Editor’s Note: This article was adapted from its original form and updated to include new information for Smithsonian’s Mysteries of the Ancient World bookazine published in Fall 2009.
From his bench toward the stern of the Sea Stallion from Glendalough, Erik Nielsen could see his crewmates’ stricken faces peering out of bright-red survival suits. A few feet behind him, the leather straps holding the ship’s rudder to its side had snapped. The 98-foot vessel, a nearly $2.5 million replica of a thousand-year-old Viking ship, was rolling helplessly atop waves 15 feet high.
With the wind gusting past 50 miles an hour and the Irish Sea just inches from the gunwales, “I thought we’d be in the drink for sure,” says Nielsen, now 63, a retired Toronto geologist.
It was August 6, 2007, and the Sea Stallion’s crew of 63 had been underway for five weeks, sailing from Roskilde, Denmark, to Dublin, Ireland, on a voyage that would culminate 35 years’ research—“the best living-archaeology experiment ever conducted anywhere,” Pat Wallace, director of the National Museum of Ireland, calls it.
As Nielsen and some of his crewmates struggled to keep the Sea Stallion upright, four others went to work at the stern. Kneeling on the ship’s heaving, rain-slicked deck, they hauled the 11-foot rudder out of the water, replaced the broken leather straps with jury-rigged nylon ones and reattached the new assembly.
Reducing the sail to a minimum, the crew proceeded at nine knots. As the ship plowed from wave to wave, a full third of the Sea Stallion’s hull was often out of the water. Ahead lay the Isle of Man, 15 hours away.
Two weeks later, its crew exhausted, the Sea Stallion limped into the port of Dublin for a nine-month refurbishment in dry dock at the National Museum of Ireland. In July 2008, it sailed, relatively uneventfully, back to Denmark. Ever since, researchers have been poring over reams of data from both voyages, gathered from electronic sensors on the ship, to learn more about the Vikings’ sailing prowess. Their findings will follow a host of recent discoveries by historians, archaeologists and even biologists that have led to a new understanding of the Vikings as a people who were as adept at trading as they were at raiding.
Norsemen have been seen as intrepid seafarers and fierce warriors—a sort of Hell’s Angels of the early Middle Ages—since A.D. 793, when they raided the rich island monastery at Lindisfarne off the northeastern coast of England. “The ravages of heathen men miserably destroyed God’s church on Lindisfarne,” according to the annals known as the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. In 845, the Viking raider and extortionist extraordinary Ragnar Lothbrok slipped up the Seine with 120 ships—an estimated 5,000 men—to Paris, where King Charles the Bald paid him 7,000 pounds of gold and silver to leave in peace. (A contemporary wrote that “never had [Ragnar] seen, he said, lands so fertile and so rich, nor ever a people so cowardly.”)
Viking raiders traveled thousands of miles to the east and south: across the Baltic, onto the rivers of modern-day Russia and across the Black Sea to menace Constantinople in 941. “Nobody imagines they were there to capture the city,” says Cambridge University historian Simon Franklin. “It was more terroristic—all about instilling fear and extracting concessions for trade.”
At the same time, the new research suggests that the Vikings pouring out of Denmark, Sweden and Norway 1,200 years ago had more than raiding on their minds. Buying and selling goods from places as distant as China and Afghanistan, they also wove a network of trade and exploration from Russia to Turkey to Canada. “They were people without boundaries,” says Wladyslaw Duczko, an archaeologist at the Institute of Anthropology and Archaeology in Pultusk, Poland. “I think that’s why Vikings are so popular in America.”
Recent climate research has led Duczko and others to posit that a warming trend around the ninth century led to a population boom in Scandinavia, causing more and more landless young Norsemen to seek their fortunes elsewhere. Not everyone agrees. The National Museum of Ireland’s Wallace says the Vikings may have had a simpler motive: “They had the best iron in the world, trees to cut down and build ships, the best swords and edges on their blades. All the factors were there. They could do it, and they did.”
Whatever the causes for the Vikings’ explorations, evidence of the range of their trading networks began turning up about 150 years ago, when their elaborate burial mounds were first excavated. Well-preserved graves in Birka, Sweden, for example, contained fragments of Chinese silk, and in Norway, the ships in which wealthy Vikings were customarily buried were painted with pigments that may have come from India and the Middle East.





Comments
Is Wallace suggesting that the Vikings had better iron than the Japanese? Does that also mean better steel?
