Secrets of the Colosseum
A German archaeologist has finally deciphered the Roman amphitheater's amazing underground labyrinth
- By Tom Mueller
- Photographs by Dave Yoder
- Smithsonian magazine, January 2011, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 4)
Here, too, the hypogeum’s powerful lifts, hidden ramps and other mechanisms were critical to the illusion-making. “Rocks have crept along,” Martial wrote, “and, marvelous sight! A wood, such as the grove of the Hesperides [nymphs who guarded the mythical golden apples] is believed to have been, has run.”
Following the executions came the main event: the gladiators. While attendants prepared the ritual whips, fire and rods to punish poor or unwilling fighters, the combatants warmed up until the editor gave the signal for the actual battle to begin. Some gladiators belonged to specific classes, each with its own equipment, fighting style and traditional opponents. For example, the retiarius (or “net man”) with his heavy net, trident and dagger often fought against a secutor (“follower”) wielding a sword and wearing a helmet with a face mask that left only his eyes exposed.
Contestants adhered to rules enforced by a referee; if a warrior conceded defeat, typically by raising his left index finger, his fate was decided by the editor, with the vociferous help of the crowd, who shouted “Missus!” (“Dismissal!”) at those who had fought bravely, and “Iugula, verbera, ure!” (“Slit his throat, beat, burn!”) at those they thought deserved death. Gladiators who received a literal thumbs down were expected to take a finishing blow from their opponents unflinchingly. The winning gladiator collected prizes that might include a palm of victory, cash and a crown for special valor. Because the emperor himself was often the host of the games, everything had to run smoothly. The Roman historian and biographer Suetonius wrote that if technicians botched a spectacle, the emperor Claudius might send them into the arena: “[He] would for trivial and hasty reasons match others, even of the carpenters, the assistants and men of that class, if any automatic device or pageant, or anything else of the kind, had not worked well.” Or, as Beste puts it, “The emperor threw this big party, and wanted the catering to go smoothly. If it did not, the caterers sometimes had to pay the price.”
To spectators, the stadium was a microcosm of the empire, and its games a re-enactment of their foundation myths. The killed wild animals symbolized how Rome had conquered wild, far-flung lands and subjugated Nature itself. The executions dramatized the remorseless force of justice that annihilated enemies of the state. The gladiator embodied the cardinal Roman quality of virtus, or manliness, whether as victor or as vanquished awaiting the deathblow with Stoic dignity. “We know that it was horrible,” says Mary Beard, a classical historian at Cambridge University, “but at the same time people were watching myth re-enacted in a way that was vivid, in your face and terribly affecting. This was theater, cinema, illusion and reality, all bound into one.”
Tom Mueller’s next book, on the history of olive oil, will be published this fall. Photographer Dave Yoder is based in Milan.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Archaeology Renovation and Restoration Historic and Cultural Monuments
Additional Sources
The Colosseum, by Filippo Coarelli et al., English translation by Mary Becker, The J. Paul Getty Trust, 2001









Comments (26)
+ View All Comments
Concerning the Coloseum I just read somewhere that in Roman times the "thumbs up" was the sign to kill the defeated gladiator, while "thumbs down" was the sign to let them continue to live. It would thus be the exact opposite of what it means today and what is stated in the otherwise very interesting article. Is this correct?
