How the Battle of Little Bighorn Was Won
Accounts of the 1876 battle have focused on Custer's ill-fated cavalry. But a new book offers a take from the Indian's point of view
- By Thomas Powers
- Photographs by Aaron Huey
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2010, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 8)
As Indians arrived they got off their horses, sought cover and began to converge on the soldiers. Taking advantage of brush and every little swale or rise in the ground to hide, the Indians made their way uphill “on hands and knees,” said Red Feather. From one moment to the next, the Indians popped up to shoot before dropping back down again. No man on either side could show himself without drawing fire. In battle the Indians often wore their feathers down flat to help in concealment. The soldiers appear to have taken off their hats for the same reason; a number of Indians noted hatless soldiers, some dead and some still fighting.
From their position on Calhoun Hill the soldiers were making an orderly, concerted defense. When some Indians approached, a detachment of soldiers rose up and charged downhill on foot, driving the Indians back to the lower end of Calhoun Ridge. Now the soldiers established a regulation skirmish line, each man about five yards from the next, kneeling in order to take “deliberate aim,” according to Yellow Nose, a Cheyenne warrior. Some Indians noted a second skirmish line as well, stretching perhaps 100 yards away along the backbone toward Custer Hill. It was in the fighting around Calhoun Hill, many Indians reported later, that the Indians suffered the most fatalities—11 in all.
But almost as soon as the skirmish line was thrown out from Calhoun Hill, some Indians pressed in again, snaking up to shooting distance of the men on Calhoun Ridge; others made their way around to the eastern slope of the hill, where they opened a heavy, deadly fire on soldiers holding the horses. Without horses, Custer’s troops could neither charge nor flee. Loss of the horses also meant loss of the saddlebags with the reserve ammunition, about 50 rounds per man. “As soon as the soldiers on foot had marched over the ridge,” the Yanktonais Daniel White Thunder later told a white missionary, he and the Indians with him “stampeded the horses...by waving their blankets and making a terrible noise.”
“We killed all the men who were holding the horses,” Gall said. When a horse holder was shot, the frightened horses would lunge about. “They tried to hold on to their horses,” said Crow King, “but as we pressed closer, they let go their horses.” Many charged down the hill toward the river, adding to the confusion of battle. Some of the Indians quit fighting to chase them.
The fighting was intense, bloody, at times hand to hand. Men died by knife and club as well as by gunfire. The Cheyenne Brave Bear saw an officer riding a sorrel horse shoot two Indians with his revolver before he was killed himself. Brave Bear managed to seize the horse. At almost the same moment, Yellow Nose wrenched a cavalry guidon from a soldier who had been using it as a weapon. Eagle Elk, in the thick of the fighting at Calhoun Hill, saw many men killed or horribly wounded; an Indian was “shot through the jaw and was all bloody.”
Calhoun Hill was swarming with men, Indian and white. “At this place the soldiers stood in line and made a very good fight,” said Red Hawk. But the soldiers were completely exposed. Many of the men in the skirmish line died where they knelt; when their line collapsed back up the hill, the entire position was rapidly lost. It was at this moment that the Indians won the battle.
In the minutes before, the soldiers had held a single, roughly continuous line along the half-mile backbone from Calhoun Hill to Custer Hill. Men had been killed and wounded, but the force had remained largely intact. The Indians heavily outnumbered the whites, but nothing like a rout had begun. What changed everything, according to the Indians, was a sudden and unexpected charge up over the backbone by a large force of Indians on horseback. The central and controlling part Crazy Horse played in this assault was witnessed and later reported by many of his friends and relatives, including He Dog, Red Feather and Flying Hawk.
