How the Battle of Little Bighorn Was Won
Accounts of the 1876 battle have focused on Custer's ill-fated cavalry. But a new book offers a take from the Indian's point of view
- By Thomas Powers
- Photographs by Aaron Huey
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2010, Subscribe
Editor’s note: In 1874, an Army expedition led by Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer found gold in the Black Hills, in present-day South Dakota. At the time, the United States recognized the hills as property of the Sioux Nation, under a treaty the two parties had signed six years before. The Grant administration tried to buy the hills, but the Sioux, considering them sacred ground, refused to sell; in 1876, federal troops were dispatched to force the Sioux onto reservations and pacify the Great Plains. That June, Custer attacked an encampment of Sioux, Cheyenne and Arapaho on the Little Bighorn River, in what is now Montana.
The Battle of the Little Bighorn is one of the most studied actions in U.S. military history, and the immense literature on the subject is devoted primarily to answering questions about Custer’s generalship during the fighting. But neither he nor the 209 men in his immediate command survived the day, and an Indian counterattack would pin down seven companies of their fellow 7th Cavalrymen on a hilltop over four miles away. (Of about 400 soldiers on the hilltop, 53 were killed and 60 were wounded before the Indians ended their siege the next day.) The experience of Custer and his men can be reconstructed only by inference.
This is not true of the Indian version of the battle. Long-neglected accounts given by more than 50 Indian participants or witnesses provide a means of tracking the fight from the first warning to the killing of the last of Custer’s troopers—a period of about two hours and 15 minutes. In his new book, The Killing of Crazy Horse, veteran reporter Thomas Powers draws on these accounts to present a comprehensive narrative account of the battle as the Indians experienced it. Crazy Horse’s stunning victory over Custer, which both angered and frightened the Army, led to the killing of the chief a year later. “My purpose in telling the story as I did,” Powers says, “was to let the Indians describe what happened, and to identify the moment when Custer’s men disintegrated as a fighting unit and their defeat became inevitable.”
The sun was just cracking over the horizon that Sunday, June 25, 1876, as men and boys began taking the horses out to graze. First light was also the time for the women to poke up last night’s cooking fire. The Hunkpapa woman known as Good White Buffalo Woman said later she had often been in camps when war was in the air, but this day was not like that. “The Sioux that morning had no thought of fighting,” she said. “We expected no attack.”
Those who saw the assembled encampment said they had never seen one larger. It had come together in March or April, even before the plains started to green up, according to the Oglala warrior He Dog. Indians arriving from distant reservations on the Missouri River had reported that soldiers were coming out to fight, so the various camps made a point of keeping close together. There were at least six, perhaps seven, cheek by jowl, with the Cheyennes at the northern, or downriver, end near the broad ford where Medicine Tail Coulee and Muskrat Creek emptied into the Little Bighorn River. Among the Sioux, the Hunkpapas were at the southern end. Between them along the river’s bends and loops were the Sans Arc, Brulé, Minneconjou, Santee and Oglala. Some said the Oglala were the biggest group, the Hunkpapa next, with perhaps 700 lodges between them. The other circles might have totaled 500 to 600 lodges. That would suggest as many as 6,000 to 7,000 people in all, a third of them men or boys of fighting age. Confusing the question of numbers was the constant arrival and departure of people from the reservations. Those travelers—plus hunters from the camps, women out gathering roots and herbs and seekers of lost horses—were part of an informal early-warning system.
There were many late risers this morning because dances the previous night had ended only at first light. One very large tent near the center of the village—probably two lodges raised side by side—was filled with the elders, called chiefs by the whites but “short hairs,” “silent eaters” or “big bellies” by the Indians. As the morning turned hot and sultry, large numbers of adults and children went swimming in the river. The water would have been cold; Black Elk, the future Oglala holy man, then 12, would remember that the river was high with snowmelt from the mountains.
It was approaching midafternoon when a report arrived that U.S. troops had been spotted approaching the camp. “We could hardly believe that soldiers were so near,” the Oglala elder Runs the Enemy said later. It made no sense to him or the other men in the big lodge. For one thing, whites never attacked in the middle of the day. For several moments more, Runs the Enemy recalled, “We sat there smoking.”
