44 Years Later, a Washington, D.C. Death Unresolved
Mary Pinchot Meyer's death remains a mystery. But it's her life that holds more interest now
- By Lance Morrow
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2008, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
The Washington gender dramas had been going on for a long time, with different casts and styles. Kay Graham had an interesting predecessor, Cissy Patterson, editor of Hearst's old Washington Herald in the '30s and '40s. She was a stylish drinker, imaginative newspaper editor and occasional hell-raiser, an heiress of the McCormick-Medill-Patterson newspaper dynasty who in her heedless youth had gone off and married a Polish count. Cissy once said most men thought of women editors as Samuel Johnson had famously regarded women preachers: "Sir, a woman preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all."
But women like my mother, or like Cissy Patterson, or like Mary Meyer, enjoyed the surprise and the delight that they were able to elicit in men—a little like the effect Marlene Dietrich achieved in Blonde Venus when she came on stage dressed in a gorilla suit and slowly removed the head to reveal her taunting, spectacular self. They knew the uses of electrical currents, erotic jolts that were lively with a cross-grained politics of sex. Exceptional women of that era were more interesting, more vivid, more dramatic—if sometimes more troubled and vulnerable and prone to folly—than some of the ironclads that emerged in Washington later on, after Mary's death, evolving through the generation of Barbara Jordan and Bella Abzug and on into the accession of Hillary Clinton or Condoleezza Rice. The political success of women—still only partial—sometimes has the perversely flattening and narrowing effect of making them (much like male politicians) a little dull, a little relentless and charmlessly self-important. Although Sarah Palin, of course, proved to be, for better or for worse, not dull.
Kennedy did not treat Mary Meyer as one of his mere sexual conveniences. He cherished a quizzical respect for her originality and independence. He told Ben Bradlee, more than once, "Mary would be rough to live with." Bradlee, her brother-in-law, agreed.
My mother, Elise Morrow, wrote a syndicated column called "Capital Capers" that appeared in papers around the country. She had an extravagant admiration for Cissy Patterson, though she disapproved of Patterson's anti-FDR isolationism. My mother's column worked the after-dark borderline between Perle Mesta's territory (parties, ladies, gossip, Embassy Row, the things that senators and congressmen said at night after several drinks) and the men's world of power and cold war.
My mother was a small woman who looked a bit like Ingrid Bergman and affected a knowing Mae West swagger. I have a photograph of her posed behind her Smith Corona, wearing long black evening gloves, with a glass of white wine on the table beside her. She knew how to drink like a man, and how to cuss like a man as well, a talent that Lyndon Johnson found hilarious. She could always get his attention.
One night at some political dinner at the Shoreham Hotel she sat next to Richard Nixon, then a young congressman. They both got a little drunk. My mother told Nixon he should get out of politics because he did not understand people and if he did not get out, things would end badly. The next day Nixon telephoned my father at his office at the Saturday Evening Post, where he was an editor, and said, "Hugh, can't you control your wife?" The answer was no.
Nixon's own wife went a separate and, when possible, more private road. An attractive, able, courageous woman, Pat Nixon had no interest in banging her head against the Washington wall that my mother banged her head against. She regarded women like my mother, media types, as the enemy. She settled into what turned out to be the complicated fate of being Mrs. Richard Nixon.
My mother had two marriages and seven children. She was an avid, headlong and brilliantly self-educated woman (married at 15!) who wanted a great deal (motherhood, a career as a great writer, lovers). Her fate was complicated as well.
Mary Meyer did not survive. My mother did. She lived to be 84. She thought now and then of writing a memoir called Before My Time. On a drizzly morning not many months ago, as she had wished, my brothers and my sister and I brought her ashes—coarse, grainy, salt-and-pepper ashes, all that was left of a vivid life—to the bank of the Potomac above Great Falls and scattered them on the surface of the brown, swollen river. The ashes swirled off downstream toward Washington, and for a second I imagined them floating down by Georgetown, passing over a pistol in the mud.
Lance Morrow, a former essayist for Time, is writing a biography of Henry Luce.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (27)
+ View All Comments
Fabulous writing, eloquent and evocatively poignant!
Posted by Karen Thomas on May 8,2013 | 03:38 PM
I've been reading a lot about the Mary Meyer case and the JFK assassination. I would like to see both cases reopened because neither of the cases have been officially closed. How do you get them opened?
Posted by on March 11,2013 | 04:52 AM
Well-written and interesting, but remarkably short on the supposed subject, that of Ms. Meyer's murder. Ending the piece with a story about the author's mother, interesting woman though she was, was especially odd.
Posted by Lucie on November 16,2012 | 02:35 PM
Great piece! Keep going, you opened my eyes to a different world.
