The Great New England Vampire Panic
Two hundred years after the Salem witch trials, farmers became convinced that their relatives were returning from the grave to feed on the living
- By Abigail Tucker
- Smithsonian magazine, October 2012, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 6)
Mercy Lena Brown lived in Exeter, Rhode Island—“Deserted Exeter,” it was dubbed, or simply “one of the border towns.” It was largely a subsistence farming community with barely fertile soil: “rocks, rocks and more rocks,” says Sheila Reynolds-Boothroyd, president of the Exeter Historical Association. Farmers heaped stones into tumbledown walls, and rows of corn swerved around the biggest boulders.
In the late 19th century, Exeter, like much of agrarian New England, was even more sparsely populated than usual. Civil War casualties had taken their toll on the community, and the new railroads and the promise of richer land to the west lured young men away. By 1892, the year Lena died, Exeter’s population had dipped to just 961, from a high of more than 2,500 in 1820. Farms were abandoned, many of them later to be seized and burned by the government. “Some sections looked like a ghost town,” Reynolds-Boothroyd says.
And tuberculosis was harrying the remaining families. “Consumption,” as it was called, had started to plague New England in the 1730s, a few decades before the first known vampire scares. By the 1800s, when the scares were at their height, the disease was the leading cause of mortality throughout the Northeast, responsible for almost a quarter of all deaths. It was a terrible end, often drawn out over years: a skyrocketing fever, a hacking, bloody cough and a visible wasting away of the body. “The emaciated figure strikes one with terror,” reads one 18th-century description, “the forehead covered with drops of sweat; the cheeks painted with a livid crimson, the eyes sunk...the breath offensive, quick and laborious, and the cough so incessant as to scarce allow the wretched sufferer time to tell his complaints.” Indeed, Bell says, symptoms “progressed in such a way that it seemed like something was draining the life and blood out of somebody.”
People dreaded the disease without understanding it. Though Robert Koch had identified the tuberculosis bacterium in 1882, news of the discovery did not penetrate rural areas for some time, and even if it had, drug treatments wouldn’t become available until the 1940s. The year Lena died, one physician blamed tuberculosis on “drunkenness, and want among the poor.” Nineteenth-century cures included drinking brown sugar dissolved in water and frequent horseback riding. “If they were being honest,” Bell says, “the medical establishment would have said, ‘There’s nothing we can do, and it’s in the hands of God.’”
The Brown family, living on the eastern edge of town, probably on a modest homestead of 30 or 40 stony acres, began to succumb to the disease in December 1882. Lena’s mother, Mary Eliza, was the first. Lena’s sister, Mary Olive, a 20-year-old dressmaker, died the next year. A tender obituary from a local newspaper hints at what she endured: “The last few hours she lived was of great suffering, yet her faith was firm and she was ready for the change.” The whole town turned out for her funeral, and sang “One Sweetly Solemn Thought,” a hymn that Mary Olive herself had selected.
Within a few years, Lena’s brother Edwin—a store clerk whom one newspaper columnist described as “a big, husky young man”—sickened too, and left for Colorado Springs hoping that the climate would improve his health.
Lena, who was just a child when her mother and sister died, didn’t fall ill until nearly a decade after they were buried. Her tuberculosis was the “galloping” kind, which meant that she might have been infected but remained asymptomatic for years, only to fade fast after showing the first signs of the disease. A doctor attended her in “her last illness,” a newspaper said, and “informed her father that further medical aid was useless.” Her January 1892 obituary was much terser than her sister’s: “Miss Lena Brown, who has been suffering from consumption, died Sunday morning.”
As Lena was on her deathbed, her brother was, after a brief remission, taking a turn for the worse. Edwin had returned to Exeter from the Colorado resorts “in a dying condition,” according to one account. “If the good wishes and prayers of his many friends could be realized, friend Eddie would speedily be restored to perfect health,” another newspaper wrote.
But some neighbors, likely fearful for their own health, weren’t content with prayers. Several approached George Brown, the children’s father, and offered an alternative take on the recent tragedies: Perhaps an unseen diabolical force was preying on his family. It could be that one of the three Brown women wasn’t dead after all, instead secretly feasting “on the living tissue and blood of Edwin,” as the Providence Journal later summarized. If the offending corpse—the Journal uses the term “vampire” in some stories but the locals seemed not to—was discovered and destroyed, then Edwin would recover. The neighbors asked to exhume the bodies, in order to check for fresh blood in their hearts.
George Brown gave permission. On the morning of March 17, 1892, a party of men dug up the bodies, as the family doctor and a Journal correspondent looked on. George was absent, for unstated but understandable reasons.
After nearly a decade, Lena’s sister and mother were barely more than bones. Lena, though, had been dead only a few months, and it was wintertime. “The body was in a fairly well-preserved state,” the correspondent later wrote. “The heart and liver were removed, and in cutting open the heart, clotted and decomposed blood was found.” During this impromptu autopsy, the doctor again emphasized that Lena’s lungs “showed diffuse tuberculous germs.”
