The Little-Known History of How the Modern Olympics Got Their Start
As London gets set to host the XXXth Olympiad, acclaimed sportswriter Frank Deford connects the modern Games to their unlikely origin—in rural England
- By Frank Deford
- Illustration by John Ritter
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2012, Subscribe
What is known as Wenlock Edge, a great palisade, almost 1,000 feet high, running for 15 miles through the county of Shropshire, overlooks, near its eastern end, the tidy town of Much Wenlock. (Much Wenlock being so named, you see, to distinguish it from its even wee-er neighbor, Little Wenlock.) However, to this quaint backwater village near Wales came, in 1994, Juan Antonio Samaranch of Spain, the grandiose president of the International Olympic Committee.
Samaranch, an old spear carrier for Franco, was a vainglorious corporate politician, either obsequious or imperious, depending on the company, who was never much given to generosity. Yet he found his way to Much Wenlock, where he trooped out to the cemetery at Holy Trinity Church and placed a wreath on a grave there. Samaranch then declared that the man who lay at his feet beneath the Shropshire sod “really was the founder of the modern Olympic Games.”
That fellow was affectionately known as Penny Brookes; more formally, he was Dr. William Penny Brookes, the most renowned citizen of Much Wenlock—at least since the eighth century, when the prioress of the abbey there, St. Milburga, regularly worked miracles (notably with birds she could order about), while also displaying a singular ability to levitate herself. If not quite so spectacular as the enchanted prioress, Penny Brookes was certainly a man of consequence—fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, town magistrate and founder of the National Olympian Association in 1865—which, significantly, he created years before the International Olympic Committee was formed. Still, notwithstanding Samaranch’s homage, Brookes and his little town are seldom cited in Olympic liturgy.
Olympic myth runs rife, too, generously embroidered with Pollyanna. Most particularly, from its inception, modern Olympic advocates have trumpeted that their sweaty contests are much more uplifting—a noble “movement” of brotherhood that will somehow influence us grubby mortals to stop our common carping and warring. Alas, poetry and peace always then fly off with the doves.
Also gospel is it that a Frenchman, venerating Greek antiquity, cowered by German physicality, was the initiating force behind the re-creation of the Games. But that’s only true so far as it goes. The fact is that the modern Olympics owe their birth and their model and, ultimately, their success foremost to England. For that matter, as we shall see, the first London Games, those of 1908, which were fashioned out of whole cloth by a towering Edwardian named Willie Grenfell—or Lord Desborough, as he had become—essentially saved the Olympics as an institution. It’s really quite appropriate that, in a few weeks hence, London will become the first city since Olympia to host the Games three times.
Across the channel, Pierre Frédy was born in Paris in 1863 into the French aristocracy. He grew up as an unapologetic chauvinist, but withal, even as France declined as a world presence, nothing ate at young Pierre more than the fact that Germany had whipped France in the Franco-Prussian War when he had been but an impressionable tot of 7. Pierre became convinced that a considerable reason for France’s shellacking was that the German soldiers had been in much better shape.
This was certainly true, too, as young Germans were assembled to participate in turnen, which were tedious, rote physical exercises that, like eating your spinach, were good for you. But Pierre Frédy’s antipathy for anything Teutonic inhibited him from simply encouraging French leaders to have their youth ape their victors’ physical education. Rather, by chance, he happened to read the British novel Tom Brown’s School Days, and thereupon Pierre, who would ascend to the title of the Baron de Coubertin, had what could only be described as a spiritual experience.
Tom Brown’s was about a smallish boy who goes off to boarding school at Rugby, where he participates in the school’s athletics, which helps him to thrash the big bully, Flashman. Moreover, the climax of the novel is a game—a cricket match. The young baron was hooked. Not only did he want to improve the physical condition of his own countrymen by emphasizing the British way of sport, but he began to conjure up the greater dream of reinstituting the ancient Greek Olympics, thereby to improve the whole world.
