George Koval: Atomic Spy Unmasked
Iowa-born and army-trained, how did George Koval manage to steal a critical U.S. atom bomb secret for the Soviets, that is only now coming to light?
- By Michael Walsh
- Smithsonian magazine, May 2009, Subscribe
The old man had always been fiercely independent, and he entered his tenth decade with his mind clear, his memory keen and his fluent Russian still tinged with an American accent. His wife had died in 1999, and when his legs began to go he had trouble accepting help from his relatives in Moscow. He gradually withdrew from most human contact and died quietly on January 31, 2006, at age 92, taking his secrets to the grave.
A singular confluence of developments forced Zhorzh Abramovich Koval out of obscurity. First, over the past decade Western intelligence analysts and cold war historians began to grasp the role of the GRU, the Soviet (now Russian) military intelligence agency, in the development of the USSR's nuclear weapons program in the 1940s. Then in 2002, Russian historian Vladimir Lota published The GRU and the Atom Bomb. The book, which has yet to be translated into English, recounts the exploits of a GRU spy code-named Delmar, who, with the exception of the British scientist Klaus Fuchs, may have done more than anyone to help the Soviet Union achieve its sudden, shocking nuclear parity with the United States in 1949.
Most tellingly, in November 2007 Russian President Vladimir Putin posthumously awarded Koval, who had mustered out of the Red Army as a lowly private in 1949, a gold star marking him as a Hero of the Russian Federation—then publicly named him as Delmar. The spy's identity had been such a closely held secret that Putin himself, a former KGB officer, may have learned of it only in 2006, after he saw the man's portrait at a GRU museum opening and asked, in effect: who's that?
Ever since the award ceremony effectively blew Koval's cover, Western scholars have been revising the narrative of cold war espionage to account for his activities during the two years he worked at top-secret nuclear laboratories in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Dayton, Ohio. Beginning in the 1940s, intercepted Soviet intelligence cables helped implicate such KGB-run spies as Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and Harry Dexter White, a senior Treasury Department official under President Franklin Roosevelt who died of a heart attack shortly after he was called before the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1948. But except for Whittaker Chambers—the American writer who spied for the GRU in the 1930s but became a prominent anti-Communist and a principal in the 1950 perjury conviction of former State Department official Alger Hiss over his Communist ties—"we knew next to nothing about the extent of the GRU's espionage operation against the Manhattan Project until the Koval thing came up," says John Earl Haynes, a historian at the Library of Congress and an authority on the cold war.
What can be gleaned so far—from Western and Soviet archives, FBI documents, current scholarship and interviews with Koval's surviving former colleagues in the United States and his relatives in Russia—is that he was perfectly positioned to steal information about one of the most crucial parts of the bomb, the device that initiates the nuclear reaction. This required not only careful planning, rigorous training and brazen lying, but also astounding turns of luck. And in contrast to the known KGB spies, Haynes notes, "Koval was a trained agent, not an American civilian. He was that rarity, which you see a lot in fiction but rarely in real life—a sleeper agent. A penetration agent. A professional officer."
Most unsettling, he was born in the United States. Scholars knew that much from Lota's book. Now, after Koval's unmasking, it is possible to trace the roots of his betrayal of his native land all the way back to Sioux City, Iowa.
Its official name was Central High School, but the red-brick Victorian fortress in Sioux City was better known as the Castle on the Hill. Built in 1892, it was a monument to the city's sense of itself at the turn of the century, when Sioux City seemed poised to become another Chicago, a center of culture and commerce that attracted migrants from back east and immigrants from Europe and Russia.
Those newcomers included a sizable Jewish community of merchants and craftsmen, who quickly erected synagogues and formed groups to support the chalutzim ("pioneers," in Hebrew) who were already beginning to settle in what would become Israel. Others brought with them some of the political and ideological movements then swirling across their homelands—including communism. Among these was Abram Koval, a carpenter who emigrated in 1910 from the Belorussian shtetl of Telekhany, near Minsk. He and his wife, Ethel Shenitsky Koval, raised three sons—Isaya, born in 1912; Zhorzh, or George, born on Christmas Day, 1913; and Gabriel, born in 1919—in a comfortable house not far from the Castle on the Hill.
In the 1950s, when the FBI assembled a dossier on Koval that ran to more than a thousand pages, neighbors recalled that young George spoke openly of his communist beliefs. In 1929, when he graduated from the Castle at the age of 15, he was in the Honor Society and the leading member of the debate squad. (That June he also had a prominent role in the class play: Nothing But the Truth.)
