George Washington: The Reluctant President
It seemed as if everyone rejoiced at the election of our first chief executive except the man himself
- By Ron Chernow
- Illustration by Joe Ciardiello
- Smithsonian magazine, February 2011, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 4)
As Washington entered Philadelphia, he found himself, willy-nilly, at the head of a full-scale parade, with 20,000 people lining the streets, their eyes fixed on him in wonder. “His Excellency rode in front of the procession, on horseback, politely bowing to the spectators who filled the doors and windows by which he passed,” reported the Federal Gazette, noting that church bells rang as Washington proceeded to his old haunt, the City Tavern. After the bare-knuckled fight over the Constitution, the newspaper editorialized, Washington had united the country. “What a pleasing reflection to every patriotic mind, thus to see our citizens again united in their reliance on this great man who is, a second time, called upon to be the savior of his country!” By the next morning, Washington had grown tired of the jubilation. When the light horse cavalry showed up to accompany him to Trenton, they discovered he had left the city an hour earlier “to avoid even the appearance of pomp or vain parade,” reported one newspaper.
As Washington approached the bridge over Assunpink Creek in Trenton, the spot where he had stood off the British and Hessians, he saw that the townsfolk had erected a magnificent floral arch in his honor and emblazoned it with the words “December 26, 1776” and the proclamation “The Defender of the Mothers will also Defend the Daughters.” As he rode closer, 13 young girls, robed in spotless white, walked forward with flower-filled baskets, scattering petals at his feet. Astride his horse, tears standing in his eyes, he returned a deep bow as he noted the “astonishing contrast between his former and actual situation at the same spot.” With that, three rows of women—young girls, unmarried ladies and married ones—burst into a fervent ode on how he had saved fair virgins and matrons alike. The adulation only quickened Washington’s self-doubt. “I greatly apprehend that my countrymen will expect too much from me,” he wrote to Rutledge. “I fear, if the issue of public measures should not correspond with their sanguine expectations, they will turn the extravagant...praises which they are heaping upon me at this moment into equally extravagant...censures.” There was no way, it seemed, that he could dim expectations or escape public reverence.
By now sated with adulation, Washington preserved a faint hope that he would be allowed to make an inconspicuous entry into New York. He had pleaded with Gov. George Clinton to spare him further hoopla: “I can assure you, with the utmost sincerity, that no reception can be so congenial to my feelings as a quiet entry devoid of ceremony.” But he was fooling himself if he imagined he might slip unobtrusively into the temporary capital. Never reconciled to the demands of his celebrity, Washington still fantasized that he could shuck that inescapable burden. When he arrived at Elizabethtown, New Jersey, on April 23, he beheld an impressive phalanx of three senators, five congressmen and three state officials awaiting him. He must have intuited, with a sinking sensation, that this welcome would eclipse even the frenzied receptions in Philadelphia and Trenton. Moored to the wharf was a special barge, glistening with fresh paint, constructed in his honor and equipped with an awning of red curtains in the rear to shelter him from the elements. To nobody’s surprise, the craft was steered by 13 oarsmen in spanking white uniforms.
As the barge drifted into the Hudson River, Washington made out a Manhattan shoreline already “crowded with a vast concourse of citizens, waiting with exulting anxiety his arrival,” a local newspaper said. Many ships anchored in the harbor were garlanded with flags and banners for the occasion. If Washington gazed back at the receding Jersey shore, he would have seen that his craft led a huge flotilla of boats, including one bearing the portly figure of Gen. Henry Knox. Some boats carried musicians and female vocalists on deck, who serenaded Washington across the waters. “The voices of the ladies were...superior to the flutes that played with the stroke of the oars in Cleopatra’s silken-corded barge,” was the imaginative verdict of the New York Packet. These wafted melodies, united with repeated cannon roar and thunderous acclaim from crowds onshore, again oppressed Washington with their implicit message of high expectations. As he confided to his diary, the intermingled sounds “filled my mind with sensations as painful (considering the reverse of this scene, which may be the case after all my labors to do good) as they are pleasing.” So as to guard himself against later disappointment, he didn’t seem to allow himself the smallest iota of pleasure.
When the presidential barge landed at the foot of Wall Street, Governor Clinton, Mayor James Duane, James Madison and other luminaries welcomed him to the city. The officer of a special military escort stepped forward briskly and told Washington that he awaited his orders. Washington again labored to cool the celebratory mood, which burst forth at every turn. “As to the present arrangement,” he replied, “I shall proceed as is directed. But after this is over, I hope you will give yourself no further trouble, as the affection of my fellow-citizens is all the guard I want.” Nobody seemed to take the hint seriously.