The original Olympics had been banned in A.D. 393 by the Roman emperor Theodosius I, but despite the prohibition, Europeans of the Dark and Middle ages kept playing their games. Frivolity by the lower classes is, however, not the stuff of history, saved. Rather, we mostly only have glamorous tapestried depictions of the nobility occupied at their expensive blood sports.
We do know, though, that by the 11th century in Scotland, various tournaments of strength were held. These were the ancient forerunners of what became the Highland Games, but it was not until 1612, farther south in England, that the embryonic modern Olympics first made their appearance. This was an athletic festival that was held on the estate of one Capt. Robert Dover, and it included the likes of fencing and “leaping” and wrestling, “while the young women were dancing to the tune of a shepard’s [sic] pipe.” It was even known, in fact, as the Cotswold Olympick Games. Captain Dover was a Roman Catholic, and he devilishly scheduled his festival as a joyous in-your-face exhibition to counter the dour Puritanism of the time. Unfortunately, with his death in 1641 the annual athletic celebration petered out.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
This is educational
Posted by hbgubgbugbgbugbygbgyvg on January 17,2013 | 10:21 PM
i liked it
Posted by adrian on November 16,2012 | 05:05 PM
In 1984 for the Los Angeles Games, the IOC brought back the idea of sending professional athletes to the Olympics. Even though FIFA did not accept the game as official for the Olympics, they would still dictate what comprised an official team. Both FIFA and the IOC wanted teams that were composed of younger individuals. Some say this was a way to sabotage the game for other countries with stronger football teams, as shown by the low scoring these countries receive every Summer Olympics. However England has been working on this problem for a long time before the United States. In 1974 the
Posted by Addison_Acton on August 29,2012 | 06:11 AM
a fascinating read - debunking a few myths and giving different perspectives which are good for us all to consider. If any of you are interested , the modern day Cotswold Olympick Games still take place on the last weekend of May / first weekend of June each year - this year was the 400th anniversary. They are held just outside Chipping Campden near Broadway and are fantastic fun to watch. See http://www.olimpickgames.co.uk/ if you are interested . There are apparently moves afoot to add " shin-kicking " to the modern day games but strangely this hasn't yet caught on around the world...
Posted by Errol on August 8,2012 | 06:10 AM
"Martin Sheridan’s famously jingoistic remark " The US a republic not a monarchy. Why bow ever to unelected authority?
Posted by T. Paine on July 23,2012 | 04:12 PM
'The law says you can’t do that for any “person or thing,” but it doesn’t say anything about honoring a memory.' Um, a memory is a thing, so yes, the law covers that.
Posted by Mike on July 23,2012 | 11:14 AM
"...cowered by German physicality"? Cowed.
Posted by Dale Hill on July 22,2012 | 12:43 PM
well, as we old-timey Southerns (capitalize, suh) express such: i done said it (above). but let us join in a chorus of "oh, them old-time....." as as the great satchmo said, "if you have to ask, you'll never know..." imprimatur, inshallah and so forth
Posted by i'm about as athletic as nada, yet i cheer for re- perpetuationid the Olympics because tit forces megmillions to become aware of ancient greks, with whom we have yet to catch uo...EVER on July 22,2012 | 10:07 AM
I am already a subscriber to the print version of the magazine. My wife and I are always cutting and scanning aricles for use in our classes. Kudos to you!!! I was wondering, as a print subscriber, are the articles in the archives truly the complete versions of what is in the print material? It would make it so much easier to reference when sharing with a class of students. Thanks for your input and attention to my inquiry!
Posted by Jim Martins on July 10,2012 | 12:54 PM
Superb article, just as one would expect from any story with the Frank Deford by-line. One quibble: is there really a Maidenhead in West Sussex? The only one I know of is in Berkshire. No matter, a simply brilliant read.
Posted by Tony on July 9,2012 | 01:47 AM
Fantastic article - I never realised the early Olympics were such a shambles! Fascinating to see the history recounted in this way - and loved the drama of the early angst between toffy old England and pugnacious America. Bring on the 2012 games!
Posted by Kelly on July 9,2012 | 03:09 AM