Finding King Herod's Tomb
After a 35-year search, an Israeli archaeologist is certain he has solved the mystery of the biblical figure’s final resting place
- By Barbara Kreiger
- Smithsonian magazine, August 2009, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 4)
The borders of Judea were quiet during Herod's reign, enabling him to undertake an ambitious building program that brought employment and prosperity to the region. The major projects he completed include the incomparable Temple in Jerusalem, a stunning winter palace in Jericho, two palaces atop Masada and the harbor at Caesarea. A palace garden in Jericho was elevated so that people strolling along the colonnades would see the foliage and flowers at eye level.
Still, Herod's reign is remembered more for its ruthlessness and paranoia than its architectural feats. He tortured and killed family members, servants and bodyguards, to say nothing of his real enemies. In an Othello-like rage, Herod even ordered the execution of the woman he loved most—his second wife, Mariamne—believing that she had committed adultery. Herod's eldest son and heir apparent, Antipater, convinced the king that two of his other sons were plotting against him—so Herod had them executed. And when Herod learned that Antipater was planning to poison him, he rose from his bed just five days before he died to order the murder of Antipater. (As the Roman Emperor Augustus supposedly quipped: "It's better to be Herod's pig than his son.") In a final act of depravity, Herod imprisoned all the notables of Judea, ordering that they be executed on the day of his death so the country would be plunged into mourning. But when Herod died, in Jericho at about age 69—probably of kidney failure exacerbated by a genital infection, according to Aryeh Kasher's recent biography King Herod: A Persecuted Persecutor—the prisoners were released. Instead of mourning, rejoicing filled the land.
Josephus wrote that Herod's body was conveyed to Herodium, "where, in accordance with the directions of the deceased, it was interred." The late king was "covered with purple; and a diadem was put upon his head, and a crown of gold above it, and a scepter in his right hand."
And so began a mystery that tantalized scholars for centuries.
In the 1860s, Felicien de Saulcy, a French explorer, searched for Herod's tomb on the island in the center of the vast pool in Lower Herodium. Father Virgilio Corbo led an excavation at the summit from 1963 to 1967 on behalf of the Franciscan Faculty of Biblical Sciences and Archaeology in Rome. In 1983, a team led by Lambert Dolphin, a Silicon Valley geophysicist, used sonar and rock-penetrating radar to identify what Dolphin thought was a burial chamber inside the base of the highest tower on the mountaintop.
Netzer, however, did not find Dolphin's data convincing enough to redirect his efforts from other, more promising sites—notably a monumental building in the lower complex. Moreover, Netzer and others argue that entombment in the tower would have been unthinkable, because Jewish law proscribed burial within a living space. Barbara Burrell, a classics professor at the University of Cincinnati, wrote in 1999 that interring Herod inside the palace "would have horrified both Romans and Jews, neither of whom dined with their dead."
Netzer smiles as he recalls that when he investigated the cisterns and tunnels within Herodium in the early 1970s, he was actually standing less than ten feet from the tomb, which he later found halfway up the eastern slope. But Netzer instead continued to focus his attention on the foot of the mountain. "We kept getting hotter and hotter," says Ya'akov Kalman, one of Netzer's longtime associates, "but nothing came of it." Netzer believes that Herod originally intended to be buried in the lower complex, but for unknown reasons changed his mind and chose this other location. In 2005, having completed his work at Lower Herodium without revealing a burial chamber, Netzer turned once again to the mountain.
In April 2007, his team discovered hundreds of red limestone fragments buried in the mountainside. Many bore delicate rosettes—a motif common to Jewish ossuaries and some sarcophagi of the era. Reassembling some of the pieces, Netzer concluded they were all that remained of a sarcophagus more than eight feet long with a gabled cover. The high quality of the craftsmanship suggested the sarcophagus was fit for a king. Plus, the extent of the fragmentation suggested that people had deliberately smashed it—a plausible outcome for the hated monarch's resting place. Based on coins and other items found nearby, Netzer surmises that the desecration occurred during the first Jewish revolt against the Romans, from A.D. 66 to 73. (As Kasher notes in his biography, "Herod the Great" was, for the Jews, an ironic title, designating an arrogant monarch who scorned the religious laws of his own people.)