Posted by Ken on June 25,2008 | 02:40 PM
The Saxons had the best sword technology in the eighth centuary, but the Northmen learned quickly. Much of the steel in swords all across Europe was pitted and not well smelted or annealed. The Japanese at this time were well behind the pace on the military technology of the day. China had some decent steel, and some of this may have found its way to Japan. Don't confuse the Samurai sword (Seventeenth Centuary) with Saxon swords a thousand years earlier.
Posted by Elk on June 26,2008 | 09:06 AM
My comment is about leather straps used for holding the Sea Stallion's rudder to its side. Did they use walrus hide? For such tasks walrus hide was the strongest and most durable material available in pre-nylon times.
Posted by Alex on June 26,2008 | 08:17 PM
Did Ragnar Lothbrok also go by the names Ragnar Ragnivaldson and Rollo the Dane?
Posted by folcrom on June 29,2008 | 01:40 AM
Can you explain how the crew handled personal hygiene issues on this 5 week experiment? Sixty-three crew members of men and women had to have challenging situations. Was this ship accompanied by other ships providing for necessities? Posted 6/30/08 C.F.
Posted by Carmen Fraga on June 30,2008 | 02:33 PM
As a child living in Bognor Regis, Sussex, England, I remember seeing a replica Viking ship visiting Bognor pier. It must have been during the late 1940s or early 1950s, and had also been rowed by a crew from Denmark.
Posted by Jo Hammond on July 1,2008 | 11:45 PM
This wonderful article makes me proud that my ancestors came from the seafaring towns of the Norwegian fiords and the towns outside of Stockholm. They were strong, fearless people.
Posted by Sonya Harris on July 2,2008 | 04:56 PM
This is a comment on iron. Norway and Sweden have an exceptionally high grade iron ore called magnetite which has a low amount of impurities. The more common ore found in the U.S. and other parts of the world is called hematite. Steel is basically a clean iron with controlled carbon. The repetitive heating and hammering which was used to make swords does somewhat clean the iron, however, given similar processes steel made from magnetite will naturally have less impurities or inclusions and thus be stronger. Today, with oxygen and vacuum degassing processes it is possible to make clean steel from even marginal ores.
Posted by Byron A.Nilsson on July 3,2008 | 09:33 PM
I believe that far too little notice has been made of their many settlements and the contributions they made to the local culture. To me this shows another facet of their natures, for they did not simply pillage and plunder, though they were clearly very skillful at it, and were also fabulous seafarers. I wonder what prompted these settlements? Were they initially merely stopping places, perhaps to rest, repair, reorganize for their next raid, or did they reflect genuine interest in being a part of a new country? I would be interested in knowing more about the women who also braved these rigorous journeys and made their homes in strange, new, maybe hostile places, especially if they initially came ashore during a raid. What must it have been like to be a Viking woman?
Posted by Pat Nelson on July 30,2008 | 01:37 PM
Question about the sails. Why are the sails always portrayed as having red and white vertical stripes? I understand that the sails consisted of squares of woven material joined together in a diamond pattern, perhaps each square edged with red-dyed leather for extra strength. This would not have produced red and white vertical stripes.
Posted by Ricky Cooper on August 15,2008 | 07:57 PM
Aug 16,2008-question Did the ship leave Ireland as scheduled in June (or since) and did it get back to Denmark safely?
Posted by Jean Hael on August 16,2008 | 02:41 PM
To Jean Hael! Yes, the Sea Stallion left Ireland as scheduled and arrived safe and sound in Roskilde, Denmark, on August 9th-2008. Website: http://www.havhingsten.dk/index.php?id=277&L=1
Posted by Lisen on August 24,2008 | 08:01 AM
Few answers to some of the questions raised:
Folcrom ought to read this article: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119131136/PDFSTART
As comprehensive a description of all the Rollo/Ragnars you could desire.
As for the reasons the Vikings began to settle, it appears land was less of an issue. Demographic pressure was only really an issue in Denmark - Vikings were almost exclusively looking for loot, not land.
One idea is interesting: With more and more Vikings raiding it became more profitable to settle in an area. Not only did this mean the settlement could exact tribute and protection money from the peopel around it, but it could protect them from *other* viking raiders. Over-plundering damaged long-term possibilities. Vikings were economically-savvy, it appears.
Posted by Alex on June 11,2009 | 11:03 AM