• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Archaeology
  • U.S. History
  • World History
  • Today in History
  • Document Deep Dives
  • The Jetsons
  • National Treasures
  • Paleofuture
  • History & Archaeology

How the Battle of Little Bighorn Was Won

Accounts of the 1876 battle have focused on Custer's ill-fated cavalry. But a new book offers a take from the Indian's point of view

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Thomas Powers
  • Photographs by Aaron Huey
  • Smithsonian magazine, November 2010, Subscribe
View More Photos »
Little Bighorn flats
On the day of the battle, 6,000 to 7,000 Indians were camped on the flats beside the Little Bighorn River. (Aaron Huey)

Photo Gallery (1/12)

Pictograph of Little Bighorn

Explore more photos from the story


Interactive Map

The Battle of the Greasy Grass

Fateful Afternoon

Related Links

  • Aaron Huey: In the Shadow of Wounded Knee

Related Books

The Killing of Crazy Horse

by Thomas Powers
Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group

Related Books

Custer’s Last Campaign: Mitch Boyer and the Little Bighorn Reconstructed

by John S. Gray
University of Nebraska Press, 1991

The Custer Myth

by W.A. Graham
Stackpole Books, 1953

Indian Views of the Custer Fight: A Source Book

by Richard G. Hardoff (editor)
Arthur H. Clark (Spokane, Washington), 2004

Lakota Recollections of the Custer Fight: New Memories of Indian Military History

by Richard G. Hardorff (editor)
University of Nebraska Press, 1997

The Sixth Grandfather: Black Elk’s Teachings Given to John G. Neihardt

by Raymond J. DeMallie (editor)
University of Nebraska Press, 1984

More from Smithsonian.com

  • Celebrating American Indian Heritage

Editor’s note: In 1874, an Army expedition led by Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer found gold in the Black Hills, in present-day South Dakota. At the time, the United States recognized the hills as property of the Sioux Nation, under a treaty the two parties had signed six years before. The Grant administration tried to buy the hills, but the Sioux, considering them sacred ground, refused to sell; in 1876, federal troops were dispatched to force the Sioux onto reservations and pacify the Great Plains. That June, Custer attacked an encampment of Sioux, Cheyenne and Arapaho on the Little Bighorn River, in what is now Montana.

The Battle of the Little Bighorn is one of the most studied actions in U.S. military history, and the immense literature on the subject is devoted primarily to answering questions about Custer’s generalship during the fighting. But neither he nor the 209 men in his immediate command survived the day, and an Indian counterattack would pin down seven companies of their fellow 7th Cavalrymen on a hilltop over four miles away. (Of about 400 soldiers on the hilltop, 53 were killed and 60 were wounded before the Indians ended their siege the next day.) The experience of Custer and his men can be reconstructed only by inference.

This is not true of the Indian version of the battle. Long-neglected accounts given by more than 50 Indian participants or witnesses provide a means of tracking the fight from the first warning to the killing of the last of Custer’s troopers—a period of about two hours and 15 minutes. In his new book, The Killing of Crazy Horse, veteran reporter Thomas Powers draws on these accounts to present a comprehensive narrative account of the battle as the Indians experienced it. Crazy Horse’s stunning victory over Custer, which both angered and frightened the Army, led to the killing of the chief a year later. “My purpose in telling the story as I did,” Powers says, “was to let the Indians describe what happened, and to identify the moment when Custer’s men disintegrated as a fighting unit and their defeat became inevitable.”

The sun was just cracking over the horizon that Sunday, June 25, 1876, as men and boys began taking the horses out to graze. First light was also the time for the women to poke up last night’s cooking fire. The Hunkpapa woman known as Good White Buffalo Woman said later she had often been in camps when war was in the air, but this day was not like that. “The Sioux that morning had no thought of fighting,” she said. “We expected no attack.”

Those who saw the assembled encampment said they had never seen one larger. It had come together in March or April, even before the plains started to green up, according to the Oglala warrior He Dog. Indians arriving from distant reservations on the Missouri River had reported that soldiers were coming out to fight, so the various camps made a point of keeping close together. There were at least six, perhaps seven, cheek by jowl, with the Cheyennes at the northern, or downriver, end near the broad ford where Medicine Tail Coulee and Muskrat Creek emptied into the Little Bighorn River. Among the Sioux, the Hunkpapas were at the southern end. Between them along the river’s bends and loops were the Sans Arc, Brulé, Minneconjou, Santee and Oglala. Some said the Oglala were the biggest group, the Hunkpapa next, with perhaps 700 lodges between them. The other circles might have totaled 500 to 600 lodges. That would suggest as many as 6,000 to 7,000 people in all, a third of them men or boys of fighting age. Confusing the question of numbers was the constant arrival and departure of people from the reservations. Those travelers—plus hunters from the camps, women out gathering roots and herbs and seekers of lost horses—were part of an informal early-warning system.

There were many late risers this morning because dances the previous night had ended only at first light. One very large tent near the center of the village—probably two lodges raised side by side—was filled with the elders, called chiefs by the whites but “short hairs,” “silent eaters” or “big bellies” by the Indians. As the morning turned hot and sultry, large numbers of adults and children went swimming in the river. The water would have been cold; Black Elk, the future Oglala holy man, then 12, would remember that the river was high with snowmelt from the mountains.

It was approaching midafternoon when a report arrived that U.S. troops had been spotted approaching the camp. “We could hardly believe that soldiers were so near,” the Oglala elder Runs the Enemy said later. It made no sense to him or the other men in the big lodge. For one thing, whites never attacked in the middle of the day. For several moments more, Runs the Enemy recalled, “We sat there smoking.”

Other reports followed. White Bull, a Minneconjou, was watching over horses near camp when scouts rode down from Ash Creek with news that soldiers had shot and killed an Indian boy at the fork of the creek two or three miles back. Women who had been digging turnips across the river some miles to the east “came riding in all out of breath and reported that soldiers were coming,” said the Oglala chief Thunder Bear. “The country, they said, looked as if filled with smoke, so much dust was there.” The soldiers had shot and killed one of the women. Fast Horn, an Oglala, came in to say he had been shot at by soldiers he saw near the high divide on the way over into the Rosebud valley.

But the first warning to bring warriors on the run probably occurred at the Hunkpapa camp around 3 o’clock, when some horse raiders—Arikara (or Ree) Indians working for the soldiers, as it turned out—were seen making a dash for animals grazing in a ravine not far from the camp. Within moments shooting could be heard at the south end of camp. Peace quickly gave way to pandemonium—shouts and cries of women and children, men calling for horses or guns, boys sent to find mothers or sisters, swimmers rushing from the river, men trying to organize resistance, looking to their weapons, painting themselves or tying up their horses’ tails.

As warriors rushed out to confront the horse thieves, people at the southernmost end of the Hunkpapa camp were shouting alarm at the sight of approaching soldiers, first glimpsed in a line on horseback a mile or two away. By 10 or 15 minutes past 3 o’clock, Indians had boiled out of the lodges to meet them. Now came the first shots heard back at the council lodge, convincing Runs the Enemy to put his pipe aside at last. “Bullets sounded like hail on tepees and tree tops,” said Little Soldier, a Hunkpapa warrior. The family of chief Gall—two wives and their three children—were shot to death near their lodge at the edge of the camp.


Editor’s note: In 1874, an Army expedition led by Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer found gold in the Black Hills, in present-day South Dakota. At the time, the United States recognized the hills as property of the Sioux Nation, under a treaty the two parties had signed six years before. The Grant administration tried to buy the hills, but the Sioux, considering them sacred ground, refused to sell; in 1876, federal troops were dispatched to force the Sioux onto reservations and pacify the Great Plains. That June, Custer attacked an encampment of Sioux, Cheyenne and Arapaho on the Little Bighorn River, in what is now Montana.

The Battle of the Little Bighorn is one of the most studied actions in U.S. military history, and the immense literature on the subject is devoted primarily to answering questions about Custer’s generalship during the fighting. But neither he nor the 209 men in his immediate command survived the day, and an Indian counterattack would pin down seven companies of their fellow 7th Cavalrymen on a hilltop over four miles away. (Of about 400 soldiers on the hilltop, 53 were killed and 60 were wounded before the Indians ended their siege the next day.) The experience of Custer and his men can be reconstructed only by inference.

