The Battle of Bull Run: The End of Illusions
Both North and South expected victory to be glorious and quick, but the first major battle signaled the long and deadly war to come
- By Ernest B. Furgurson
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2011, Subscribe
Cannon boomed, brass bands serenaded and ladies tossed bouquets as Jefferson Davis arrived in Richmond on May 29, 1861, to make it the capital of the Confederate States of America. He had set out from the original capital at Montgomery, Alabama, soon after Virginia seceded from the Union six days earlier. Along the way, jubilant well-wishers slowed his train and he crossed the James River into Richmond far behind schedule. It was a scene wholly unlike President-elect Abraham Lincoln’s arrival in Washington the previous February, when he sneaked into the city at dawn in a curtained sleeping car because of threats of assassination as he passed through Baltimore. Richmond welcomed Davis as if he personally were going to smite the Yankees and drive them from Virginia soil.
To a cheering crowd, he said, “I know that there beats in the breasts of Southern sons a determination never to surrender, a determination never to go home but to tell a tale of honor....Give us a fair field and a free fight, and the Southern banner will float in triumph everywhere.”
Unlike Davis’ Mississippi and the other cotton states of the Deep South, Virginia, the most populous state below the Mason-Dixon line, had been reluctant to leave the Union of its fathers. The Richmond convention that debated secession leaned strongly against it; a country lawyer and West Point graduate named Jubal Early spoke for the majority when he warned that the convention could decide “the existence and the preservation of the fairest fabric of government that was ever erected....We ought not to act in hot haste, but coolly deliberate in view of the grave consequences.”
But after the first guns at Fort Sumter, when Lincoln called for 75,000 troops to put down the rebellion, the convention reversed itself. Opinion swung so sharply that the result of the May 23 referendum confirming the convention’s decision was a foregone conclusion. More than five months after South Carolina became the first state to depart the Union, Virginia followed. As a result, the proud, conservative Old Dominion would be the bloodiest battleground of the Civil War—and the first and final objective of all that slaughter was the capital, the very symbol of Southern resistance, the city of Richmond.
At first, there had been brave talk in Dixie of making Washington the capital of the Confederacy, surrounded as it was by the slave states of Maryland and Virginia. Federal troops had been attacked by a mob in Baltimore, and Marylanders had cut rail and telegraph lines to the North, forcing regiments headed for Washington to detour by steaming down the Chesapeake Bay. Washington was in a state of nerves; officials fortified the Capitol and the Treasury against feared invasion. Richmond was alarmed by rumors that the Union gunboat Pawnee was on its way up the James River to shell the city into flames. Some families panicked, believing an Indian tribe was on the warpath. Militiamen rushed to riverside and aimed cannon downstream. But the Pawnee never came.
North and South, such rumors pursued rumors, but soon the preliminaries, real and imagined, were either resolved or laughed away. The stage was set for war, and both sides were eager for a quick and glorious victory.
The society widow Rose O’Neal Greenhow was well known for her Southern sentiments, but in her home just across Lafayette Square from the White House she entertained Army officers and congressmen regardless of their politics. Indeed, one of her favorites was Henry Wilson, a dedicated abolitionist and future vice president from Massachusetts who had replaced Jefferson Davis as chairman of the Senate Committee on Military Affairs. Greenhow, sophisticated and seductive, listened carefully to everything her admirers said. Soon she would be sending notes across the Potomac encoded in a cipher left with her by Thomas Jordan, who had resigned his Army commission and gone south.
As summer began, Jordan was adjutant of the Confederate Army under Brig. Gen. Pierre Gustave Toutant Beauregard, a dashing Louisianan. Beauregard, who had become the Confederacy’s premier hero by commanding the bombardment of Fort Sumter in April, was now gathering brigades to protect the vital rail junction at Manassas, little more than 25 miles west-southwest of Washington.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.







Comments (11)
This may be an interesting article, but I must admit I couldn't get past the caption under the photo on the first page. "Scores of high-spirited civilians carried picnic baskets and champagne to the battlefield to watch what would turn out to be the first major land ..." Surely experts at the Smithsonian are aware that no spectators or picnickers made it onto the battlefield. The closest they came was to disembark on the high point of Centreville, VA where they could see the smoke from the guns and some of the troop movements. I hope that the rest of the article does not carry similar myths that are being perpetuated through the years. Also, as to the naming of the battlefield.~~ In all official papers it is referred to as Bull Run or in some cases, Bulls Run. Decades later, a group of Manassas citizens bought up the land, and offer it to the National Park Service. They had several conditions attached to the donation, which included--the Park must be referred to as Manassas National Battlefield Park, and a statue of Stonewall Jackson had to be erected on the battlefield. So it was not named Manassas because they won the battle, but because the donation of the land dictated the name. I just want to set the record straight on the above points because today is the anniversary of the day, 151 years ago, that my young ancestor, Cornelius Sullivan, lost his life somewhere in the vicinity of the Stone House. RIP to him and all of those brave men who fought and lost their lives on that battlefield.
