George Koval: Atomic Spy Unmasked
Iowa-born and army-trained, how did George Koval manage to steal a critical U.S. atom bomb secret for the Soviets, that is only now coming to light?
- By Michael Walsh
- Smithsonian magazine, May 2009, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
On June 27, 1945, after almost a year at Oak Ridge, Koval was transferred to a top-secret laboratory in Dayton, Ohio. This may have been his most damaging placement; it was there that the polonium-based initiator went into production. Once again, Koval was designated a health physics officer, free to roam the installation.
That July 16, the initiator passed a crucial test: the world's first atomic bomb exploded at a site called Trinity within the bombing range in Alamogordo, New Mexico. This was the explosion that prompted J. Robert Oppenheimer, the scientific director of the Manhattan Project, to quote the Bhagavad-Gita: "I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." It gave U.S. war planners the confidence to deploy a plutonium-based bomb, in addition to the uranium-based one in their arsenal.
By then, Germany had surrendered, but Japan had not. Just three weeks later, on August 6, 1945, the uranium-based bomb was detonated over the city of Hiroshima, killing 70,000 people immediately and 70,000 more by the end of the year. And on August 9, 1945, a replica of the Trinity bomb exploded over Nagasaki. Five days later, Japanese Emperor Hirohito announced his nation's surrender.
Amid the devastation of the two cities, there were widespread calls for a ban on nuclear weapons. The United States and the Soviet Union proposed an international system of nuclear arms control, but that never happened. Indeed, the Soviets intensified an atomic-bomb program they had begun during the war. As early as October 31, 1946, the CIA estimated that they would succeed "some time between 1950 and 1953"; as the months passed that estimate tilted more toward 1953.
But on August 29, 1949, the Soviets detonated their first atomic bomb, at their Semipalatinsk Test Site in Kazakhstan. The device was a plutonium weapon. Not until 2007 did Russian military officials disclose one crucial factor in their accelerated achievement: the initiator for that bomb was "prepared to the 'recipe' provided by military intelligence agent Delmar—Zhorzh Abramovich Koval," the Defense Ministry newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda reported when Koval received his gold star.
In 1949, President Harry Truman calmly apprised the American public of the Soviets' test. "We have evidence that within recent weeks an atomic explosion occurred in the USSR," he announced on September 24, in a statement of 217 words, not one of which was "bomb" or "weapon." "Ever since atomic energy was first released by man, the eventual development of this new force by other nations was to be expected," he said. "This probability has always been taken into account by us." Behind the scenes, however, nuclear scientists, generals and policy makers were furiously debating whether the United States should push for arms control or for the next generation of nuclear weapons. Truman rendered that debate moot in January 1950, when he authorized the development of a hydrogen bomb. The nuclear arms race had begun in earnest.
Given that George Koval used his real name, it is tempting to wonder why he didn't fall under suspicion as a security risk until long after it was too late. (Klaus Fuchs was caught after the war, implicated in the same group of intercepted Soviet cables that exposed the Rosenbergs and others. Fuchs served more than nine years in a British prison and then emigrated to Dresden, where he died at age 76 in 1988.) Scholars and analysts are still trying to find out why Koval went undetected.
One reason may be that the Soviets were U.S. allies at the time; counterintelligence efforts were focused on German agents. Another is that interservice rivalry hobbled the Manhattan Project's efforts to vet its scientists. According to Kramish and others, Gen. Leslie Groves, the military director of the Manhattan Project, did not trust the FBI to do security checks on the scientists, preferring to rely on Army counterintelligence officers. A third possibility is that in wartime, the Allies chose scientific talent over pristine clearance records. "People like Oppenheimer had all sorts of questionable connections. The question was: What do you do about it?" says Jon Lellenberg, a retired policy and strategy official with the Office of the Secretary of Defense. "If Oppenheimer was as essential as he seemed, and as committed to success as he was, it was probably deemed worth some political risk for the sake of the program."
And finally, there was the timing: by 1949, when the Soviets exploded their bomb, George Koval had left the United States.
His exit was unhurried. Honorably discharged from the Army in 1946, he returned to the Bronx and to CCNY. He joined Eta Kappa Nu, an electrical-engineering fraternity, and received his bachelor's degree in electrical engineering cum laude on February 1, 1948. A few months later, he told friends that he was thinking about going abroad, to Poland or Israel. According to Norris, Koval secured a U.S. passport for six months' travel to Europe on behalf of a company called Atlas Trading. That October he sailed for Le Havre aboard the ocean liner America, never to return.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: US Army People Cold War USSR
Additional Sources
"A Spy's Path: Iowa to A-Bomb to Kremlin Honor" by William J. Broad, The New York Times, November 12, 2007









Comments (7)
I have not seen any recognition, either from the Smithsonian editorial staff or from readers, regarding the contradiction between the substance of the Koval article in the May 2009 issue and the introductory remarks preceding it. There is not even a hint that this revealing testimony throws a new light on the prosecution and execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, as well as the reputations of others mentioned in the introductory passages such as Harry Dexter White. For documentation I can refer you to the new book "Exoneration" by Emily and David Alman. To clarify the record, I would suggest that the Smithsonian review in detail this very factual book.
