Raiders or Traders?
A replica Viking vessel sailing the North Sea has helped archaeologists figure out what the stalwart Norsemen were really up to
- By Andrew Curry
- Photographs by Carsten Snejbjerg
- Smithsonian magazine, July 2008, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
Information from the crew proved as valuable as technical data. Exhausted sailors told researchers that the close quarters made sleeping nearly impossible. Between the rough water, constant rain and their nautical duties, it was all crew members could do to nap for an hour or two during their rest periods. “That indicates the ship must have had an amphibious behavior—they had to land often just to get some rest,” Englert says. Crossing the North Sea in a narrow ship like this one would have stretched a Viking crew almost to the breaking point, and crossing the Atlantic would have been inconceivable. A ship like this would have likely been used for coastal raiding only.
On June 29, 2008, the Sea Stallion sailed once again, down the Liffey and out of Dublin harbor. It was, crew member Louise Kaempe Henriksen would blog, “typical Sea Stallion weather—pouring rain.” The ship set course south and then east around England to the cliffs of Dover, north to Lowestoft, then across the North Sea, following its Viking predecessors northeast toward home.
At last, after 1,261 nautical miles, the Sea Stallion reached Denmark a little more than a month later, on August 9. “We turn to Roskilde,” wrote crew member Vibeke Bischoff as they neared port. “We are escorted the whole way in,” he reported of their festive homecoming, “by hundreds of boats.” History does not record whether the Vikings, more than a millennium ago, were similarly greeted by their own vessels, bearing tidings of welcome to seafarers who were at last nearing landfall.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (18)
+ View All Comments
With the collapse of the Carolingian Empire, it left a power vacuum in Europe to be filled. So the Vikings came down, and filled it. When I was in Waterford, Ireland, that started as a Viking trading post, where commodities could be brought up from the Mediterranean to Western and Northern Europe. While in Ireland, they heard tales of western islands from Irish monks, which led to the Viking colonization of Iceland, Greenland, and North America. In the east, they united the Slavs together, and formed the powerful nation of Kievan Rus, and great trading cities such as Novgorod. But the Viking power was to eclipse with the rise of kingdoms such as Russia, Poland, France, and England. What happened to the Vikings who colonized these areas? Simple they merged with the local people. When the Vikings took on French speech and customs, they became the Normans. When they founded Bruges, that later became the great trading center of Northern Europe.
Posted by Tim Upham on January 3,2013 | 12:14 AM
this is awsome
Posted by anymous on November 8,2012 | 09:39 AM
Continued:
Just to clarify, to make a laminated sword blade that weighs around two pounds ( a typical weight of a Viking sword or larger Japanese Katana), when finished, requires about 10 to 15 times as much iron to start with. So twenty to thirty pounds of iron is worked in the forge to not only shape but to laminate and weld and add hardening minerals to what becomes the final blade. During this long and skillfull process, oxygen from the air combines with the surface of each red hot portion of the iron and forms a skin of black material called iron oxide ( also refered to as "scale" ). This scale is not flexible and "chips off" every time the metal is bent , usually by each hammer stroke, leaving a freshly made "bare surface" ready to form new iron oxide, which chips off with the next hammer stroke, and repeats the scale formation continuously. This loss of scale is where the 28 pounds of iron is lost in the long process of making a two pound laminated sword blade from thirty pounds of iron.
Making a solid steel sword blade doesn't require as much forging since no fold laminating occurs and so less scale is produced and less iron is lost in the process.
Steel is simply iron , to which has been combined a small amount of the element carbon. Carbon is the key ingredient in making iron into very hard steel. It is absorbed into the atomic structure of the iron and is permanent. One way to combine the right amount of carbon with iron is in the smelting of the iron ore. Another way is during the forging of the iron after it has been produced by smelting. The twist lamination teniques of the early Viking smiths employed this latter method of adding carbon while the iron was in the forge. The Frankish sword makers did this during the smelting process and as a result all the iron was made into steel, not just the sword blade's edge. This produced a superior sword blade which the Vikings prefered.
Posted by Henrik the Dane on September 26,2010 | 03:47 PM
Continued:
Contrary to any supposition that the Viking art of blade making was "lost", the real reason the Vikings stopped making twist laminated swords that way was because they had been introduiced to a "better" way and simply used frankish sword blades to make their own Viking swords from. Late period Viking swords have Viking hilt fittings assembled to Frankish blades.
As far as asian swords are concerned, that is a whole different matter that has no relation to Viking swords at all. Briefly, the Japanese method of sword forging derives from fold lamination, not twist lamination. The iron ore the Japanese used was typically magnetite deposits found in river sand, not iron rich mineral deposits found in bogs, nor rock ore mined from deep underground. Japanese sword making technology and traditions migrated to Japan from the mainland of the Asian continent, through Korea and most likely originated in China, which has been smelting iron, sometimes in huge massive quantities for several thousand years. Lumps of ancient Chinese iron smelts weighing several thousand pounds have been discovered in China and smaller ones weighing up to several hundreds of pounds have been discovered in Japan. These are all a far cry from the bog iron of the vikings, amounting to a mere tens of pounds at most and typically much less.
