Lincoln's Missing Bodyguard
The night of the assassination, Lincoln's bodyguard snuck off to drink in the same saloon as John Wilkes Booth
- By Paul Martin
- Smithsonian.com, April 08, 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
No one knows for sure if Parker ever returned to Ford’s Theatre that night. When Booth struck, the vanishing policeman may have been sitting in his new seat with a nice view of the stage, or perhaps he had stayed put in the Star Saloon. Even if he had been at his post, it’s not certain he would have stopped Booth. “Booth was a well-known actor, a member of a famous theatrical family,” says Ford’s Theatre historical interpreter Eric Martin. “They were like Hollywood stars today. Booth might have been allowed in to pay his respects. Lincoln knew of him. He’d seen him act in The Marble Heart, here in Ford’s Theatre in 1863.”
A fellow presidential bodyguard, William H. Crook, wouldn’t accept any excuses for Parker. He held him directly responsible for Lincoln’s death. “Had he done his duty, I believe President Lincoln would not have been murdered by Booth,” Crook wrote in his memoir. “Parker knew that he had failed in duty. He looked like a convicted criminal the next day.” Parker was charged with failing to protect the president, but the complaint was dismissed a month later. No local newspaper followed up on the issue of Parker’s culpability. Nor was Parker mentioned in the official report on Lincoln’s death. Why he was let off so easily is baffling. Perhaps, with the hot pursuit of Booth and his co-conspirators in the chaotic aftermath, he seemed like too small a fish. Or perhaps the public was unaware that a bodyguard had even been assigned to the president.
Incredibly, Parker remained on the White House security detail after the assassination. At least once he was assigned to protect the grieving Mrs. Lincoln before she moved out of the presidential mansion and returned to Illinois. Mrs. Lincoln’s dressmaker, former slave Elizabeth Keckley, recalled the following exchange between the president’s widow and Parker: “So you are on guard tonight,” Mrs. Lincoln yelled, “on guard in the White House after helping to murder the President.”
“I could never stoop to murder,” Parker stammered, “much less to the murder of so good and great a man as the President. I did wrong, I admit, and have bitterly repented. I did not believe any one would try to kill so good a man in such a public place, and the belief made me careless.”
Mrs. Lincoln snapped that she would always consider him guilty and ordered him from the room. Some weeks before the assassination, she had written a letter on Parker’s behalf to exempt him from the draft, and some historians think she may have been related to him on her mother’s side.
Parker remained on the Metropolitan Police Force for three more years, but his shiftlessness finally did him in. He was fired on August 13, 1868, for once again sleeping on duty. Parker drifted back into carpentry. He died in Washington in 1890, of pneumonia. Parker, his wife and their three children are buried together in the capital’s Glenwood Cemetery—on present-day Lincoln Road. Their graves are unmarked. No photographs have ever been found of John Parker. He remains a faceless character, his role in the great tragedy largely forgotten.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (85)
+ View All Comments
it figures that the actor ..would use a ladies handgun....lol i thought boothe looked a little swishy.
Posted by toni on April 23,2013 | 10:26 PM
THEY HIRED A SOUTHERNER TO GUARD OUR PRESIDENT....MMM SOUNDS FISHY TO ME.
Posted by toni on April 23,2013 | 09:50 PM
There has never been research evidence to indicate or even suggest that Mrs. Lincoln was related to John Parker, the Washington Policeman who left his post that night. In fact, Mrs. Lincoln was the daughter of one of the first Senators from Kentucky, a moneyed and family of good standing in Kentucky. On the other hand, Parker was the son of a butcher/watchman [later called police] in Winchester, VA. Figure the odds that their families would have had any relationship. To suggest this is merely repetition of whispers and conjecture of poorly or non-researched articles from the past, an example of poorly researched journalism at it's best. Further, I am surprised that an editor of the Smithsonian Magazine would allow this article, especially when records are readily available to resolve this rehashed gossip, through the National Archives and Library of Congress. The article resembles a cut/paste job, with no original research.
Posted by Anne Clayton on March 25,2013 | 09:05 AM
you suckkkkk
Posted by on April 28,2012 | 03:47 PM
There were five, not four, occupants of the presidential box at the time of Booth's entrance: Charles Forbes, Lincoln's personal attendant, was also present, as his affidavit makes clear. Interestingly, Forbes' presence was systematically excluded from the official record in the assassination's aftermath, not least from the witness stand statement of Major Rathbone. It is also worth noting that both Union and Confederate intelligence used actors as spies. In the spring of 1862, for example, Union intelligence in St. Louis detained an actor on suspicion of spying for the South. His name was John Wilkes Booth. It was a goodly stroke of fortune for Booth that Union intelligence in Washington was either unaware of this detention, or else surprisingly trusting.
Posted by Paul Rigby on April 23,2012 | 02:22 PM
Do a little research, Desiree. Like everything else Bill O'Reilly has ever touched, that Lincoln assassination book is chock-full of factual errors. Please, please, please don't believe everything you read.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2011/1025/Bill-O-Reilly-s-Killing-Lincoln-is-Lincoln-Lite
http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/fords_theatre_flunks_oreillys_lincoln_book/singleton/
Posted by Lazlo Toth on April 23,2012 | 02:16 PM
I just finished reading "Killing Lincoln" by Bill O'Reilly and the answers to most of your questions of answered in it. Be warned though, that it is a in depth account that is the last 6 weeks of President Lincoln's life and it is an emotional and driven piece of writing.
Posted by Desiree on April 21,2012 | 10:24 PM
Hello:
Was this "dirty cop", Parker a member of the same Parkers, the relatives Martha Washington, wife of George Washington, the first U.S. President? If so, he most likely carried a lot of cultural and political clout. Thus granting and guaranteeing him fantastic life opportunities and keeping him free of consequences...
Posted by John Jarvis on March 24,2012 | 04:23 PM
What if anything was done about this lack of protection?? Seems like John Parker should have been held with some responsibility for this!!! I am just shocked!!!
Posted by Ali Broome on February 19,2012 | 12:22 PM
O.k. Parker and Crook. Was one of the other two Presidential bodyguards named Hugh McHugh? My grandmother had a conspiricy theory that she shared with me that included a man named Hugh McHugh, who may have later worked for Pinkerton. Thanks.
Posted by R. Bricco on February 6,2012 | 01:41 AM
I was always interested in the door which led to the Presidential Box at Ford's theatre. When I was about 10, I remember taking a field trip to the Smithsonian and on display was the door to the Presidential box. In that door was drilled a hole, which I was told Booth used to see the President's location. I've search the internet and I can not find any theories on who drilled this hole. Was it Booth? And with the President deciding last minute to attend this play, who would have had the time or planned out this smallest detail with Booth?
Posted by Tommy on January 17,2012 | 02:25 PM
This is truly a shocking example of how incompetents who could not do their jobs have affected history.
Posted by harvey garod on December 26,2011 | 05:13 PM
I would be grateful for any and all information on John Fredrick Parker. Before Lincoln was killed, during Parkers time as a Policeman and after his time as a policeman.
I am also looking for a photograph of Parker. Please include credits. Although I have no intention at this to do anything with this nformation other then to put it together, I like to have the history of the information for my files.
Thank You in Advance,
Chuck Gallagher
mpdchistory1861@yahoo.com
Posted by Chuck Gallagher on November 29,2011 | 07:11 PM
Establishment of the Washington Metropolitan Police Force 150 Years Ago. http://civilwarwashingtondc1861-1865.blogspot.com/2011/09/establishment-of-washington.html
Posted by Steven on September 15,2011 | 10:48 PM
+ View All Comments