Please let me know if you will consider this favorably.
Sincerely Yours,
Lionel Davis
Posted by Lionel Davis on August 12,2010 | 01:46 PM
the question that iam wondering is: how did koval even survive in Russia at the time of Stalin?
Posted by Elias on June 2,2010 | 07:28 PM
Harry Dexter White was identified as a Soviet agent by both Whittaker Chambers and Elizabeth Bentley, acting independently. His hearing before HUAC may have convinced some of his biographers that he was not entirely culpable but the full transcripts reveal a man who was badly tripped up by Karl Mundt and Richard Nixon, unfashionable as that may be to mention. He gave him famous "American creed" speech before Chief Investigator Robert Stripling showed him a photograph of Whittaker Chambers, his courier to the Soviets, whom White had known only as "Carl." At that point White started to fall apart at the hearing. He suffered a "heart attack" on the train back home. White posed as an observant Jew, taught Jewish religious classes and received a Jewish funeral but his body was cremated after his "heart attack" -- and devout Jews don't cremate their dead. Does that strike anybody as odd?
Posted by John Koster on January 30,2010 | 12:50 PM
Sioux City Central High School is not made out of red brick, but, rather is constructed of brownish-pink Lake Superior sandstone (Sioux Falls granite. It really does resemble a castle and it really is on a hill.
Posted by Lucinda Keller Mahmoud on August 7,2009 | 07:41 PM
I feel there is something missing here. Who was instrumental in transferring Mr Koval to these various posts within our atomic program? Seems mighty handy to be placed in one of the few positions which allowed him to do his spying time after time.
Posted by s.orvik on May 14,2009 | 10:57 PM
Comments on the Comments:
2. Bill Getz (hi, Bill!) refers to the "much-maligned Senator Joe McCarthy" having reason for his passion against Communists in the government. Passion there was, but enough of his accusations were misdirected that, in response to his bullying tactics, he provided enough ammunition to both the political Left and moderates that their "blow-back" counter-attacks (e.g., by Edward R. Murrow and Army attorney Joseph Welch, inter alia) discredited serious anti-communist efforts for the next several decades.
Two quotes from Romerstein & Breindel’s “The Venona Secrets: Exposing Soviet Espionage and America’s Traitors” (2000; i.e., after access to Soviet-era archives):
P. 451: “One of the most interesting aspects of the new documentary evidence of Soviet intelligence activities in the United States is that it demonstrates to what a very great degree Senator Joseph R. McCarthy was, in fact, irrelevant to the anti-Communist cause.… Ultimately, the attacks on McCarthy did substantial damage to the cause he championed.”
P. 454: “Some of the McCarthy Committee’s probes produced important and damning information,… But the far more knowledgeable and competent House Committee on Un-American Activities … and the Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security … — McCarthy played no role in either — produced an immense body of evidence, collected at hearings and set down in reports. The printed hearings of these two committees remain an invaluable resource, particularly in the continuing efforts to place new revelations in perspective.”*
*In fairness, it should be noted that the Secret reports of McCarthy’s subcommittee were declassified 50 years later, in 2003. It has been my long-term goal to compare the names of those accused by McCarthy’s committee with the documented spies and traitors listed in R&B’s index, but free time has been lacking; xin loi. (JM)
Posted by Jonathan Myer on May 10,2009 | 06:07 AM
Comments on the Comments: 1. Scott Croly reminds us that, whatever may be said about the Soviets, "in the end, they were with us in WWII." Historical facts provide a more nuanced view of who was with whom, and why. First, on August 23, 1939, a bare week before WWII officially began in Europe, Nazi Germany signed a non-aggression pact with the Communist USSR known as the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact (named for their respective foreign ministers, who signed it in Moscow). This pact assured Hitler of a free hand in Western Europe while reassuring Stalin with both peace and the vision of a Poland divided between them. British cartoonist David Lowe's famous cartoon of the day showed Hitler and Stalin bowing to each other with the greetings: "Bloody assassin of the workers, I presume?" and "Scum of the earth, I believe?" Hitler, as we know, had his own plans, and in December 1940 launched a full-scale attack against an unready Soviet Union (and shocked Stalin) known as Operation Barbarossa. When the U.S. entered the war a year later (after our "Pearl Harbor"), it was in both the U.S.-British and Soviet interests to keep the USSR in the war, despite our antithetical ideologies. Thus, sheer pragmatism, rather than any "hands-across-the-sea" friendship, sustained the Alliance, although to assure popular support at home (especially in light of the sacrifices that resupplying Russia entailed), the USSR was then publicly portrayed as a vital ally in our common struggle against the Axis powers. (The current PBS TV documentary, "World War II: Behind Closed Doors: Stalin, the Nazis and the West" reveals more of Stalin's viewpoint during this time, culled from Soviet archives during the past dozen-odd years.)
