The Battle of Bull Run: The End of Illusions
Both North and South expected victory to be glorious and quick, but the first major battle signaled the long and deadly war to come
- By Ernest B. Furgurson
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2011, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 6)
In both directions, this short, sharp clash was vastly exaggerated. Back in Washington, Southern sympathizers crowding the barrooms along Pennsylvania Avenue celebrated what they already called “the Battle of Bull Run.” One Union general told the Times of London correspondent William Howard Russell that the news meant “we are whipped,” while a senator quoted General Scott as announcing “a great success.... We ought to be in Richmond by Saturday”—just two days later. Swarms of civilians rushed out from the capital in a party mood, bringing picnic baskets and champagne, expecting to cheer the boys on their way. One of the less cheerful scenes they encountered was the Fourth Pennsylvania Infantry and the Eighth New York Battery walking away on the brink of battle because their 90-day enlistments were up. For the next two days, McDowell stayed put, resupplying and planning. It was a fateful delay.
Soon after Johnston’s troops departed Winchester on July 18, he issued a communiqué to every regiment. Beauregard was being attacked by “overwhelming forces,” he wrote. “Every moment now is precious...for this march is a forced march to save the country.” Out front, Jackson’s brigade forded the Shenandoah River and toiled up the Blue Ridge through Ashby Gap before bedding down that night at the hamlet of Paris. From there it was six-plus miles downhill to the Manassas Gap Railroad station at Piedmont (now Delaplane). Arriving about 8:30 a.m., the troops jammed into freight cars, and overworked locomotives took eight more hours to bring them the last 34 miles to Manassas Junction.
The rest of Johnston’s army straggled in over the next 24 hours. Johnston himself reached Manassas about midday. To head off confusion, he asked President Davis to make clear that he was senior in rank to Beauregard. Later the two officers agreed that since Beauregard was more familiar with the immediate situation, he would retain command at the tactical level while Johnston managed the overall campaign.
That day, July 20, two opposing generals sat writing orders that, if carried through, would send their attacking armies pinwheeling around each other. Beauregard intended to strike McDowell’s left, throwing most of his army toward Centreville to cut the Federals off from Washington. McDowell prepared to cross Bull Run above Stone Bridge and come down on Beauregard’s left. His plan looked good on paper, but did not account for the arrival of Johnston’s reinforcements. Beauregard’s plan was sound in concept, but not in detail: it told which brigades would attack where, but not exactly when. He woke Johnston to endorse it at 4:30 a.m. on Sunday, July 21. By then McDowell’s army was already moving.
Tyler’s division marched toward Stone Bridge, where it would open a secondary attack to distract the Confederates. Meanwhile Union Brig. Gens. David Hunter and Samuel Heintzelman started their divisions along the Warrenton Turnpike, then made a wide arc north and west toward an undefended ford at Sudley Springs, two miles above the bridge. They were to cross Bull Run there and drive down the opposite side, clearing the way for other commands to cross and join a mass assault on Beauregard’s unsuspecting left flank.
The going was slow, as McDowell’s brigades bungled into each other and troops groped along dark, unscouted roads. McDowell himself was sick from some canned fruit he had eaten the night before. But hopes were high.
In the 11th New York Infantry, known as the Zouaves, Pvt. Lewis Metcalf heard “the latest news, of which the very latest seemed to be that General [Benjamin] Butler had captured Richmond and the Rebels had been surrounded by General Patterson,” he later wrote. “All that we had to do was to give Beauregard a thrashing in order to end all the troubles.” When they slogged past blankets strewn on the roadside by sweltering troops ahead of them, the Zouaves assumed the bedding had been thrown away by fleeing Confederates and “set up a lively shout.”
About 5:30 that morning, the first shell, a massive Federal 30-pounder, whanged through the tent of a Confederate signal station near Stone Bridge without hurting anybody. That round announced Tyler’s advance, but the Confederates would not detect McDowell’s main effort for three more hours—until Capt. Porter Alexander, far back at Beauregard’s command post, spotted through his spyglass a flash of metal far beyond the turnpike. Then he picked out a glitter of bayonets nearing Sudley Springs. He quickly sent a note to Beauregard and flagged a signal to Capt. Nathan Evans, who was posted with 1,100 infantry and two smoothbore cannon at the far end of the Confederate line, watching Stone Bridge. “Look out for your left,” he warned. “You are flanked.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.







Comments (11)
This may be an interesting article, but I must admit I couldn't get past the caption under the photo on the first page. "Scores of high-spirited civilians carried picnic baskets and champagne to the battlefield to watch what would turn out to be the first major land ..." Surely experts at the Smithsonian are aware that no spectators or picnickers made it onto the battlefield. The closest they came was to disembark on the high point of Centreville, VA where they could see the smoke from the guns and some of the troop movements. I hope that the rest of the article does not carry similar myths that are being perpetuated through the years. Also, as to the naming of the battlefield.~~ In all official papers it is referred to as Bull Run or in some cases, Bulls Run. Decades later, a group of Manassas citizens bought up the land, and offer it to the National Park Service. They had several conditions attached to the donation, which included--the Park must be referred to as Manassas National Battlefield Park, and a statue of Stonewall Jackson had to be erected on the battlefield. So it was not named Manassas because they won the battle, but because the donation of the land dictated the name. I just want to set the record straight on the above points because today is the anniversary of the day, 151 years ago, that my young ancestor, Cornelius Sullivan, lost his life somewhere in the vicinity of the Stone House. RIP to him and all of those brave men who fought and lost their lives on that battlefield.
