George Washington: The Reluctant President
It seemed as if everyone rejoiced at the election of our first chief executive except the man himself
- By Ron Chernow
- Illustration by Joe Ciardiello
- Smithsonian magazine, February 2011, Subscribe
Editor’s note: Even as the Constitution was being ratified, Americans looked toward a figure of singular probity to fill the new office of the presidency. On February 4, 1789, the 69 members of the Electoral College made George Washington the only chief executive to be unanimously elected. Congress was supposed to make the choice official that March but could not muster a quorum until April. The reason—bad roads—suggests the condition of the country Washington would lead. In a new biography, Washington: A Life, Ron Chernow has created a portrait of the man as his contemporaries saw him. The excerpt below sheds light on the president’s state of mind as the first Inauguration Day approached.
The Congressional delay in certifying George Washington’s election as president only allowed more time for doubts to fester as he considered the herculean task ahead. He savored his wait as a welcome “reprieve,” he told his former comrade in arms and future Secretary of War Henry Knox, adding that his “movements to the chair of government will be accompanied with feelings not unlike those of a culprit who is going to the place of his execution.” His “peaceful abode” at Mount Vernon, his fears that he lacked the requisite skills for the presidency, the “ocean of difficulties” facing the country—all gave him pause on the eve of his momentous trip to New York. In a letter to his friend Edward Rutledge, he made it seem as if the presidency was little short of a death sentence and that, in accepting it, he had given up “all expectations of private happiness in this world.”
The day after Congress counted the electoral votes, declaring Washington the first president, it dispatched Charles Thomson, the secretary of Congress, to bear the official announcement to Mount Vernon. The legislators had chosen a fine emissary. A well-rounded man, known for his work in astronomy and mathematics, the Irish-born Thomson was a tall, austere figure with a narrow face and keenly penetrating eyes. He couldn’t have relished the trying journey to Virginia, which was “much impeded by tempestuous weather, bad roads, and the many large rivers I had to cross.” Yet he rejoiced that the new president would be Washington, whom he venerated as someone singled out by Providence to be “the savior and father” of the country. Having known Thomson since the Continental Congress, Washington esteemed him as a faithful public servant and exemplary patriot.
Around noon on April 14, 1789, Washington flung open the door at Mount Vernon and greeted his visitor with a cordial embrace. Once in the privacy of the mansion, he and Thomson conducted a stiff verbal minuet, each man reading from a prepared statement. Thomson began by declaring, “I am honored with the commands of the Senate to wait upon your Excellency with the information of your being elected to the office of President of the United States of America” by a unanimous vote. He read aloud a letter from Senator John Langdon of New Hampshire, the president pro tempore. “Suffer me, sir, to indulge the hope that so auspicious a mark of public confidence will meet your approbation and be considered as a sure pledge of the affection and support you are to expect from a free and enlightened people.” There was something deferential, even slightly servile, in Langdon’s tone, as if he feared that Washington might renege on his promise and refuse to take the job. Thus was greatness once again thrust upon George Washington.
Any student of Washington’s life might have predicted that he would acknowledge his election in a short, self-effacing speech full of disclaimers. “While I realize the arduous nature of the task which is conferred on me and feel my inability to perform it,” he replied to Thomson, “I wish there may not be reason for regretting the choice. All I can promise is only that which can be accomplished by an honest zeal.” This sentiment of modesty jibed so perfectly with Washington’s private letters that it could not have been feigned: he wondered whether he was fit for the post, so unlike anything he had ever done. The hopes for republican government, he knew, rested in his hands. As commander in chief, he had been able to wrap himself in a self-protective silence, but the presidency would leave him with no place to hide and expose him to public censure as nothing before.
Because the vote counting had been long delayed, Washington, 57, felt the crush of upcoming public business and decided to set out promptly for New York on April 16, accompanied in his elegant carriage by Thomson and aide David Humphreys. His diary entry conveys a sense of foreboding: “About ten o’clock, I bade adieu to Mount Vernon, to private life, and to domestic felicity and, with a mind oppressed with more anxious and painful sensations than I have words to express, set out for New York...with the best dispositions to render service to my country in obedience to its call, but with less hope of answering its expectations.” Waving goodbye was Martha Washington, who wouldn’t join him until mid-May. She watched her husband of 30 years depart with a mixture of bittersweet sensations, wondering “when or whether he will ever come home again.” She had long doubted the wisdom of this final act in his public life. “I think it was much too late for him to go into public life again,” she told her nephew, “but it was not to be avoided. Our family will be deranged as I must soon follow him.”
