Raiders or Traders?
A replica Viking vessel sailing the North Sea has helped archaeologists figure out what the stalwart Norsemen were really up to
- By Andrew Curry
- Photographs by Carsten Snejbjerg
- Smithsonian magazine, July 2008, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
In the 1970s, archaeologists in Dublin found a Viking settlement spread over several acres—and in it more than 3,000 pieces of amber that were probably imported from Denmark. Excavation at Staraya Ladoga, outside St. Petersburg, unearthed a multiethnic settlement that included Viking jewelry, weapons and tools buried amid 1,000-year-old houses. And elsewhere in Russia, archaeologists have uncovered hundreds of Scandinavian graves containing artifacts from the Viking era; in 2006, they found one in the province of Kaliningrad, 500 miles from Norway.
Almost all these sites share a common artifact: thin, silver coins called dirhams. Most of them were made in Baghdad, which was the center of the Arab world from 750 to 950, and they were usually stamped with the year they were minted. Vikings apparently traded furs, amber, ivory and slaves for dirhams, which they then carried with them on their ships. As a result, the coins mark Viking trade routes like shiny silver bread crumbs.
In January 2007, metal-detector hobbyists in Harrogate, England, uncovered a treasure worth millions of dollars that one or more Vikings buried around 927; it included 617 coins, 15 of which were dirhams. Thousands of dirhams dating from 780 to 1050 were found at Viking sites near St. Petersburg. In Poland, archaeologists excavating a Viking settlement near Gdansk found nearly 800 coins dating from 780 to 840, almost all of them Arabic. Other Arabic coins made their way to France, Ireland, Iceland and Greenland. “What we’re seeing is the remnants of an extremely intricate network of barter trade,” says historian Jonathan Shepard of St. Kliment Ohrid University in Sofia, Bulgaria. “It’s a weird combination of coercion and tribute side by side and intermingled with bartering.”
By the 11th century, Vikings began adopting the languages and customs of local peoples, even settling in and intermarrying from Ireland to Russia. Researchers at the universities of Leicester and Nottingham, in England, found that up to half the DNA from men in northwest England matches Scandinavian genetic types.
All that wandering would have been impossible without ships—which is where Erik Nielsen and the rest of the Sea Stallion’s crew come in. For much of the 20th century, archaeologists assumed that Viking ships all resembled a vessel excavated in Norway in 1880. Known as the Gokstad ship, for the farm on which it was found, it dated to the year 900. The ship was “clinker-built,” meaning it was constructed of overlapping planks, which made it stout, flexible and light, with a sail and room for 32 oarsmen. In 1893, Magnus Andersen sailed a replica from Norway to Chicago for the World’s Fair. “Gokstad was thought to be universal, whether trader or raider,” says Niels Lund, a Viking historian at the University of Copenhagen. But a 1962 discovery forced researchers to abandon the idea that the Vikings had only one kind of ship.
At the bottom of a fjord near Roskilde, archaeologists found remnants of five Viking ships piled one atop the other. Dubbed the Skuldelev ships, for a nearby town, each had had a specialized role. One had been a fishing boat; two were cargo ships, so easy to handle that a crew of eight or nine could move 20-ton loads; and one was a warship that could carry about 30 people. The fifth ship, a raider named the Skuldelev, was the largest.
It was 98 feet long but just 12 feet wide. Its keel reached just three feet below the surface, and its masts and sail could be lowered so the ship could approach fortifications and settlements with stealth. It could accommodate 65 armed men. “This is a boat for warriors,” says Soren Nielsen, head boat builder at the Viking Ship Museum in Roskilde.
Because only about 20 percent of the Skuldelev 2 could be recovered, the only way to determine its capabilities for certain was to reconstruct it and put it to sea. In 2000, Nielsen and his colleagues at the ship museum began working with scientists to build an accurate replica. They used thousand-year-old methods and reproductions of tools from that time, which meant carving each of the ship’s 90 oak planks with axes, wedges and hammers. After four years and almost $2.5 million, the eight builders had their replica. They called it Sea Stallion From Glendalough for the Irish village where Vikings used to procure oak for their ships. With its narrow beam and shallow draft, the Sea Stallion could navigate just about any river in Europe. But how would it fare on the open sea?
In the summer of 2006, the Sea Stallion sailed under sunny skies and gentle winds to Norway and back in four weeks—a virtual pleasure cruise. A test sail in May 2007 around the Roskilde Fjord enjoyed similar conditions. “We like to say we’ve been cursed with good weather,” said Carsten Hvid, the Sea Stallion’s skipper. But the six-week voyage that began in July 2007— from Roskilde north to Norway, west to Scotland and south to Dublin—proved a tougher test. Fully loaded, the ship weighed 24 tons—eight of ship, eight of rock for ballast and eight of crew and gear. In ideal conditions, the Sea Stallion could travel 160 nautical miles in a day; it could sprint at 13 knots, or almost 15 miles an hour. (A high-tech America’s Cup racer might hit 20 knots.) “It ranks as one of the fastest warships in history,” says Anton Englert, an archaeologist at the ship museum.