Posted by Bruce K. Steuer on November 5,2012 | 07:44 PM
Saint Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, was an early Christian martyr sentenced to die in the Colosseum--his own writings at the time, around 108 A.D. (not accounts by others in the Renaissance--the author of this article hasn't researched this aspect of history well), describe his journey as a prisoner to meet his death there, and he was recognized as a martyr by the early church following his death in the Colosseum, eaten by lions. I hope the author, Tom Mueller, who has written this incredible historical description of the workings of the Colosseum, can understand why his denial of historical accounts from the time (again, not the Renaissance) of Christian martyrs meeting horrible deaths in the Colosseum (and throughout the Roman Empire during persecutions by Trajan, Nero and others), feels a little like hearing from people who deny the Holocaust in Germany. It was long ago, but it was real. I wouldn't take offense at omitting it from the article, but to imply that it didn't happen is not what I would expect from an article published by a society of the caliber of the Smithsonian. Here is a link regarding St. Ignatius of Antioch and his writings: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatius_of_Antioch
Posted by Greg Wrenn on June 30,2012 | 01:46 PM
Well you guys are just amazing, dissing the artical, calling for spell checks. It's not an amphitheater that's stupid, it's an ampitheater. And who cares about the thumbs?! It's ancient history. Literally!!! And if you all are so smart why don't you go study the same building for 14 years, post a veary entertaining and usefull artical about it, (that might not even get hits!) Then get dissed by some idiots who don't even know what they're talking about,(and frankely no one cares) who just want to feel supirior against evryone else by claiming they know more. But you know what? If you don't like the artical.....DON'T READ IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Gaby on April 24,2012 | 09:54 PM
(Yes I am a girl, it's like Gabby, but with one B, it's french.) I thought the artical was amazing and veary well written. I especially liked findinng out all the new info aboout the levies and pullys and such. I guess the Romans were more advanced then thouhgt. (at least by a sixth grader.) It is so amazing what was entertaaing back then,but scary how close some of our movies and even books are to that. Does this call for something that may happen in the futer? One can only imagen.
Posted by Gaby L. on April 24,2012 | 09:34 PM
exceptional. Highly impressed. Very vivid. Thank you.
Posted by Juliet Miyabo on April 7,2012 | 08:14 PM
Reading comprehension is clearly not your thing, Chappy. There is no reliable evidence that Christians were killed *in the Colosseum*.
Posted by Squiggle on October 19,2011 | 07:42 AM
Contrary to the statement in this article, there is in fact a great deal of history attesting to the death of christians at the behest of emporers who had declared themselves god, and to whom some christians would not worship.
It is just become unpopular to state the truth in certain circles.
Posted by chappy on October 2,2011 | 03:41 AM
I could not bring up "What Gladiators saw"...
help me out please
Posted by judy telechowski on May 5,2011 | 07:41 AM
I could not bring up "What Gladiators saw"...can you give me more direction? Intriguing article...I am amazed at the fact that the stadium held so many spectators and must have been filled...so many people observing other people battle beautiful beasts...to the death. A re=enactment of the beginning of man destroying our planet?? The determination, expertise, logistics required for the construction aspect is mind boggling... WOW!
Posted by Barb Gregoire on March 26,2011 | 10:38 AM
I couldn"t get "What the Gladiators Saw" picture.
Posted by Travis Smith on March 8,2011 | 02:42 PM
how can one visit the hypogeum? Is there a tour? Ihave people in rome the week of June 21 to June 24 2011.
Thank you very much
Paula Mark
Posted by Paula Mark on February 24,2011 | 06:39 PM
they kill animals, yes..... but im trying to get the point across to my friend that it cant be changed now....yeah, it wasnt right what they did was infact for fun, and it was fair game at times, but we cant change it. i wish i could change it,maybe i'll be in the stands chearing the gladiater on, who knows....and who really cares. i hope i got my point across!!!! :P haha! boo yaa!!!
Posted by Maxy woman on February 17,2011 | 01:19 PM
it killes me to know that they fought and sometimes killed animals for the fun of it didnt they sit an think about it at all and if they did how cruel
Posted by Kyles girl on February 17,2011 | 01:16 PM
When Heinz-Jürgen Beste and a team of German and Italian archaeologists first began exploring the hypogeum in 1996, they were baffled by the intricacy and sheer size of its structures.Unraveling the site’s tangled history, Beste identified four major building phases and numerous modifications over nearly 400 years of continuous use. Colosseum architects made some changes to allow new methods of stagecraft. Other changes were accidental; a fire sparked by lightning in A.D. 217 gutted the stadium and sent huge blocks of travertine plunging into the hypogeum. Beste also began to decipher the odd marks and incisions in the masonry, having had a solid grounding in Roman mechanical engineering from excavations in southern Italy, where he learned about catapults and other Roman war machines. He also studied the cranes that the Romans used to move large objects, such as 18-foot-tall marble blocks.
i love how u guys put, all this info.
Posted by maxy girl on February 17,2011 | 01:12 PM
+ View All Comments