Determined to travel rapidly, Washington and his entourage set out each day at sunrise and put in a full day on the road. Along the way he hoped to keep ceremonial distractions to a minimum, but he was soon disabused: eight exhausting days of festivities lay ahead. He had only traveled ten miles north to Alexandria when the townspeople waylaid him with a dinner, lengthened by the mandatory 13 toasts. Adept at farewells, Washington was succinctly eloquent in response. “Unutterable sensations must then be left to more expressive silence, while, from an aching heart, I bid you all, my affectionate friends and kind neighbors, farewell.”
Before long, it was apparent that Washington’s journey would form the republican equivalent of the procession to a royal coronation. As if already a seasoned politician, he left a trail of political promises in his wake. While in Wilmington, he addressed the Delaware Society for Promoting Domestic Manufacturers and imparted a hopeful message. “The promotion of domestic manufactures will, in my conception, be among the first consequences which may naturally be expected to flow from an energetic government.” Arriving in Philadelphia, he was met by local dignitaries and asked to mount a white horse for his entry into town. When he crossed a bridge over the Schuylkill, it was wreathed with laurels and evergreens, and a cherubic boy, aided by a mechanical device, lowered a laurel crown over his head. Recurrent cries of “Long Live George Washington” confirmed what his former aide James McHenry had already told him before he left Mount Vernon: “You are now a king under a different name.”
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: George Washington American Revolution
Additional Sources
George Washington: A Biography, Volume Six: Patriot and President by Douglas Southall Freeman, Scribner & Sons, 1954









Comments (9)
I THINK IS INTERESTING, BUT THERE ARE SOME WORDS THAN I DON`T UNDERSTAND =(
Posted by manuel on February 11,2011 | 09:32 AM
This was a very interesting article to me. Presently I am reading "George Washington - the Christian" by William J. Johnson (The Abingdon Press, New York/Cincinnati, 1919). As it treats the time leading up to this inauguration, the content of Washington's correspondence corroborates Chernow's premise of reluctance. Washington seems to have had a very limited view of his own capabilities. He attributed his success as a general and his hope of success as president to Almighty God. This is attested in his public and private worship as well as his diary and correspondence. There can be no doubt of his deep, abiding faith. He was a communicant in good standing with the Protestant Episcopal Church (successor to the Church of England after the revolution), but he attended other services, including Presbyterian and Roman Catholic. He confessed no prejudice toward any man's faith, but this seemed to be confined to the Christian religions since Washington qualified his statement by saying that a man's faith should lead him to God. As a Christian himself, he would have subscribed to Jesus' statement, "No man comes to the Father except through me." (Gospel of John 14:6b)
Posted by Rev. Charles Hofmeister on February 9,2011 | 02:35 PM
George Washington, on his journey to his inauguration, did not arrive in Elizabethtown at the docks, and immediately climb aboard a barge to N.Y. He arrived at Boxwood Hall on Water Street (now East Jersey St.) the home of Elias Boudinot, the President of the Continental Congress. There he had lunch with Boudinot and his guests, William Livingston, John Jay, Richard Henry Lee, and Charles Carol. Washington's wife Martha was, at that time , a guest at William Livingston's home, Liberty Hall, on Morris Ave. in Elizabethtown.
Dan Pagdon
Posted by Dan Pagdon on February 7,2011 | 05:15 PM
Chernow’s a superb writer and a great story teller.
But his portrait suffers from laudatory boredom. This is the same old story told and retold since Mason Weems authored the first “history” of Washington in 1800 with the express purpose of making money, something he candidly admitted to his publisher.
There are contrary views, from Paul Longmore’s famous, The Invention of George Washington, to more present accounts, such as John Ferling’s, The Ascent of George Washington: The Hidden Political Genius of an American Icon.
In my view, both views lack context. To see Washington as something more than a reluctant president, or one secretly harboring a desire to be president, as is suggested in these books, a comparison that takes us beyond the confines of the United States is needed. This is really an elementary step given that the United States at that time was a product of an Atlantic World.