Undeterred, the villagers burned her heart and liver on a nearby rock, feeding Edwin the ashes. He died less than two months later.
***
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (32)
Vampires are not real. At least not 'original' ones. If vampires were real, they would be afraid of the Lord God and crosses. They would be afraid because they are evil. Anyone who thinks that they can suck other peoples blood is not only sick, but also possibly possessed. There is NO such thing as the undead and if you think that you are a vampire, i am saying this for your safty."Get help."I hope that this helps anyone who is confused about the subject of vampires.
Posted by fangtooth on March 21,2013 | 08:37 PM
vampires do exist. there are cults around New York and other major cities. while they aren't affected by sunlight, they still partake in the drinking of blood.
Posted by J on January 25,2013 | 10:17 PM
VERY HELPFULL INFORMATION, THANK YOU.
Posted by ROACHESGIRL56@GMAIL.COM on January 21,2013 | 06:07 PM
Do really vampires exist? i think they do cuz may b there r in the dark vampires really exist in dark they need to live in dark places to avoid sunlight cuz sunlight hurts them......
Posted by Kanwal on January 18,2013 | 11:31 AM
i am love with vampires but your translation
Posted by a vampire on January 11,2013 | 04:11 AM
Vampires are cool species
Posted by varia on January 7,2013 | 02:40 AM
The real art by god. Amaging power and mind.
Posted by on January 7,2013 | 06:09 AM
From where the tale arose something true or not
Posted by Leo the hunter on January 1,2013 | 02:47 AM
If vampires are real were would they be today
Posted by Max on December 28,2012 | 12:37 PM
i think vampires are real because there are many people around where i live claim to see them
Posted by michelle h on December 24,2012 | 04:29 AM
is this a true espically believe in vampire but i am little bit confuesd.
Posted by chringdoma sherpa on December 21,2012 | 02:04 AM
i need more in the bit that it sais what they are and things about them!
Posted by ryleigh on December 20,2012 | 07:27 AM
Are vampires real ? I mean not like movies & books but are they real ?
Posted by Ash on December 18,2012 | 11:58 PM
You think we are to blame? If you had just not have been so interested in us then you would have not disturbed us. Can't you think about other people's feelings and understand how we feel. We aren't bad people, it's juts that we have a bad habit of feeding off of people. The crazy thing is that you really think we ate afraid of The Lord god well let me tell you that we are not afraid of crosses, we can go in any type of water, and most of us go to church. Please help us be spreading good things about us, not bad things. This is what I have to say for all of us "monsters" or also known as humans have to say. Thank you for understanding, I hope. Sincerely, your mysterious friend the vampire daughter Angelina
Posted by Ally on November 11,2012 | 01:27 AM
The Griswold, Conn. discovery back in 1990 was very interesting. It is one of the very few tangible examples of this ritual being carried out; the man's name who's bones were found was never conclusively identified except for a "J B-55" in tacks on the coffin lid. He died sometime about 1820 and within a few years he was dug up and the bones rearranged as they were later found. None of the other remains were disturbed, though JB's was found in a makeshift vault of sorts, made of field stone with three large stone slabs covering the whole, it being unique to the area and fueled much speculation as to who he was.
Posted by A Ballard on November 8,2012 | 10:51 AM
I am a resident of West Greenwich, RI. My mother's family has lived here for over two hundred years. The locals resent any interest in the Browns, and we would appreciate no further publicity. Would you want strangers mucking through the cemetery where your dear ones were buried?
Posted by Heather Knight on November 2,2012 | 09:59 PM
I do not see any comments concerning "sparkly vampires" there "Sanity" Inspector. Even if there were such a post who are you to speak for the readership? You are best off remaining quite and quit trying to be everyone's daddy and quit trying to kiss up to the moderators.
Posted by Mitchell F. on October 26,2012 | 10:08 PM
I think the author of "The Great Vampire Panic" would be interested in my family history regarding warlocks (or however you spell it). I do not know what is the purported relationship between warlocks and vampires. Seems to me they occupy a similar space in our consciousness. But I do know the following. And believe me, you can't make up this stuff. I earned my M.A. at Indiana University, Bloomington, IN in Tibetan language, with minors in Old Turkic, Mongolian and Sanskrit, 1977. While taking a Mongolian language course in 1972, a classmate named Prof. Lee from France was in our class. He came to learn Mongolian language. At that time, our dept. was one of the best in the USA for Mongolian language instruction. Prof. Lee and I talked from time to time. He was a Russian language professor in France. That means he also knows the old forms of the Cyrillic language, its predecessors, and so on. I told him my Dad's original last name was Warcholak. My father changed it to Watson when he was in college due to the rascism against so-called "Hungarians" when the Hungarian revolution drove many people to America. They were derided as "hunkies" because they took jobs that folks already here wanted instead. My Dad was raised in Ford City, PA, a town on the Allegheny river where lots of industrial factories were located with lots of jobs. Prof. Lee looked up our last name in an ancient "dictionary" he owned. The dictionary was published around the 13th century. In it, a warcholak is defined as a supernatural being. We figured out that word came into the English language as "warlock", having dropped the middle palatal syllable since such a sound doesn't exist in English. That makes our family the warlock family. Dad's family was likely centered in Transylvania, in the southern Carpathian Mts. There you have it. Like I said at the beginning, you can't make up this stuff!
