Finding King Herod's Tomb
After a 35-year search, an Israeli archaeologist is certain he has solved the mystery of the biblical figure’s final resting place
- By Barbara Kreiger
- Smithsonian magazine, August 2009, Subscribe
Shielding my eyes from the glare of the morning sun, I look toward the horizon and the small mountain that is my destination: Herodium, site of the fortified palace of King Herod the Great. I'm about seven miles south of Jerusalem, not far from the birthplace of the biblical prophet Amos, who declared: "Let justice stream forth like water." Herod's reign over Judea from 37 to 4 B.C. is not remembered for justice but for its indiscriminate cruelty. His most notorious act was the murder of all male infants in Bethlehem to prevent the fulfillment of a prophecy heralding the birth of the Messiah. There is no record of the decree other than the Gospel of Matthew, and biblical scholars debate whether it actually took place, but the story is in keeping with a man who arranged the murders of, among others, three of his own sons and a beloved wife.
Long an object of scholarly as well as popular fascination, Herodium, also called Herodion, was first positively identified in 1838 by the American scholar Edward Robinson, who had a knack for locating biblical landmarks. After scaling the mountain and comparing his observations with those of the first century Jewish-Roman historian Flavius Josephus, Robinson concluded that "all these particulars...leave scarcely a doubt, that this was Herodium, where the [Judean] tyrant sought his last repose." Robinson's observation was confirmed later that century by Conrad Schick, the famous German architect and archaeologist who conducted extensive surveys of Jerusalem and its nearby sites.
But where precisely was the king entombed? At the summit of Herodium? At the base? Inside the mountain itself? Josephus didn't say. By the late 1800s, Herod's tomb had become one of biblical archaeology's most sought-after prizes. And for more than a century archaeologists scoured the site. Finally, in 2007, Ehud Netzer of Hebrew University announced that after 35 years of archaeological work he had found Herod's resting place. The news made headlines worldwide—"A New Discovery May Solve the Mystery of the Bible's Bloodiest Tyrant," trumpeted the London Daily Mail.
"In terms of size, quality of decoration and prominence of its position, it's hard to reach any other conclusion," says Jodi Magness, an archaeologist in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who has excavated at other sites where Herod oversaw construction projects. Ken Holum, a University of Maryland archaeologist and historian who served as a curator for the traveling Smithsonian exhibition "King Herod's Dream," cautions that "it is always wise to be less than certain when there is no identifying inscription or other explicit identification." But he says he personally believes Netzer has indeed discovered Herod's tomb.
Netzer, 75, is one of Israel's best-known archaeologists and a renowned authority on Herod. Trained as an architect, he worked as an assistant to the archaeologist Yigael Yadin, who from 1963 to 1965 led an exhaustive dig at Masada, the fortified plateau near the Dead Sea where Herod built two palaces. In 1976, Netzer led a team that discovered the site of one of Herod's infamous misdeeds: the murder of his young brother-in-law, Aristobulus, whom Herod ordered to be drowned in a pool at his winter palace complex near Jericho. Yet the discovery of Herod's tomb would be Netzer's most celebrated find. And as is often the case with such discoveries, Netzer found it where, for years, he least expected it.
Arriving at Herodium, which is not only an active archaeological site but also, since the late 1960s, a national park, I drive partway up the mountain to the parking lot where I will meet Netzer. In the early 1980s, before the first intifada turned the West Bank into a conflict zone, Herodium drew some 250,000 people per year. For the moment I'm the sole visitor. At a kiosk I buy a ticket that lets me ascend on foot to the summit. At the base of the mountain the remains of a royal complex, known as Lower Herodium, sprawl across nearly 40 acres. Gone are the homes, gardens and stables; the most recognizable structure is an immense pool, 220 by 150 feet, which is graced with a center island.
A narrow trail hugging the hillside leads me to an opening in the slope, where I enter an enormous cistern now part of a route to the summit, more than 300 feet above the surrounding countryside. The air inside is pleasantly cool, and the walls are smooth and dry, with patches of original plaster. I follow a network of tunnels dug during the second Jewish revolt against the Romans in A.D. 135 and enter another, smaller cistern. Daylight pours in. I climb a steep staircase and emerge at the summit, in the middle of the palace courtyard.