Of course, such a telling would gravitate to a figure most un-Washington at the surface level, Napoleon Bonaparte. But their similarities are astounding. These contemporaries both presided over an age of revolution, and this important context binds them together.
Alas, no such comparison exists, one that refocuses the debate of Washington by placing it in the international—Atlantic World—context it deserves.
That is, none exists until later this year, when a book I am co-authoring is to be released. Titled, Washington and Napoleon: Leadership in the Age of Revolution.
Longmore had suggested long ago that Washington was playing the part of general to secure a place in colonial society. Did he take that ambition to the presidency, a desire to cement his place as the greatest American? And how best to accomplish this? Would it be by feigning a reluctance to accept power?
Answers to these and other questions are what is “new” when studying Washington.
Matthew Flynn
Hisotry Professor, USMA, West Point
Posted by Matthew J. Flynn on February 5,2011 | 03:48 PM
Wow, what a great idea, I like it.
Posted by GemiHemi on February 4,2011 | 09:34 AM
After reading this article, I am sure it was daunting for George Washington to be faced with the task of being the leader of this new country. It was almost as if that people expected him to wave magic wand and fix everything. The same could be said for the men that occupied this office since Washington. Washington certainly realized that all of those celebrations were easiest thing he would attend to.
Posted by Rose Ann Jones on January 30,2011 | 03:41 PM
While reading of Washington's fear that he would disappoint the extravagant expectations of his countrymen, I could only rejoice that we now have presidential candidates who are unencumbered by such crippling doubts. Indeed, rather than wait for extravagant praise from others, they take the more dependable course and manufacture it themselves. Some even muse that their mere nomination for the office has signaled a moment when oceans have ceased to rise and the earth itself has begun to heal. I don't know about you, but I certainly prefer a politician of the modern kind rather than an old fuddy-duddy like George Washington. I want someone who will do something, and stopping the rise of oceans sounds pretty impressive to me.
Posted by Robert Pujat on January 26,2011 | 03:33 PM
Ron Chernow is not only a sophisticated historical biographer, but, at heart, he is also a very imaginative storyteller.
It's simple to see how Chernow's imagination allows his inaugural narrative to wander away from the facts at several critical points.
As an example, Chernow explains the presence of a Bible at the inauguration by saying, "That morning, a Congressional committee decided to add solemnity by having Washington place his hand on a Bible during the oath." There's a problem here, because there's no historical record of any congressional representative recommending the use of a Bible during the administration of the oath. In reality, the distinction of having Washington swear his oath on a Bible most likely belongs to NY Chancellor Robert Livingston.
Another example occurs where Chernow writes "the president finished the oath, he bent forward, seized the Bible and brought it to his lips." Unfortunately, if anyone saw Washington seize the Bible of British manufacture, no one other than Chernow has ever said so.
Next up, Chernow tells the reader: "very few people would have heard him [add 'So help me God'] anyway, since his voice was soft and breathy." It's a puzzle why Chernow chose to rev up the notion that "few people would have heard him anyway," because even if Washington spoke with a quiet voice, the French ministerial report filed by Count de Moustier included a complete transcription of the oath as it was heard by the Count while standing nearby on the balcony. In addition, William Duer, who witnessed the event from a position across the street from Federal Hall (say, forty feet away) wrote: "The words of the oath were audibly, distinctly repeated by Washington after the Chancellor, in a solemn and impressive manner, and after he had reverently kissed the book ... ."
Posted by Ray Soller on January 22,2011 | 10:03 AM
Thank you for a very interesting and informative book excerpt, which expands on a comprehensive biography, "Washington: The Indispensible Man," that I own. I had not realized he was that reluctant, though I knew from the bio that he had not wanted to serve. He also must have known about the unstated assumption of the 1787 Constitutional Convention that he would be the first to fill the presidency. Does the book treat that period?
This is also the first time the role of Madison has been detailed. At the same time he was Washington's confidante, a point not at all mentioned in the bio above, he was also the key legislator in the 1st Congress, pushing through the Bill of Rights, the first tariff legislation, the patent legislation and Hamilton's economic measures, among other things.
Posted by mark gruenberg on January 20,2011 | 12:41 AM