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (14)
When archaeologists excavated King Herod’s palace—an opulent structure boasting a pool large enough to float boats! It stood on a hill outside Bethlehem that allowed the king to monitor the happenings of that little town. The prophet Micah had spoken of a ruler who would emerge from Bethlehem, and Herod, watching from his palace, was ready to squash any challenge to his throne. When the wise men came to inquire about where the “king” had been born (Matthew 2:2), Herod attempted to trick them into leading him to Jesus. And when the plan failed, he slaughtered all the boys under age 2 (v.16). Herod refused to be outranked.
John the Baptist stands in sharp contrast. This goatskin-clad, locust-eating, desert wanderer was not a headliner like Herod. Yet, his ministry drew large crowds as he preached a message of repentance in preparation for the coming Messiah. Mark records that all of Jerusalem had gone to the wilderness to hear him. It would have been easy for John to be taken with himself. Yet, when Jesus showed up one day, John humbly turned all attention toward Christ, proclaiming, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29). John counted it a privilege to be outranked by Jesus and readily turned the spotlight on the Savior.
As you think about these two contemporaries of Jesus, ask yourself whom you most resemble—Herod or John? I’m afraid, if we’re really honest, there’s a little Herod in all of us. How often do we attempt to cling to our own glory and try to squash Jesus’ will in our lives when it threatens our control of our own kingdom? Instead, if you have your head on straight, you’d be like John, and joyfully bow to the Lamb who took away our sins, directing all the attention to Him—the only One worthy to receive it.
By the way, the body of Herod was found during the archaeological dig. The headliner is dead. But the Lamb is alive! When you know how worthy He is, it’s a privilege to be outranked by Him!
Posted by tony on February 18,2010 | 10:44 AM
I am an arab born and raised in america i recently was in jordan on land my father owns and i stumbled upon an amazing find.It is a ancient hebrew burial chamber loaded with artifacts,I wish i had a clue who to contact about this because if the jordanian government finds out about it they will destroy it and regardless of what religion i am i cant allow history to be destroyed.I could use some advice
Posted by Frank on October 31,2009 | 01:57 AM
I am a licensed tour guide and often take people to Herodium, in fact, I was there a couple of weeks ago. The tomb area is still closed but they've built a path that takes you quite close with a good view. You can see that the stone used is not local to the site but would have been brought from elsewhere, conceivably Zedekiah's Cave (quarry) near Damascus gate. According to Netzer (remember he himself is an architect and probably the expert on Herod) he sees the monument (nefesh) to be quite similar to Yad Avshalom in the Kidron which is from the same period. The sarcophagus that is assumed to be Herod's and a second sarcophagus of a family member and other artifacts will be the opening exhibit when the Israel Museum opens their renovated Archaeology wing in November 2010.
In the meantime they're still excavating and uncovered a small Roman-style theater with a loggia (like box seats) with frescoes.
Check out my website for 3 blog entries on Herodium including some photos
http://israeltours.wordpress.com/
Posted by Shmuel Browns on October 28,2009 | 12:46 PM
We were at Herodium in the spring and one can descend the eastern slope to view the tomb area but there is a separation from the actual dig area. However, one is able to see incredible details of the tomb area. I was fascinated that the very fine materials (meleke stone) used here were the same as Tomb of Absolam in Jerusalem which is very accessible. The massive relocation of soil to form this mountain is as impressive as the condition of the site. You can feel Herod's paranoia with the 360 degree view of the desolate countryside below. No one would sneak up on him while there. Fascinating place and just as spectatcular in person as in the wonderful photos in Smithsonian Magazine.
