The Little-Known History of How the Modern Olympics Got Their Start
As London gets set to host the XXXth Olympiad, acclaimed sportswriter Frank Deford connects the modern Games to their unlikely origin—in rural England
- By Frank Deford
- Illustration by John Ritter
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2012, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 7)
(The other was Sweden’s, and the Swedes were even more put out, but never mind.)
Sullivan, who could be a real jerk—four years later, he distinguished himself before the Stockholm Games by unilaterally refusing to let any female Americans swim or dive because he thought the bathing outfits too provocative—went out of his way to protest something or other every day. He started off, for instance, by claiming that the victorious English tug-of-war team wore illegal shoes. And so forth. For their part, the British grew increasingly irritated at the American fans, whose raucous cheers were hysterically described as “barbarous cries.”
Controversy continued to ensue, invariably somehow involving Americans. The ’08 marathon, for example, does surely still boast the most botched-up finish in Olympic annals. Now, at the first modern Olympics, the marathon, starting in the real namesake town of Marathon, had been run into Athens for 24.85 miles, but at the London Games the distance was lengthened to 26 miles 385 yards, which it remains, officially, to this day. The reason for this curious distance was that the race was started at Windsor Castle, so that Queen Alexandra’s grandchildren would have the best vantage.
It was an uncommonly hot, steamy day, but the largest crowd ever to see an athletic event in the history of humankind lined the streets. And here came little Dorando Pietri, a candy maker from Capri, down through Shepherd’s Bush, first into the Great Stadium, where the huge throng awaited. Unfortunately, as the Times of London described it: “A tired man, dazed, bewildered, hardly conscious...his hair white with dust, staggered on to the track.” Pietri not only would fall, but twice turned in the wrong direction, and only made it through those last 385 yards because, in a convoy of suits, helpful British officials held him up and escorted him home.
Naturally, upon review, Pietri was disqualified. However, sympathy for the little fellow knew no bounds. The queen herself presented him with a special loving cup, hastily, lovingly inscribed. Not only that, but, sure enough, the runner who first made it to the finish on his own and thus was fairly awarded the gold by default, turned out to be an American of Irish stock. He had a nerve. You see, during these Games the British themselves took all the gold medals in boxing, rowing, sailing and tennis, and also won at polo, water polo, field hockey and soccer (not to mention their disputed-shoe-shod triumph at the tug-of-war), but the Yanks had dominated on the track, and thus it was deemed bad form for the barbarous Americans to revel in their man’s victory over the brave little Italian.
But that brouhaha could not hold a candle to the 400-meter final, when three Americans went up against the favorite, Britain’s greatest runner, a Scottish Army officer named Wyndham Halswelle. Down the stretch, one of the Americans, J. C. Carpenter, clearly elbowed Halswelle, forcing him out to the very edge of the cinders. Properly, the British umpire disqualified Carpenter and ordered the race rerun.
Led by the obstreperous Sullivan, the Americans protested, lamely, and then, in high dudgeon, also ordered the other two U.S. runners not to enter the rerun. Halswelle himself was so disillusioned that he didn’t want to run either, but was instructed to, and, good soldier that he was, he won in what is still the only walkover in Olympic history. It left such a bitter taste in his mouth, though, that he raced but once more in his life, that only for a farewell turn in Glasgow.
Notwithstanding all the rancor, Lord Desborough’s ’08 Games absolutely did restore de Coubertin’s Olympics, establishing them as a healthy, going concern. Still, simple success as a mere sports spectacular is never enough for Olympic pooh-bahs, and Lord Desborough felt obliged to bloviate: “In the Games of London were assembled some two thousand young men... representative of the generation into whose hands the destinies of most of the nations of the world are passing....We hope that their meeting...may have a beneficial effect hereafter on the cause of international peace.”