Other reports followed. White Bull, a Minneconjou, was watching over horses near camp when scouts rode down from Ash Creek with news that soldiers had shot and killed an Indian boy at the fork of the creek two or three miles back. Women who had been digging turnips across the river some miles to the east “came riding in all out of breath and reported that soldiers were coming,” said the Oglala chief Thunder Bear. “The country, they said, looked as if filled with smoke, so much dust was there.” The soldiers had shot and killed one of the women. Fast Horn, an Oglala, came in to say he had been shot at by soldiers he saw near the high divide on the way over into the Rosebud valley.
But the first warning to bring warriors on the run probably occurred at the Hunkpapa camp around 3 o’clock, when some horse raiders—Arikara (or Ree) Indians working for the soldiers, as it turned out—were seen making a dash for animals grazing in a ravine not far from the camp. Within moments shooting could be heard at the south end of camp. Peace quickly gave way to pandemonium—shouts and cries of women and children, men calling for horses or guns, boys sent to find mothers or sisters, swimmers rushing from the river, men trying to organize resistance, looking to their weapons, painting themselves or tying up their horses’ tails.
As warriors rushed out to confront the horse thieves, people at the southernmost end of the Hunkpapa camp were shouting alarm at the sight of approaching soldiers, first glimpsed in a line on horseback a mile or two away. By 10 or 15 minutes past 3 o’clock, Indians had boiled out of the lodges to meet them. Now came the first shots heard back at the council lodge, convincing Runs the Enemy to put his pipe aside at last. “Bullets sounded like hail on tepees and tree tops,” said Little Soldier, a Hunkpapa warrior. The family of chief Gall—two wives and their three children—were shot to death near their lodge at the edge of the camp.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (50)
+ View All Comments
Custer and the Army was ordered by President Grant and his administration to force the Indians back to the reservation Generals Terry,Crook were in charge of the expedition.Custer"s plan was to capture the non combatants avoiding a big battle but faith intervened.
Posted by Emil on February 4,2013 | 02:02 PM
Was helpfull for my college report on the Battle of Little Bighorn.
Posted by Kristin Kuettel ( Q tell) on January 8,2013 | 01:02 PM
so who got to keep the land?
Posted by abnerd on December 5,2012 | 02:55 PM
I love the history! I went to many of your museums, Smithsonian and I love them. This article about Custer is awesome!
Posted by Bob Anderson on November 13,2012 | 05:12 PM
It was more likely counted on above Custer commanding gen. Terri that Custer didn't accept those extra troops or Buffalo soldiers to use as troops to wrecklessly sacrifice on that field of battle for their own good, Finally if those dam Indians ancestors had stayed in touch with their Asiatic roots then I believe the total war methods would have had the Indians lure Custer entire command into that valley and decimated them, also taking prisoners for leverage in wining the peace in the plains Indian wars with American history being totally different in European really paying a heavier price in dominanting the American continent.
Posted by darryl singleton on September 5,2012 | 09:14 PM
it sounds like war isnt fun no matter where it is
Posted by mike kinsella on August 6,2012 | 09:11 AM
Amazing history in a native American (Indian) view. Custer should have kept his promise to Stone Forehead. The Indians were merely trying to preserve their way of life and their land. Great history!
Posted by Ronnie Land on July 7,2012 | 01:00 PM
Better armed, Better numbers, meets arrogance and lack of forethought. Custer died because he was supposed to. His men died because they had the misfortune of being with a man who had consistently lost more men in the civil war than any other. Recklessness and medicine that was working took care of the rest. All that could have possibly gone differently, is that the whole of the outfit, Reno and Benteen's men could have easily shared the fate of Custer had they pushed it.
Posted by Jbeau edwards on June 26,2012 | 08:58 PM
My grandmother (100 years old) said that her grandfather was an indian guide for Custer. She says he told her that several of the indian guides left before the attack, saying that they were guides not soldiers.
