The Mystery of Bosnia's Ancient Pyramids
An amateur archaeologist says he's discovered the world's oldest pyramids in the Balkans. But many experts remain dubious
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2009, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 5)
"The landform [Osmanagich] is calling a pyramid is actually quite common," agrees Paul Heinrich, an archaeological geologist at Louisiana State University. "They're called ‘flatirons' in the United States and you see a lot of them out West." He adds that there are "hundreds around the world," including the "Russian Twin Pyramids" in Vladivostok.
Apparently unperturbed by the University of Tuzla report, Osmanagich said Visocica's conglomerate blocks were made of concrete that ancient builders had poured on-site. This theory was endorsed by Joseph Davidovits, a French materials scientist who, in 1982, advanced another controversial hypothesis—that the blocks making up the Egyptian pyramids were not carved, as nearly all experts believe, but cast in limestone concrete. Osmanagich dubbed Pljesevica's sandstone plates "paved terraces," and according to Schoch, workers carved the hillside between the layers—to create the impression of stepped sides on the Pyramid of the Moon. Particularly uniform blocks and tile sections were exposed for viewing by dignitaries, journalists and the many tourists who descended on the town.
Osmanagich's announcements sparked a media sensation, stoked with a steady supply of fresh observations: a 12,000-year-old "burial mound" (without any skeletons) in a nearby village; a stone on Visocica with alleged curative powers; a third pyramid dubbed the Pyramid of the Dragon; and two "shaped hills" that he has named the Pyramid of Love and the Temple of Earth. And Osmanagich has recruited an assortment of experts whom he says vindicate his claims. For instance, in 2007, Enver Buza, a surveyor from Sarajevo's Geodetic Institute, published a paper stating that the Pyramid of the Sun is "oriented to the north with a perfect precision."
Many Bosnians have embraced Osmanagich's theories, particularly those from among the country's ethnic Bosniaks (or Bosnian Muslims), who constitute about 48 percent of Bosnia's population. Visoko was held by Bosniak-led forces during the 1990s war, when it was choked with refugees driven out of surrounding villages by Bosnian Serb (and later, Croat) forces, who repeatedly shelled the town. Today it is a bastion of support for the Bosniaks' nationalist party, which controls the mayor's office. A central tenet of Bosniak national mythology is that Bosniaks are descended from Bosnia's medieval nobility. Ruins of the 14th-century Visoki Castle can be found on the summit of Visocica Hill—on top of the Pyramid of the Sun—and, in combination, the two icons create considerable symbolic resonance for Bosniaks. The belief that Visoko was a cradle of European civilization and that the Bosniaks' ancestors were master builders who surpassed even the ancient Egyptians has become a matter of ethnic pride. "The pyramids have been turned into a place of Bosniak identification," says historian Dubravko Lovrenovic of the Bosnia and Herzegovina Commission to Preserve National Monuments. "If you are not for the pyramids, you are accused of being an enemy of the Bosniaks."
For his part, Osmanagich insists he disapproves of those who exploit his archaeological work for political gain. "Those pyramids don't belong to any particular nationality," he says. "These are not Bosniak or Muslim or Serb or Croat pyramids, because they were built at a time when those nations and religions were not in existence." He says his project should "unite people, not divide them."
Yet Bosnia and Herzegovina still bears the deep scars of a war in which the country's Serbs and, later, Croats sought to create ethnically pure small states by killing or expelling people of other ethnicities. The most brutal incident occurred in 1995, when Serb forces seized control of the town of Srebrenica—a United Nations-protected "safe haven"—and executed some 8,000 Bosniak men of military age. It was the worst civilian massacre in Europe since World War II.
Wellesley College anthropologist Philip Kohl, who has studied the political uses of archaeology, says that Osmanagich's pyramids exemplify a narrative common to the former Eastern bloc. "When the Iron Curtain collapsed, all these land and territorial claims came up, and people had just lost their ideological moorings," he notes. "There's a great attraction in being able to say, ‘We have great ancestors, we go back millennia and we can claim these special places for ourselves.' In some places it's relatively benign; in others it can be malignant."
"I think the pyramids are symptomatic of a traumatized society that is still trying to recover from a truly horrendous experience," says Andras Riedlmayer, a Balkan specialist at Harvard University. "You have many people desperate for self-affirmation and in need of money."
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Archaeology Mesolithic Bosnia and Herzegovina Historic and Cultural Monuments
Additional Sources
"Mad About Pyramids," Science, by John Bohannon, September 22, 2006.
"Some See a 'Pyramid' to Hone Bosnia's Image. Others See a Big Hill," by Craig S. Smith, New York Times, May 15, 2006.









Comments (54)
+ View All Comments
Intresting comment on the Egytian pyrimids being cast from a sandstone mixture. Ive read about this before and it seems this guy noticed street vendors selling Spynx sp. replicas and other souveniers that look real so he asked a vendor about it and was told they mix up this stuff out of pulverized sandstone and cement type and cast it like any mold and out comes the sandstone looking ptoduct. So he starts thinking and goes out to the great pyrimid and gets some chunks od debris and breakes it up and behold..Contamination with camel hair etc. Or so the story goes.. Supposedly the Egyptian Government doesnt want this to get around as it makes the construction of the pyramids very much more easily doable. Ancient American magazine has a story on the Bosnian pyramid and someone states a carbon dating from wood in alleged tunnel at 30,000 years old.