This is not true of the Indian version of the battle. Long-neglected accounts given by more than 50 Indian participants or witnesses provide a means of tracking the fight from the first warning to the killing of the last of Custer’s troopers—a period of about two hours and 15 minutes. In his new book, The Killing of Crazy Horse, veteran reporter Thomas Powers draws on these accounts to present a comprehensive narrative account of the battle as the Indians experienced it. Crazy Horse’s stunning victory over Custer, which both angered and frightened the Army, led to the killing of the chief a year later. “My purpose in telling the story as I did,” Powers says, “was to let the Indians describe what happened, and to identify the moment when Custer’s men disintegrated as a fighting unit and their defeat became inevitable.”

The sun was just cracking over the horizon that Sunday, June 25, 1876, as men and boys began taking the horses out to graze. First light was also the time for the women to poke up last night’s cooking fire. The Hunkpapa woman known as Good White Buffalo Woman said later she had often been in camps when war was in the air, but this day was not like that. “The Sioux that morning had no thought of fighting,” she said. “We expected no attack.”

Those who saw the assembled encampment said they had never seen one larger. It had come together in March or April, even before the plains started to green up, according to the Oglala warrior He Dog. Indians arriving from distant reservations on the Missouri River had reported that soldiers were coming out to fight, so the various camps made a point of keeping close together. There were at least six, perhaps seven, cheek by jowl, with the Cheyennes at the northern, or downriver, end near the broad ford where Medicine Tail Coulee and Muskrat Creek emptied into the Little Bighorn River. Among the Sioux, the Hunkpapas were at the southern end. Between them along the river’s bends and loops were the Sans Arc, Brulé, Minneconjou, Santee and Oglala. Some said the Oglala were the biggest group, the Hunkpapa next, with perhaps 700 lodges between them. The other circles might have totaled 500 to 600 lodges. That would suggest as many as 6,000 to 7,000 people in all, a third of them men or boys of fighting age. Confusing the question of numbers was the constant arrival and departure of people from the reservations. Those travelers—plus hunters from the camps, women out gathering roots and herbs and seekers of lost horses—were part of an informal early-warning system.

There were many late risers this morning because dances the previous night had ended only at first light. One very large tent near the center of the village—probably two lodges raised side by side—was filled with the elders, called chiefs by the whites but “short hairs,” “silent eaters” or “big bellies” by the Indians. As the morning turned hot and sultry, large numbers of adults and children went swimming in the river. The water would have been cold; Black Elk, the future Oglala holy man, then 12, would remember that the river was high with snowmelt from the mountains.

It was approaching midafternoon when a report arrived that U.S. troops had been spotted approaching the camp. “We could hardly believe that soldiers were so near,” the Oglala elder Runs the Enemy said later. It made no sense to him or the other men in the big lodge. For one thing, whites never attacked in the middle of the day. For several moments more, Runs the Enemy recalled, “We sat there smoking.”

Other reports followed. White Bull, a Minneconjou, was watching over horses near camp when scouts rode down from Ash Creek with news that soldiers had shot and killed an Indian boy at the fork of the creek two or three miles back. Women who had been digging turnips across the river some miles to the east “came riding in all out of breath and reported that soldiers were coming,” said the Oglala chief Thunder Bear. “The country, they said, looked as if filled with smoke, so much dust was there.” The soldiers had shot and killed one of the women. Fast Horn, an Oglala, came in to say he had been shot at by soldiers he saw near the high divide on the way over into the Rosebud valley.

But the first warning to bring warriors on the run probably occurred at the Hunkpapa camp around 3 o’clock, when some horse raiders—Arikara (or Ree) Indians working for the soldiers, as it turned out—were seen making a dash for animals grazing in a ravine not far from the camp. Within moments shooting could be heard at the south end of camp. Peace quickly gave way to pandemonium—shouts and cries of women and children, men calling for horses or guns, boys sent to find mothers or sisters, swimmers rushing from the river, men trying to organize resistance, looking to their weapons, painting themselves or tying up their horses’ tails.

As warriors rushed out to confront the horse thieves, people at the southernmost end of the Hunkpapa camp were shouting alarm at the sight of approaching soldiers, first glimpsed in a line on horseback a mile or two away. By 10 or 15 minutes past 3 o’clock, Indians had boiled out of the lodges to meet them. Now came the first shots heard back at the council lodge, convincing Runs the Enemy to put his pipe aside at last. “Bullets sounded like hail on tepees and tree tops,” said Little Soldier, a Hunkpapa warrior. The family of chief Gall—two wives and their three children—were shot to death near their lodge at the edge of the camp.

But now the Indians were rushing out and shooting back, making show enough to check the attack. The whites dismounted. Every fourth man took the reins of three other horses and led them along with his own into the trees near the river. The other soldiers deployed in a skirmish line of perhaps 100 men. It was all happening very quickly.

As the Indians came out to meet the skirmish line, straight ahead, the river was to their left, obscured by thick timber and undergrowth. To the right was open prairie rising away to the west, and beyond the end of the line, a force of mounted Indians rapidly accumulated. These warriors were swinging wide, swooping around the end of the line. Some of the Indians, He Dog and Brave Heart among them, rode out still farther, circling a small hill behind the soldiers.

By then the soldiers had begun to bend back around to face the Indians behind them. In effect the line had halted; firing was heavy and rapid, but the Indians racing their ponies were hard to hit. Ever-growing numbers of men were rushing out to meet the soldiers while women and children fled. No more than 15 or 20 minutes into the fight the Indians were gaining control of the field; the soldiers were pulling back into the trees that lined the river.

The pattern of the Battle of the Little Bighorn was already established—moments of intense fighting, rapid movement, close engagement with men falling dead or wounded, followed by sudden relative quiet as the two sides organized, took stock and prepared for the next clash. As the soldiers disappeared into the trees, Indians by ones and twos cautiously went in after them while others gathered nearby. Shooting fell away but never halted.

Two large movements were unfolding simultaneously—most of the women and children were moving north down the river, leaving the Hunkpapa camp behind, while a growing stream of men passed them on the way to the fighting—“where the excitement was going on,” said Eagle Elk, a friend of Red Feather, Crazy Horse’s brother-in-law. Crazy Horse himself, already renowned among the Oglala for his battle prowess, was approaching the scene of the fighting at about the same time.

Crazy Horse had been swimming in the river with his friend Yellow Nose when they heard shots. Moments later, horseless, he met Red Feather bridling his pony. “Take any horse,” said Red Feather as he prepared to dash off, but Crazy Horse waited for his own mount. Red Feather didn’t see him again until 10 or 15 minutes later, when the Indians had gathered in force near the woods where the soldiers had taken refuge.

It was probably during those minutes that Crazy Horse had prepared himself for war. In the emergency of the moment many men grabbed their weapons and ran toward the shooting, but not all. War was too dangerous to treat casually; a man wanted to be properly dressed and painted before charging the enemy. Without his medicine and time for a prayer or song, he would be weak. A 17-year-old Oglala named Standing Bear reported that after the first warnings Crazy Horse had called on a wicasa wakan (medicine man) to invoke the spirits and then took so much time over his preparations “that many of his warriors became impatient.”

Ten young men who had sworn to follow Crazy Horse “anywhere in battle” were standing nearby. He dusted himself and his companions with a fistful of dry earth gathered up from a hill left by a mole or gopher, a young Oglala named Spider would recall. Into his hair Crazy Horse wove some long stems of grass, according to Spider. Then he opened the medicine bag he carried about his neck, took from it a pinch of stuff “and burned it as a sacrifice upon a fire of buffalo chips which another warrior had prepared.” The wisp of smoke, he believed, carried his prayer to the heavens. (Others reported that Crazy Horse painted his face with hail spots and dusted his horse with the dry earth.) Now, according to Spider and Standing Bear, he was ready to fight.