For the July 2007 voyage, the ship set sail under dark skies that presaged Northern Europe’s coldest and wettest summer in decades. Nighttime temperatures plunged into the 30s. Three days into the voyage, two crew members had to be treated for hypothermia, and, to stay on schedule, Hvid had to accept a 24-hour tow across part of the North Sea because of weak winds. “It kept on raining and raining and raining,” says crew member Henrik Kastoft, in his day job a spokesman for the United Nations Development Program. “There were so many nights I just sat there shivering for hours.” Each crew member had about eight square feet of space. “I really suffered from being so close to people for so long. I got edgy, cranky,” says Erik Nielsen. “Maybe the modern analogue would be a submarine.”
If the night the rudder broke was the low point of the voyage, sailing along the western coast of Scotland almost made up for it. For nearly two weeks, the crew had the dramatic scenery almost completely to themselves. As the ship neared Dublin, escorts appeared. When it cruised up the River Liffey into port on August 14, ships and cars blasted their horns, church bells pealed and throngs of people waved from the balconies and windows of riverfront buildings.
Days later, the ship was trucked to the center of Dublin and lifted by a crane over a four-story building into the courtyard of the National Museum of Ireland, where it would spend the winter. By then, archaeologists at the ship museum in Roskilde had begun analyzing data generated during the voyage. As the crew’s close call in the Irish Sea made clear, high speeds over long distances pushed the ship to its limits—and challenged assumptions about how the original had been put together. “The sails are very stable and can take a lot of wind, but the problems with the rudder come up again and again, and haven’t been solved yet,” Englert says.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (18)
+ View All Comments
With the collapse of the Carolingian Empire, it left a power vacuum in Europe to be filled. So the Vikings came down, and filled it. When I was in Waterford, Ireland, that started as a Viking trading post, where commodities could be brought up from the Mediterranean to Western and Northern Europe. While in Ireland, they heard tales of western islands from Irish monks, which led to the Viking colonization of Iceland, Greenland, and North America. In the east, they united the Slavs together, and formed the powerful nation of Kievan Rus, and great trading cities such as Novgorod. But the Viking power was to eclipse with the rise of kingdoms such as Russia, Poland, France, and England. What happened to the Vikings who colonized these areas? Simple they merged with the local people. When the Vikings took on French speech and customs, they became the Normans. When they founded Bruges, that later became the great trading center of Northern Europe.
Posted by Tim Upham on January 3,2013 | 12:14 AM
this is awsome
Posted by anymous on November 8,2012 | 09:39 AM
Continued:
Just to clarify, to make a laminated sword blade that weighs around two pounds ( a typical weight of a Viking sword or larger Japanese Katana), when finished, requires about 10 to 15 times as much iron to start with. So twenty to thirty pounds of iron is worked in the forge to not only shape but to laminate and weld and add hardening minerals to what becomes the final blade. During this long and skillfull process, oxygen from the air combines with the surface of each red hot portion of the iron and forms a skin of black material called iron oxide ( also refered to as "scale" ). This scale is not flexible and "chips off" every time the metal is bent , usually by each hammer stroke, leaving a freshly made "bare surface" ready to form new iron oxide, which chips off with the next hammer stroke, and repeats the scale formation continuously. This loss of scale is where the 28 pounds of iron is lost in the long process of making a two pound laminated sword blade from thirty pounds of iron.
Making a solid steel sword blade doesn't require as much forging since no fold laminating occurs and so less scale is produced and less iron is lost in the process.
Steel is simply iron , to which has been combined a small amount of the element carbon. Carbon is the key ingredient in making iron into very hard steel. It is absorbed into the atomic structure of the iron and is permanent. One way to combine the right amount of carbon with iron is in the smelting of the iron ore. Another way is during the forging of the iron after it has been produced by smelting. The twist lamination teniques of the early Viking smiths employed this latter method of adding carbon while the iron was in the forge. The Frankish sword makers did this during the smelting process and as a result all the iron was made into steel, not just the sword blade's edge. This produced a superior sword blade which the Vikings prefered.
Posted by Henrik the Dane on September 26,2010 | 03:47 PM
Continued:
Contrary to any supposition that the Viking art of blade making was "lost", the real reason the Vikings stopped making twist laminated swords that way was because they had been introduiced to a "better" way and simply used frankish sword blades to make their own Viking swords from. Late period Viking swords have Viking hilt fittings assembled to Frankish blades.
As far as asian swords are concerned, that is a whole different matter that has no relation to Viking swords at all. Briefly, the Japanese method of sword forging derives from fold lamination, not twist lamination. The iron ore the Japanese used was typically magnetite deposits found in river sand, not iron rich mineral deposits found in bogs, nor rock ore mined from deep underground. Japanese sword making technology and traditions migrated to Japan from the mainland of the Asian continent, through Korea and most likely originated in China, which has been smelting iron, sometimes in huge massive quantities for several thousand years. Lumps of ancient Chinese iron smelts weighing several thousand pounds have been discovered in China and smaller ones weighing up to several hundreds of pounds have been discovered in Japan. These are all a far cry from the bog iron of the vikings, amounting to a mere tens of pounds at most and typically much less.
