to be defined.
Posted by katesisco on November 24,2012 | 07:47 PM
There are Pyramids in Bosnia, in spite of the fact, that according to mainstream science, they should not be there. There are lots of excavations sites, any of them is showing lined up megalithic structures. Any megalith is 3D-rectangular. Lets say, lets presume they are natural. If that is the truth, then Empire State Building is also natural, not man made. Why? If you check the soil, it is made of the same material (iron, conglomerate). There are lots of other, similar objects that go high in the sky, made of the same material, in the near-by. I could even find some geologist (not real professionals, of course) that could confirm that. It's easy to play games of science, but it is hard to catch a deep breath and look into the hard evidence, and to be frank with oneself. In defiance to all side counter-theories, Bosnian Pyramids are there, for anyone that is really interested into the truth to go there and to look for himself, and to form his own independent opinion. I am convinced, because I was there, looked at the evidence, touched the megaliths, and saw how jackhammer broke down trying to drill into one of them. Concrete in megaliths is harder then any known natural rock, or man made concrete, so, it must be something done with basic materials, like with concrete material of Empire State Building, yet, the method is unknown to modern science, as in other cases of ancient structures. Mainstream science started to be dogmatic, as church was in middle ages. The which-hunt in media is like which-hunts in those times. It is said, said moment for the world today, that one of the biggest archeological discoveries was being so maliciously scrutinized.
Posted by Nick on October 21,2012 | 09:16 PM
I looked at the pictures and saw no real evidence of a pyramid there. Since when are tunnels (even if they were man made) a solid indication of the existence of a pyramid. Carbon dating, please, what did they carbon dated? the soil or what? Shouldn't we expect the soil of a mountain to be as old as the mountain? Who discovered this pyramids? someone with a degree in international economics and politics and a doctorate in the sociology of history who made a lot of trips to other pyramid sites before he "found" this "pyramids". How many years since the discovery? Can anyone provide me with a link to any undeniable evidence? He and the Bosnian government are really smart. He gains fame and gets paid very well and the government gets tourism. Isn't a book about Hitler and some others going to Antarctica his story to make money and not the history of the world? Were is the evidence in any of this?
Posted by livinginstone on October 19,2012 | 02:34 AM
I am sedimentologist in Comenius University, Bratislava. What I have seen on videos, there are not human made pavement or terraces, but natural beds of sandstones and conglomerates. Individual beds were deposited on sea bottom between marl beds. Sandstone beds were naturally breaked up to regular or irregular blocks. It si common in nature. Very peculiar is shape of the hill. If it is ancient pyramid, it was carved from natural hill but not built.
Posted by Daniel on October 18,2012 | 05:13 AM
i cant halp but enjoy you quack smarmy historians who deny the validation of this pyramid to keep your pathetic tenure. LMFAO! time to rewrite history you paid off shills. your not worth the paper your printed on. what a waste of time and money you were. I guess the smithsonain cant dump THESE artifacts at sea. on behalf of humanity, thanks for nothing.
Posted by jaydi on September 22,2012 | 11:07 AM
I have said it before and I'll say it again. If you are an armchair critic, degreed or not, and have not done research your self on a project, then your comments are hollow.
Posted by Arthur Faram on August 6,2012 | 01:48 PM
pyramid?where is it?inside the mountain,inside the soil.how did it get in there?where are the perfectly cut stones?where are the lovely rooms?where are the lovely steps?where are the corridors?where are the wall drawings and paintings?they either lie for easy money or they work for cia or mossad or
Posted by anticapitalist on July 6,2012 | 12:21 PM
Are we sure we are reading a scientific article on the pyramids in the Smithsonian Magazine? The magazine article reads like a state department rebuttal bringing up the recent Bosnian war. It reads like a white-wash. Sorry Smithsonian, but I have read enough articles in the Smithsonian to realize that this is very un-Smithsonian like article. The article sounds defensive and that I want to ask, is there something that the US government writers are trying to hide, and using the Smithsonian Magazine to get that information out couched in a slanted article.
Posted by Carol on May 23,2012 | 11:46 PM
+ View All Comments