By the time Crazy Horse caught up with his cousin Kicking Bear and Red Feather, it was hard to see the soldiers in the woods, but there was a lot of shooting; bullets clattered through tree limbs and sent leaves fluttering to the ground. Several Indians had already been killed, and others were wounded. There was shouting and singing; some women who had stayed behind were calling out the high-pitched, ululating cry called the tremolo. Iron Hawk, a leading man of Crazy Horse’s band of Oglala, said his aunt was urging on the arriving warriors with a song:

Brothers-in-law, now your friends have come.
Take courage.
Would you see me taken captive?

At just this moment someone near the timber cried out, “Crazy Horse is coming!” From the Indians circling around behind the soldiers came the charge word—“Hokahey!” Many Indians near the woods said that Crazy Horse repeatedly raced his pony past the soldiers, drawing their fire—an act of daring sometimes called a brave run. Red Feather remembered that “some Indian shouted, ‘Give way; let the soldiers out. We can’t get at them in there.’ Soon the soldiers came out and tried to go to the river.” As they bolted out of the woods, Crazy Horse called to the men near him: “Here are some of the soldiers after us again. Do your best, and let us kill them all off today, that they may not trouble us anymore. All ready! Charge!”

Crazy Horse and all the rest now raced their horses directly into the soldiers. “Right among them we rode,” said Thunder Bear, “shooting them down as in a buffalo drive.” Horses were shot and soldiers tumbled to the ground; a few managed to pull up behind friends, but on foot most were quickly killed. “All mixed up,” said the Cheyenne Two Moons of the melee. “Sioux, then soldiers, then more Sioux, and all shooting.” Flying Hawk, an Oglala, said it was hard to know exactly what was happening: “The dust was thick and we could hardly see. We got right among the soldiers and killed a lot with our bows and arrows and tomahawks. Crazy Horse was ahead of all, and he killed a lot of them with his war club.”

Two Moons said he saw soldiers “drop into the river-bed like buffalo fleeing.” The Minneconjou warrior Red Horse said several troops drowned. Many of the Indians charged across the river after the soldiers and chased them as they raced up the bluffs toward a hill (now known as Reno Hill, for the major who led the soldiers). White Eagle, the son of Oglala chief Horned Horse, was killed in the chase. A soldier stopped just long enough to scalp him—one quick circle-cut with a sharp knife, then a yank on a fistful of hair to rip the skin loose.

The whites had the worst of it. More than 30 were killed before they reached the top of the hill and dismounted to make a stand. Among the bodies of men and horses left on the flat by the river below were two wounded Ree scouts. The Oglala Red Hawk said later that “the Indians [who found the scouts] said these Indians wanted to die—that was what they were scouting with the soldiers for; so they killed them and scalped them.”

The soldiers’ crossing of the river brought a second breathing spell in the fight. Some of the Indians chased them to the top of the hill, but many others, like Black Elk, lingered to pick up guns and ammunition, to pull the clothes off dead soldiers or to catch runaway horses. Crazy Horse promptly turned back with his men toward the center of the great camp. The only Indian to offer an explanation of his abrupt withdrawal was Gall, who speculated that Crazy Horse and Crow King, a leading man of the Hunkpapa, feared a second attack on the camp from some point north. Gall said they had seen soldiers heading that way along the bluffs on the opposite bank.

The fight along the river flat—from the first sighting of soldiers riding toward the Hunkpapa camp until the last of them crossed the river and made their way to the top of the hill—had lasted about an hour. During that time, a second group of soldiers had shown itself at least three times on the eastern heights above the river. The first sighting came only a minute or two after the first group began to ride toward the Hunkpapa camp—about five minutes past 3. Ten minutes later, just before the first group formed a skirmish line, the second group was sighted across the river again, this time on the very hill where the first group would take shelter after their mad retreat across the river. At about half-past 3, the second group was seen yet again on a high point above the river not quite halfway between Reno Hill and the Cheyenne village at the northern end of the big camp. By then the first group was retreating into the timber. It is likely that the second group of soldiers got their first clear view of the long sprawl of the Indian camp from this high bluff, later called Weir Point.

The Yanktonais White Thunder said he saw the second group make a move toward the river south of the ford by the Cheyenne camp, then turn back on reaching “a steep cut bank which they could not get down.” While the soldiers retraced their steps, White Thunder and some of his friends went east up and over the high ground to the other side, where they were soon joined by many other Indians. In effect, White Thunder said, the second group of soldiers had been surrounded even before they began to fight.

From the spot where the first group of soldiers retreated across the river to the next crossing place at the northern end of the big camp was about three miles—roughly a 20-minute ride. Between the two crossings steep bluffs blocked much of the river’s eastern bank, but just beyond the Cheyenne camp was an open stretch of several hundred yards, which later was called Minneconjou Ford. It was here, Indians say, that the second group of soldiers came closest to the river and to the Indian camp. By most Indian accounts it wasn’t very close.

Approaching the ford at an angle from the high ground to the southeast was a dry creek bed in a shallow ravine now known as Medicine Tail Coulee. The exact sequence of events is difficult to establish, but it seems likely that the first sighting of soldiers at the upper end of Medicine Tail Coulee occurred at about 4 o’clock, just as the first group of soldiers was making its dash up the bluffs toward Reno Hill and Crazy Horse and his followers were turning back. Two Moons was in the Cheyenne camp when he spotted soldiers coming over an intervening ridge and descending toward the river.

Gall and three other Indians were watching the same soldiers from a high point on the eastern side of the river. Well out in front were two soldiers. Ten years later, Gall identified them as Custer and his orderly, but more probably it was not. This man he called Custer was in no hurry, Gall said. Off to Gall’s right, on one of the bluffs upriver, some Indians came into sight as Custer approached. Feather Earring, a Minneconjou, said Indians were just then coming up from the south on that side of the river “in great numbers.” When Custer saw them, Gall said, “his pace became slower and his actions more cautious, and finally he paused altogether to await the coming up of his command. This was the nearest point any of Custer’s party ever got to the river.” At that point, Gall went on, Custer “began to suspect he was in a bad scrape. From that time on Custer acted on the defensive.”

Others, including Iron Hawk and Feather Earring, confirmed that Custer and his men got no closer to the river than that—several hundred yards back up the coulee. Most of the soldiers were still farther back up the hill. Some soldiers fired into the Indian camp, which was almost deserted. The few Indians at Minneconjou Ford fired back.

The earlier pattern repeated itself. Little stood in the soldiers’ way at first, but within moments more Indians began to arrive, and they kept coming—some crossing the river, others riding up from the south on the east side of the river. By the time 15 or 20 Indians had gathered near the ford, the soldiers had hesitated, then begun to ride up out of Medicine Tail Coulee, heading toward high ground, where they were joined by the rest of Custer’s command.

The battle known as the Custer Fight began when the small, leading detachment of soldiers approaching the river retreated toward higher ground at about 4:15. This was the last move the soldiers would take freely; from this moment on everything they did was in response to an Indian attack growing rapidly in intensity.

As described by Indian participants, the fighting followed the contour of the ground, and its pace was determined by the time it took for Indians to gather in force and the comparatively few minutes it took for each successive group of soldiers to be killed or driven back. The path of the battle follows a sweeping arc up out of Medicine Tail Coulee across another swale into a depression known as Deep Coulee, which in turn opens up and out into a rising slope cresting at Calhoun Ridge, rising to Calhoun Hill, and then proceeds, still rising, past a depression in the ground identified as the Keogh site to a second elevation known as Custer Hill. The high ground from Calhoun Hill to Custer Hill was what men on the plains called “a backbone.” From the point where the soldiers recoiled away from the river to the lower end of Calhoun Ridge is about three-quarters of a mile—a hard, 20-minute uphill slog for a man on foot. Shave Elk, an Oglala in Crazy Horse’s band, who ran the distance after his horse was shot at the outset of the fight, remembered “how tired he became before he got up there.” From the bottom of Calhoun Ridge to Calhoun Hill is another uphill climb of about a quarter-mile.

But it would be a mistake to assume that all of Custer’s command—210 men—advanced in line from one point to another, down one coulee, up the other coulee and so on. Only a small detachment had approached the river. By the time this group rejoined the rest, the soldiers occupied a line from Calhoun Hill along the backbone to Custer Hill, a distance of a little over half a mile.