Posted by Jonathan Myer on May 10,2009 | 05:09 AM
Enjoyed Michael Walsh's interesting article about the spy, George Koval (Iowa-Born, Soviet Trained, 'Smithsonian," May 2009). What wasn't mentioned was a contemporary of Koval's, a brilliant young physicist by the name of Ted Hall, code-name "Mlad." Ted was at Los Alamos concurrently with the time of Koval's misadventures. His name appeared in an earlier Smithsonian article, "Spies Who Spilled Atomic Bomb Secrets." Although he was known to the CIA and FBI, Ted Hall managed to elude incarceration, and eventually "escaped" to Russia (still a mystery). Even more mystifying was the part played by his older brother, Air Force Colonel Ed Hall, also brilliant and one of the leading experts on missile propulsion. I knew Ed Hall in the Air Force's missiles program, and he had a very strange personality and demeanor clearly recognized by his associates and bosses, Colonel (later Lt. General) Charles Terhune, and Brigadier General (later four star general) Bernard A. Schriever, my direct boss. The Hall brothers' parents were Barney and Rose Holtzberg of New York City. Julius Rosenberg was a classmate of Colonel Ed Hall at the City College of New York. The City and College in the mid-1930s "were hotbeds of Depression-spawned Marxist activism." Whether Ed Hall was complicit in or at least knowledgeable of his brother's espionage is still a subject of debate. Their activities came to public light with the publication of the "Venona Transcripts" in 1996. The full story up to 2004 was well-described in an amazing book written by ex-Secretary of the Air Force, Thomas C. Reed, At The Abyss; An Insider's History Of The Cold War, (Random House Publishing Group, New York, 2004) from which the details above derived. The much-maligned Senator Joe McCarthy had reason for his passion against Communists in the government.
Posted by Bill Getz on May 6,2009 | 02:45 PM
John Taber. Thank you for all that detailed and important information and observations. Much appreciated,
Posted by Don Noyes-More on April 24,2009 | 08:47 PM
You can say what you want about Russia, the Soviets, or whoever else, but remember this: in the end, they were with us in WWII. Personally, I am half of them through my mother (my great grandparents came here) and they saved the other half (my father, a veteran) during WWII. They were there for all of us when it counted. I shall never forget. They are an incredible group of people, a macro-communal society (as are we, by the way) encompassing diverse ideas, people and territory with the seminal gifts of music, mathematics, chess, physics, and the dogged determination to maintain forward, principally as expedited through their DOD. Furthermore, they made it from the horse and buggy in 1917 to Sputnik in 1957 in forty years, one and a half generations; the CIA still studies this amazing feat. They are potential and indispensible allies in the current state of world affairs forward.
Posted by Scott Croly on April 24,2009 | 06:27 PM
This will be a movie soon
Posted by Ken Fenslage on April 24,2009 | 05:39 PM
This IS (mmmmmm)very Interesting.
Posted by Tanikki on April 24,2009 | 02:33 PM
Two complaints:
1. Lumping Harry Dexter White with the atomic spies misleads the reader to the false conclusion that White betrayed atomic secrets to the Soviets. There is no evidence of that, not even in Herbert Romerstein's account.
Further, some historians do not accept that White was a Soviet agent. See James Boughton and Roger Sandiland. I too am not convinced. There is one VENONA cable that implies that White, under the covername RICHARD, was a journalist or PR person. This cable has the NSA footnote pointing out this discrepancy. The NSA footnote does not exculpate White because in this instance it is possible that RICHARD was somebody else as yet unidentified. The Soviet agencies changed covernames, and were sometimes inconsistent.
My point is, the VENONA decrypts alone are not sufficient to inculpate White.
My second objection is to your unresearched claim that the decrypted cables had to be kept secret so as not to jeopardize the code breaking.
No.
The Soviets already knew we were reading their cables. They had been informed by Philby, MacLean, and the code breaker Weissband who kept checking on Meredith Gardner's progress (the latter is claimed as the principle code breaker).
Second, the cables were not evidence acceptable to a court. There is a memo from Alan Belmont, third in command at the FBI, that advised not to use the cables in court because they would be hearsay. Belmont explains exceptions to the hearsay rule under which the cables could have been used, but that would open up counter attacks to the defense. There were too many gaps in the decrypts, too many guesses, too many uncertainties as to what the cables really said or meant. I do not mean this as an insult to the NSA - cryptanalysis is a trial and error process, and the decrypts were too early in that process.
In a magazine of your importance, you must do more fact checking and research than I would expect from the National Enquirer.
Posted by John K. Taber on April 22,2009 | 08:47 AM
Wow that is pretty amazing dude!
RT
www.privacy.pro.tc
Posted by Jason Wright on April 21,2009 | 02:24 PM