The palace fortress once reached close to 100 feet high and was surrounded by double concentric walls accented by four cardinal point towers. Besides living quarters, the upper palace had a triclinium (a Greco-Roman-style formal dining room lined on three sides by a couch) and a bathhouse that features a domed, hewn-stone ceiling with an oculus (round opening). It's strange to find such a perfectly preserved structure amid the ancient ruins, and it leaves me with an eerie sense of standing both in the past and the present.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (14)
When archaeologists excavated King Herod’s palace—an opulent structure boasting a pool large enough to float boats! It stood on a hill outside Bethlehem that allowed the king to monitor the happenings of that little town. The prophet Micah had spoken of a ruler who would emerge from Bethlehem, and Herod, watching from his palace, was ready to squash any challenge to his throne. When the wise men came to inquire about where the “king” had been born (Matthew 2:2), Herod attempted to trick them into leading him to Jesus. And when the plan failed, he slaughtered all the boys under age 2 (v.16). Herod refused to be outranked.
John the Baptist stands in sharp contrast. This goatskin-clad, locust-eating, desert wanderer was not a headliner like Herod. Yet, his ministry drew large crowds as he preached a message of repentance in preparation for the coming Messiah. Mark records that all of Jerusalem had gone to the wilderness to hear him. It would have been easy for John to be taken with himself. Yet, when Jesus showed up one day, John humbly turned all attention toward Christ, proclaiming, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29). John counted it a privilege to be outranked by Jesus and readily turned the spotlight on the Savior.
As you think about these two contemporaries of Jesus, ask yourself whom you most resemble—Herod or John? I’m afraid, if we’re really honest, there’s a little Herod in all of us. How often do we attempt to cling to our own glory and try to squash Jesus’ will in our lives when it threatens our control of our own kingdom? Instead, if you have your head on straight, you’d be like John, and joyfully bow to the Lamb who took away our sins, directing all the attention to Him—the only One worthy to receive it.
By the way, the body of Herod was found during the archaeological dig. The headliner is dead. But the Lamb is alive! When you know how worthy He is, it’s a privilege to be outranked by Him!
Posted by tony on February 18,2010 | 10:44 AM
I am an arab born and raised in america i recently was in jordan on land my father owns and i stumbled upon an amazing find.It is a ancient hebrew burial chamber loaded with artifacts,I wish i had a clue who to contact about this because if the jordanian government finds out about it they will destroy it and regardless of what religion i am i cant allow history to be destroyed.I could use some advice
Posted by Frank on October 31,2009 | 01:57 AM
I am a licensed tour guide and often take people to Herodium, in fact, I was there a couple of weeks ago. The tomb area is still closed but they've built a path that takes you quite close with a good view. You can see that the stone used is not local to the site but would have been brought from elsewhere, conceivably Zedekiah's Cave (quarry) near Damascus gate. According to Netzer (remember he himself is an architect and probably the expert on Herod) he sees the monument (nefesh) to be quite similar to Yad Avshalom in the Kidron which is from the same period. The sarcophagus that is assumed to be Herod's and a second sarcophagus of a family member and other artifacts will be the opening exhibit when the Israel Museum opens their renovated Archaeology wing in November 2010.
In the meantime they're still excavating and uncovered a small Roman-style theater with a loggia (like box seats) with frescoes.
Check out my website for 3 blog entries on Herodium including some photos
http://israeltours.wordpress.com/
Posted by Shmuel Browns on October 28,2009 | 12:46 PM
We were at Herodium in the spring and one can descend the eastern slope to view the tomb area but there is a separation from the actual dig area. However, one is able to see incredible details of the tomb area. I was fascinated that the very fine materials (meleke stone) used here were the same as Tomb of Absolam in Jerusalem which is very accessible. The massive relocation of soil to form this mountain is as impressive as the condition of the site. You can feel Herod's paranoia with the 360 degree view of the desolate countryside below. No one would sneak up on him while there. Fascinating place and just as spectatcular in person as in the wonderful photos in Smithsonian Magazine.
