How the Battle of Little Bighorn Was Won
Accounts of the 1876 battle have focused on Custer's ill-fated cavalry. But a new book offers a take from the Indian's point of view
- By Thomas Powers
- Photographs by Aaron Huey
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2010, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 8)
Others, including Iron Hawk and Feather Earring, confirmed that Custer and his men got no closer to the river than that—several hundred yards back up the coulee. Most of the soldiers were still farther back up the hill. Some soldiers fired into the Indian camp, which was almost deserted. The few Indians at Minneconjou Ford fired back.
The earlier pattern repeated itself. Little stood in the soldiers’ way at first, but within moments more Indians began to arrive, and they kept coming—some crossing the river, others riding up from the south on the east side of the river. By the time 15 or 20 Indians had gathered near the ford, the soldiers had hesitated, then begun to ride up out of Medicine Tail Coulee, heading toward high ground, where they were joined by the rest of Custer’s command.
The battle known as the Custer Fight began when the small, leading detachment of soldiers approaching the river retreated toward higher ground at about 4:15. This was the last move the soldiers would take freely; from this moment on everything they did was in response to an Indian attack growing rapidly in intensity.
As described by Indian participants, the fighting followed the contour of the ground, and its pace was determined by the time it took for Indians to gather in force and the comparatively few minutes it took for each successive group of soldiers to be killed or driven back. The path of the battle follows a sweeping arc up out of Medicine Tail Coulee across another swale into a depression known as Deep Coulee, which in turn opens up and out into a rising slope cresting at Calhoun Ridge, rising to Calhoun Hill, and then proceeds, still rising, past a depression in the ground identified as the Keogh site to a second elevation known as Custer Hill. The high ground from Calhoun Hill to Custer Hill was what men on the plains called “a backbone.” From the point where the soldiers recoiled away from the river to the lower end of Calhoun Ridge is about three-quarters of a mile—a hard, 20-minute uphill slog for a man on foot. Shave Elk, an Oglala in Crazy Horse’s band, who ran the distance after his horse was shot at the outset of the fight, remembered “how tired he became before he got up there.” From the bottom of Calhoun Ridge to Calhoun Hill is another uphill climb of about a quarter-mile.
But it would be a mistake to assume that all of Custer’s command—210 men—advanced in line from one point to another, down one coulee, up the other coulee and so on. Only a small detachment had approached the river. By the time this group rejoined the rest, the soldiers occupied a line from Calhoun Hill along the backbone to Custer Hill, a distance of a little over half a mile.
The uphill route from Medicine Tail Coulee over to Deep Coulee and up the ridge toward Custer Hill would have been about a mile and a half or a little more. Red Horse would later say that Custer’s troops “made five different stands.” In each case, combat began and ended in about ten minutes. Think of it as a running fight, as the survivors of each separate clash made their way along the backbone toward Custer at the end; in effect the command collapsed back in on itself. As described by the Indians, this phase of the battle began with the scattering of shots near Minneconjou Ford, unfolding then in brief, devastating clashes at Calhoun Ridge, Calhoun Hill and the Keogh site, climaxing in the killing of Custer and his entourage on Custer Hill and ending with the pursuit and killing of about 30 soldiers who raced on foot from Custer Hill toward the river down a deep ravine.
Back at Reno Hill, just over four miles to the south, the soldiers preparing their defenses heard three episodes of heavy firing—one at 4:25 in the afternoon, about ten minutes after Custer’s soldiers turned back from their approach to Minneconjou Ford; a second about 30 minutes later; and a final burst about 15 minutes after that, dying off before 5:15. Distances were great, but the air was still, and the .45/55 caliber round of the cavalry carbine made a thunderous boom.
