Ten Inventions That Inadvertently Transformed Warfare
Some of the most pivotal battlefield innovations throughout history began as peacetime inventions
- By Mark Strauss
- Smithsonian.com, September 19, 2010, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 4)
Tide-Predicting Machine: As the Allies planned their invasion of Europe in 1944, they faced a dilemma: Should they land on the beaches of Normandy at high tide or low tide?
The argument in favor of high tide was that troops would have less terrain to cross as they were subjected to enemy fire. However, German Gen. Erwin Rommel had spent months overseeing the construction of obstacles and booby traps—which he called a “devil’s garden”—to thwart a potential Allied landing. During high tide, the devil’s garden would be submerged and virtually invisible; but during low tide it would be exposed.
Ultimately, military planners concluded that the best conditions for an invasion would be a day with an early-morning (but steadily rising) low tide. That way, landing craft could avoid the German obstacles, and Army engineers could begin clearing them away for subsequent landings.
To complicate matters, the Allies also wanted a date when, prior to the dawn invasion, there would be sufficient moonlight to aid pilots in landing paratroopers.
So the Allies consulted meteorologists and other experts to calculate the dates when the tides and the moon would meet the ideal conditions. Among those experts was Arthur Thomas Doodson, a British mathematician who had constructed one of the world’s most precise tide-predicting machines—which reduced the risk of ships running aground when entering a harbor. Doodson’s machine was essentially a primitive computer that produced calculations using dozens of pulley wheels. Doodson himself calculated the ideal dates for the D-Day invasion—a narrow set of options that included June 5-7, 1944. The Allied invasion of Europe commenced on June 6.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
Thanks!....This information VERY HEPLFUL ;) Please continue to post this. I APPRECIATE IT.
Posted by Rebecca Ruby-Smithison on March 12,2013 | 01:13 PM
They forgot duct tape! It was developed before WW2 to seal insulative batts around duct work. During the war it sealed off openings in tanks before being shipped on boats, seal ammo box lids, repaired tents, boots, clothing and anything else in need of a quick fix.
Posted by Bill Wilson on February 21,2013 | 10:06 AM
The mobile `phone has been used by the "insurgents", to detonate pre-set roadside bombs, (IEDs), both in Iraq and Afghanistan. The IRA also used them to some extent.
Posted by bill Khan on January 18,2012 | 10:29 AM
In the real war the Norden bombsight did not work well.
Posted by D BROWN on November 16,2010 | 02:44 AM
Aircraft were not invented for war fighting, yet they inadvertantly found their way into battle quickly.
Posted by john b on November 16,2010 | 05:30 PM
Seems to me the article would be better titled as "Ten Non-Military Inventions that Changed Modern Warfare."
The only one of anything close to military character in its origin was the bayonet, and it was first used by hunters.
As for why other inventions weren't included, in any short list you have to make a choice of what to leave out and what to include. That list doesn't claim to be final or exclusive. It's "Ten Inventions . . . " not "THE Ten Inventions . . ."
Posted by Jeb Raitt on October 28,2010 | 04:21 PM
Gentlemen, please! TNT also qualifies, but is better known to a broader public. And the title does limit the article to "ten" inventions that "inadvertently" changed modern warfare.
Posted by Shir-El on October 15,2010 | 05:22 PM
And how does the airplane/aircraft not make the list???
Posted by John on October 13,2010 | 01:53 PM
Good as far as it goes, and with the addition of Mr. Gubas' comments. But what about the Norden bombsight, nuclear fission, and the internal combustion engine?
Posted by Kenba on October 12,2010 | 07:46 AM
Excellent article! Very interesting and informative. Thanks.
TIY
Posted by Thomas I Young on October 9,2010 | 02:01 PM
Smokeless gun powder
optical observation tools and
REjection of red, blue and other uniforms as a result of both?
Posted by Larry Gubas on September 27,2010 | 01:07 AM