Posted by Phill Bettis on September 23,2009 | 10:51 AM
Having climbed Herodium several times through the years, I am wondering if the site of Herod's tomb area is now open to the public. My last visit was in the summer of 2007 and I'm quite sure I found the area even though no one was working there at the time. Also, where are the fragments of the sarcophagus stored and are they available for viewing? I have always been fascinated by the building prowess of Heron, the Great. He must have had some inteligent engineers.
Posted by Ruth Hansen on September 9,2009 | 01:43 PM
I jumped at the chance to use the Herod article as a means of teaching a Sunday School Class about Biblical and World History Timeline. This article provided information for my first class. Kids from 7 to 12 were fascinated. So was I.
Posted by Kay Harper on August 10,2009 | 07:23 PM
And whether the residents arrived recently as a result of a war and occupation. Americans who "settled" the West built settlements -- which turned into towns. And they made a number of the "natives" living in very old villages unhappy.
Posted by Gary Burge on August 9,2009 | 09:43 PM
About the difference between Arab Villages and Israeli settlements I find the question very clear and innocent while the answer by Ferreira is sarcastic. Arab villages are the towns of the local Palestinians as old as 2 thousand years, and the Israeli settlements are the modern colonies of Jewish Settlers who invaded Palestine after 1948 or after 1967.
The article does not appear to be mingling in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and is a neutral report.
Posted by Dean Chourafa on August 9,2009 | 04:54 PM
I read this article with much curiosity..scrolling from page to page..As an Artist I find it so satifying that it is indeed the Arts that also survive to tell the story and mark the spirit.
Posted by Leah Orr on August 8,2009 | 09:42 AM
That definition depends on whether you are Arab or Jewish.
Posted by Sotario Ferreira on August 7,2009 | 05:44 PM
Very good read, interesting tale.
Check it out on Google Earth http://www.tage.de/docs/herodion.kmz
Open with Google Earth and it will direct you there. Impressive, and incredible view from there. Best with Panoramino activated in Google Earth to see more pictures.
Posted by andreas.wpv on August 7,2009 | 07:51 AM
I found "Finding Herod's Tomb' most interesting, I would, however ask you to define the difference between an Arab village and a Jewish settlement. They are both villages, cities, or settlements. Please explain.
Thank you. Judith Nusbaum
Posted by Judith Nusbaum on July 29,2009 | 11:36 AM
If I had commented on author's claim about Intifada (with capital I), I would have accused of performing an agitated talk. But the author can quickly conclude that it is the Intifada "turned the West Bank into a conflict zone".
Maybe we all should remember again how archaeology is (or can become) political. However, the real problem arises when critical thinking diminishes.
Best regards.
Posted by Tuna Balik on July 27,2009 | 11:36 AM
Your cover article (August 2009) certainly caught my eye, and here is why:
It was May 2007, on the 20th, I believe, when we were visiting this site. It was a beautiful day, good for pictures and video, but windy enough to interfere with audio recording. After looking over most of the area, our excellent tour guide, Malcolm, took us around to the back side of the tel not hinting at what we were going to see.
When we arrived at the far side, we saw archaeologists and their assistants stringing wire up to stakes they had just put into the ground. Malcolm then made one of his usual dry comments that the stakes & wire were being put up to keep us from falling in with the tombs and joining them. He then proceeded to tell us about what we were seeing, such as the staircase Josephus wrote of, the "cannon balls" that lay about, and tombs.
Then Malcolm pointed at a recessed opening with a grate covering it and told us if we looked in there we would be looking at the site of Herod's tomb itself, just discovered (they believed) after an 18-year search.
We were delighted to have the privilege to be led to this site so soon after the discovery - or likely discovery, whichever. And I was excited to see it make the cover of your magazine this month. It vividly reminded me of my favorite vacation to date.
David Westfall
Posted by David Westfall on July 25,2009 | 11:59 PM