The uphill route from Medicine Tail Coulee over to Deep Coulee and up the ridge toward Custer Hill would have been about a mile and a half or a little more. Red Horse would later say that Custer’s troops “made five different stands.” In each case, combat began and ended in about ten minutes. Think of it as a running fight, as the survivors of each separate clash made their way along the backbone toward Custer at the end; in effect the command collapsed back in on itself. As described by the Indians, this phase of the battle began with the scattering of shots near Minneconjou Ford, unfolding then in brief, devastating clashes at Calhoun Ridge, Calhoun Hill and the Keogh site, climaxing in the killing of Custer and his entourage on Custer Hill and ending with the pursuit and killing of about 30 soldiers who raced on foot from Custer Hill toward the river down a deep ravine.

Back at Reno Hill, just over four miles to the south, the soldiers preparing their defenses heard three episodes of heavy firing—one at 4:25 in the afternoon, about ten minutes after Custer’s soldiers turned back from their approach to Minneconjou Ford; a second about 30 minutes later; and a final burst about 15 minutes after that, dying off before 5:15. Distances were great, but the air was still, and the .45/55 caliber round of the cavalry carbine made a thunderous boom.

At 5:25 some of Reno’s officers, who had ridden out with their men toward the shooting, glimpsed from Weir Point a distant hillside swarming with mounted Indians who seemed to be shooting at things on the ground. These Indians were not fighting; more likely they were finishing off the wounded, or just following the Indian custom of putting an extra bullet or arrow into an enemy’s body in a gesture of triumph. Once the fighting began it never died away, the last scattering shots continuing until night fell.

The officers at Weir Point also saw a general movement of Indians—more Indians than any of them had ever encountered before—heading their way. Soon the forward elements of Reno’s command were exchanging fire with them, and the soldiers quickly returned to Reno Hill.

As Custer’s soldiers made their way from the river toward higher ground, the country on three sides was rapidly filling with Indians, in effect pushing as well as following the soldiers uphill. “We chased the soldiers up a long, gradual slope or hill in a direction away from the river and over the ridge where the battle began in good earnest,” said Shave Elk. By the time the soldiers made a stand on “the ridge”—evidently the backbone connecting Calhoun and Custer hills—the Indians had begun to fill the coulees to the south and east. “The officers tried their utmost to keep the soldiers together at this point,” said Red Hawk, “but the horses were unmanageable; they would rear up and fall backward with their riders; some would get away.” Crow King said, “When they saw that they were surrounded they dismounted.” This was cavalry tactics by the book. There was no other way to make a stand or maintain a stout defense. A brief period followed of deliberate fighting on foot.

As Indians arrived they got off their horses, sought cover and began to converge on the soldiers. Taking advantage of brush and every little swale or rise in the ground to hide, the Indians made their way uphill “on hands and knees,” said Red Feather. From one moment to the next, the Indians popped up to shoot before dropping back down again. No man on either side could show himself without drawing fire. In battle the Indians often wore their feathers down flat to help in concealment. The soldiers appear to have taken off their hats for the same reason; a number of Indians noted hatless soldiers, some dead and some still fighting.

From their position on Calhoun Hill the soldiers were making an orderly, concerted defense. When some Indians approached, a detachment of soldiers rose up and charged downhill on foot, driving the Indians back to the lower end of Calhoun Ridge. Now the soldiers established a regulation skirmish line, each man about five yards from the next, kneeling in order to take “deliberate aim,” according to Yellow Nose, a Cheyenne warrior. Some Indians noted a second skirmish line as well, stretching perhaps 100 yards away along the backbone toward Custer Hill. It was in the fighting around Calhoun Hill, many Indians reported later, that the Indians suffered the most fatalities—11 in all.

But almost as soon as the skirmish line was thrown out from Calhoun Hill, some Indians pressed in again, snaking up to shooting distance of the men on Calhoun Ridge; others made their way around to the eastern slope of the hill, where they opened a heavy, deadly fire on soldiers holding the horses. Without horses, Custer’s troops could neither charge nor flee. Loss of the horses also meant loss of the saddlebags with the reserve ammunition, about 50 rounds per man. “As soon as the soldiers on foot had marched over the ridge,” the Yanktonais Daniel White Thunder later told a white missionary, he and the Indians with him “stampeded the horses...by waving their blankets and making a terrible noise.”

“We killed all the men who were holding the horses,” Gall said. When a horse holder was shot, the frightened horses would lunge about. “They tried to hold on to their horses,” said Crow King, “but as we pressed closer, they let go their horses.” Many charged down the hill toward the river, adding to the confusion of battle. Some of the Indians quit fighting to chase them.

The fighting was intense, bloody, at times hand to hand. Men died by knife and club as well as by gunfire. The Cheyenne Brave Bear saw an officer riding a sorrel horse shoot two Indians with his revolver before he was killed himself. Brave Bear managed to seize the horse. At almost the same moment, Yellow Nose wrenched a cavalry guidon from a soldier who had been using it as a weapon. Eagle Elk, in the thick of the fighting at Calhoun Hill, saw many men killed or horribly wounded; an Indian was “shot through the jaw and was all bloody.”

Calhoun Hill was swarming with men, Indian and white. “At this place the soldiers stood in line and made a very good fight,” said Red Hawk. But the soldiers were completely exposed. Many of the men in the skirmish line died where they knelt; when their line collapsed back up the hill, the entire position was rapidly lost. It was at this moment that the Indians won the battle.

In the minutes before, the soldiers had held a single, roughly continuous line along the half-mile backbone from Calhoun Hill to Custer Hill. Men had been killed and wounded, but the force had remained largely intact. The Indians heavily outnumbered the whites, but nothing like a rout had begun. What changed everything, according to the Indians, was a sudden and unexpected charge up over the backbone by a large force of Indians on horseback. The central and controlling part Crazy Horse played in this assault was witnessed and later reported by many of his friends and relatives, including He Dog, Red Feather and Flying Hawk.

Recall that as Reno’s men were retreating across the river and up the bluffs on the far side, Crazy Horse had headed back toward the center of camp. He had time to reach the mouth of Muskrat Creek and Medicine Tail Coulee by 4:15, just as the small detachment of soldiers observed by Gall had turned back from the river toward higher ground. Flying Hawk said he had followed Crazy Horse down the river past the center of camp. “We came to a ravine,” Flying Hawk later recalled, “then we followed up the gulch to a place in the rear of the soldiers that were making the stand on the hill.” From his half-protected vantage at the head of the ravine, Flying Hawk said, Crazy Horse “shot them as fast as he could load his gun.”

This was one style of Sioux fighting. Another was the brave run. Typically the change from one to the other was preceded by no long discussion; a warrior simply perceived that the moment was right. He might shout: “I am going!” Or he might yell “Hokahey!” or give the war trill or clench an eagle bone whistle between his teeth and blow the piercing scree sound. Red Feather said Crazy Horse’s moment came when the two sides were keeping low and popping up to shoot at each other—a standoff moment.

“There was a great deal of noise and confusion,” said Waterman, an Arapaho warrior. “The air was heavy with powder smoke, and the Indians were all yelling.” Out of this chaos, said Red Feather, Crazy Horse “came up on horseback” blowing his eagle bone whistle and riding between the length of the two lines of fighters. “Crazy Horse...was the bravest man I ever saw,” said Waterman. “He rode closest to the soldiers, yelling to his warriors. All the soldiers were shooting at him but he was never hit.”

After firing their rifles at Crazy Horse, the soldiers had to reload. It was then that the Indians rose up and charged. Among the soldiers, panic ensued; those gathered around Calhoun Hill were suddenly cut off from those stretching along the backbone toward Custer Hill, leaving each bunch vulnerable to the Indians charging them on foot and horseback.

The soldiers’ way of fighting was to try to keep an enemy at bay, to kill him from a distance. The instinct of Sioux fighters was the opposite—to charge in and engage the enemy with a quirt, bow or naked hand. There is no terror in battle to equal physical contact—shouting, hot breath, the grip of a hand from a man close enough to smell. The charge of Crazy Horse brought the Indians in among the soldiers, whom they clubbed and stabbed to death.

Those soldiers still alive at the southern end of the backbone now made a run for it, grabbing horses if they could, running if they couldn’t. “All were going toward the high ground at end of ridge,” the Brulé Foolish Elk said.