Posted by Henrik the Dane on September 26,2010 | 03:46 PM
Early Vikings and their predicessors made swords from local iron that they smelted from local sources. Contrary to modern understanding, local iron was not mined from local iron deposits ( which were not known nor available on the land's surface , for the most part), rich though they may have been particularly in Sweden, but instead was refined from mineral rich bogs which produced "bog iron". This iron was of poor quality and required great skill to produce the fine twist laminated blades ( such as the one discovered in the Sutton Hoo Burial)that early Vikings have become noted for. However on the Continent , the Franks produced fine steel swords that soon became known to the Vikings after they began raiding those lands. Swords such as those made by "Ulfbert" and others made with a "runnning Wolf" mark became famous and of great desirability.
The Early twist laminated Viking swords , although pretty to look, at had weaker construction over all due to the presence of hard steel on only the edges of the blades. These blades were forge welded together throughout and the hard steel edges were forge welded in place last. Sometimes the construction was not perfect and failures were not uncommon.
The Franks discovered a method of making large blocks of steel that they forged out into homogenous bars of steel which then were shaped into the blades they made. These blades lacked any forge welds and were uniformly hard all over. As such they could be made thinner and lighter and could be were more flexible than the more massive twist laminated blades they were contemporary with. The Frankish blades were soon prefered by anyone who had seen them and experienced their performance in combat.
Posted by Henrik the Dane on September 26,2010 | 03:43 PM
Few answers to some of the questions raised:
Folcrom ought to read this article: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119131136/PDFSTART
As comprehensive a description of all the Rollo/Ragnars you could desire.
As for the reasons the Vikings began to settle, it appears land was less of an issue. Demographic pressure was only really an issue in Denmark - Vikings were almost exclusively looking for loot, not land.
One idea is interesting: With more and more Vikings raiding it became more profitable to settle in an area. Not only did this mean the settlement could exact tribute and protection money from the peopel around it, but it could protect them from *other* viking raiders. Over-plundering damaged long-term possibilities. Vikings were economically-savvy, it appears.
Posted by Alex on June 11,2009 | 11:03 AM
To Jean Hael! Yes, the Sea Stallion left Ireland as scheduled and arrived safe and sound in Roskilde, Denmark, on August 9th-2008. Website: http://www.havhingsten.dk/index.php?id=277&L=1
Posted by Lisen on August 24,2008 | 08:01 AM
Aug 16,2008-question Did the ship leave Ireland as scheduled in June (or since) and did it get back to Denmark safely?
Posted by Jean Hael on August 16,2008 | 02:41 PM
Question about the sails. Why are the sails always portrayed as having red and white vertical stripes? I understand that the sails consisted of squares of woven material joined together in a diamond pattern, perhaps each square edged with red-dyed leather for extra strength. This would not have produced red and white vertical stripes.
Posted by Ricky Cooper on August 15,2008 | 07:57 PM
I believe that far too little notice has been made of their many settlements and the contributions they made to the local culture. To me this shows another facet of their natures, for they did not simply pillage and plunder, though they were clearly very skillful at it, and were also fabulous seafarers. I wonder what prompted these settlements? Were they initially merely stopping places, perhaps to rest, repair, reorganize for their next raid, or did they reflect genuine interest in being a part of a new country? I would be interested in knowing more about the women who also braved these rigorous journeys and made their homes in strange, new, maybe hostile places, especially if they initially came ashore during a raid. What must it have been like to be a Viking woman?
Posted by Pat Nelson on July 30,2008 | 01:37 PM
This is a comment on iron. Norway and Sweden have an exceptionally high grade iron ore called magnetite which has a low amount of impurities. The more common ore found in the U.S. and other parts of the world is called hematite. Steel is basically a clean iron with controlled carbon. The repetitive heating and hammering which was used to make swords does somewhat clean the iron, however, given similar processes steel made from magnetite will naturally have less impurities or inclusions and thus be stronger. Today, with oxygen and vacuum degassing processes it is possible to make clean steel from even marginal ores.
Posted by Byron A.Nilsson on July 3,2008 | 09:33 PM
This wonderful article makes me proud that my ancestors came from the seafaring towns of the Norwegian fiords and the towns outside of Stockholm. They were strong, fearless people.
Posted by Sonya Harris on July 2,2008 | 04:56 PM
As a child living in Bognor Regis, Sussex, England, I remember seeing a replica Viking ship visiting Bognor pier. It must have been during the late 1940s or early 1950s, and had also been rowed by a crew from Denmark.
Posted by Jo Hammond on July 1,2008 | 11:45 PM
Can you explain how the crew handled personal hygiene issues on this 5 week experiment? Sixty-three crew members of men and women had to have challenging situations. Was this ship accompanied by other ships providing for necessities? Posted 6/30/08 C.F.
Posted by Carmen Fraga on June 30,2008 | 02:33 PM
+ View All Comments