Posted by Dale on February 4,2013 | 03:45 PM
Whack-a-doodle is not a valid scientific methodology. Nice looking hills though.
Posted by Northland on February 2,2013 | 11:25 AM
It's a natural form. Bosnian Pyramid is fake.
Posted by Jess on January 24,2013 | 05:21 PM
I have not seen the others, but from basic photos one can tell that Visocica Hill looks closer to a pyramid than to a regular 'hill'. Anybody that refutes this is in a constant state of denial.
Posted by jef on January 8,2013 | 01:36 PM
if this is a real pyramid why not clear the foliage off the very top to uncover the top and that would soon prove this to be genuine pyramid or geological????
Posted by alex on December 23,2012 | 03:34 PM
Quite fascinating, his economics degree did him well. #YOLO
Posted by Semeni Somnus on November 27,2012 | 08:18 AM
Well, is certainly strange that this shape should be so naturally pyramidic. I thought that when no entrance could be found that they must be some form of natural. But you do have to take the water site into consideration. As in Ireland. It remains to be determined what conditions existed on Earth when these massive forms were solidified. I am thinking magnetism? What if the water was levitated? In a 10 Tesla that happens, and the effort to draw down this sky river would require? This theory fits with the Maori myth of eels from the sky. For all our science discoveries we are focused on astronomical occurrences when the history of E has yet to be defined.
Posted by katesisco on November 24,2012 | 07:47 PM
There are Pyramids in Bosnia, in spite of the fact, that according to mainstream science, they should not be there. There are lots of excavations sites, any of them is showing lined up megalithic structures. Any megalith is 3D-rectangular. Lets say, lets presume they are natural. If that is the truth, then Empire State Building is also natural, not man made. Why? If you check the soil, it is made of the same material (iron, conglomerate). There are lots of other, similar objects that go high in the sky, made of the same material, in the near-by. I could even find some geologist (not real professionals, of course) that could confirm that. It's easy to play games of science, but it is hard to catch a deep breath and look into the hard evidence, and to be frank with oneself. In defiance to all side counter-theories, Bosnian Pyramids are there, for anyone that is really interested into the truth to go there and to look for himself, and to form his own independent opinion. I am convinced, because I was there, looked at the evidence, touched the megaliths, and saw how jackhammer broke down trying to drill into one of them. Concrete in megaliths is harder then any known natural rock, or man made concrete, so, it must be something done with basic materials, like with concrete material of Empire State Building, yet, the method is unknown to modern science, as in other cases of ancient structures. Mainstream science started to be dogmatic, as church was in middle ages. The which-hunt in media is like which-hunts in those times. It is said, said moment for the world today, that one of the biggest archeological discoveries was being so maliciously scrutinized.
Posted by Nick on October 21,2012 | 09:16 PM
I looked at the pictures and saw no real evidence of a pyramid there. Since when are tunnels (even if they were man made) a solid indication of the existence of a pyramid. Carbon dating, please, what did they carbon dated? the soil or what? Shouldn't we expect the soil of a mountain to be as old as the mountain? Who discovered this pyramids? someone with a degree in international economics and politics and a doctorate in the sociology of history who made a lot of trips to other pyramid sites before he "found" this "pyramids". How many years since the discovery? Can anyone provide me with a link to any undeniable evidence? He and the Bosnian government are really smart. He gains fame and gets paid very well and the government gets tourism. Isn't a book about Hitler and some others going to Antarctica his story to make money and not the history of the world? Were is the evidence in any of this?
Posted by livinginstone on October 19,2012 | 02:34 AM
I am sedimentologist in Comenius University, Bratislava. What I have seen on videos, there are not human made pavement or terraces, but natural beds of sandstones and conglomerates. Individual beds were deposited on sea bottom between marl beds. Sandstone beds were naturally breaked up to regular or irregular blocks. It si common in nature. Very peculiar is shape of the hill. If it is ancient pyramid, it was carved from natural hill but not built.
Posted by Daniel on October 18,2012 | 05:13 AM
i cant halp but enjoy you quack smarmy historians who deny the validation of this pyramid to keep your pathetic tenure. LMFAO! time to rewrite history you paid off shills. your not worth the paper your printed on. what a waste of time and money you were. I guess the smithsonain cant dump THESE artifacts at sea. on behalf of humanity, thanks for nothing.
Posted by jaydi on September 22,2012 | 11:07 AM
I have said it before and I'll say it again. If you are an armchair critic, degreed or not, and have not done research your self on a project, then your comments are hollow.
Posted by Arthur Faram on August 6,2012 | 01:48 PM
pyramid?where is it?inside the mountain,inside the soil.how did it get in there?where are the perfectly cut stones?where are the lovely rooms?where are the lovely steps?where are the corridors?where are the wall drawings and paintings?they either lie for easy money or they work for cia or mossad or
Posted by anticapitalist on July 6,2012 | 12:21 PM
Are we sure we are reading a scientific article on the pyramids in the Smithsonian Magazine? The magazine article reads like a state department rebuttal bringing up the recent Bosnian war. It reads like a white-wash. Sorry Smithsonian, but I have read enough articles in the Smithsonian to realize that this is very un-Smithsonian like article. The article sounds defensive and that I want to ask, is there something that the US government writers are trying to hide, and using the Smithsonian Magazine to get that information out couched in a slanted article.
Posted by Carol on May 23,2012 | 11:46 PM
+ View All Comments