Posted by Phill Bettis on September 23,2009 | 10:51 AM
Having climbed Herodium several times through the years, I am wondering if the site of Herod's tomb area is now open to the public. My last visit was in the summer of 2007 and I'm quite sure I found the area even though no one was working there at the time. Also, where are the fragments of the sarcophagus stored and are they available for viewing? I have always been fascinated by the building prowess of Heron, the Great. He must have had some inteligent engineers.
Posted by Ruth Hansen on September 9,2009 | 01:43 PM
I jumped at the chance to use the Herod article as a means of teaching a Sunday School Class about Biblical and World History Timeline. This article provided information for my first class. Kids from 7 to 12 were fascinated. So was I.
Posted by Kay Harper on August 10,2009 | 07:23 PM
And whether the residents arrived recently as a result of a war and occupation. Americans who "settled" the West built settlements -- which turned into towns. And they made a number of the "natives" living in very old villages unhappy.
Posted by Gary Burge on August 9,2009 | 09:43 PM
About the difference between Arab Villages and Israeli settlements I find the question very clear and innocent while the answer by Ferreira is sarcastic. Arab villages are the towns of the local Palestinians as old as 2 thousand years, and the Israeli settlements are the modern colonies of Jewish Settlers who invaded Palestine after 1948 or after 1967.
The article does not appear to be mingling in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and is a neutral report.
Posted by Dean Chourafa on August 9,2009 | 04:54 PM
I read this article with much curiosity..scrolling from page to page..As an Artist I find it so satifying that it is indeed the Arts that also survive to tell the story and mark the spirit.
Posted by Leah Orr on August 8,2009 | 09:42 AM
That definition depends on whether you are Arab or Jewish.
Posted by Sotario Ferreira on August 7,2009 | 05:44 PM
Very good read, interesting tale.
Check it out on Google Earth http://www.tage.de/docs/herodion.kmz
Open with Google Earth and it will direct you there. Impressive, and incredible view from there. Best with Panoramino activated in Google Earth to see more pictures.
Posted by andreas.wpv on August 7,2009 | 07:51 AM
I found "Finding Herod's Tomb' most interesting, I would, however ask you to define the difference between an Arab village and a Jewish settlement. They are both villages, cities, or settlements. Please explain.
Thank you. Judith Nusbaum
Posted by Judith Nusbaum on July 29,2009 | 11:36 AM
If I had commented on author's claim about Intifada (with capital I), I would have accused of performing an agitated talk. But the author can quickly conclude that it is the Intifada "turned the West Bank into a conflict zone".
Maybe we all should remember again how archaeology is (or can become) political. However, the real problem arises when critical thinking diminishes.
Best regards.
Posted by Tuna Balik on July 27,2009 | 11:36 AM
Your cover article (August 2009) certainly caught my eye, and here is why:
It was May 2007, on the 20th, I believe, when we were visiting this site. It was a beautiful day, good for pictures and video, but windy enough to interfere with audio recording. After looking over most of the area, our excellent tour guide, Malcolm, took us around to the back side of the tel not hinting at what we were going to see.
When we arrived at the far side, we saw archaeologists and their assistants stringing wire up to stakes they had just put into the ground. Malcolm then made one of his usual dry comments that the stakes & wire were being put up to keep us from falling in with the tombs and joining them. He then proceeded to tell us about what we were seeing, such as the staircase Josephus wrote of, the "cannon balls" that lay about, and tombs.
Then Malcolm pointed at a recessed opening with a grate covering it and told us if we looked in there we would be looking at the site of Herod's tomb itself, just discovered (they believed) after an 18-year search.
We were delighted to have the privilege to be led to this site so soon after the discovery - or likely discovery, whichever. And I was excited to see it make the cover of your magazine this month. It vividly reminded me of my favorite vacation to date.
David Westfall
Posted by David Westfall on July 25,2009 | 11:59 PM