Posted by Donna on November 4,2012 | 08:38 AM
I find Mr. Morrow's article interesting, but he does not answer the question as to who killed Mary Meyer. I think his conjecture that the jury was wrong is inaccurate, based on recent scholarship and research about who killed her. Also, he starts off talking about her and turns her death into some sort of gender balancing act in DC, as if she was an example of what could have happened to other women. Really, he has two articles, two topics in one. The fact that Mary Meyer did not survive and his mother did has nothing to do with the fact that they may have had similar lives. It has much more to do with the fact that Mary Meyer was probably kiled by the CIA because of things she knew & had figured out.
Posted by Meby Carr on September 30,2012 | 08:05 PM
So........ where's Part Deux, Charles? "Well, I heard me sumthin' strange today and I'm sure he wuz' a liar I heard that Billy Mitchell's boy done murdered Mary Meyer Mary Meyer, Mary Meyer, tell me what spook they done hired and tell me why they hads ta' fire That missin .38 at Mary Meyer" -----refrain from "The Ballad of Mary Meyer (Cherry in the Snow)" ------
Posted by Mark A. O'Blazney on September 26,2012 | 05:22 AM
Wake up people! The "false flag" operation is a signature of covert activity and subterfuge. Smoke and mirrors is the modus operandi of CIA spymaster James Jesus Angleton, head of CIA counter-intelligence. The players: JFK, Mary Meyer, Cord Meyer, Tony and Ben Bradlee, James Angleton, Washington Metro Police, and Ray Crump, Jr.( the lone nut!) The single thread running through this scenario is CIA complicity through law enforcement. You have doubts. Notice Angleton already "knew" about the diary. Notice how the "diary" was supposed to be given to her best friend and the Bradlees already knew this info? Notice it was NOT given to the best friend, but to the CIA by the Bradlees - which is probably totally opposite of what Mary wanted. How many times need we see the emergence of the "lone nut" character in scenarios involving the CIA before we get a clue? What are the odds that one would fall neatly into a fetal position if running and yelling "someone help me, someone help me?" while the assailant shoots you in the back of the head? Let's NOT get bogged down in minutia of shots and escape routes. Bottom line is that the "establishment" wants readers to believe it was a random act of violence in a metro area and thus, no big deal. Happens all the time in America - accept it. Mary's murder is unsolved, but closed. This is the way the powers that be want us to accept this murder. In every (CIA) case there is skewed motive, vague means and happenstance opportunity - and, the lone nut (Ray Crump, Jr.! Wake up people! Ms. Roundtree (Crump’s lawyer) did not have to prove Crump’s innocence. Our constitution gives the accused this presumption. It is the burden of the state to prove guilt. They did not, nor could they. [Part One]
Posted by Charles on July 6,2012 | 10:21 AM
This is not an unsolved case. Crump killed her. Look at his actions. Standing over the body after shooting her and trying to find something of value. Being found soaking wet after jumping into the river. Telling the police that he fell in while fishing yet there was no fishing rod. He happened to get off because a witness or two could not positively identify him as the black guy standing over the body. They were 300 feet away. Just because a jury delivers a not guilty verdict it does not mean that someone is innocent. There is no doubt that Crump killed this woman. After his acquittal he went on and assaulted other women and robbed others.
Posted by Jack on July 3,2012 | 11:28 AM
WE ALL KNOW WHO MURDERED MARY AND IT WASN'T CRUMP,YOU THUG'S IN D.C.!
Posted by GOV SUX on May 31,2012 | 10:13 PM
Morrow's writing had the most striking effect on me, too. I was excited to read more. It reminded me of how effective writing can absorb the reader to the point that a great measure of control is given over to the author. I agree, he should write his mother's biography, then the bios of all the other characters in the article.
Posted by Roland Daniels on February 19,2012 | 11:55 PM
Her killing may have had more to do with her affair with Bobby or Lyndon than it did with the President.
Posted by Ross H. on February 14,2012 | 11:34 AM
I WAS ONE OF THE FIRST POLICEMAN ON THE SCENE THAT DAY AND PROTECTED THE CRIME SCENE.I BELIEVE THAT GUN IS STILL NEAR BY BURIED IN THE CANAL MUD IN OR CLOSE NEAR BY.
Posted by robert decker,pvt mpdc,retired 7th precinct on January 25,2012 | 03:09 PM
When they catch someone Red handed, they usually get convicted , don't they ?!
Most interest !
Posted by Harold on October 22,2011 | 01:42 AM
I agree with Rusty and Garza that the evidence needs fresh eyes. Maybe Crump pulled the trigger, maybe not, but the husband most likely arranged it and possibly the JFK murder as well. Why is that so hard for people to believe? Back in those days, the CIA employed hired assassins. Fingers have pointed toward Nixon and G.H.W Bush as participants. Much was left out of this article including the many affairs of both Mary and her ex-husband Cord.
The truth won't come out until all the players have died.
Posted by Bancroft on August 2,2011 | 12:06 AM
+ View All Comments