Sarah Vowell on the Puritans' Legacy
The author and 'This American Life' correspondent talks about her newest book on the words and influence of the colonies' early religious leaders
- By Amanda Bensen
- Smithsonian.com, November 04, 2008, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
Winthrop and his fellow magistrates eventually ban Williams from Massachusetts, and he goes on to found Rhode Island. Williams is able to escape before the Massachusetts militia comes to put him on a boat back to England—and the person who warned him was John Winthrop!
Publicly, Winthrop thought Williams was disturbing the peace and needed to be removed—but he was still his friend, so he warned him. And they kept up this correspondence for the rest of Winthrop's life. I thought it was just a great story that their friendship could live on after one guy banished the other. It made me interested in finding out more.
Tell us about Anne Hutchinson, another strong character. How did she end up getting banished from the Massachusetts colony?
Anne Hutchinson was the groupie of John Cotton, who was the most important Protestant minister in England. So when John Cotton immigrates to New England, she and her husband and their 15 children follow him to Boston.
She is a midwife, so when she gets to Boston she meets a lot of women very quickly. And she starts having these prayer meetings in her home for the other women. At first she's just talking about Cotton's sermons, but eventually she starts preaching on her own, and attracts these huge crowds to her house. Not just women, men came too. She became really influential, really fast.
She and her followers were causing an enormous amount of discord and trouble in the colony, so the magistrates of the Bay Colony haul her into court and put her on trial for disturbing the peace.
She's probably about to get acquitted, because she really refutes all of their arguments against her, but the thing about her is: She couldn't shut up. And she liked the sound of her own voice. She uses this opportunity to just go off and start kind of preaching what she believes—and a lot of what she believes is very blasphemous. Like, she believes she hears the voice of God. She believes she's filled with the Holy Spirit.
A lot of what she's saying, modern-day evangelicals would probably recognize as the kind of Protestantism they practice, but for the Puritans it was way too emotional. To say that you heard the voice of God was not to be believed.
So she gets kicked out, and also goes to Rhode Island, as Roger Williams before her. And Rhode Island becomes a place of refuge, where not just Puritans who get kicked out of Massachusetts seek solace, but all kinds of religious outcasts.
If there were a ship full of people sailing off for a new colony today, would you join them?
Well, no. I like where I live (laughs)!
I mean, what they did was pretty remarkable and brave. And just, one thing I love about Winthrop's and Cotton's sermons, is they are both these pep talks given almost at the dock, as these people are about to embark, and what they're embarking on is really terrifying. The fact that they would do it exhibits an enormous amount of bravery and optimism.
And... I also hate boats and can't swim.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (7)
good history
Posted by mariyah on December 14,2010 | 08:20 PM
Good and bad, we all have our history, and denying the "bad" is absolutely absurd. Historical events are just a matter of fact. I suggest to Dave that he takes a better look at the Bible and its heros -- such as King David who commited murder, adultry, and pretty much coveted everything there was to covet. We are all free to discuss these facts without the fear of being "blasphemous." Shame on you, Dave, for suggesting that the measure of our patriotism hangs on such a fragile thread. Question... why are you reading the Smithsonian?
Posted by Jenifer on November 20,2008 | 01:46 PM
I just wanted to say thank you for your wonderful book, which I recently finished. I found it to be a refreshingly accessible and humanizing look into the history of the Puritans and of the Indian tribes they decimated, and the parallels you draw with our modern follies are spot on.
Posted by Angelique on November 20,2008 | 11:24 AM
I truly enjoy that history has decided not to take itself so seriously. Researching the foibles or the aches and pains which contributed to the colonizers decision making processes not only amuse but enlighten. Pop culture did not invent the "Rock Stars" in the days of yore, but the charisma and ambition of individuals outshone their fellow men (and women, for that matter). It is only right that readers learn all sides of the story so they can form their own objective opinions and judge the past as they see fit. Learning the truth of your nation's origins does not make you unpatriotic. Nor do I betray my own ancestors who were systematically murdered, swindled, and acculturated by the dominant society as I strive to learn more about America's founding fathers. The story is there. So pray thee historian, tell it.
Posted by Janette on November 19,2008 | 07:53 PM
It always amuses me to read what Americans think of historical reality. As an expatriate from the UK and a US citizen I may have a more realistic view of the US and perhaps a more reasonable view of the World. I was brought up in Scotland in the 60's and 70's through a miserable time when all the heavy industries were going away and there was mass unemployment. I was desperate to leave and my holy grail was the US. I arrived with my family in Detroit in 1982 in the middle of madness and mayhem. I actually lived in the city and was stunned to see the brutality and ignorance (over 400 murders a year in a city with a population of 1 million). As I grew used to the American scene I could see something that is distinctly American; that is reality is a closely guarded idea wherein the people who have money and education dictate to everyone else what they should aspire for. Why does this relate to the story of the Puritans? Mainly because they would be appalled by what the America of 2008 has become. They had values and there are very few of us who could hold up a mirror and say "we have their values". In the US there is a distinct lack of moral honesty - just see what the politicians were saying in their stump speeches etc. We have become a race of cynics with so little time a sound byte is more information than we can handle. In the end perhaps the seekers amongst us will find a new moral compass, just like the Puritans of old did when they left for the new world. Till then I applaud Sarah V for casting a new light on a little understood time when words had power that can still resonate today.
Posted by Indra on November 19,2008 | 06:56 PM
Your comment: It is so easy to set here 400 years hence and comdemn them. I believe 100 years from today when the country has few religous rememberances and a religiously guided consience is not one's barometer, we'll end up like all other places in the world not founded in Christianity! And I don't go to church but,I do realize and see truths! I SAY THIS. Truths regarding religion are very narrow in scope. They are based on what the hierarchy of the religion wants you to believe as truth. If all places in the world operate, not without Christianity, but without Organized Religion altogether, the world would be better off.
Posted by Fred Bichl on November 19,2008 | 06:09 PM
Your attempt as an authority on Puritans is limited in scope and vision. The statement by Winthrop to which you were alluding, regarding being the "city on a hill" was in reference to the world seeing what was being built. They believed God was with them and was leading their every step. Failure was not part of their convictions as long as they followed their doctrinal beliefs. Lack of adherence to their Doctrine is exactly why Rogers was run off. They were for the most part all of a common belief when they first left England in April of 1630 By that I mean some of the women following husbands may have not been in line with the rest. It is so easy to set here 400 years hence and comdemn them. I believe 100 years from today when the country has few religous rememberances and a religiously guided consience is not one's barometer, we'll end up like all other places in the world not founded in Christianity! And I don't go to church but,I do realize and see truths! And if this is not a special country I will send you a one way ticket to the best and special country of your choice. All you snobs have to do is complain about this country! Why don't you go out and get your noses bloodied, experience the world, have a loved one die in your arms, experience much trauma! It is that which causes one to probe into the realms of reality and find appreciation in America! Dave
Posted by Dave on November 17,2008 | 01:14 AM