Posted by Craig Watson on October 26,2012 | 05:48 PM
That was an amazing article on American vampire folklore. I had no idea. Traditional New England grave markers being both an avocation and vocation of mine, I feel compelled to make a couple of corrections. Mrs. Tucker writes of the carving on slate stones, “fading away” with time, but this is inaccurate. Slate holds up better than anything else out there and such stones cut 250 years ago or more still show the crisp, individual chisel marks left on the day they were carved. It is marble (the same stone that poor Mercy Brown’s stone was cut from. Opposed to granite, as was stated in the article) that has seen such rapid and catastrophic deterioration over the last few decades. Sadly, we will loose the history of a hundred years of burials in this lifetime because of marble. Some of what I’ve done in fact has been replacing illegible marble markers with hand cut slate.
Posted by Yankee Slate Cutting on October 25,2012 | 08:11 PM
Agree with Thoreau ~ "The savage in man is never quite eradicated..." Both this article and the Unmasking Thomas Jefferson article show that vampires, body snatchers and zombies do exist. The look like regular people and behave like regular people until some perceived ecstasy of need. Then they do really nasty things. I can only think that eating his sister's exhumed, then incinerated heart and liver hastened Edwin's end. A modern day parallel to this is routine infant circumcision.
Posted by Jerry Norton on October 14,2012 | 12:26 AM
Matt, thanks for the post about Thoreau. The article inaccurately refers to Thoreau's Journal of Sept 29, not Sept 26. But I appreciate your finding the correct reference. However, the article implies that "exhumations = vampires." Thoreau's account is of exhumation and burning in order to eradicate the spread of disease, in this case, tuberculosis. He says this quite clearly.
Posted by on October 14,2012 | 03:54 PM
Out of curiosity, I checked Thoreau's Journal entry of September 29, 1859. I find no reference to exhumations. I would appreciate a clarification of where this reference is made.
Posted by Renee Barrick on October 6,2012 | 11:48 AM
Hello Matt, I read this article in the Smithsonian magazine and thought of you and your excellent summer course. Hope your move is going well. Emily Howard
Posted by gunterman@gmail.com on October 4,2012 | 02:56 PM
The reference by Thoreau to exhumation as an example of contemporary superstition may be found in his journals on September 26, 1859. "The savage in man is never quite eradicated. I have just read of a family in Vermont--who, several of its members having died of consumption, just burned the lungs & heart & liver of the last deceased, in order to prevent any more from having it." http://thoreau.library.ucsb.edu/writings_journals_pdfs/J15f4-f6.pdf
Posted by Doug Henning on October 1,2012 | 11:13 AM
Interesting! I hope that everyone's Sunday is going great and safe!
Posted by Mike on September 30,2012 | 03:25 PM
Yes, there is a photo, it's part of The Quilt Index: http://www.quiltindex.org/fulldisplay.php?kid=4D-85-35
Posted by Casey on September 29,2012 | 06:35 PM
"Simple vandalism seemed unlikely, as did robbery, because of the lack of valuables at the site." Wouldn't 'no valuables at the site' be the end result of robbery? That doesn't mean it happened, of course, but it seems a nonsensical reason to rule it out.
Posted by Laura on September 29,2012 | 07:27 AM
I have Thoreau's Journal for 1859 and there's absolutely no mention of any exhumation--nor for any other day in Sept., 1859.
Posted by on September 27,2012 | 08:10 PM
Dear mods, please do the readership a favor and block in advance any comments about sparkly vampires.
Posted by The Sanity Inspector on September 27,2012 | 02:41 PM
Are there photos of the quilt mentioned in the article?
Posted by Amy Wilson on September 25,2012 | 12:49 PM
I was hoping that the additional material contained references for the exhumations in the 17 Century as a result of or related to vampirism. Minnesota is cited as a site of this activity. I would love to know more. With the exception of random adventurers and French "Canadians", there weren't a whole lot of European based folks out here in the 1700's. While not expert in the burial customs of the Native Peoples who were out here in the 1700's, I wonder who would be conducting such exhumations. Thanks.
Posted by patricia turbes-mohs on September 24,2012 | 09:18 PM