The skirmish lines were gone. Men crowded in on each other for safety. Iron Hawk said the Indians followed close behind the fleeing soldiers. “By this time the Indians were taking the guns and cartridges of the dead soldiers and putting these to use,” said Red Hawk. The boom of the Springfield carbines was coming from Indian and white fighters alike. But the killing was mostly one-sided.

In the rush of the Calhoun Hill survivors to rejoin the rest of the command, the soldiers fell in no more pattern than scattered corn. In the depression in which the body of Capt. Myles Keogh was found lay the bodies of some 20 men crowded tight around him. But the Indians describe no real fight there, just a rush without letup along the backbone, killing all the way; the line of bodies continued along the backbone. “We circled all round them,” Two Moons said, “swirling like water round a stone.”

Another group of the dead, ten or more, was left on the slope rising up to Custer Hill. Between this group and the hill, a distance of about 200 yards, no bodies were found. The mounted soldiers had dashed ahead, leaving the men on foot to fend for themselves. Perhaps the ten who died on the slope were all that remained of the foot soldiers; perhaps no bodies were found on that stretch of ground because organized firing from Custer Hill held the Indians at bay while soldiers ran up the slope. Whatever the cause, Indian accounts mostly agree that there was a pause in the fighting—a moment of positioning, closing in, creeping up.

The pause was brief; it offered no time for the soldiers to count survivors. By now, half of Custer’s men were dead, Indians were pressing in from all sides, the horses were wounded, dead or had run off. There was nowhere to hide. “When the horses got to the top of the ridge the gray ones and bays became mingled, and the soldiers with them were all in confusion,” said Foolish Elk. Then he added what no white soldier lived to tell: “The Indians were so numerous that the soldiers could not go any further, and they knew that they had to die.”

The Indians surrounding the soldiers on Custer Hill were now joined by others from every section of the field, from downriver where they had been chasing horses, from along the ridge where they had stripped the dead of guns and ammunition, from upriver, where Reno’s men could hear the beginning of the last heavy volley a few minutes past 5. “There were great numbers of us,” said Eagle Bear, an Oglala, “some on horseback, others on foot. Back and forth in front of Custer we passed, firing all of the time.”

Kill Eagle, a Blackfeet Sioux, said the firing came in waves. His interviewer noted that he clapped “the palms of his hands together very fast for several minutes” to demonstrate the intensity of the firing at its height, then clapped slower, then faster, then slower, then stopped.

In the fight’s final stage, the soldiers killed or wounded very few Indians. As Brave Bear later recalled: “I think Custer saw he was caught in [a] bad place and would like to have gotten out of it if he could, but he was hemmed in all around and could do nothing only to die then.”

Exactly when custer died is unknown; his body was found in a pile of soldiers near the top of Custer Hill surrounded by others within a circle of dead horses. It is probable he fell during the Indians’ second, brief and final charge. Before it began, Low Dog, an Oglala, had called to his followers: “This is a good day to die: follow me.” The Indians raced up together, a solid mass, close enough to whip each other’s horses with their quirts so no man would linger. “Then every chief rushed his horse on the white soldiers, and all our warriors did the same,” said Crow King.

In their terror some soldiers threw down their guns, put their hands in the air and begged to be taken prisoner. But the Sioux took only women as prisoners. Red Horse said they “did not take a single soldier, but killed all of them.”

The last 40 or more of the soldiers on foot, with only a few on horseback, dashed downhill toward the river. One of the mounted men wore buckskins; Indians said he fought with a big knife. “His men were all covered with white dust,” said Two Moons.

These soldiers were met by Indians coming up from the river, including Black Elk. He noted that the soldiers were moving oddly. “They were making their arms go as though they were running, but they were only walking.” They were likely wounded—hobbling, lurching, throwing themselves forward in the hope of escape.

The Indians hunted them all down. The Oglala Brings Plenty and Iron Hawk killed two soldiers running up a creek bed and figured they were the last white men to die. Others said the last man dashed away on a fast horse upriver toward Reno Hill, and then inexplicably shot himself in the head with his own revolver. Still another last man, it was reported, was killed by the sons of the noted Santee warrior chief Red Top. Two Moons said no, the last man alive had braids on his shirt (i.e., a sergeant) and rode one of the remaining horses in the final rush for the river. He eluded his pursuers by rounding a hill and making his way back upriver. But just as Two Moons thought this man might escape, a Sioux shot and killed him. Of course none of these “last men” was the last to die. That distinction went to an unknown soldier lying wounded on the field.

Soon the hill was swarming with Indians—warriors putting a final bullet into enemies, and women and boys who had climbed the long slopes from the village. They joined the warriors who had dismounted to empty the pockets of the dead soldiers and strip them of their clothes. It was a scene of horror. Many of the bodies were mutilated, but in later years Indians did not like to talk about that. Some said they had seen it but did not know who had done it.

But soldiers going over the field in the days following the battle recorded detailed descriptions of the mutilations, and drawings made by Red Horse leave no room for doubt that they took place. Red Horse provided one of the earliest Indian accounts of the battle and, a few years later, made an extraordinary series of more than 40 large drawings of the fighting and of the dead on the field. Many pages were devoted to fallen Indians, each lying in his distinctive dress and headgear. Additional pages showed the dead soldiers, some naked, some half-stripped. Each page depicting the white dead showed severed arms, hands, legs, heads. These mutilations reflected the Indians’ belief that an individual was condemned to have the body he brought with him to the afterlife.

Acts of revenge were integral to the Indians’ notion of justice, and they had long memories. The Cheyenne White Necklace, then in her middle 50s and wife of Wolf Chief, had carried in her heart bitter memories of the death of a niece killed in a massacre whites committed at Sand Creek in 1864. “When they found her there, her head was cut off,” she said later. Coming up the hill just after the fighting had ended, White Necklace came upon the naked body of a dead soldier. She had a hand ax in her belt. “I jumped off my horse and did the same to him,” she recalled.

Most Indians claimed that no one really knew who the leader of the soldiers was until long after the battle. Others said no, there was talk of Custer the very first day. The Oglala Little Killer, 24 years old at the time, remembered that warriors sang Custer’s name during the dancing in the big camp that night. Nobody knew which body was Custer’s, Little Killer said, but they knew he was there. Sixty years later, in 1937, he remembered a song:

Long Hair, Long Hair,
I was short of guns,
and you brought us many.
Long Hair, Long Hair,
I was short of horses,
and you brought us many.

As late as the 1920s, elderly Cheyennes said that two southern Cheyenne women had come upon the body of Custer. He had been shot in the head and in the side. They recognized Custer from the Battle of the Washita in 1868, and had seen him up close the following spring when he had come to make peace with Stone Forehead and smoked with the chiefs in the lodge of the Arrow Keeper. There Custer had promised never again to fight the Cheyennes, and Stone Forehead, to hold him to his promise, had emptied the ashes from the pipe onto Custer’s boots while the general, all unknowing, sat directly beneath the Sacred Arrows that pledged him to tell the truth.

It was said that these two women were relatives of Mo-nah-se-tah, a Cheyenne girl whose father Custer’s men had killed at the Washita. Many believed that Mo-nah-se-tah had been Custer’s lover for a time. No matter how brief, this would have been considered a marriage according to Indian custom. On the hill at the Little Bighorn, it was told, the two southern Cheyenne women stopped some Sioux men who were going to cut up Custer’s body. “He is a relative of ours,” they said. The Sioux men went away.

Every Cheyenne woman routinely carried a sewing awl in a leather sheath decorated with beads or porcupine quills. The awl was used daily, for sewing clothing or lodge covers, and perhaps most frequently for keeping moccasins in repair. Now the southern Cheyenne women took their awls and pushed them deep into the ears of the man they believed to be Custer. He had not listened to Stone Forehead, they said. He had broken his promise not to fight the Cheyenne anymore. Now, they said, his hearing would be improved.

Thomas Powers is the author of eight previous books. Aaron Huey has spent six years documenting life among the Oglala Sioux on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota.

Adapted from The Killing of Crazy Horse, by Thomas Powers. Copyright © 2010. With the permission of the publisher, Alfred A. Knopf.


Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


Related topics: Native American History Military Leaders Reconstruction


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (50)

Custer and the Army was ordered by President Grant and his administration to force the Indians back to the reservation Generals Terry,Crook were in charge of the expedition.Custer"s plan was to capture the non combatants avoiding a big battle but faith intervened.

Posted by Emil on February 4,2013 | 02:02 PM

Was helpfull for my college report on the Battle of Little Bighorn.

Posted by Kristin Kuettel ( Q tell) on January 8,2013 | 01:02 PM

so who got to keep the land?

Posted by abnerd on December 5,2012 | 02:55 PM

I love the history! I went to many of your museums, Smithsonian and I love them. This article about Custer is awesome!

Posted by Bob Anderson on November 13,2012 | 05:12 PM

It was more likely counted on above Custer commanding gen. Terri that Custer didn't accept those extra troops or Buffalo soldiers to use as troops to wrecklessly sacrifice on that field of battle for their own good, Finally if those dam Indians ancestors had stayed in touch with their Asiatic roots then I believe the total war methods would have had the Indians lure Custer entire command into that valley and decimated them, also taking prisoners for leverage in wining the peace in the plains Indian wars with American history being totally different in European really paying a heavier price in dominanting the American continent.

Posted by darryl singleton on September 5,2012 | 09:14 PM

it sounds like war isnt fun no matter where it is

Posted by mike kinsella on August 6,2012 | 09:11 AM

Amazing history in a native American (Indian) view. Custer should have kept his promise to Stone Forehead. The Indians were merely trying to preserve their way of life and their land. Great history!

Posted by Ronnie Land on July 7,2012 | 01:00 PM

Better armed, Better numbers, meets arrogance and lack of forethought. Custer died because he was supposed to. His men died because they had the misfortune of being with a man who had consistently lost more men in the civil war than any other. Recklessness and medicine that was working took care of the rest. All that could have possibly gone differently, is that the whole of the outfit, Reno and Benteen's men could have easily shared the fate of Custer had they pushed it.

Posted by Jbeau edwards on June 26,2012 | 08:58 PM

My grandmother (100 years old) said that her grandfather was an indian guide for Custer. She says he told her that several of the indian guides left before the attack, saying that they were guides not soldiers.

Posted by Wonderdog on June 25,2012 | 05:05 PM

Very insightful article and commentary. I am a relatively new student of this subject. I've read a great deal on this & related subjects in the past few years. Two simple thoughts. All factors considered, this was a recipe for disaster. Textbook. Further, I simply don't find Reno's account credible. Given the scenario, when does a man abandon being a soldier and simply attempt survival?

Posted by Bart Beaudin on January 24,2012 | 02:14 AM

Previously, General Custer's reckless and audacious charges won him the day but, as with any game of chance, you don`t always win. He gambled and it was his moment to lose. He misjudged things at the Little Bighorn and it's as simple as that. In some people`s eyes he was the invincible hero. In their minds, the blame for his defeat must be shifted to other individuals or equipment that apparently failed or wasn`t there. They blame General Crook, Maj. Reno, Capt. Benteen, the Springfield carbines, the lack of sabers, the lack of Gatling guns, that Brisbin`s troops weren`t along, the fact that the Indians had Henry repeating rifles and whatever else they can think of. The bottom line is that Custer commanded the regiment and that it was his, and his decision alone to attack. Therefore the 7th Cavalry debacle was his responsibility. As such are the fortunes of war. On the other hand, the Indian combatants responded courageously and with alacrity to the attack on their village and they repulsed the invaders. The battle proceeded as it should have given the circumstances.

Posted by M. Provenzano on December 28,2011 | 09:58 AM

If at the very least,that overated buffoon crook had kept the pressure on the hostiles,after the rosebud,which was only about 40 miles from littlebighorn,and a week before the custer debacle,the massacre would never have happened. While custer and his men are being slaughtered,good old crook is back at goose creek[an apt place for george], hunting and fishing.Remember,this fool commanded 1300 men, double custers numbers,and simply withdrew from the campaign on the back of casualties,according to him of, ten killed and twentyone wounded,out of 1300 and made no effort to tell anyone.Now there is the sort of man you want to go to war with.If there is a more compelling reason for custers defeat,i would love to hear it.

regards to all david.

Posted by david wicker on December 7,2011 | 06:43 AM

I have been interested in the Battle of the Little Bighorn have read many books. All the books so far have been written by the white population. Can anyone tell me where i can find any books that are written by the Native American? I would very much like to get the views from the other side of the battle. Thank You very much for seeing this type of information is readily at the despositalbe to any one that might like reading this kind of history.

I, too have been at the Site of the "LITTLE BIGHORN Battle" and can see how the mistakes could be made before and after the battle. The day i was there was like stepping back into History and reliving the battle but of course there were no actual battles going on. Reading the books you don't get the size of the Battlefield. You don't really see the Indian camp until you are almost upon it and then it blows your mind the size of it.

I have always wondered if Custer had keep his command all together i know with the size of the Indians camped there were greater and the battle probably would have lasted alittle bit longer but the the Whole Command would have been wiped out. "Now this is my own thoughts but i personally hold Custer at fault for the lost of so many men for being just a great commander he made so many mistakes that lead up to his men being killed. 1. He never listen to his scouts when they reported the size of Indain camp 2. he never scouted the lay of the land so he would know what he should do. 3. He never kept his word to Reno or Benteen but went looking for glory for himself and doing so caused his death and those of his men. I am sorry that for what little bit of glory he found that it cost the lives of the men with him.

Posted by Robert D Cruit on September 22,2011 | 08:48 PM

Having been stationed at Fort Reilly Kansas, Custer's home is on the original parade ground. We used to tell the joke that while departing for his campaign with Crook..Custer turned in his saddle and reportedly said.."don't do anything until I get back". While there...I purchased "My life on the Plains" by LTC Custer, a fascinating account of his life on the frontier. Later I read "CRAZY HORSE & CUSTER", another good book on these two warriors. It wasn't until I was stationed in Oklahoma, that I ventured to Cheyenne to see the site of the Black Kettle Massacre that I could appreciate plains warfare. From everything I've read to include the Wet Point analysis..this article is pretty much right on the mark. It is important to understand that many plains Troopers were Irish and German immigrants whose motivation did not equal those of the natives they fought.
Custer points out the many discipline problems he had with his command. "MY LIFE ON THE PLAINS"

Posted by Gerald Chernicoff on June 29,2011 | 02:14 AM

Custer led many engagements against plains Indians and well understood that to attack the camp and block their escape as orders instructed he would have to divide his command, one group under Reno to cross the river and keep the Indians drawn to that attack as Custer with his command moved to encircle the camp and so prevent the Indians disbursing. But, there were simply too many Indians as Reno's attack collapsed and the terrain disfavoured more rapid movement by Custer. Instead, he got caught up in a topography veined with gullies which the Indians exploited, negating Custer's advantage of concentrated firepower.

He did not take the Gatling guns exactly because such lumbering guns would hinder progress of the cavalry. Fights against plains Indians - or survival and escape - were decided by speed and maneuver. Custer was no fool and surely no coward, but he was coming upon a superior number of hostiles highly strengthened by "summer roamers" and was obliged to make his own attack crossing terrain he hadn't had time to properly understand.

It is difficult to appreciate any of this - and refrain from looking to one viewpoint as "the truth" - without reading Centennial Campaign: The Sioux War of 1876 and the Custer battle in particular as analyzed by time-motion studies in Custer's Last Campaign: Mitch Boyer and the Little Bighorn Reconstructed, both by John S. Gray.

Posted by ScottLoar on June 27,2011 | 05:01 AM

In my opinion,on the available evidence,renos valley fight, and the custer fighting,were very similar in character. That is,initial stability,followed by a command break down, and then disintergration.Once the structure broke down on both fronts,it was a rout.Its fair to say,many wont like the sound of that,but as the relative of white man runs him said on one of the custer docos,{for some reason the white man does not want to believe the way it really was]. This is politically correct code for[It was a turkey shoot]. The only difference between renos and custers men,was renos command had a defendable position to run to,and custers men did not.Everybody wants to believe that custers men fought like demons,which is natural,but in this case,the laws of probability and reality need to come to the fore in my considered opinion.