But, of course, only six years after the Olympic flame was extinguished, the world fell into the most ghastly maelstrom of killing that any generation had ever suffered. Hardly had the Great War started, at the Battle of Neuve Chapelle, when Capt. Wyndham Halswelle of the Highland Light Infantry wrote in his diary how his men had bravely moved up the front a full 15 yards against the Germans. This minute gain of ground came at the loss of life to 79 men. Three days later the captain was winged by a sniper, but, after the wound was dressed, he returned to his position. This time, the very same sniper shot him dead in the head. He was 32.
Two months on, Lord Desborough’s eldest son, Julian Grenfell, a poet, fell near Ypres, to be buried close by, with so many others, on a hill above Boulogne. A few weeks after that, not far away, His Lordship’s second son, Billy, was so drilled with machine-gun bullets that his body was rendered remnants and merely left, like so many others, to spoil upon the battlefield. Nobody ever learned the lesson of how ephemeral the Games are better than did Lord Desborough, he who made them forever possible.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
This is educational
Posted by hbgubgbugbgbugbygbgyvg on January 17,2013 | 10:21 PM
i liked it
Posted by adrian on November 16,2012 | 05:05 PM
In 1984 for the Los Angeles Games, the IOC brought back the idea of sending professional athletes to the Olympics. Even though FIFA did not accept the game as official for the Olympics, they would still dictate what comprised an official team. Both FIFA and the IOC wanted teams that were composed of younger individuals. Some say this was a way to sabotage the game for other countries with stronger football teams, as shown by the low scoring these countries receive every Summer Olympics. However England has been working on this problem for a long time before the United States. In 1974 the
Posted by Addison_Acton on August 29,2012 | 06:11 AM
a fascinating read - debunking a few myths and giving different perspectives which are good for us all to consider. If any of you are interested , the modern day Cotswold Olympick Games still take place on the last weekend of May / first weekend of June each year - this year was the 400th anniversary. They are held just outside Chipping Campden near Broadway and are fantastic fun to watch. See http://www.olimpickgames.co.uk/ if you are interested . There are apparently moves afoot to add " shin-kicking " to the modern day games but strangely this hasn't yet caught on around the world...
Posted by Errol on August 8,2012 | 06:10 AM
"Martin Sheridan’s famously jingoistic remark " The US a republic not a monarchy. Why bow ever to unelected authority?
Posted by T. Paine on July 23,2012 | 04:12 PM
'The law says you can’t do that for any “person or thing,” but it doesn’t say anything about honoring a memory.' Um, a memory is a thing, so yes, the law covers that.
Posted by Mike on July 23,2012 | 11:14 AM
"...cowered by German physicality"? Cowed.
Posted by Dale Hill on July 22,2012 | 12:43 PM
well, as we old-timey Southerns (capitalize, suh) express such: i done said it (above). but let us join in a chorus of "oh, them old-time....." as as the great satchmo said, "if you have to ask, you'll never know..." imprimatur, inshallah and so forth
Posted by i'm about as athletic as nada, yet i cheer for re- perpetuationid the Olympics because tit forces megmillions to become aware of ancient greks, with whom we have yet to catch uo...EVER on July 22,2012 | 10:07 AM
I am already a subscriber to the print version of the magazine. My wife and I are always cutting and scanning aricles for use in our classes. Kudos to you!!! I was wondering, as a print subscriber, are the articles in the archives truly the complete versions of what is in the print material? It would make it so much easier to reference when sharing with a class of students. Thanks for your input and attention to my inquiry!
Posted by Jim Martins on July 10,2012 | 12:54 PM
Superb article, just as one would expect from any story with the Frank Deford by-line. One quibble: is there really a Maidenhead in West Sussex? The only one I know of is in Berkshire. No matter, a simply brilliant read.
Posted by Tony on July 9,2012 | 01:47 AM
Fantastic article - I never realised the early Olympics were such a shambles! Fascinating to see the history recounted in this way - and loved the drama of the early angst between toffy old England and pugnacious America. Bring on the 2012 games!
Posted by Kelly on July 9,2012 | 03:09 AM