Recall that as Reno’s men were retreating across the river and up the bluffs on the far side, Crazy Horse had headed back toward the center of camp. He had time to reach the mouth of Muskrat Creek and Medicine Tail Coulee by 4:15, just as the small detachment of soldiers observed by Gall had turned back from the river toward higher ground. Flying Hawk said he had followed Crazy Horse down the river past the center of camp. “We came to a ravine,” Flying Hawk later recalled, “then we followed up the gulch to a place in the rear of the soldiers that were making the stand on the hill.” From his half-protected vantage at the head of the ravine, Flying Hawk said, Crazy Horse “shot them as fast as he could load his gun.”
This was one style of Sioux fighting. Another was the brave run. Typically the change from one to the other was preceded by no long discussion; a warrior simply perceived that the moment was right. He might shout: “I am going!” Or he might yell “Hokahey!” or give the war trill or clench an eagle bone whistle between his teeth and blow the piercing scree sound. Red Feather said Crazy Horse’s moment came when the two sides were keeping low and popping up to shoot at each other—a standoff moment.
“There was a great deal of noise and confusion,” said Waterman, an Arapaho warrior. “The air was heavy with powder smoke, and the Indians were all yelling.” Out of this chaos, said Red Feather, Crazy Horse “came up on horseback” blowing his eagle bone whistle and riding between the length of the two lines of fighters. “Crazy Horse...was the bravest man I ever saw,” said Waterman. “He rode closest to the soldiers, yelling to his warriors. All the soldiers were shooting at him but he was never hit.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (50)
+ View All Comments
Custer and the Army was ordered by President Grant and his administration to force the Indians back to the reservation Generals Terry,Crook were in charge of the expedition.Custer"s plan was to capture the non combatants avoiding a big battle but faith intervened.
Posted by Emil on February 4,2013 | 02:02 PM
Was helpfull for my college report on the Battle of Little Bighorn.
Posted by Kristin Kuettel ( Q tell) on January 8,2013 | 01:02 PM
so who got to keep the land?
Posted by abnerd on December 5,2012 | 02:55 PM
I love the history! I went to many of your museums, Smithsonian and I love them. This article about Custer is awesome!
Posted by Bob Anderson on November 13,2012 | 05:12 PM
It was more likely counted on above Custer commanding gen. Terri that Custer didn't accept those extra troops or Buffalo soldiers to use as troops to wrecklessly sacrifice on that field of battle for their own good, Finally if those dam Indians ancestors had stayed in touch with their Asiatic roots then I believe the total war methods would have had the Indians lure Custer entire command into that valley and decimated them, also taking prisoners for leverage in wining the peace in the plains Indian wars with American history being totally different in European really paying a heavier price in dominanting the American continent.
Posted by darryl singleton on September 5,2012 | 09:14 PM
it sounds like war isnt fun no matter where it is
Posted by mike kinsella on August 6,2012 | 09:11 AM
Amazing history in a native American (Indian) view. Custer should have kept his promise to Stone Forehead. The Indians were merely trying to preserve their way of life and their land. Great history!
Posted by Ronnie Land on July 7,2012 | 01:00 PM
Better armed, Better numbers, meets arrogance and lack of forethought. Custer died because he was supposed to. His men died because they had the misfortune of being with a man who had consistently lost more men in the civil war than any other. Recklessness and medicine that was working took care of the rest. All that could have possibly gone differently, is that the whole of the outfit, Reno and Benteen's men could have easily shared the fate of Custer had they pushed it.
Posted by Jbeau edwards on June 26,2012 | 08:58 PM
My grandmother (100 years old) said that her grandfather was an indian guide for Custer. She says he told her that several of the indian guides left before the attack, saying that they were guides not soldiers.
Posted by Wonderdog on June 25,2012 | 05:05 PM
Very insightful article and commentary. I am a relatively new student of this subject. I've read a great deal on this & related subjects in the past few years. Two simple thoughts. All factors considered, this was a recipe for disaster. Textbook. Further, I simply don't find Reno's account credible. Given the scenario, when does a man abandon being a soldier and simply attempt survival?
