The Little-Known History of How the Modern Olympics Got Their Start
As London gets set to host the XXXth Olympiad, acclaimed sportswriter Frank Deford connects the modern Games to their unlikely origin—in rural England
- By Frank Deford
- Illustration by John Ritter
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2012, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 7)
London’s first Olympics also left us with the huffy reverberations of a celebrated incident, which is still, a whole century later, proudly cited by Americans. Unfortunately, it really only kinda, sorta happened. All right, though, first the glorious legend:
During the opening ceremony, as the American contingent passed the royal box, the U.S. flag bearer, a shot-putter named Ralph Rose, standing up for his Irish forebears, acting with noble premeditation, did not dip the Stars and Stripes before King Edward as every other nation’s flagman did. Afterward, a teammate of Rose’s named Martin Sheridan sneered: “This flag dips to no earthly king.” And thereafter, at all subsequent Olympics, while all other countries continue to dutifully dip their national standard as they pass the official box, our flag alone forever waves as high at the Olympics as the one Francis Scott Key saw by the dawn’s early light.
Well, as sure as George Washington cut down the cherry tree, it’s a good all-American story. However, comprehensive research by Bill Mallon and Ian Buchanan, published in the Journal of Olympic History in 1999, casts doubt on most of the great patriotic flag tale. Yes, Ralph Rose carried the flag, and while there were not one, but two occasions when flag bearers were supposed to “salute,” he surely only dipped it once—although when asked about it, he denied that anyone had suggested he forgo protocol to make a political point. For all we know, Rose may have just forgotten to drop the flag. Martin Sheridan’s famously jingoistic remark about how the red-white-and-blue “dips to no earthly king” did not appear in print until almost 50 years later—long after Sheridan was dead.
Moreover, at the time, the episode didn’t even rise to the level of a tempest in a teapot. Mallon and Buchanan could not find a single reference in the British press to Rose’s allegedly insulting action, and the New York Herald even went out of its way to write that the crowd’s cheers for the U.S. contingent were “particularly enthusiastic.” Rose’s action set no precedent either. In subsequent Olympics, the flag was not lowered on some occasions—most assuredly not before Adolf Hitler in 1936—but it was politely dropped down on others. Moreover, at various times, other nations have also chosen not to dip.
In 1942, rendering Olympic flag-dipping moot, Congress passed a law that declared “the flag should not be dipped to any person or thing.” That seems terribly overwrought, but it was in the midst of World War II. Ironically, then, Mallon and Buchanan concluded that the last U.S. Olympian known to have dipped the flag was Billy Fiske, a two-time bobsled gold medalist, who lowered the standard at Lake Placid, New York, in 1932 before the American official who opened the Winter Games, the governor of New York, one Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Coincidentally, Fiske himself is surely more identified with England than any other American Olympian in history. He was born in Brooklyn, but his forebears were English, from Suffolk. He had won his first gold, driving the bobsled, in 1928 at St. Moritz when he was only 16, and then he matriculated at Cambridge, where he read economics and history before coming back to the States to repeat his victory in the ’32 Games, when he also proudly dipped the flag before FDR.
But Billy Fiske would return again to England.
As the Olympic Movement wants to think that it succors peace and goodwill, so too is it reluctant to acknowledge that even in the Games, bad people up to no good do still muck about. If you’re for the Olympics, nothing much else matters. When the Japanese government reluctantly had to give up the 1940 Games because it was otherwise occupied with killing and raping Chinese, the International Olympic Committee simply decreed that the Winter Games would be returned to Germany, because they’d been so swell there in ’36. This decision was made in June of 1939, only three months before the Nazis invaded Poland.