After graduation, George studied electrical engineering at the University of Iowa for two and a half years. But about the time the Great Depression put an end to Sioux City's hopes of becoming another Chicago, Abram Koval packed up his wife and sons to seek his fortune elsewhere. He was secretary of an organization known as ICOR, a Yiddish acronym for the Association for Jewish Colonization in the Soviet Union. ICOR was a communist organization that functioned as a rival to the Zionist movement's hopes for a Jewish homeland in the Middle East, and it was to the Soviet Union that the Kovals moved in 1932.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: US Army People Cold War USSR
Additional Sources
"A Spy's Path: Iowa to A-Bomb to Kremlin Honor" by William J. Broad, The New York Times, November 12, 2007









Comments (7)
I have not seen any recognition, either from the Smithsonian editorial staff or from readers, regarding the contradiction between the substance of the Koval article in the May 2009 issue and the introductory remarks preceding it. There is not even a hint that this revealing testimony throws a new light on the prosecution and execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, as well as the reputations of others mentioned in the introductory passages such as Harry Dexter White. For documentation I can refer you to the new book "Exoneration" by Emily and David Alman. To clarify the record, I would suggest that the Smithsonian review in detail this very factual book.
Please let me know if you will consider this favorably.
Sincerely Yours,
Lionel Davis
Posted by Lionel Davis on August 12,2010 | 01:46 PM
the question that iam wondering is: how did koval even survive in Russia at the time of Stalin?
Posted by Elias on June 2,2010 | 07:28 PM
Harry Dexter White was identified as a Soviet agent by both Whittaker Chambers and Elizabeth Bentley, acting independently. His hearing before HUAC may have convinced some of his biographers that he was not entirely culpable but the full transcripts reveal a man who was badly tripped up by Karl Mundt and Richard Nixon, unfashionable as that may be to mention. He gave him famous "American creed" speech before Chief Investigator Robert Stripling showed him a photograph of Whittaker Chambers, his courier to the Soviets, whom White had known only as "Carl." At that point White started to fall apart at the hearing. He suffered a "heart attack" on the train back home. White posed as an observant Jew, taught Jewish religious classes and received a Jewish funeral but his body was cremated after his "heart attack" -- and devout Jews don't cremate their dead. Does that strike anybody as odd?
Posted by John Koster on January 30,2010 | 12:50 PM
Sioux City Central High School is not made out of red brick, but, rather is constructed of brownish-pink Lake Superior sandstone (Sioux Falls granite. It really does resemble a castle and it really is on a hill.
Posted by Lucinda Keller Mahmoud on August 7,2009 | 07:41 PM
I feel there is something missing here. Who was instrumental in transferring Mr Koval to these various posts within our atomic program? Seems mighty handy to be placed in one of the few positions which allowed him to do his spying time after time.
Posted by s.orvik on May 14,2009 | 10:57 PM
Comments on the Comments:
2. Bill Getz (hi, Bill!) refers to the "much-maligned Senator Joe McCarthy" having reason for his passion against Communists in the government. Passion there was, but enough of his accusations were misdirected that, in response to his bullying tactics, he provided enough ammunition to both the political Left and moderates that their "blow-back" counter-attacks (e.g., by Edward R. Murrow and Army attorney Joseph Welch, inter alia) discredited serious anti-communist efforts for the next several decades.
Two quotes from Romerstein & Breindel’s “The Venona Secrets: Exposing Soviet Espionage and America’s Traitors” (2000; i.e., after access to Soviet-era archives):
P. 451: “One of the most interesting aspects of the new documentary evidence of Soviet intelligence activities in the United States is that it demonstrates to what a very great degree Senator Joseph R. McCarthy was, in fact, irrelevant to the anti-Communist cause.… Ultimately, the attacks on McCarthy did substantial damage to the cause he championed.”
P. 454: “Some of the McCarthy Committee’s probes produced important and damning information,… But the far more knowledgeable and competent House Committee on Un-American Activities … and the Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security … — McCarthy played no role in either — produced an immense body of evidence, collected at hearings and set down in reports. The printed hearings of these two committees remain an invaluable resource, particularly in the continuing efforts to place new revelations in perspective.”*
*In fairness, it should be noted that the Secret reports of McCarthy’s subcommittee were declassified 50 years later, in 2003. It has been my long-term goal to compare the names of those accused by McCarthy’s committee with the documented spies and traitors listed in R&B’s index, but free time has been lacking; xin loi. (JM)
Posted by Jonathan Myer on May 10,2009 | 06:07 AM
Comments on the Comments: 1. Scott Croly reminds us that, whatever may be said about the Soviets, "in the end, they were with us in WWII." Historical facts provide a more nuanced view of who was with whom, and why. First, on August 23, 1939, a bare week before WWII officially began in Europe, Nazi Germany signed a non-aggression pact with the Communist USSR known as the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact (named for their respective foreign ministers, who signed it in Moscow). This pact assured Hitler of a free hand in Western Europe while reassuring Stalin with both peace and the vision of a Poland divided between them. British cartoonist David Lowe's famous cartoon of the day showed Hitler and Stalin bowing to each other with the greetings: "Bloody assassin of the workers, I presume?" and "Scum of the earth, I believe?" Hitler, as we know, had his own plans, and in December 1940 launched a full-scale attack against an unready Soviet Union (and shocked Stalin) known as Operation Barbarossa. When the U.S. entered the war a year later (after our "Pearl Harbor"), it was in both the U.S.-British and Soviet interests to keep the USSR in the war, despite our antithetical ideologies. Thus, sheer pragmatism, rather than any "hands-across-the-sea" friendship, sustained the Alliance, although to assure popular support at home (especially in light of the sacrifices that resupplying Russia entailed), the USSR was then publicly portrayed as a vital ally in our common struggle against the Axis powers. (The current PBS TV documentary, "World War II: Behind Closed Doors: Stalin, the Nazis and the West" reveals more of Stalin's viewpoint during this time, culled from Soviet archives during the past dozen-odd years.)