Posted by Bart Beaudin on January 24,2012 | 02:14 AM
Previously, General Custer's reckless and audacious charges won him the day but, as with any game of chance, you don`t always win. He gambled and it was his moment to lose. He misjudged things at the Little Bighorn and it's as simple as that. In some people`s eyes he was the invincible hero. In their minds, the blame for his defeat must be shifted to other individuals or equipment that apparently failed or wasn`t there. They blame General Crook, Maj. Reno, Capt. Benteen, the Springfield carbines, the lack of sabers, the lack of Gatling guns, that Brisbin`s troops weren`t along, the fact that the Indians had Henry repeating rifles and whatever else they can think of. The bottom line is that Custer commanded the regiment and that it was his, and his decision alone to attack. Therefore the 7th Cavalry debacle was his responsibility. As such are the fortunes of war. On the other hand, the Indian combatants responded courageously and with alacrity to the attack on their village and they repulsed the invaders. The battle proceeded as it should have given the circumstances.
Posted by M. Provenzano on December 28,2011 | 09:58 AM
If at the very least,that overated buffoon crook had kept the pressure on the hostiles,after the rosebud,which was only about 40 miles from littlebighorn,and a week before the custer debacle,the massacre would never have happened. While custer and his men are being slaughtered,good old crook is back at goose creek[an apt place for george], hunting and fishing.Remember,this fool commanded 1300 men, double custers numbers,and simply withdrew from the campaign on the back of casualties,according to him of, ten killed and twentyone wounded,out of 1300 and made no effort to tell anyone.Now there is the sort of man you want to go to war with.If there is a more compelling reason for custers defeat,i would love to hear it.
regards to all david.
Posted by david wicker on December 7,2011 | 06:43 AM
I have been interested in the Battle of the Little Bighorn have read many books. All the books so far have been written by the white population. Can anyone tell me where i can find any books that are written by the Native American? I would very much like to get the views from the other side of the battle. Thank You very much for seeing this type of information is readily at the despositalbe to any one that might like reading this kind of history.
I, too have been at the Site of the "LITTLE BIGHORN Battle" and can see how the mistakes could be made before and after the battle. The day i was there was like stepping back into History and reliving the battle but of course there were no actual battles going on. Reading the books you don't get the size of the Battlefield. You don't really see the Indian camp until you are almost upon it and then it blows your mind the size of it.
I have always wondered if Custer had keep his command all together i know with the size of the Indians camped there were greater and the battle probably would have lasted alittle bit longer but the the Whole Command would have been wiped out. "Now this is my own thoughts but i personally hold Custer at fault for the lost of so many men for being just a great commander he made so many mistakes that lead up to his men being killed. 1. He never listen to his scouts when they reported the size of Indain camp 2. he never scouted the lay of the land so he would know what he should do. 3. He never kept his word to Reno or Benteen but went looking for glory for himself and doing so caused his death and those of his men. I am sorry that for what little bit of glory he found that it cost the lives of the men with him.
Posted by Robert D Cruit on September 22,2011 | 08:48 PM
Having been stationed at Fort Reilly Kansas, Custer's home is on the original parade ground. We used to tell the joke that while departing for his campaign with Crook..Custer turned in his saddle and reportedly said.."don't do anything until I get back". While there...I purchased "My life on the Plains" by LTC Custer, a fascinating account of his life on the frontier. Later I read "CRAZY HORSE & CUSTER", another good book on these two warriors. It wasn't until I was stationed in Oklahoma, that I ventured to Cheyenne to see the site of the Black Kettle Massacre that I could appreciate plains warfare. From everything I've read to include the Wet Point analysis..this article is pretty much right on the mark. It is important to understand that many plains Troopers were Irish and German immigrants whose motivation did not equal those of the natives they fought.
Custer points out the many discipline problems he had with his command. "MY LIFE ON THE PLAINS"
Posted by Gerald Chernicoff on June 29,2011 | 02:14 AM
+ View All Comments