The Battle of Bull Run: The End of Illusions
Both North and South expected victory to be glorious and quick, but the first major battle signaled the long and deadly war to come
- By Ernest B. Furgurson
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2011, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 6)
In the chaos of driving the Federals downhill toward the turnpike, the Confederates exposed both their flanks. McDowell sent more troops at them, and pushed back up the hill. But in doing so, he exposed his own flank. At about 4 o’clock, two new Rebel brigades, under Brig. Gen. Kirby Smith and Col. Jubal Early, suddenly appeared from the rear. Smith, just arrived from the Shenandoah Valley, was seriously wounded almost immediately. Led by Col. Arnold Elzey, his troops kept moving and stretched the Confederate line to the left. Then came Early—in hot haste, now thoroughly committed to Virginia’s cause—swinging his brigade still wider around the Union flank.
That did it.
Struck by this fresh wave of Rebels, McDowell’s exhausted troops on that side started falling back. Seeing them, Beauregard raised a cheer and waved his whole line forward. The Confederates charged again, sending the Federals reeling back toward Bull Run. McDowell and Burnside tried and failed to halt them. At first the retreat was deliberate, as if the men were simply tired of fighting—as the historian John C. Ropes wrote, they “quietly but definitively broke ranks and started on their homeward way.” But Stuart’s cavalry harried them, and as they recrossed beyond Stone Bridge, Rebel cannon zeroed in on the turnpike. Then, according to Capt. James C. Fry of McDowell’s staff, “the panic began...utter confusion set in: pleasure-carriages, gun-carriages, and ambulances...were abandoned and blocked the way, and stragglers broke and threw aside their muskets and cut horses from their harness and rode off on them.” Congressman Alfred Ely of New York, among the civilians who had come out to enjoy the show, was captured in the stampede and barely escaped execution by a raging South Carolina colonel, who was restrained by Captain Alexander.
As Rebel artillery harassed McDowell’s army, men “screamed with rage and fright when their way was blocked up,” wrote Russell, the British correspondent. “Faces black and dusty, tongues out in the heat, eyes staring....Drivers flogged, lashed, spurred and beat their horses....At every shot a convulsion...seized upon the morbid mass.”
McDowell himself was just as frank, if not as descriptive. After trying to organize a stand at Centreville, he was swept along by his fleeing army. Pausing at Fairfax that night, he fell asleep in the midst of reporting that his men were without food and artillery ammunition, and most of them were “entirely demoralized.” He and his officers, he wrote, agreed that “no stand could be made this side of the Potomac.”
The dark, stormy morning of July 22 found thousands of McDowell’s men stumbling into Washington, soaked and famished, collapsing in doorways. The sight was “like a hideous dream,” Mary Henry, daughter of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, wrote in her diary. News of the rout inspired a panic: Rebels about to march into Washington! But the Rebels were nowhere near. Beauregard followed the retreat into positions he had held a week earlier, but his army was too disorganized to make a serious effort against the capital itself.
Thus ended the “Forward to Richmond!” campaign of 1861.
Bull Run—or Manassas, as Southerners call it, preferring to name Civil War battles for towns instead of watercourses—was a fierce battle, but not huge compared with those to come later. Counts vary, but the Union lost about 460 men killed, 1,125 wounded and 1,310 missing, most of those captured. The Confederates suffered about 390 killed, 1,580 wounded—and only 13 missing, because they occupied the field. Altogether, both sides lost about 4,900—fewer than a fifth of the casualties counted when they fought on the same ground a year later, and fewer than a tenth of those at Gettysburg in 1863. Regardless of numbers, the psychological effect on both sides was profound.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.







Comments (11)
This may be an interesting article, but I must admit I couldn't get past the caption under the photo on the first page. "Scores of high-spirited civilians carried picnic baskets and champagne to the battlefield to watch what would turn out to be the first major land ..." Surely experts at the Smithsonian are aware that no spectators or picnickers made it onto the battlefield. The closest they came was to disembark on the high point of Centreville, VA where they could see the smoke from the guns and some of the troop movements. I hope that the rest of the article does not carry similar myths that are being perpetuated through the years. Also, as to the naming of the battlefield.~~ In all official papers it is referred to as Bull Run or in some cases, Bulls Run. Decades later, a group of Manassas citizens bought up the land, and offer it to the National Park Service. They had several conditions attached to the donation, which included--the Park must be referred to as Manassas National Battlefield Park, and a statue of Stonewall Jackson had to be erected on the battlefield. So it was not named Manassas because they won the battle, but because the donation of the land dictated the name. I just want to set the record straight on the above points because today is the anniversary of the day, 151 years ago, that my young ancestor, Cornelius Sullivan, lost his life somewhere in the vicinity of the Stone House. RIP to him and all of those brave men who fought and lost their lives on that battlefield.