Posted by Jonathan Myer on May 10,2009 | 05:09 AM
Enjoyed Michael Walsh's interesting article about the spy, George Koval (Iowa-Born, Soviet Trained, 'Smithsonian," May 2009). What wasn't mentioned was a contemporary of Koval's, a brilliant young physicist by the name of Ted Hall, code-name "Mlad." Ted was at Los Alamos concurrently with the time of Koval's misadventures. His name appeared in an earlier Smithsonian article, "Spies Who Spilled Atomic Bomb Secrets." Although he was known to the CIA and FBI, Ted Hall managed to elude incarceration, and eventually "escaped" to Russia (still a mystery). Even more mystifying was the part played by his older brother, Air Force Colonel Ed Hall, also brilliant and one of the leading experts on missile propulsion. I knew Ed Hall in the Air Force's missiles program, and he had a very strange personality and demeanor clearly recognized by his associates and bosses, Colonel (later Lt. General) Charles Terhune, and Brigadier General (later four star general) Bernard A. Schriever, my direct boss. The Hall brothers' parents were Barney and Rose Holtzberg of New York City. Julius Rosenberg was a classmate of Colonel Ed Hall at the City College of New York. The City and College in the mid-1930s "were hotbeds of Depression-spawned Marxist activism." Whether Ed Hall was complicit in or at least knowledgeable of his brother's espionage is still a subject of debate. Their activities came to public light with the publication of the "Venona Transcripts" in 1996. The full story up to 2004 was well-described in an amazing book written by ex-Secretary of the Air Force, Thomas C. Reed, At The Abyss; An Insider's History Of The Cold War, (Random House Publishing Group, New York, 2004) from which the details above derived. The much-maligned Senator Joe McCarthy had reason for his passion against Communists in the government.
Posted by Bill Getz on May 6,2009 | 02:45 PM
John Taber. Thank you for all that detailed and important information and observations. Much appreciated,
Posted by Don Noyes-More on April 24,2009 | 08:47 PM
You can say what you want about Russia, the Soviets, or whoever else, but remember this: in the end, they were with us in WWII. Personally, I am half of them through my mother (my great grandparents came here) and they saved the other half (my father, a veteran) during WWII. They were there for all of us when it counted. I shall never forget. They are an incredible group of people, a macro-communal society (as are we, by the way) encompassing diverse ideas, people and territory with the seminal gifts of music, mathematics, chess, physics, and the dogged determination to maintain forward, principally as expedited through their DOD. Furthermore, they made it from the horse and buggy in 1917 to Sputnik in 1957 in forty years, one and a half generations; the CIA still studies this amazing feat. They are potential and indispensible allies in the current state of world affairs forward.
Posted by Scott Croly on April 24,2009 | 06:27 PM
This will be a movie soon
Posted by Ken Fenslage on April 24,2009 | 05:39 PM
This IS (mmmmmm)very Interesting.
Posted by Tanikki on April 24,2009 | 02:33 PM
Two complaints:
1. Lumping Harry Dexter White with the atomic spies misleads the reader to the false conclusion that White betrayed atomic secrets to the Soviets. There is no evidence of that, not even in Herbert Romerstein's account.
Further, some historians do not accept that White was a Soviet agent. See James Boughton and Roger Sandiland. I too am not convinced. There is one VENONA cable that implies that White, under the covername RICHARD, was a journalist or PR person. This cable has the NSA footnote pointing out this discrepancy. The NSA footnote does not exculpate White because in this instance it is possible that RICHARD was somebody else as yet unidentified. The Soviet agencies changed covernames, and were sometimes inconsistent.
My point is, the VENONA decrypts alone are not sufficient to inculpate White.
My second objection is to your unresearched claim that the decrypted cables had to be kept secret so as not to jeopardize the code breaking.
No.
The Soviets already knew we were reading their cables. They had been informed by Philby, MacLean, and the code breaker Weissband who kept checking on Meredith Gardner's progress (the latter is claimed as the principle code breaker).
Second, the cables were not evidence acceptable to a court. There is a memo from Alan Belmont, third in command at the FBI, that advised not to use the cables in court because they would be hearsay. Belmont explains exceptions to the hearsay rule under which the cables could have been used, but that would open up counter attacks to the defense. There were too many gaps in the decrypts, too many guesses, too many uncertainties as to what the cables really said or meant. I do not mean this as an insult to the NSA - cryptanalysis is a trial and error process, and the decrypts were too early in that process.
In a magazine of your importance, you must do more fact checking and research than I would expect from the National Enquirer.
Posted by John K. Taber on April 22,2009 | 08:47 AM
Wow that is pretty amazing dude!
RT
www.privacy.pro.tc
Posted by Jason Wright on April 21,2009 | 02:24 PM