Posted by david wicker on May 5,2011 | 07:54 AM

Suggestion: For insightful reading and understanding

The Journey of Crazy Horse: A Lakota History
Joseph Marshall III

The Day the World Ended at Little Big Horn: A Lakota History
Joseph Marshall III

Posted by CJ Ashley on March 24,2011 | 12:19 PM

Even today when I hear Garry Owen played it sends chills through my old body-Those who dont remember the past are condemmned to repeat it George Santanya.....

Posted by Thomas P Harry on January 28,2011 | 10:32 AM

how could custer ever have won?
crook had over twice as many men at the rosebud against roughly equal numbers,and just escaped with a draw. as for some of this nonsense about hundreds of indians being killed,its laughable crooks men fought for five or six hours,firing off 25000 rounds,and managedto kill about 40 indians.everybody accepts renos men stampeded out of the timber,but many will not accept custers men doing the same.
when the command was split,a g and m could just as easily have gone with custer.
its about time many historians looked at this battle from what probably happened,and not from the way they want to believe happened.more nonsense written on this battle than any other in history of armed conflict.

Posted by david wicker on January 5,2011 | 03:56 AM

Well written article. I fully intend to get the book. Custer's arrogance cost the lives of these troopers, set the heart of a nation and the face of the military on extermination of the Indians.

I have as have many other commenter’s, visit this battle site and in addition, the site of the running fight known as the Fetterman “massacre”. Only seeing the lay of the land, especially the deep coulles adequately informs how all his could happen.

Posted by Doug Johnson on December 28,2010 | 12:52 AM

Has no one heard of David Humphreys Miller's wonderful 1957 book, "Custer's Fall"?

Mr. Miller also used Native American accounts of the battle, but drew a dramatically different conclusion as to why Custer's men fell into dissaray almost before being fully engaged by the Sioux and Cheyenne.

Anyone truly interested in the battle would benefit from Mr. Miller's apparently unique reconstruction of that day's events.

Posted by Monte Montague on December 13,2010 | 09:43 PM

After visiting the battlefield, I discovered that you could not see the Native American's camps until you were almost on top of them (due to the lay of the land). The best article I ever read was the forensic investigation of the burned over battlefield, written in National Geographic, a few years ago. You must walk the site to even sense what was going on, as a flat map in a book provides no three-dimensional understanding.

Custer was a great leader of his men in the Civil War. He was not so as an Indian fighter (he and his men preferred to kill women and children in camps).

Gatling guns are useless, except in Hollywood movies. They are cumbersome to move, and do not work well against traditional Indian fighting styles.

The only battle Custer lost was at the Little Big Horn. Both Custer and Crazy Horse led their men from the front of the battle, and not from the far rear. This demonstrates rare courage.

Posted by Gerald Miller on November 24,2010 | 01:40 AM

What about Gen. James Sanks Brisbin who offered Custer the use of his men's Gatling Guns. Custer, in typical arrogance,refused the offer.

Posted by Lyn Dunham on November 23,2010 | 04:29 PM

If Custer had stayed off of Indian land this would have never happened.

Posted by ray wofford on November 18,2010 | 12:07 AM

What of Benteen?

Posted by Jack Walsh on November 17,2010 | 10:09 PM

A hard charge had always worked before. This time there were just to many. I've read that Indians were instinct shooters, which works well at close range. At any kind of longer range you miss a lot. In battle almost everyone misses. West Point cadets are still taken to the battle site . They find themselves shocked when, using what Custer knew, they do the same thing. Indian repeating rifles were so few they portably had no impact outside the movies.

Posted by D BROWN on November 17,2010 | 03:21 AM

One of the best books I have read on the Indian viewpoint of the affair is: A Warrior Who Fought Custer by Wooden Leg.

It has been about thirty years since I read the hardcover.

Posted by clifford cuellar on November 14,2010 | 03:54 AM

I'm reminded of a large antique Anheuser-Busch-sponsored, diorama-like, painting depicting the valiant and noble Custer atop his trusty white steed adorned in his buckskin fringed coat with dismounted soldiers all around whilst a sea of menacing Indians (not a name they use to describe themselves) swarms around him. Such a grand and utter falsehood portrayed on canvas to sell beer to the ignorant mass of misled arrogant European conquerors back East!

Posted by Zane Evans on November 10,2010 | 05:17 PM

I found it odd that there is no mention of Sitting Bull in this article. I realize that the book is focused on Crazy Horse but one would expect the role of Sitting Bull in the battle would be at least noted.

Posted by Larry Mugler on November 8,2010 | 12:05 PM

Another interesting note is the story I've heard from the idigenous Lakota themselves. I was told that the word "sioux" wasn't even from their language. The men from the calvary would ask their Crow scouts "who ARE these people in the Black Hills??" and the Crow scouts snickered and simply replied (because they were at war with the Lakota amongst others) "they are 'Sioux'..." which translates in Crow as 'snake in the grass'...

Posted by Craig on November 7,2010 | 02:28 PM

This is merely an excerpt, condensed somewhat for the magazine. I am reading Mr. Powers' book now, and it is both finely detailed and thrilling. Highly recommended, by myself AND Larry McMurtry, who calls it "one of the finest books yet written about the American West." I figured Mr. McMurtry should know - and I figured right.

Posted by Alex on November 7,2010 | 12:56 PM

In the mid-50s I lived in San Antonio where a newspaper reporter realized that it was fewer than 80 years earlier that the battle occured and perhaps there were some still alive who were there. He found an American Indian who stated that at the last moment, Custer shot imself in the head. Thomas Power's article notes that Custer died of a bullet in the head, and some further research can verify my recollection of reading it in the paper and add to the story.

Posted by George K on November 5,2010 | 02:44 PM

We visited the Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument this Summer, 2010. We did the auto tour which helps join the pieces together. I was born on an anniversary of the battle and into a family with Cherokee ancestors, so I have been interested in the story since childhood. This was my first time at the Monument. The main "aha" was the re-interpretations based on the use of forensic archaeology. On that information, the oral histories look generally accurate. In short, the "Last Stand" and "Massacre" legends fit a dictionary definition: "An unverified story handed down from earlier times, especially one popularly believed to be historical."

The National Park Service's shifting interpretation should remind us that while "victors write history", sometimes it takes awhile for their message to be heard.

Posted by Lee Seaton on November 5,2010 | 02:27 PM

My parents loved to travel to the West from Texas and when I was about 8 years old they took me to the Custer Battlefield. I can never forget how a wave of feelings splashed over me as I stood there frozen to the ground and felt that I had been there before. The wind, the ground, the sky and the smell were so familiar, as if I had been there yesterday. At that age I had no idea of past live experience and certainly had little real knowledge of the battle and the area around it. But I knew I had lived in this place before and perhaps died there. In the military or a Native human being? I did not know which, only that something seemed to take over my spirit and tell me things I could not know. I have returned many times in my life and still get this feeling, stronger at some times but always there. I simply can't explain this but I will have my ashes scattered on this sacred ground when I pass from this existence. Perhaps the Great Spirit will smile upon me and welcome me back with open arms.

Posted by David Mead on November 4,2010 | 02:50 PM

The shooting of women and children outside the camps before the battle even began makes Custer's "mission" clear.

Posted by Cleve Gray on November 4,2010 | 12:08 PM

I have discovered a most unusual stone in the Black Hills of Wyoming, which historically have been the sacred hunting grounds for Native Americans since at least 7000 b.c. As the discovery was midway between the Paha Sapa and the Battle of the Greasy Grass, I believe I have a supposition theory of what it may actually be, although I am curious to learn what others may think also... http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z122/s34w0lf3/image04.jpg

Posted by Craig on November 2,2010 | 04:36 PM

For another viewpoint story read Flashman and the Redskins

Posted by Speedicut on October 30,2010 | 12:53 PM

It is interesting to note that the exhibit in the museum located near Custer Hill states that the US Calvary didn't have enough funds to afford shells for target practice and thus these US soldiers "couldn't hit the broadside of a barn".