The streets were solidly thronged with well-wishers and it took Washington a half-hour to arrive at his new residence at 3 Cherry Street, tucked away in the northeast corner of the city, a block from the East River, near the present-day Brooklyn Bridge. One week earlier, the building’s owner, Samuel Osgood, had agreed to allow Washington to use it as the temporary presidential residence. From the descriptions of Washington’s demeanor en route to the house, he finally surrendered to the general mood of high spirits, especially when he viewed the legions of adoring women. As New Jersey Representative Elias Boudinot told his wife, Washington “frequently bowed to the multitude and took off his hat to the ladies at the windows, who waved their handkerchiefs and threw flowers before him and shed tears of joy and congratulation. The whole city was one scene of triumphal rejoicing.”
Though the Constitution said nothing about an inaugural address, Washington, in an innovative spirit, contemplated such a speech as early as January 1789 and asked a “gentleman under his roof”—David Humphreys—to draft one. Washington had always been economical with words, but the collaboration with Humphreys produced a wordy document, 73 pages long, which survives only in tantalizing snippets. In this curious speech, Washington spent a ridiculous amount of time defending his decision to become president, as if he stood accused of some heinous crime. He denied that he had accepted the presidency to enrich himself, even though nobody had accused him of greed. “In the first place, if I have formerly served the community without a wish for pecuniary compensation, it can hardly be suspected that I am at present influenced by avaricious schemes.” Addressing a topical concern, he disavowed any desire to found a dynasty, citing his childless state. Closer in tone to future inaugural speeches was Washington’s ringing faith in the American people. He devised a perfect formulation of popular sovereignty, writing that the Constitution had brought forth “a government of the people: that is to say, a government in which all power is derived from, and at stated periods reverts to, them—and that, in its operation...is purely a government of laws made and executed by the fair substitutes of the people alone.”
This ponderous speech never saw the light of day. Washington sent a copy to James Madison, who wisely vetoed it on two counts: that it was much too long and that its lengthy legislative proposals would be interpreted as executive meddling with the legislature. Instead, Madison helped Washington draft a far more compact speech that avoided the tortured introspection of its predecessor. A whirlwind of energy, Madison would seem omnipresent in the early days of Washington’s administration. Not only did he help draft the inaugural address, he also wrote the official response by Congress and then Washington’s response to Congress, completing the circle. This established Madison, despite his role in the House, as a pre-eminent adviser and confidant to the new president. Oddly enough, he wasn’t troubled that his advisory relationship to Washington might be construed as violating the separation of powers.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: George Washington American Revolution
Additional Sources
George Washington: A Biography, Volume Six: Patriot and President by Douglas Southall Freeman, Scribner & Sons, 1954









Comments (9)
I THINK IS INTERESTING, BUT THERE ARE SOME WORDS THAN I DON`T UNDERSTAND =(
Posted by manuel on February 11,2011 | 09:32 AM
This was a very interesting article to me. Presently I am reading "George Washington - the Christian" by William J. Johnson (The Abingdon Press, New York/Cincinnati, 1919). As it treats the time leading up to this inauguration, the content of Washington's correspondence corroborates Chernow's premise of reluctance. Washington seems to have had a very limited view of his own capabilities. He attributed his success as a general and his hope of success as president to Almighty God. This is attested in his public and private worship as well as his diary and correspondence. There can be no doubt of his deep, abiding faith. He was a communicant in good standing with the Protestant Episcopal Church (successor to the Church of England after the revolution), but he attended other services, including Presbyterian and Roman Catholic. He confessed no prejudice toward any man's faith, but this seemed to be confined to the Christian religions since Washington qualified his statement by saying that a man's faith should lead him to God. As a Christian himself, he would have subscribed to Jesus' statement, "No man comes to the Father except through me." (Gospel of John 14:6b)
Posted by Rev. Charles Hofmeister on February 9,2011 | 02:35 PM
George Washington, on his journey to his inauguration, did not arrive in Elizabethtown at the docks, and immediately climb aboard a barge to N.Y. He arrived at Boxwood Hall on Water Street (now East Jersey St.) the home of Elias Boudinot, the President of the Continental Congress. There he had lunch with Boudinot and his guests, William Livingston, John Jay, Richard Henry Lee, and Charles Carol. Washington's wife Martha was, at that time , a guest at William Livingston's home, Liberty Hall, on Morris Ave. in Elizabethtown.
Dan Pagdon
Posted by Dan Pagdon on February 7,2011 | 05:15 PM
Chernow’s a superb writer and a great story teller.
But his portrait suffers from laudatory boredom. This is the same old story told and retold since Mason Weems authored the first “history” of Washington in 1800 with the express purpose of making money, something he candidly admitted to his publisher.