Posted by Wonderdog on June 25,2012 | 05:05 PM
Very insightful article and commentary. I am a relatively new student of this subject. I've read a great deal on this & related subjects in the past few years. Two simple thoughts. All factors considered, this was a recipe for disaster. Textbook. Further, I simply don't find Reno's account credible. Given the scenario, when does a man abandon being a soldier and simply attempt survival?
Posted by Bart Beaudin on January 24,2012 | 02:14 AM
Previously, General Custer's reckless and audacious charges won him the day but, as with any game of chance, you don`t always win. He gambled and it was his moment to lose. He misjudged things at the Little Bighorn and it's as simple as that. In some people`s eyes he was the invincible hero. In their minds, the blame for his defeat must be shifted to other individuals or equipment that apparently failed or wasn`t there. They blame General Crook, Maj. Reno, Capt. Benteen, the Springfield carbines, the lack of sabers, the lack of Gatling guns, that Brisbin`s troops weren`t along, the fact that the Indians had Henry repeating rifles and whatever else they can think of. The bottom line is that Custer commanded the regiment and that it was his, and his decision alone to attack. Therefore the 7th Cavalry debacle was his responsibility. As such are the fortunes of war. On the other hand, the Indian combatants responded courageously and with alacrity to the attack on their village and they repulsed the invaders. The battle proceeded as it should have given the circumstances.
Posted by M. Provenzano on December 28,2011 | 09:58 AM
If at the very least,that overated buffoon crook had kept the pressure on the hostiles,after the rosebud,which was only about 40 miles from littlebighorn,and a week before the custer debacle,the massacre would never have happened. While custer and his men are being slaughtered,good old crook is back at goose creek[an apt place for george], hunting and fishing.Remember,this fool commanded 1300 men, double custers numbers,and simply withdrew from the campaign on the back of casualties,according to him of, ten killed and twentyone wounded,out of 1300 and made no effort to tell anyone.Now there is the sort of man you want to go to war with.If there is a more compelling reason for custers defeat,i would love to hear it.
regards to all david.
Posted by david wicker on December 7,2011 | 06:43 AM
I have been interested in the Battle of the Little Bighorn have read many books. All the books so far have been written by the white population. Can anyone tell me where i can find any books that are written by the Native American? I would very much like to get the views from the other side of the battle. Thank You very much for seeing this type of information is readily at the despositalbe to any one that might like reading this kind of history.
I, too have been at the Site of the "LITTLE BIGHORN Battle" and can see how the mistakes could be made before and after the battle. The day i was there was like stepping back into History and reliving the battle but of course there were no actual battles going on. Reading the books you don't get the size of the Battlefield. You don't really see the Indian camp until you are almost upon it and then it blows your mind the size of it.
I have always wondered if Custer had keep his command all together i know with the size of the Indians camped there were greater and the battle probably would have lasted alittle bit longer but the the Whole Command would have been wiped out. "Now this is my own thoughts but i personally hold Custer at fault for the lost of so many men for being just a great commander he made so many mistakes that lead up to his men being killed. 1. He never listen to his scouts when they reported the size of Indain camp 2. he never scouted the lay of the land so he would know what he should do. 3. He never kept his word to Reno or Benteen but went looking for glory for himself and doing so caused his death and those of his men. I am sorry that for what little bit of glory he found that it cost the lives of the men with him.
Posted by Robert D Cruit on September 22,2011 | 08:48 PM
Having been stationed at Fort Reilly Kansas, Custer's home is on the original parade ground. We used to tell the joke that while departing for his campaign with Crook..Custer turned in his saddle and reportedly said.."don't do anything until I get back". While there...I purchased "My life on the Plains" by LTC Custer, a fascinating account of his life on the frontier. Later I read "CRAZY HORSE & CUSTER", another good book on these two warriors. It wasn't until I was stationed in Oklahoma, that I ventured to Cheyenne to see the site of the Black Kettle Massacre that I could appreciate plains warfare. From everything I've read to include the Wet Point analysis..this article is pretty much right on the mark. It is important to understand that many plains Troopers were Irish and German immigrants whose motivation did not equal those of the natives they fought.
Custer points out the many discipline problems he had with his command. "MY LIFE ON THE PLAINS"
Posted by Gerald Chernicoff on June 29,2011 | 02:14 AM
+ View All Comments