At 5:25 some of Reno’s officers, who had ridden out with their men toward the shooting, glimpsed from Weir Point a distant hillside swarming with mounted Indians who seemed to be shooting at things on the ground. These Indians were not fighting; more likely they were finishing off the wounded, or just following the Indian custom of putting an extra bullet or arrow into an enemy’s body in a gesture of triumph. Once the fighting began it never died away, the last scattering shots continuing until night fell.
The officers at Weir Point also saw a general movement of Indians—more Indians than any of them had ever encountered before—heading their way. Soon the forward elements of Reno’s command were exchanging fire with them, and the soldiers quickly returned to Reno Hill.
As Custer’s soldiers made their way from the river toward higher ground, the country on three sides was rapidly filling with Indians, in effect pushing as well as following the soldiers uphill. “We chased the soldiers up a long, gradual slope or hill in a direction away from the river and over the ridge where the battle began in good earnest,” said Shave Elk. By the time the soldiers made a stand on “the ridge”—evidently the backbone connecting Calhoun and Custer hills—the Indians had begun to fill the coulees to the south and east. “The officers tried their utmost to keep the soldiers together at this point,” said Red Hawk, “but the horses were unmanageable; they would rear up and fall backward with their riders; some would get away.” Crow King said, “When they saw that they were surrounded they dismounted.” This was cavalry tactics by the book. There was no other way to make a stand or maintain a stout defense. A brief period followed of deliberate fighting on foot.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (50)
+ View All Comments
Custer and the Army was ordered by President Grant and his administration to force the Indians back to the reservation Generals Terry,Crook were in charge of the expedition.Custer"s plan was to capture the non combatants avoiding a big battle but faith intervened.
Posted by Emil on February 4,2013 | 02:02 PM
Was helpfull for my college report on the Battle of Little Bighorn.
Posted by Kristin Kuettel ( Q tell) on January 8,2013 | 01:02 PM
so who got to keep the land?
Posted by abnerd on December 5,2012 | 02:55 PM
I love the history! I went to many of your museums, Smithsonian and I love them. This article about Custer is awesome!
Posted by Bob Anderson on November 13,2012 | 05:12 PM
It was more likely counted on above Custer commanding gen. Terri that Custer didn't accept those extra troops or Buffalo soldiers to use as troops to wrecklessly sacrifice on that field of battle for their own good, Finally if those dam Indians ancestors had stayed in touch with their Asiatic roots then I believe the total war methods would have had the Indians lure Custer entire command into that valley and decimated them, also taking prisoners for leverage in wining the peace in the plains Indian wars with American history being totally different in European really paying a heavier price in dominanting the American continent.
Posted by darryl singleton on September 5,2012 | 09:14 PM
it sounds like war isnt fun no matter where it is
Posted by mike kinsella on August 6,2012 | 09:11 AM
Amazing history in a native American (Indian) view. Custer should have kept his promise to Stone Forehead. The Indians were merely trying to preserve their way of life and their land. Great history!
Posted by Ronnie Land on July 7,2012 | 01:00 PM
Better armed, Better numbers, meets arrogance and lack of forethought. Custer died because he was supposed to. His men died because they had the misfortune of being with a man who had consistently lost more men in the civil war than any other. Recklessness and medicine that was working took care of the rest. All that could have possibly gone differently, is that the whole of the outfit, Reno and Benteen's men could have easily shared the fate of Custer had they pushed it.
Posted by Jbeau edwards on June 26,2012 | 08:58 PM
My grandmother (100 years old) said that her grandfather was an indian guide for Custer. She says he told her that several of the indian guides left before the attack, saying that they were guides not soldiers.
Posted by Wonderdog on June 25,2012 | 05:05 PM
Very insightful article and commentary. I am a relatively new student of this subject. I've read a great deal on this & related subjects in the past few years. Two simple thoughts. All factors considered, this was a recipe for disaster. Textbook. Further, I simply don't find Reno's account credible. Given the scenario, when does a man abandon being a soldier and simply attempt survival?