After the unfortunate hostilities were concluded, the IOC still embraced Nazi and Fascist members. “These are old friends whom we receive today,” the president, a Swede named Sigfrid Edstrom, noted later. And because the show must go on as if nothing was amiss, poor London was the ideal symbolic choice. It was September 1946 when the decision was hurriedly made—again, giving the hosts barely a year and a half to prepare. Not everyone was on board, either. “A people which...is preparing for a winter battle for survival,” the Evening Standard editorialized, “may be forgiven for thinking that a full year of expensive preparation for the reception of an army of foreign athletes verges on the border of excessive.”
London in the peace of 1946 was barely better off than during the war. Never mind that much of it still lay, bombed, in rubble. Citizens were allotted only 2,600 calories per day. All sorts of foods were still rationed; indeed, bread rationing wouldn’t end till just days before the Olympics began. I remember Sir Roger Bannister, the first four-minute miler, telling me that, with no disrespect to Bob Mathias—the 17-year-old American who won the decathlon in London—no English athlete could have possibly enjoyed sufficient nutrition to allow him to achieve such a feat at such a young age.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
This is educational
Posted by hbgubgbugbgbugbygbgyvg on January 17,2013 | 10:21 PM
i liked it
Posted by adrian on November 16,2012 | 05:05 PM
In 1984 for the Los Angeles Games, the IOC brought back the idea of sending professional athletes to the Olympics. Even though FIFA did not accept the game as official for the Olympics, they would still dictate what comprised an official team. Both FIFA and the IOC wanted teams that were composed of younger individuals. Some say this was a way to sabotage the game for other countries with stronger football teams, as shown by the low scoring these countries receive every Summer Olympics. However England has been working on this problem for a long time before the United States. In 1974 the
Posted by Addison_Acton on August 29,2012 | 06:11 AM
a fascinating read - debunking a few myths and giving different perspectives which are good for us all to consider. If any of you are interested , the modern day Cotswold Olympick Games still take place on the last weekend of May / first weekend of June each year - this year was the 400th anniversary. They are held just outside Chipping Campden near Broadway and are fantastic fun to watch. See http://www.olimpickgames.co.uk/ if you are interested . There are apparently moves afoot to add " shin-kicking " to the modern day games but strangely this hasn't yet caught on around the world...
Posted by Errol on August 8,2012 | 06:10 AM
"Martin Sheridan’s famously jingoistic remark " The US a republic not a monarchy. Why bow ever to unelected authority?
Posted by T. Paine on July 23,2012 | 04:12 PM
'The law says you can’t do that for any “person or thing,” but it doesn’t say anything about honoring a memory.' Um, a memory is a thing, so yes, the law covers that.
Posted by Mike on July 23,2012 | 11:14 AM
"...cowered by German physicality"? Cowed.
Posted by Dale Hill on July 22,2012 | 12:43 PM
well, as we old-timey Southerns (capitalize, suh) express such: i done said it (above). but let us join in a chorus of "oh, them old-time....." as as the great satchmo said, "if you have to ask, you'll never know..." imprimatur, inshallah and so forth
Posted by i'm about as athletic as nada, yet i cheer for re- perpetuationid the Olympics because tit forces megmillions to become aware of ancient greks, with whom we have yet to catch uo...EVER on July 22,2012 | 10:07 AM
I am already a subscriber to the print version of the magazine. My wife and I are always cutting and scanning aricles for use in our classes. Kudos to you!!! I was wondering, as a print subscriber, are the articles in the archives truly the complete versions of what is in the print material? It would make it so much easier to reference when sharing with a class of students. Thanks for your input and attention to my inquiry!
Posted by Jim Martins on July 10,2012 | 12:54 PM
Superb article, just as one would expect from any story with the Frank Deford by-line. One quibble: is there really a Maidenhead in West Sussex? The only one I know of is in Berkshire. No matter, a simply brilliant read.
Posted by Tony on July 9,2012 | 01:47 AM
Fantastic article - I never realised the early Olympics were such a shambles! Fascinating to see the history recounted in this way - and loved the drama of the early angst between toffy old England and pugnacious America. Bring on the 2012 games!
Posted by Kelly on July 9,2012 | 03:09 AM