Posted by Henrik the Dane on September 26,2010 | 03:46 PM
Early Vikings and their predicessors made swords from local iron that they smelted from local sources. Contrary to modern understanding, local iron was not mined from local iron deposits ( which were not known nor available on the land's surface , for the most part), rich though they may have been particularly in Sweden, but instead was refined from mineral rich bogs which produced "bog iron". This iron was of poor quality and required great skill to produce the fine twist laminated blades ( such as the one discovered in the Sutton Hoo Burial)that early Vikings have become noted for. However on the Continent , the Franks produced fine steel swords that soon became known to the Vikings after they began raiding those lands. Swords such as those made by "Ulfbert" and others made with a "runnning Wolf" mark became famous and of great desirability.
The Early twist laminated Viking swords , although pretty to look, at had weaker construction over all due to the presence of hard steel on only the edges of the blades. These blades were forge welded together throughout and the hard steel edges were forge welded in place last. Sometimes the construction was not perfect and failures were not uncommon.
The Franks discovered a method of making large blocks of steel that they forged out into homogenous bars of steel which then were shaped into the blades they made. These blades lacked any forge welds and were uniformly hard all over. As such they could be made thinner and lighter and could be were more flexible than the more massive twist laminated blades they were contemporary with. The Frankish blades were soon prefered by anyone who had seen them and experienced their performance in combat.
Posted by Henrik the Dane on September 26,2010 | 03:43 PM
Few answers to some of the questions raised:
Folcrom ought to read this article: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119131136/PDFSTART
As comprehensive a description of all the Rollo/Ragnars you could desire.
As for the reasons the Vikings began to settle, it appears land was less of an issue. Demographic pressure was only really an issue in Denmark - Vikings were almost exclusively looking for loot, not land.
One idea is interesting: With more and more Vikings raiding it became more profitable to settle in an area. Not only did this mean the settlement could exact tribute and protection money from the peopel around it, but it could protect them from *other* viking raiders. Over-plundering damaged long-term possibilities. Vikings were economically-savvy, it appears.
Posted by Alex on June 11,2009 | 11:03 AM
To Jean Hael! Yes, the Sea Stallion left Ireland as scheduled and arrived safe and sound in Roskilde, Denmark, on August 9th-2008. Website: http://www.havhingsten.dk/index.php?id=277&L=1
Posted by Lisen on August 24,2008 | 08:01 AM
Aug 16,2008-question Did the ship leave Ireland as scheduled in June (or since) and did it get back to Denmark safely?
Posted by Jean Hael on August 16,2008 | 02:41 PM
Question about the sails. Why are the sails always portrayed as having red and white vertical stripes? I understand that the sails consisted of squares of woven material joined together in a diamond pattern, perhaps each square edged with red-dyed leather for extra strength. This would not have produced red and white vertical stripes.
Posted by Ricky Cooper on August 15,2008 | 07:57 PM
I believe that far too little notice has been made of their many settlements and the contributions they made to the local culture. To me this shows another facet of their natures, for they did not simply pillage and plunder, though they were clearly very skillful at it, and were also fabulous seafarers. I wonder what prompted these settlements? Were they initially merely stopping places, perhaps to rest, repair, reorganize for their next raid, or did they reflect genuine interest in being a part of a new country? I would be interested in knowing more about the women who also braved these rigorous journeys and made their homes in strange, new, maybe hostile places, especially if they initially came ashore during a raid. What must it have been like to be a Viking woman?
Posted by Pat Nelson on July 30,2008 | 01:37 PM
This is a comment on iron. Norway and Sweden have an exceptionally high grade iron ore called magnetite which has a low amount of impurities. The more common ore found in the U.S. and other parts of the world is called hematite. Steel is basically a clean iron with controlled carbon. The repetitive heating and hammering which was used to make swords does somewhat clean the iron, however, given similar processes steel made from magnetite will naturally have less impurities or inclusions and thus be stronger. Today, with oxygen and vacuum degassing processes it is possible to make clean steel from even marginal ores.
Posted by Byron A.Nilsson on July 3,2008 | 09:33 PM
This wonderful article makes me proud that my ancestors came from the seafaring towns of the Norwegian fiords and the towns outside of Stockholm. They were strong, fearless people.
Posted by Sonya Harris on July 2,2008 | 04:56 PM
As a child living in Bognor Regis, Sussex, England, I remember seeing a replica Viking ship visiting Bognor pier. It must have been during the late 1940s or early 1950s, and had also been rowed by a crew from Denmark.
Posted by Jo Hammond on July 1,2008 | 11:45 PM
Can you explain how the crew handled personal hygiene issues on this 5 week experiment? Sixty-three crew members of men and women had to have challenging situations. Was this ship accompanied by other ships providing for necessities? Posted 6/30/08 C.F.
Posted by Carmen Fraga on June 30,2008 | 02:33 PM
+ View All Comments