Posted by Bart Beaudin on January 24,2012 | 02:14 AM
Previously, General Custer's reckless and audacious charges won him the day but, as with any game of chance, you don`t always win. He gambled and it was his moment to lose. He misjudged things at the Little Bighorn and it's as simple as that. In some people`s eyes he was the invincible hero. In their minds, the blame for his defeat must be shifted to other individuals or equipment that apparently failed or wasn`t there. They blame General Crook, Maj. Reno, Capt. Benteen, the Springfield carbines, the lack of sabers, the lack of Gatling guns, that Brisbin`s troops weren`t along, the fact that the Indians had Henry repeating rifles and whatever else they can think of. The bottom line is that Custer commanded the regiment and that it was his, and his decision alone to attack. Therefore the 7th Cavalry debacle was his responsibility. As such are the fortunes of war. On the other hand, the Indian combatants responded courageously and with alacrity to the attack on their village and they repulsed the invaders. The battle proceeded as it should have given the circumstances.
Posted by M. Provenzano on December 28,2011 | 09:58 AM
If at the very least,that overated buffoon crook had kept the pressure on the hostiles,after the rosebud,which was only about 40 miles from littlebighorn,and a week before the custer debacle,the massacre would never have happened. While custer and his men are being slaughtered,good old crook is back at goose creek[an apt place for george], hunting and fishing.Remember,this fool commanded 1300 men, double custers numbers,and simply withdrew from the campaign on the back of casualties,according to him of, ten killed and twentyone wounded,out of 1300 and made no effort to tell anyone.Now there is the sort of man you want to go to war with.If there is a more compelling reason for custers defeat,i would love to hear it.
regards to all david.
Posted by david wicker on December 7,2011 | 06:43 AM
I have been interested in the Battle of the Little Bighorn have read many books. All the books so far have been written by the white population. Can anyone tell me where i can find any books that are written by the Native American? I would very much like to get the views from the other side of the battle. Thank You very much for seeing this type of information is readily at the despositalbe to any one that might like reading this kind of history.
I, too have been at the Site of the "LITTLE BIGHORN Battle" and can see how the mistakes could be made before and after the battle. The day i was there was like stepping back into History and reliving the battle but of course there were no actual battles going on. Reading the books you don't get the size of the Battlefield. You don't really see the Indian camp until you are almost upon it and then it blows your mind the size of it.
I have always wondered if Custer had keep his command all together i know with the size of the Indians camped there were greater and the battle probably would have lasted alittle bit longer but the the Whole Command would have been wiped out. "Now this is my own thoughts but i personally hold Custer at fault for the lost of so many men for being just a great commander he made so many mistakes that lead up to his men being killed. 1. He never listen to his scouts when they reported the size of Indain camp 2. he never scouted the lay of the land so he would know what he should do. 3. He never kept his word to Reno or Benteen but went looking for glory for himself and doing so caused his death and those of his men. I am sorry that for what little bit of glory he found that it cost the lives of the men with him.
Posted by Robert D Cruit on September 22,2011 | 08:48 PM
Having been stationed at Fort Reilly Kansas, Custer's home is on the original parade ground. We used to tell the joke that while departing for his campaign with Crook..Custer turned in his saddle and reportedly said.."don't do anything until I get back". While there...I purchased "My life on the Plains" by LTC Custer, a fascinating account of his life on the frontier. Later I read "CRAZY HORSE & CUSTER", another good book on these two warriors. It wasn't until I was stationed in Oklahoma, that I ventured to Cheyenne to see the site of the Black Kettle Massacre that I could appreciate plains warfare. From everything I've read to include the Wet Point analysis..this article is pretty much right on the mark. It is important to understand that many plains Troopers were Irish and German immigrants whose motivation did not equal those of the natives they fought.
Custer points out the many discipline problems he had with his command. "MY LIFE ON THE PLAINS"
Posted by Gerald Chernicoff on June 29,2011 | 02:14 AM
+ View All Comments