Posted by Jan Cunard on July 21,2012 | 05:17 PM
civil war rocks
Posted by jasmine on May 24,2012 | 06:08 PM
During the War’s centennial, writers perpetrated errors. As the sesquicentennial begins, this article repeats two. Such mistakes ill serve readers with only limited knowledge of the War. Bull Run was popular during the centennial when most referred to Monitor vs. Merrimac (omitting the "k," which the Navy Historian notes is an error) instead of Monitor vs. Virginia. Smithsonian should help the centennial’s more glaring errors fade, not perpetuate them to 2061. Use proper names for events. Bull Run may have been popular in 1961 because it was easy to spell & for editors it can wrap to the next line. It fit in the title box on the first page of your magazine, whereas Manassas wouldn't. The National Park Service calls the battles First & Second Manassas. http://www.nps.gov/mana/index.htm The accepted convention is victors name battles. The South won, so its name for this battle wins. The author & Smithsonian are in Washington, DC, & should know the name of a site within 30 miles. Your magazine’s sketch of Stonewall Jackson in gray uniform with plumed hat & Confederate Battle Flag (CBF) reflects 2 errors. Artist Henry Ogden was only five in 1861, so he couldn’t have made his sketch during this battle. is closer to the truth what Jackson wore: a pre-1861 blue uniform & hat. The author should have stated that Gen. Beauregard & Johnston approved the CBF later because of confusion between the 1st National & US flags during 1st Manassas. The caption could have noted both errors.
Posted by Michael Shumaker on August 4,2011 | 11:55 AM
I just finished reading Ernest B. Furgurson’s summary of the first Battle of Bull Run (Manassas). I felt compelled to read it and found it interesting. But, I am haunted by a lingering question: What is there in the American Psyche (including my own) that makes us want to read about war battles? So many deaths, incapacitating injuries, orphans, widows, PTSD! Is this desire(liking?)found in all world cultures? Now that would be an article worthy of the “Smithsonian”.
Posted by Martin Sanden on August 3,2011 | 03:19 PM
Reply to Dan Fischer from Ernest Furgurson, writer of "The End of Illusions" --
Among the many Southern remarks about taking Washington was the Richmond Examiner's April 26 assertion that "Washington should be the capital of the Southern Confederacy....If we attack her we shall meet with little opposition and much aid from her citizens." General Scott took such threats seriously: "They are closing their coils around us," he said, and fortified the Capitol, City Hall and the Treasury building. General Beauregard himself wrote of urging the concentration of Confederate forces "so that the moment McDowell should be sufficiently far detached from Washington, I would be enabled to to move rapidly round his more convenient flank upon his rear and his communications, and attack him in reverse, or get between his forces, then separated, thus cutting off his retreat upon Arlington in the event of his defeat, and insuring as an immediate consequence the crushing of Patterson, the liberation of Maryland, and the capture of Washington."
Posted by Reader Services on July 13,2011 | 05:10 PM
I had always been taught that the 'capitol' of a state or nation is spelled with an 'o,' not an 'a,' 'capital' being reserved to describe fiduciary matters. Mr. Furgurson and the Editors seem to have let that one go.
Posted by Joseph Salata on July 11,2011 | 11:50 AM
well written and balanced. familiar with battle area since my son lives in Centreville Va. Sam Croot
Posted by sam croot on July 8,2011 | 04:17 PM
It sure would be nice if The Smithsonian Magazine would show many more photos, and in good quality resolution, so that we can better enjoy the articles.
Posted by Ike Cabase on July 6,2011 | 05:47 PM
The article "End of Illusions" had as a headliner "Confederates thought they would quickly capture Washington D.C.". That is completely untrue.
In fact Jefferson Davis proclaimed many times that was not the Confederacy's intention. After Lincoln called for 400,000 troops to punish the Confederacy, and the Northern newspapers blaring "On to Richmond, on to Richmond" and the Yankees invaded Virginia, Gen Beauregard did say that if the North penetrated too deeply that he could move in behind tham and capture Washington, but this was miliary defensive move and not a strategit objective, and not the obejective of th Confederate Executive Branch.
The article is obviously too biased to be a credible documentation of history, as was the previous month's Civil War article.
Posted by Dan Fischer on June 28,2011 | 01:12 PM
If you want to zoom in on over 230 Civil War Battle locations in an interactive Google Map that enable you to zoom in on the actual battlefields and forts in both satellite and terrain mode. It comes complete with links to Wikipedia descriptions and battle maps of each battle location, National Archive photos, and battle animations from CivilWarAnimated, then check out the Civil War Google Map at MyReadingMapped:
http://myreadingmapped.blogspot.com/2011/03/interactive-map-of-geoffery-wards-book.html
This interactive map can also supply directions, hotel and other points-of-interest information.
Posted by PragmaticStatistic on June 26,2011 | 07:51 PM
Can anyone tell me what the two very tall structures in the rear of the ruined Manassas railroad station are? The picture is on page 62 of the July-August Smithsonian Magazine. It is also viewable in the 'View More Photos' frame, button #10.
Posted by Larry Dykas on June 25,2011 | 09:21 PM