Posted by Jan Cunard on July 21,2012 | 05:17 PM
civil war rocks
Posted by jasmine on May 24,2012 | 06:08 PM
During the War’s centennial, writers perpetrated errors. As the sesquicentennial begins, this article repeats two. Such mistakes ill serve readers with only limited knowledge of the War. Bull Run was popular during the centennial when most referred to Monitor vs. Merrimac (omitting the "k," which the Navy Historian notes is an error) instead of Monitor vs. Virginia. Smithsonian should help the centennial’s more glaring errors fade, not perpetuate them to 2061. Use proper names for events. Bull Run may have been popular in 1961 because it was easy to spell & for editors it can wrap to the next line. It fit in the title box on the first page of your magazine, whereas Manassas wouldn't. The National Park Service calls the battles First & Second Manassas. http://www.nps.gov/mana/index.htm The accepted convention is victors name battles. The South won, so its name for this battle wins. The author & Smithsonian are in Washington, DC, & should know the name of a site within 30 miles. Your magazine’s sketch of Stonewall Jackson in gray uniform with plumed hat & Confederate Battle Flag (CBF) reflects 2 errors. Artist Henry Ogden was only five in 1861, so he couldn’t have made his sketch during this battle. is closer to the truth what Jackson wore: a pre-1861 blue uniform & hat. The author should have stated that Gen. Beauregard & Johnston approved the CBF later because of confusion between the 1st National & US flags during 1st Manassas. The caption could have noted both errors.
Posted by Michael Shumaker on August 4,2011 | 11:55 AM
I just finished reading Ernest B. Furgurson’s summary of the first Battle of Bull Run (Manassas). I felt compelled to read it and found it interesting. But, I am haunted by a lingering question: What is there in the American Psyche (including my own) that makes us want to read about war battles? So many deaths, incapacitating injuries, orphans, widows, PTSD! Is this desire(liking?)found in all world cultures? Now that would be an article worthy of the “Smithsonian”.
Posted by Martin Sanden on August 3,2011 | 03:19 PM
Reply to Dan Fischer from Ernest Furgurson, writer of "The End of Illusions" --
Among the many Southern remarks about taking Washington was the Richmond Examiner's April 26 assertion that "Washington should be the capital of the Southern Confederacy....If we attack her we shall meet with little opposition and much aid from her citizens." General Scott took such threats seriously: "They are closing their coils around us," he said, and fortified the Capitol, City Hall and the Treasury building. General Beauregard himself wrote of urging the concentration of Confederate forces "so that the moment McDowell should be sufficiently far detached from Washington, I would be enabled to to move rapidly round his more convenient flank upon his rear and his communications, and attack him in reverse, or get between his forces, then separated, thus cutting off his retreat upon Arlington in the event of his defeat, and insuring as an immediate consequence the crushing of Patterson, the liberation of Maryland, and the capture of Washington."
Posted by Reader Services on July 13,2011 | 05:10 PM
I had always been taught that the 'capitol' of a state or nation is spelled with an 'o,' not an 'a,' 'capital' being reserved to describe fiduciary matters. Mr. Furgurson and the Editors seem to have let that one go.
Posted by Joseph Salata on July 11,2011 | 11:50 AM
well written and balanced. familiar with battle area since my son lives in Centreville Va. Sam Croot
Posted by sam croot on July 8,2011 | 04:17 PM
It sure would be nice if The Smithsonian Magazine would show many more photos, and in good quality resolution, so that we can better enjoy the articles.
Posted by Ike Cabase on July 6,2011 | 05:47 PM
The article "End of Illusions" had as a headliner "Confederates thought they would quickly capture Washington D.C.". That is completely untrue.
In fact Jefferson Davis proclaimed many times that was not the Confederacy's intention. After Lincoln called for 400,000 troops to punish the Confederacy, and the Northern newspapers blaring "On to Richmond, on to Richmond" and the Yankees invaded Virginia, Gen Beauregard did say that if the North penetrated too deeply that he could move in behind tham and capture Washington, but this was miliary defensive move and not a strategit objective, and not the obejective of th Confederate Executive Branch.
The article is obviously too biased to be a credible documentation of history, as was the previous month's Civil War article.
Posted by Dan Fischer on June 28,2011 | 01:12 PM
If you want to zoom in on over 230 Civil War Battle locations in an interactive Google Map that enable you to zoom in on the actual battlefields and forts in both satellite and terrain mode. It comes complete with links to Wikipedia descriptions and battle maps of each battle location, National Archive photos, and battle animations from CivilWarAnimated, then check out the Civil War Google Map at MyReadingMapped:
http://myreadingmapped.blogspot.com/2011/03/interactive-map-of-geoffery-wards-book.html
This interactive map can also supply directions, hotel and other points-of-interest information.
Posted by PragmaticStatistic on June 26,2011 | 07:51 PM
Can anyone tell me what the two very tall structures in the rear of the ruined Manassas railroad station are? The picture is on page 62 of the July-August Smithsonian Magazine. It is also viewable in the 'View More Photos' frame, button #10.
Posted by Larry Dykas on June 25,2011 | 09:21 PM