There are contrary views, from Paul Longmore’s famous, The Invention of George Washington, to more present accounts, such as John Ferling’s, The Ascent of George Washington: The Hidden Political Genius of an American Icon.
In my view, both views lack context. To see Washington as something more than a reluctant president, or one secretly harboring a desire to be president, as is suggested in these books, a comparison that takes us beyond the confines of the United States is needed. This is really an elementary step given that the United States at that time was a product of an Atlantic World.
Of course, such a telling would gravitate to a figure most un-Washington at the surface level, Napoleon Bonaparte. But their similarities are astounding. These contemporaries both presided over an age of revolution, and this important context binds them together.
Alas, no such comparison exists, one that refocuses the debate of Washington by placing it in the international—Atlantic World—context it deserves.
That is, none exists until later this year, when a book I am co-authoring is to be released. Titled, Washington and Napoleon: Leadership in the Age of Revolution.
Longmore had suggested long ago that Washington was playing the part of general to secure a place in colonial society. Did he take that ambition to the presidency, a desire to cement his place as the greatest American? And how best to accomplish this? Would it be by feigning a reluctance to accept power?
Answers to these and other questions are what is “new” when studying Washington.
Matthew Flynn
Hisotry Professor, USMA, West Point
Posted by Matthew J. Flynn on February 5,2011 | 03:48 PM
Wow, what a great idea, I like it.
Posted by GemiHemi on February 4,2011 | 09:34 AM
After reading this article, I am sure it was daunting for George Washington to be faced with the task of being the leader of this new country. It was almost as if that people expected him to wave magic wand and fix everything. The same could be said for the men that occupied this office since Washington. Washington certainly realized that all of those celebrations were easiest thing he would attend to.
Posted by Rose Ann Jones on January 30,2011 | 03:41 PM
While reading of Washington's fear that he would disappoint the extravagant expectations of his countrymen, I could only rejoice that we now have presidential candidates who are unencumbered by such crippling doubts. Indeed, rather than wait for extravagant praise from others, they take the more dependable course and manufacture it themselves. Some even muse that their mere nomination for the office has signaled a moment when oceans have ceased to rise and the earth itself has begun to heal. I don't know about you, but I certainly prefer a politician of the modern kind rather than an old fuddy-duddy like George Washington. I want someone who will do something, and stopping the rise of oceans sounds pretty impressive to me.
Posted by Robert Pujat on January 26,2011 | 03:33 PM
Ron Chernow is not only a sophisticated historical biographer, but, at heart, he is also a very imaginative storyteller.
It's simple to see how Chernow's imagination allows his inaugural narrative to wander away from the facts at several critical points.
As an example, Chernow explains the presence of a Bible at the inauguration by saying, "That morning, a Congressional committee decided to add solemnity by having Washington place his hand on a Bible during the oath." There's a problem here, because there's no historical record of any congressional representative recommending the use of a Bible during the administration of the oath. In reality, the distinction of having Washington swear his oath on a Bible most likely belongs to NY Chancellor Robert Livingston.
Another example occurs where Chernow writes "the president finished the oath, he bent forward, seized the Bible and brought it to his lips." Unfortunately, if anyone saw Washington seize the Bible of British manufacture, no one other than Chernow has ever said so.
Next up, Chernow tells the reader: "very few people would have heard him [add 'So help me God'] anyway, since his voice was soft and breathy." It's a puzzle why Chernow chose to rev up the notion that "few people would have heard him anyway," because even if Washington spoke with a quiet voice, the French ministerial report filed by Count de Moustier included a complete transcription of the oath as it was heard by the Count while standing nearby on the balcony. In addition, William Duer, who witnessed the event from a position across the street from Federal Hall (say, forty feet away) wrote: "The words of the oath were audibly, distinctly repeated by Washington after the Chancellor, in a solemn and impressive manner, and after he had reverently kissed the book ... ."
Posted by Ray Soller on January 22,2011 | 10:03 AM
Thank you for a very interesting and informative book excerpt, which expands on a comprehensive biography, "Washington: The Indispensible Man," that I own. I had not realized he was that reluctant, though I knew from the bio that he had not wanted to serve. He also must have known about the unstated assumption of the 1787 Constitutional Convention that he would be the first to fill the presidency. Does the book treat that period?
This is also the first time the role of Madison has been detailed. At the same time he was Washington's confidante, a point not at all mentioned in the bio above, he was also the key legislator in the 1st Congress, pushing through the Bill of Rights, the first tariff legislation, the patent legislation and Hamilton's economic measures, among other things.
Posted by mark gruenberg on January 20,2011 | 12:41 AM