Posted by Jan Cunard on July 21,2012 | 05:17 PM
civil war rocks
Posted by jasmine on May 24,2012 | 06:08 PM
During the War’s centennial, writers perpetrated errors. As the sesquicentennial begins, this article repeats two. Such mistakes ill serve readers with only limited knowledge of the War. Bull Run was popular during the centennial when most referred to Monitor vs. Merrimac (omitting the "k," which the Navy Historian notes is an error) instead of Monitor vs. Virginia. Smithsonian should help the centennial’s more glaring errors fade, not perpetuate them to 2061. Use proper names for events. Bull Run may have been popular in 1961 because it was easy to spell & for editors it can wrap to the next line. It fit in the title box on the first page of your magazine, whereas Manassas wouldn't. The National Park Service calls the battles First & Second Manassas. http://www.nps.gov/mana/index.htm The accepted convention is victors name battles. The South won, so its name for this battle wins. The author & Smithsonian are in Washington, DC, & should know the name of a site within 30 miles. Your magazine’s sketch of Stonewall Jackson in gray uniform with plumed hat & Confederate Battle Flag (CBF) reflects 2 errors. Artist Henry Ogden was only five in 1861, so he couldn’t have made his sketch during this battle. is closer to the truth what Jackson wore: a pre-1861 blue uniform & hat. The author should have stated that Gen. Beauregard & Johnston approved the CBF later because of confusion between the 1st National & US flags during 1st Manassas. The caption could have noted both errors.
Posted by Michael Shumaker on August 4,2011 | 11:55 AM
I just finished reading Ernest B. Furgurson’s summary of the first Battle of Bull Run (Manassas). I felt compelled to read it and found it interesting. But, I am haunted by a lingering question: What is there in the American Psyche (including my own) that makes us want to read about war battles? So many deaths, incapacitating injuries, orphans, widows, PTSD! Is this desire(liking?)found in all world cultures? Now that would be an article worthy of the “Smithsonian”.
Posted by Martin Sanden on August 3,2011 | 03:19 PM
Reply to Dan Fischer from Ernest Furgurson, writer of "The End of Illusions" --
Among the many Southern remarks about taking Washington was the Richmond Examiner's April 26 assertion that "Washington should be the capital of the Southern Confederacy....If we attack her we shall meet with little opposition and much aid from her citizens." General Scott took such threats seriously: "They are closing their coils around us," he said, and fortified the Capitol, City Hall and the Treasury building. General Beauregard himself wrote of urging the concentration of Confederate forces "so that the moment McDowell should be sufficiently far detached from Washington, I would be enabled to to move rapidly round his more convenient flank upon his rear and his communications, and attack him in reverse, or get between his forces, then separated, thus cutting off his retreat upon Arlington in the event of his defeat, and insuring as an immediate consequence the crushing of Patterson, the liberation of Maryland, and the capture of Washington."
Posted by Reader Services on July 13,2011 | 05:10 PM
I had always been taught that the 'capitol' of a state or nation is spelled with an 'o,' not an 'a,' 'capital' being reserved to describe fiduciary matters. Mr. Furgurson and the Editors seem to have let that one go.
Posted by Joseph Salata on July 11,2011 | 11:50 AM
well written and balanced. familiar with battle area since my son lives in Centreville Va. Sam Croot
Posted by sam croot on July 8,2011 | 04:17 PM
It sure would be nice if The Smithsonian Magazine would show many more photos, and in good quality resolution, so that we can better enjoy the articles.
Posted by Ike Cabase on July 6,2011 | 05:47 PM
The article "End of Illusions" had as a headliner "Confederates thought they would quickly capture Washington D.C.". That is completely untrue.
In fact Jefferson Davis proclaimed many times that was not the Confederacy's intention. After Lincoln called for 400,000 troops to punish the Confederacy, and the Northern newspapers blaring "On to Richmond, on to Richmond" and the Yankees invaded Virginia, Gen Beauregard did say that if the North penetrated too deeply that he could move in behind tham and capture Washington, but this was miliary defensive move and not a strategit objective, and not the obejective of th Confederate Executive Branch.
The article is obviously too biased to be a credible documentation of history, as was the previous month's Civil War article.
Posted by Dan Fischer on June 28,2011 | 01:12 PM
If you want to zoom in on over 230 Civil War Battle locations in an interactive Google Map that enable you to zoom in on the actual battlefields and forts in both satellite and terrain mode. It comes complete with links to Wikipedia descriptions and battle maps of each battle location, National Archive photos, and battle animations from CivilWarAnimated, then check out the Civil War Google Map at MyReadingMapped:
http://myreadingmapped.blogspot.com/2011/03/interactive-map-of-geoffery-wards-book.html
This interactive map can also supply directions, hotel and other points-of-interest information.
Posted by PragmaticStatistic on June 26,2011 | 07:51 PM
Can anyone tell me what the two very tall structures in the rear of the ruined Manassas railroad station are? The picture is on page 62 of the July-August Smithsonian Magazine. It is also viewable in the 'View More Photos' frame, button #10.
Posted by Larry Dykas on June 25,2011 | 09:21 PM