Posted by Ed Rice on October 29,2010 | 04:57 PM

This is a rehash of work already done in Lakota Noon by Greg Michno who has aptly covered the Indian accounts. There is nothing really new and the author only has a superficial knowledge of the battle at best. Some timed rides and field research will poke many holes in his writing here. There are some glaring errors as well as Indian accounts and maps that have been omitted (or the author was unaware of them). John Stands in Timber is a good example and one of the most important Indian contributors. Custer never went to Weir Point and the Indians movement's noted in Michael Donahue' book "Drawing Battle Lines" are overlooked and not used. Kill Eagle is another important Indian map and account.

This claims to be an Indian perspective but he needs to look at Rich Fox's book as well. He was the first to do this and put it with the archeology. The author has ignored the entire Company C fight on Finkle/Finley Ridge and has not pieced this together very well.

I hope his book is more original that this article. There are others more deserving of Smithsonian space.

Posted by michael Donahue on October 28,2010 | 05:21 PM

Excellent article from Indians' viewpoint. Visited the battlefield years ago and stood there silently, looking out over that empty scene, but for grave markers and the memorial stone, and thought, "What a helluva place to die."

Posted by Keith Simons on October 26,2010 | 01:53 PM

I'm pleased to see the Smithsonian Magazine feature this topic, and look forward to reading the actual book. I would like to comment, however, that this is by no means the first publication to foreground Indian accounts of the battle. Interest in the Indian side of the story began as soon as the dust settled, and newspaper correspondents began trying to track down and interview Indian battle veterans immediately. Historians and anthropologists soon followed, and many of them recorded important Native accounts. The first major book on this topic appeared in the 1930s. In the past several decades these narratives as well as pictographic drawings created by several Indian battle veterans have provided the source materials for several books that chronicle Indian accounts of the battle. Gregory Michno's 1997 LAKOTA NOON:THE INDIAN NARRATIVE OF CUSTER"S DEFEAT provides a close chronological recap of the battle based on Native sources, and Richard Hardorff has published separate volumes devoted to Lakota and Cheyenne accounts. In short, there is a voluminous literature on the Custer fight from every conceivable angle, this one included.

Posted by Castle McLaughlin on October 25,2010 | 04:24 PM

A very insightful and interesting article, for too long we have alwways heard or hear the white man's version of events. But this exerpt gives us the indians view and being the victor, it is quite unbias. More than often the victor writes the history, but in this case the victor's voice was silenced, it is nice to see this wrong being righted.

Posted by Jeff Mouland on October 24,2010 | 02:34 PM

My hat is off to Mr. Thomas Powers on his article on "How the Little Bighorn Battle was Won." I have read numerous books on the subject much to my confusion of the sequential events and locations. The illustration on the chronology of the battle with times established by soldiers testimony (in the Smithsonian magazine) cleared up in my mind once and for all this historic event. The correct whys and responsibilities of this event will always and forever be only in the minds of the participants at the time.

This illustration should be in all textbooks! Thanks

Posted by Robert E. Bose on October 24,2010 | 01:36 PM

In 1935, David Humphreys Miller began a 22 year interview process of native survivors of the Battle of the Little Bighorn. His findings are recorded in Custer's Fall: The Native American Side of the Story. He deserves much of the credit for the solid evidence we have available today. In the 1970's I was in the museum in Cody, Wyoming and saw a gruesome reminder of the battle: a trigger finger necklace given to a white female teacher at around 1900, as a gift from one of her students. I have no idea if it is still in display, but will never forget how real that made the battle for me. It still haunts me to this day and Mr. Powers' rendition brings it clearly to mind again. As painful as it is, we need to hear these stories. Those who do not learn from our history are doomed to repeat it.

Posted by Christine Wilson on October 24,2010 | 12:47 PM

Eight pages of great detail on the battle, and not one word on the repeating rifles the Indians had, where they had gotten them, and the effect of the difference in firepower vs. the soldiers' single-shot carbines?

Not one word?

Posted by doug on October 23,2010 | 06:22 PM

Comment: “How Little Bighorn Was Won”

This well-written account from the Native American perspective focuses on the fight on the Custer battlefield known as “Custer’s Last Stand.”

Apparently based exclusively on Indian testimony, its depiction of a compact fast-moving battle along “backbone ridge” differs from scholarship that assumes a northward movement beyond “Last Stand Hill” by Companies E and F (the Left Wing) of Custer’s command. This research is based on Native American accounts and oral history as well as archeological evidence. A “re-ride” by one historian has established that there would have been sufficient time for such a movement and a return to the battlefield to witness the final action in the Keogh/Calhoun sector.

Also debatable is the author’s conclusion that “Custer and his men got no closer” to the Little Bighorn River than “several hundred yards back up” Medicine Tail Coulee at which point “Custer acted on the defensive.” For example, interviews of Indian participants by researcher Walter M. Camp confirm that at least part of the command reached the river bank, engaged in limited fighting but did not cross the Little Bighorn. If one accepts the premise of the subsequent northward movement to capture non-combatants and/or to block the escape of the Indian encampment, the command remained on the offense until the warrior assault in the Keogh/Calhoun sector. Archeological as well as historical evidence does support the statement that the troops made “an orderly, concerted defense” on Calhoun Hill.

Further comment on the merits of this article is difficult in the absence of knowing the author’s sources, which are not cited.

C. Lee Noyes, Editor
CBHMA Battlefield Dispatch

www.custerbattlefield.org

Posted by C. Lee Noyes on October 23,2010 | 10:55 AM

My point of view is that Custer was killed trying to ford the Little Big Horn River. This is the main reason the troops did not cross or enter the camp. Knowing what the Indian's would do to his body, his relatives carried him back during there retreat.

Posted by Edward Hruslinski on October 22,2010 | 08:27 PM

The more I read about the battle of the Little Big Horn, the more fascinated I become! This month's (Nov) is no exception. I know there are many that subscribe to Custer's vanity, stupidy or a number of other reasons. I've never thought that the answer, but this article made me wonder- could it be that Custer & his men weren't even out there looking for a fight, could it have been that they were on another mission or missions? That's more than likely not a new thought, just new to me.

Posted by Mary Lou Stewart on October 22,2010 | 03:23 PM

When I received my current issue of SM I was hoping to learn something about the Battle of Little Big Horn, but I was so confused about where to start so started with the two page diagram of the battle site and then tried to correlate the text with that but soon gave up in frustration. Perhaps a subsequent effort at further publication, if possible, might be worth while by another author. I assume the battle was more complicated than I first thought and maybe I should go to the book, but the article did not inspire me to want to read more by the author. My apologies for any offense. rc

Posted by ray cush on October 21,2010 | 10:11 PM



Advertisement


Smithsonian Journeys

Battle of Little Bighorn
Retrace the pivitol battles of the Great Sioux War and Custer's chilling defeat at Last Stand Hill

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  1. For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of WWII
  2. Seven Famous People Who Missed the Titanic
  3. Top Ten Demonstrations of Love
  4. Bodybuilders Through the Ages
  5. A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials
  6. Tattoos
  7. The Battle Over Richard III’s Bones…And His Reputation
  8. Harry Truman’s Adorable Love “List” to His Wife, Bess
  9. Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
  10. The Unsuccessful Plot to Kill Abraham Lincoln
  1. For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of WWII
  2. A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials
  3. Uncovering Secrets of the Sphinx
  1. Tattoos
  2. Roberto Clemente: The King of Béisbol
  3. New Light on Stonehenge
  4. For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of WWII
  5. The Surprisingly Colorful Spaces Where the World’s Biggest Decisions Get Made (PHOTOS)
  6. Harry Truman’s Adorable Love “List” to His Wife, Bess

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement

Follow Us

Smithsonian Magazine
@SmithsonianMag
Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

In The Magazine

February 2013

  • The First Americans
  • See for Yourself
  • The Dragon King
  • America’s Dinosaur Playground
  • Darwin In The House

View Table of Contents »






First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store

Framed Lincoln Tribute

This Framed Lincoln Tribute includes his photograph, an excerpt from his Gettysburg Address, two Lincoln postage stamps and four Lincoln pennies... $40



View full archiveRecent Issues


  • Feb 2013


  • Jan 2013


  • Dec 2012

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution